Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Narrative research method
Narrative research method
Narrative in film genre
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Hitchcock's North by Northwest, the protagonist, Roger Thornhill, is placed in a precarious position when he is abducted after being mistaken for an F.B.I. agent by the name of Kaplan. The men who took him, under orders from a man named Vandamm, proceed to make attempts on his life for the remainder of the film. However, Roger manages to survive time after time despite the circumstances he was forced into. By evaluating three of Roger Thornhill's pivotal scenes in North by Northwest, it can be understood that Hitchcock intended to demonstrate that an individual is capable of controlling his or her own existence through individual choices, despite being placed in scenarios beyond his or her control. After being abducted, Roger makes the conscious choice to find the man he was mistaken for in order to prove he is not who Vandamm's men want dead. His first stop was the hotel in which Kaplan was said to be staying at. When he arrives, he has his mother obtain a keycard to the appropriate room, and proceeds to search for information regarding Kaplan. He asks the staff questions, impersonating Kaplan in order to get information regarding the last …show more content…
time he was there and if he'd ever been seen. The belief was that if Roger could find Kaplan, then Vandamm's men would stop hunting him. In this case, Roger was demonstrating that he could choose how he handled the situation he was put in, regardless of how hopeless it seemed. It was his first step towards controlling what happened to him because he refused to sit around and wait for the next life threatening scenario to arrive. After searching for Kaplan at the hotel, and then at the General Assembly, Roger's search leads him to Chicago, meeting a woman named Eve along the way. Eve gives him a time and location to meet Kaplan, which ends up being a set-up to kill Roger. After he escapes, Roger learns Eve was involved with Vandamm all along when he follows her to an auction and sees the two of them together. Angry, Roger provokes Vandamm, which causes his life to be in danger yet again. Realizing Vandamm's men intend to take him from the auction, Roger devises a plan to evade capture. He rudely disrupts the auction until he is forcibly removed and escorted out by police. Knowing Vandamm's men won't interfere with the police, Roger secures his safety once more. As he's leaving, Roger tells one of Vandamm's men, "Sorry, old man; too bad. Keep trying!" as if to brag about how well he continually stops their plans to kill him. Roger's ability to make choices that bring him out of harm's way is the sole reason he was able to survive that night, and why he continued to be a nuisance to Vandamm. In the remainder of the film, Roger's choices begin to center around protecting Eve after learning that she was a double agent all along.
In one particular scene, Roger chooses to go against the orders of a government agent in order to help Eve escape the fate of ending up with Vandamm. While different from the aforementioned scenes, Roger's choice to go after Eve still demonstrates his ability to control his existence. This is because he is making a choice that will affect his future--a future he hopes will include Eve. In this sense, the scene where Roger refuses to do as the government agent wishes becomes essential to this overall happiness in the end of the film. If he had not taken control of the situation, Eve would have been killed by Vandamm and Roger would have lived his life wondering "what could have
been." Towards the end of the film, Roger says, "Nobody has to do anything." This single line demonstrates the attitude Roger held from the moment he chose to look for Kaplan. He knew he didn't have to do anything; he was innocent regardless of what people said. However, he made the conscious choice to try and change his "fate." He was thrown into situations where he arguably had no control over what happened, but he still managed to find ways to get out. He did his best to make choices that would help save his life and the life of Eve, choices that counteracted the "impossible" situations he was in. In order to survive, he had no choice but to take control of his own existence through specific actions that would inevitably cause the destruction of his opposition.
This action shows that Roger is very disrespectful, and that he does not care about inflicting pain on someone who does not deserve it, by doing something disrespectful. This action may cause a series of problems later on in the novel, because Roger seems to like being rude to others and insulting them.
Roger has shaped his identity throughout the book by doing actions to form his new cruel, violent identity. Roger has done things such as throw and release rocks at two boys, and then viciously hunting a pig and killing him.
C. When Roger hears about how Jack is going to beat up Wilfried he asked why but Robert doesn’t know why because Jack didn't gave a reason. Roger sees this as an opportunity, Roger “received this news as an illumination”(Goulding 160) and sees that he is able to beat littluns up without a punishment.
What marks North by Northwest as the father of the modern action film is that of its hero. He is a contemporary man, with a decent and respectful job (here an advertising executive). As opposed to the heroes of Westerns, who are dark and mysterious characters with shady pasts, in the action film the hero is likeable, attractive, and witty. What made Cary Grant so perfect for the role of Thornhill is that he is attractive to both men and women. “Cary Grant is the male love object,” said Pauline Kael. “Men want to be as lucky and enviable as he is—they want to be like him. And women imagine landing him.” The influence of North by Northwest on the action and spy film is immeasurable. It influenced the James Bond series, the Die Hard movies, and even science fiction films such as Total Recall. What Hitchcock did, basically, was create an action film of such quality that directors ever since have been trying to equal its success in story, action, and characterization.
Hitchcock employs the notion of the capability of isolation to create conflict and fear. Isolation is apparent in the crop dusting scene due to the lack of people and buildings which juxtaposes to the busy streets of New York City earlier in the film. An establishing shot of the empty desert and Thornhill standing on the road alone, implies that Thornhill is insignificant and isolated as the scene is predominantly the landscape. A long shot of Thornhill and an unknown character in a “typical standoff” scene creates tension and fear for the audience. As the two men speak, non-diegetic sounds of a plane becomes prevalent. When the man says “I’ve seen worse” in response to Rodgers question, this is a foreshadowing of the crop dusting plane attack
During his high school days, Roger did not put effort into studying, but spent his time partying and drinking. After he got married to Joan, they had a son who passed away a few years later, causing the two to separate.... ... middle of paper ... ... These decisions can help change a destructive past, into a more exciting and motivational future.
Alfred Hitchcock’s films not only permanently scar the brains of his viewers but also addict them to his suspense. Hitchcock’s films lure you in like a trap, he tells the audience what the characters don’t know and tortures them with the anticipation of what’s going to happen.
When the boys first landed on the island, Golding describes Roger in the quote, “There was a slight, furtive boy whom no one knew, who kept to himself . . . He muttered that his name was Roger and was silent again,” (Golding 14) Roger wasn’t really one of the bolder boys and was timid at the beginning, when they had first landed on the island. He says his name quietly and that is all to be heard of shy little Roger. Roger is also the one who suggests having a vote to pick a chief, ending the argument between Ralph and Jack and coming up with a solution that is more sophisticated than other options. When they are trying to light a fire, Roger says “‘You make a bow and spin the arrow,’ . . . He rubbed his hands in mime,” (Golding 32). This indicates that Roger knows about how to survive and that he is slowly coming out of his shell, the transition to savagery has begun.
Rowe, Lawrence. "Through the Looking Glass: Reflexivity, Reciprocality, and Defenestration in Hitchcock's"Rear Window"." College Literature 35.1 (2008): 16-37.
An example of this in the movie is when Willard faces his own personality of whether or not to complete his soldierly mission of killing Kurtz or to abort it. If he completes the mission he is still civil, if he does not, the Vietnam jungle has conquered him. The first soldier that is sent to kill Kurtz did not kill Kurtz, but in fact became one of his followers.
Alfred Hitchcock’s favorite subject was the superficial placidity of American life, whose clean, bright surfaces disguised the most shockingly moral, political, psychological and sexual aberrations. For Hitchcock, the most striking, funny, and terrifying quality of American life was its confidence in its sheer ordinariness. Beneath the surface, ordinary people and normal life were always ‘bent’ for Hitchcock.
A. Roger is now showing the evil that is in all of the boys, but has not been presented yet.
Alfred Hitchcock’s film North by Northwest (1959) is famed as a classic man-on-the-run thriller, following protagonist Roger Thornhill as he flees across state lines in a mad dash to save his life and unravel the mystery of his extraordinary predicament. However, mid-way through the film Thornhill’s quandary is further complicated by the introduction of Eve Kendall, a beautiful yet mysterious woman he encounters on a train during his escape from the authorities and people trying to kill him. During the dining room scene on the train, Hitchcock expertly uses the camera to convey the characters thoughts and feelings. Interestingly, in a film that has several sequences with complicated cinematography and editing, the dining car scene is rather reserved in comparison. Hitchcock uses nominal mise-en-scène elements and instead elects to focus the camera largely on the subtleties in the performances of the actors.
Through the use of irony, mis en scene and recurring symbols, Hitchcock has reinforced the fundamental idea of duality throughout his film, Psycho. Alfred Hitchcock’s 1960’s American psychological horror thriller, was one of the most awarded films of its time, proposing contrasting connections between characters, Anthony Perkins and Janet Leigh, and cinematic/film techniques to develop this idea. Irony identifies contrasts between the dual personalities of Marion Crane and Norman Bates, often foreshadowing the future events of the film. Mis en scene is particularly influential to enforcing the idea of duality, evidently shown through the music and diegetic sounds used. The recurring symbols including the mirrors and specifically the birds, underpin a representation of the character’s dual personalities. Hitchcock’s use of devices reinforces the dual personalities of characters Anthony Perkins and Janet Leigh.
First of all, Mrs. Jones helps Roger his face, and provide him dinner. For instance, on page 1, Mrs. Jones says: The woman said: “Um-hum! And your face is dirty. I got a great mind to wash your face for you. Ain’t you got nobody home to tell you to wash your face?” She somewhat ignored the robbery, only to assist Roger. Mrs. Jones doesn’t question him of where he lived, or his folks. Instead, she took on an action to clean his face and feed him. This is significant because Roger is still growing. He has a long life ahead of him, and he needs to