In Hamlet by William Shakespeare there are many distinct characters, who each have their own original characteristics and personalities. Hamlet, the main character, has incredible character depth, as he is neither good nor bad. His interactions with other personalities in the play are what helps the reader to form opinions on the nature of Hamlet’s own actions. These characters also help the reader to notice the faults and or triumphs in the character of Hamlet. There are many personalities in Hamlet that are stark contrasts with Hamlet himself, these foil characters help the establish the depth of Hamlet’s personality.
One of the most evident cases of a foil character is Hamlet and Fortinbras., for both these men have lost their fathers,
…show more content…
and both are princes who feel they need to avenge them. Hamlet is not a man of action but rather talking about action.While staring down at the army Fortinbras commands, Hamlet shames himself for not taking action against his father's death like Fortinbras when he says, “I do not know why yet I live to say 'This thing's to do,' sith I have cause, and will and strength, and means to do 't...How stand I, then, that have a father kill'd, a mother stained, excitements of my reason and my blood, and let all sleep”(4.4.44-46,56-59). Hamlet knows what he must to do avenge his father, for King Hamlet gave direct orders to him, yet he cannot take action. Hamlet is ashamed of himself for being weak and indecisive when it comes to his own father being murdered and his mother stained with inces, and yet the men in Fortinbras’ army march to their likely death for simply some land and glory. Being almost the exact opposite of Hamlet; Fortinbras takes action. When Claudius hears of his Fortinbras’ plan he says, “ He hath not fail’d to pester us with message importing the surrender of those lands lost by his father” (1.2.22-24). Fortinbras’ father had been killed by King Hamlet in a battle, and therefore, took the land that Norway had. As soon as Fortinbras heard that King Hamlet had passed he sent note to Denmark to warn them that he was to avenge his father’s death. This is a foil to Hamlet’s character because it shows how Hamlet is not a man of action but more talking about action, for he hesitated, and talked himself out of doing what he needed to do. On the other hand Fortinbras is barely has any lines, yet he is mentioned throughout both as a threat and in admiration. This is a stark contrast to Hamlet and his personality traits. Fortinbras’ strong and swift actions are admired by all, even Hamlet himself. Hamlet, as he watches Fortinbras’ army, says, “Witness this army of such mass and charge,led by a delicate and tender prince, whose spirit with divine ambition puff’d” (4.4.47-49). When Hamlet directly admires Fortinbras and his actions it shows that he knows Fortinbras is more driven than himself. Hamlet later realizes his imminent death, and knows Fortinbras is the best option to take the crown, so he gives it to him giving him his dying voice. Fortinbras, after Hamlet has passed, says “Bear Hamlet like a soldier to the stage for he as likely..to have proved most royal”. (5.2.375-376). Both the men have suffered a great loss, but Fortinbras proved to be the most driven and determined. These characteristics of the prince helped the reader to better see the hesitance and hor frightened Hamlet was of actually taking action; therefore solidifying the fact that Fortinbras is a foil for Hamlet. Yet another character who suffers a tragic loss similar to those of Hamlet’s is Ophelia. Ophelia loses her father at the hands of her past lover, and suffers from the disappointment of someone she once loved, much like Hamlet; thus created large amounts of stress upon the young girl. Hamlet was first betrayed by his mother, for she had left Hamlet in mourning for his father to wed his uncle. Hamlet speaks of the betrayal that he felt when he says, “so excellent a king,... so loving to my mother… and yet within a month-- let me not think on’t Frailty, thy name is woman” (1.2.139-140,145-146). Hamlet witnessed the love his mother felt for his father, and he felt as though she had betrayed him and his father when she, as he saw it, forgot about him to marry his brother. Hamlet is greatly disappointed by his mother's weakness. Ophelia is also a victim to such disappointment, but hers comes from a lover. Hamlet brakes Ophelia’s heart and trust when he blatantly tells her after denying his love for her, “You should not have believed me, for virtue cannot so inoculate our old stock but we shall relish of it. I loved you not”(3.1.116-117). Hamlet had made Ophelia fall for him by telling her many lies, for he is even telling her that she cannot believe any men due to the fact that they will lie to her because of her beauty. Not only is Hamlet playing off the affair as though it meant nothing to him, he is also telling Ophelia that all men will lie to her as he did, so she should simply give up and go to a nunnery, for there is no way to escape the disappointment of men. Ophelia can be seen as a foil to Hamlet for how they both handle these betrayals. While Hamlet does take these acts of disloyalty seriously, for he cannot trust his mother for the rest of the play, he does not let them eat away at his thoughts. Hamlet often thinks about suicide as an escape to the murderous tasks and betrayals he faces. The best example of this is in one of his soliloquies when Hamlet asks, “To be or not to be, that is the question:whether ‘tis nobler in the mind so suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or to take arms against the sea of troubles” (3.1.56-59). Hamlet knows he has a duty to avenge his father, but the pressure put on him and the disappointment he feels is daunting enough to make him think dying would be a better option. Ophelia copes with this pressure and betrayal in a directly opposite way. Ophelia slowly goes mad after the loss of her father and betrayal and embarrassment felt after Hamlet humiliated her. In the midst of her self-destructive madness she sings a song with the lyrics, “ You promised me to wed, So would I ‘a’ done, by yonder sun, An thou hadst not come to my bed” (4.5.62-64). Here Ophelia is directly blaming Hamlet for leaving her and betraying her. Ophelia eventually succumbs to her mental fracturing madness and kills herself. Her failure to push through the pressure and disappointment makes Hamlet's mental strength more apparent to the reader, as he went through similar struggle. This make Ophelia a successful character foil for Hamlet. Laertes is yet another character who loses his father in the play, and he also loses his sister Ophelia, who is Hamlet’s love interest.
Laertes is a foil to Hamlet once again with his actions upon hearing of his father’s death. We see Hamlet struggle with avenging his father's death throughout the entire play. Hamlet lets his intelligence talk him out of killing Claudius when he sees him praying; Hamlet tells himself, “Now might I do it pat, now ‘a is a-praying, and now I’ll do’t-- and so a’ goes to heaven” (3.3.73-774). Hamlet knows he must requite his father, but does not make any rash decisions because he knows he must be smart about it, as to get full revenge. Laertes, like Hamlet, loses his father, but he reacts rashly and without much thought. In fact, Laertes assumes it is Claudius who kill his father at first and he says, “To hell, allegiance! Vows, to the blackest devil! Conscience and grace, to the profoundest pit! I dare damnation. To this point I stand, that both worlds I give to negligence, let come what comes, only I’ll be revenged most thoroughly for my father”(4.5.129-134). Laertes is ready and willing to avenge his father and kill Claudius, but he does not take anytime to think. While Laertes does not even know Claudius was not the one who killed him. It is as simple as that, his father is dead and he wants revenge, it requires no time for thought or consideration. When he finds that it is Hamlet, rather than Claudius he shows great pleasure in the fact that he, himself, will be able to deal Hamlet a fatal blow in a fight. There is no soul-searching, no worrying about an afterlife and no concerns about conscience. It is a simple matter. His father has been killed by Hamlet, so Hamlet must die at his hands. It was Laertes’ rash decisions guided by his desire to take quick action that eventually lead to his demise. Laertes unfortunately does not get to see the the results of his revenge, but he does realize the error in his rash ways. Before he dies
he tells Hamlet, “Mine and my father’s death come not upon thee” (5.2.309). While Hamlet is dying due to wounds caused by Laertes, he does manage to finally enact his revenge on Claudius and kill him. His revenge though, barely acted on time, was committed moments before his death. Hamlet angrily shouts as he kills Claudius, “Drink off this potion. Is thy union here? Follow my mother” (5.2.305-306) It is in this scene that Laertes and Hamlet are most apparent as foils. Laertes is in this position due to his rash actions, yet Hamlet’s inability to act gave Claudius the opportunity end Hamlet’s life and also accidently his mother’s as well. Hamlet's greatest flaw is shown through the foil between him and Laertes; this is his hesitation and inability to commit and take action. All of the these characters in Shakespeare's Hamlet face similar struggles and pressures, but it is the way they cope with these issues that create foil characters. Hamlet’s morals and character traits are shown through the use of foil characters contrasting his traits making them more apparent and creating more character depth.
A major difference between Laertes and Hamlet is that Laertes didn't procrastinate in his attempt at revenge. He went right to it with the encouragement of Claudius. His hastiness is what gets him killed in the end. Because Laertes doesn't think long about getting his revenge gives the reader reason to compare Laertes to and think about Hamlets' struggle to decide weather [H-50] revenge is the right thing to do. [SS -1] He contemplates through the whole play on weather [H-50] to kill Claudius or not, leaving the reader with the sense that Hamlet is very careful when making decisions. [Doesn't this point deserve more discussion?
Let’s begin by talking about how Shakespeare uses other characters in the play as foils to Hamlet’s character. There are three distinct characters that are used as...
In Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, the main character, Hamlet, possesses qualities and characteristics that shape him into the man he is. Grief stricken and revenge seeking, Hamlet’s true self is displayed through his actions. Hamlet’s love, Ophelia, serves as a foil to his character highlighting his strong mind, coping methods with emotions, and corruption within families.
Hamlet questions what may or may not happen however Laertes just wants the revenge fast and effective. Although these characters have different standards when it comes to revenge, they both immediately blamed and directed their anger towards Claudius when they found out their father’s were dead. Hamlet’s reason to blame Claudius is simply because he is his father’s murderer. In 1.5 while Hamlet is talking to the ghost of his father he says, “Haste me to know ’t, that I, with wings as swift/As meditation or the thoughts of love/May sweep to my revenge” (Shakespeare 1.5.31-33). At first is seems as if Hamlet would seek revenge right away because he seems eager to find out who the killer is and when he does find out he says he knew it was Claudius all along. He is furious and after this part in the play, Hamlet’s anger is mainly focused on Claudius. On the other hand when Laertes found out Polonius is dead he went straight to Claudius assuming it was him. By doing this he shows that he is controlled by his impulses unlike Hamlet who waited until he got proof to act on his fury. Laertes also blamed Claudius for not giving his father a proper burial, which can relate to Hamlet’s anger too because Hamlet felt as if there was not enough mourning for his father death. Not only did they both lose their fathers, but they both lost Ophelia, a female figure in their lives that they both loved.
In the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare, the theme of revenge is very palpable as the reader examines the characters of Hamlet himself, as well as Laertes, son of Polonius, and Fortinbras, prince of Norway and son of the late King Fortinbras. Each of these young characters felt the need to avenge the deaths of their fathers who they felt were untimely killed at the bloody hands of their murderers. However, the way each chose to go about this varies greatly and gives insight into their characters and how they progress throughout the play. Hamlet, Laertes and Fortinbras are similar in the fact that each had love, or at least respect, their fathers. Enough to make an attempt to wreak revenge upon their fathers murderers at the risk of their own reputation, freedom, and souls.
Claudius, using his wits, convinced Laertes that Hamlet should be killed, “To show yourself your father’s son in deed/ More than in words? / To cut his throat I’ the church!” (Hamlet 4.7 125-127). Claudius learns that Hamlet is still alive he thought of a master plan to use Laertes to kill Hamlet. Claudius has already turned Laertes against Hamlet by saying that he murdered his father in cold blood and has gone unpunished because the queen and all the kingdom is in love with him. Laertes who is fueled by misguided anger is prepared to do whatever it takes to get his revenge against Hamlet. Laertes simply suggests that he kill Hamlet in cold blood, but Claudius uses his superior intelligence to come up with a truly dark and evil plan to kill Hamlet. Intelligence is mostly thought of as an admirable quality but a select few choose to use it for the wrong reasons. It can sometimes lead people to think they are above the law and can simply get away with whatever terrible crime the commit (Nyborg 344-345). This was the case with Claudius he thought that he had planned the murder carefully and meticulously enough that no one would ever ask questions. Even once Hamlet knew his evil secret Claudius did not give up he came up with plan after plan to kill Hamlet. Claudius, in his mind, had thought that he had earned everything he had acquired. He may have
In William Shakespeare’s tragic play Hamlet, Prince Hamlet conspires to avenge his father’s murder. Throughout the play, Hamlet spirals through bouts of insanity, depression, and hostility. However, across his tragic tale, Hamlet’s old friend Horatio remains a constant. A scholar and a loyal friend to Hamlet, Horatio acts as one of Hamlet’s many character foils, meaning his characteristics contrast to Hamlet highlighting certain personality traits and allowing the reader to understand Hamlet.
Laertes has the ability to perform tasks that may be unpleasant or dangerous. Laertes does not simply try to kill someone by thinking cautiously the whole time, but by directly confronting them and facing them head-on. When Laertes returns home to Denmark he even confronts Claudius about the death of his father. Swearing Laertes says “I dare damnation. To this point I stand,/That both the worlds I give to negligence,/Let come what comes, only I’ll be reveng’d/Most thoroughly for my father.” (IV. v. 133-136). With this declaration Laertes plots with Claudius to kill Hamlet and they construct a plan to have Laertes fence with Hamlet and for him to kill him. They instrument a plot of revenge for the death of Polonius, quickly coming up with three ways to kill Hamlet: stabbing him with an unblunted sword, placing poison on the sword, and poisoning Hamlet’s drink (IV. vii.). After they construct this plan they swiftly utilize the plan. Laertes did not wait for the perfect moment, at the perfect time, and at the perfect place. He created the place, time, and moment to carry out the dangerous task. Hamlet, however, waited and waited for what he thought one day would be the perfect moment in which he could kill his uncle. Even when Hamlet had an opportunity to kill Claudius, he talked himself out of it. When compared to Laertes, Hamlet is a coward because of his inability
Hamlet's response to the grief of his father is very different from Laertes. Laertes responded immediately to the death. He showed his anger to others, he didn't hide it inside. He is also suspicious, it's evident in his speech to Claudius, he asked, "How came he dead? I'll not be juggled with. / To hell, allegiance" (Act 4, 5: 130)! Hamlet however is very private with his grief. He mourned long and hard for the death of Old King Hamlet, even two months after his father's death, after his mother's wedding to Claudius. He is still observed by Claudius and Gertrude to be wearing " . . . Suits of solemn black"
There is a great variety of characters in this story, many of which at one point or another act as a character foil to Hamlet. A foil is a character that is used to contrasts the main character, giving us a better view of some of his various traits, the reasoning behind their decisions or other differences. In Hamlet, his character traits are revealed and better seen when compared and contrasted to that of other characters. In this paper we take a close look at the character foils in Hamlet. These minor characters give us a deeper understanding of Hamlet and the reasoning behind his actions. These characters include Laertes, Ophelia, Roazencrantz and Guildenstern,
In William Shakespeare's tragedy Hamlet, Laertes, Fortinbras and Hamlet find themselves in similar situations. While Hamlet waits for the right time to avenge his father's death, Laertes learns of his father's death and immediately wants vengeance, and Fortinbras awaits his chance to recapture land that used to belong to his father. Laertes and Fortinbras go about accomplishing their desires quite differently than Hamlet. While Hamlet acts slowly and carefully, Laertes and Fortinbras seek their revenge with haste. Although Laertes and Fortinbras are minor characters, Shakespeare molds them in order to contrast with Hamlet. Fortinbras and, to a greater extent, Laertes act as foils to Hamlet with respect to their motives for revenge, execution of their plans and behavior while carrying out their plans.
As the play’s tragic hero, Hamlet exhibits a combination of good and bad traits. A complex character, he displays a variety of characteristics throughout the play’s development. When he is first introduced in Act I- Scene 2, one sees Hamlet as a sensitive young prince who is mourning the death of his father, the King. In addition, his mother’s immediate marriage to his uncle has left him in even greater despair. Mixed in with this immense sense of grief, are obvious feelings of anger and frustration. The combination of these emotions leaves one feeling sympathetic to Hamlet; he becomes a very “human” character. One sees from the very beginning that he is a very complex and conflicted man, and that his tragedy has already begun.
Upon examining Shakespeare's characters in this play, Hamlet proves to be a very complex character, and functions as the key element to the development of the play. Throughout the play we see the many different aspects of Hamlet's personality by observing his actions and responses to certain situations. Hamlet takes on the role of a strong character, but through his internal weaknesses we witness his destruction.
He has the ability to perform tasks that may be unpleasant or dangerous. Laertes does not simply try to kill someone by thinking cautiously the whole time, but by directly confronting them and facing them head-on. When Laertes returns home to Denmark he even confronts Claudius about the death of his father. Swearing Laertes says “I dare damnation. To this point I stand,/That both the worlds I give to negligence,/Let come what comes, only I’ll be reveng’d/Most throughly for my father.” (IV. v. 133-136). With this declaration Laertes plots with Claudius to kill Hamlet and they construct a plan to have Laertes fence with Hamlet and for him to kill him. They instrument a plot of revenge for the death of Polonius, quickly coming up with three ways to kill Hamlet: stabbing him with an unblunted sword, placing poison on the sword, and poisoning Hamlet’s drink (IV. vii.). After they construct this plan they swiftly utilize the plan. Laertes did not wait for the perfect moment, at the perfect time, and at the perfect place. He created the place, time, and moment to carry out the dangerous task. Hamlet, however, waited and waited for what he thought one day would be the perfect moment in which he could kill his uncle. Even when Hamlet had an opportunity to kill Claudius, he talked himself out of it. When compared to Laertes, Hamlet is a coward because of his inability to
His father was killed by Hamlet and his sister was driven insane due to the series of events that took place because of Hamlet. Like Hamlet, Laertes wants to avenge his father by killing the man who killed Polonius. As described earlier, Hamlet is slow to act. Laertes, on the other hand, acts quickly and with precision, wasting no time in acquiring his target and formulating a plan. Robert Palfrey Utter, Jr., puts it best, Hamlet and Laertes both come to the same conclusion that murder must be carried out, but Hamlet reaches that conclusion only “after he has had a few minutes to think it over.” (140) Once Laertes finds out that the man who killed his father was Hamlet he is ready to charge in and kill him as soon as possible. He is only stopped by Claudius, who advises him on a more subtle approach. Straight off the bat it is clear how efficient Laertes is compared to Hamlet. Hamlet wastes a large amount of time scheming up complex ideas on how to get a confession out of Claudius and how to kill him. Laertes on the other hand wastes no time in getting a straight and to the point plan that he can execute immediately. After spending more than half the play watching Hamlet squirm around on the stage getting almost nothing accomplished, the audience would be acutely aware of the stark difference between Hamlet and Laertes even though they share the same motivations. Laertes has his speed but he shares in Hamlets lack of critical thinking when he gets hot headed. He is in such a blind rage that he doesn’t think on what he is agreeing to do with Claudius. Just like Hamlet, his brash actions cost those around him his life. In carrying out the plan, the King, the Queen, Hamlet, and he all die to the poison that was used in the duel. Hamlet was slow and reckless while Laertes was quick and reckless. Wilds sums up the relationship between Hamlet and Laertes perfectly, “Laertes and Hamlet have been foils to each other