Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis of a biblical text
Rhetorical devices philosophy
Literary analysis paper on the bible
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literary analysis of a biblical text
Amos 5:23 focuses on the musical aspects of worship. The Lord commands the Israelites remove the noise of their songs. The music of the assembly is a clanging noise in the ears which parallels Paul’s illustration of one without love (1 Corinthians 13:1). God will not listen (Amos 5:23). It is only a few years later when Isaiah will indict the Southern Kingdom on similar grounds (Isaiah 1:10-17). Amos 5:24 possesses a different cadence than Amos 1:1 and 3:3. One can recognize that this verse is special with a heightened sound of poetry. In biblical poetry the rhythm comes forth from the structure of the words and lines in addition to the flow of the accented syllables. Biblical poetry is more succinct than lines of prose. Robert Alter asserts …show more content…
. . is a particular way of imagining the world – particular in its own ways of making connections and engendering implications . . . .” The dominant principle of biblical poetry, whether in prophecy, psalm, eulogy, or elsewhere, is parallelism. Parallelism is the repetition of two related semantic or syntactic elements of a line or lines. The relationship between the two parts is one of equivalence. Parallelism takes many forms. Amos 5:24 is an example of a parallel line with two parts, “but let justice roll up like the waters, and righteousness like a mighty stream.” Justice in the first half of the line is equivalent to the second half about righteousness as a mighty stream. The rhythm of the Hebrew parallel line comes from the accents in the two component halves with three in each half allowing the feeling of the three accented syllables, a pause for a breath, and three more accented syllables. In Hebrew, a rhyming sound exists in …show more content…
In 5:21-23 Amos is chastising the Israelites for their behavior. Speaking on behalf of the Lord, Amos specifies examples of unacceptable actions. These examples lead the reader to hear the contrasting “but” that begins verse 24, to expect a list of positive actions for the Israelites. Such a list might comprise behaviors opposite the ones mentioned in 5:21- 23 and of other behaviors mentioned earlier in Amos’ prophecy. For example, the new actions may be to abide by the laws of the Torah (Amos 2:4), live peacefully with your brother (Amos 1:11), provide sandals for the needy (Amos 2:6), honor the bones of the dead (Amos 2:1), allow the prophets to prophesy (Amos 2:13), honor the Nazirites’ pledge of abstinence from alcohol (Amos 2:12), treat the poor honestly (Amos 4:1), and give provisions to the needy (Amos 2:1). The expectation following the sharp contrasting “but” is to hear positive guidance to the people. The expectation is that one will receive an opposition paralleling the sins against the Lord. However, Amos 5:24 surprises by not fulfilling this expectation. Instead, justice and righteousness are wrapped in a metaphor that stems from Amos’ experience in the fields close to water. It offers the power, fullness, and potential of rolling water, and of a mighty, ever-flowing stream. Amos 5:24 speaks of justice and righteousness while providing a quality of chastisement as Amos points out what the people should
23. 7. The meek and humble Jesus, the great pattern of humanity, and every other virtue that can adorn and dignify men, hath commanded to love our enemies, to do good to them that hate and despitefully use us. I feel the obligations, I wish to impress them on the minds of our colored brethren, and that we may all forgive you, as we wish to be forgiven, we think it a great mercy to have all anger and bitterness removed from our minds; I appeal to your own feelings, if it is not very disquieting to feel yourselves under dominion of wrathful disposition.”
For example, the metaphor; “Every breaths a gift, the first one to the last” (28). The use of this metaphor is to treat every day and breathing moment of your life as a gift. Therefore, your life should not be taken for granted and it is precious. Another poetic device is this lyric, “I believe that days go slow and years go fast” (27), this line is a form of paradox. This form of poetry is used to explain how the long days contradict the fast years and to cherish them. Life goes by in the blink of an eye, and it could have been wasted by regret, not making amends with people once trusted (forgiveness), and holding resentment. In addition, assonance is used frequently, for example, “I believe most people are good” (7) uses o’s is to elongate the sentence and create a slurred, calm feeling when the chorus is sung. Euphony is used in the lyric; “I believe them streets of gold are worth the work” (14), which creates a harmonious tone. The similar words “worth and work” sound the same so the sentence flows better together creating harmony. Finally, there is rhyming in most of the verses’, one of the examples is; “I believe we gotta forgive and make amends” (3), with “ ‘Cause nobody gets a second chance to make new old friends” (4). The rhyming of “amends and friends” aide the verse to become catchy which helps listeners enjoy the
All on the verses have four stresses per line, with a rhythm and a rhyme, except for the last verse.
The Assyrians were known to have a powerful, ruthless army. The army was the largest Middle East or Mediterranean fighting force that had ever been seen. It is believed that God himself promised the Israelites that if they disobeyed Him he would allow them to be taken up and carried away to foreign lands. His promise is explained in Isaiah 5:26-29. It reads, “He will whistle to them from the end of the earth; Surely they shall come with speed, swiftly. No one weary or stumble among them No one will slumber or sleep Nor will the belt on their loins be loosed, Nor the strap of their sandals be broken; Whose arrows are sharp, And all their bows bent; Their horses’ hooves will seem like flint, And their wheels like whirlwind. Their roaring will be like a lion, They will roar like young lions; Yes, they will roar And lay hold of the prey; They will carry it away safely, And no one will deliver.” Israel’s rebellion angered God and it led to war with the invincible Assyrians. The Northern Kingdom of Israel was wiped out.
The poem is in iambic tetrameter, in which, means there are four syllables that stand out on each line. For example, “one shade the more, one ray the less.” (Line 7) The rhyme scheme is as simple ABAB, “And all that’s best of dark and bright; Meet her in her aspect and her eyes; Thus mellowed to that tender light; Which heaven to gaudy day denies.” (Lines 3-6) However, when we look at the passage from the Old Testament we can see that there is no organization into lines or stanzas; instead, they are organized into chapters and verses. The author of these compiles of passages is still unknown to this date, so we do not know exactly who the author is. However, from context clues we can identify that they were called “Solomon’s” but we cannot exactly identify that. The poem has been translated so many different times we don’t have form, meter, or even a rhyme scheme. Whether that is because it was lost over time and translations, but these passages are also so old the author may not have been able to identify or educated enough to know what those were. Yet one thing is for certain, the love for this woman was still well portrayed even without the form and
The “everlasting covenant” referred to Isaiah 24:5 is interpreted by numerous theologians as the universal covenant made between God and man at creation or as Noahic covenant after the flood. Some believe the text is referring to Israel, and others believe it is in reference to the Mosaic covenant between God and Israel.
This phrase is later repeated three more times, in Judges 18:1, 19:1, and 21:25. Since the phrase is repeated several times, it emphasizes the need for a king to govern the people and lead them in better ways. The Davidic covenant also exemplifies this positive view, since God showed favor on David and his descendants. God said that King David’s descendants are God’s sons, and that the LORD will establish a “royal throne forever”, as in a line of kings until the end of time (2 Sam. 7:13). God also promises to give David “rest from all your enemies” (2 Sam. 7:11) and a place for his people to live (2 Sam. 7:10). Just like Abraham, King David is promised descendants, blessings, and land. Hezekiah, another good king of Judah, was also viewed favorably. In the LORD’s sight, Hezekiah did what was right, just like David (2 Kgs 18:3). 2 Kings 18: 5 also states that “and neither before nor after [Hezekiah] was there anyone like him among all the kings of Judah.” Unlike Solomon, Hezekiah observed the commandments and thus, “the LORD was with him, and he succeeded in all he set out to do” (2 Kgs 18:7). Therefore, the Deuteronomistic History looks favorably upon kings, since the need for a king is stated multiple times in Judges, and kings like David and Hezekiah are looked upon with favor by God and the people
Exodus 21-24 was definitely quite an instructive piece of literature. It was almost raw in its nature as a text or “book” but more of reading an excerpt from a piece of non-fiction most similar to an instruction manual of some sort that you get when you buy a dissembled bike or desk. Something like being enrolled in a police academy there was definite sense of a master-slave relationship in the air. It is like something never before seen in the Torah, these chapters showed a whole new YHWH. The YHWH who is feared like the school principal in an elementary school, not even mom and dad has come on so strong as to the dos and donts of living life. It seems as if YHWH was pushed to such a point where YHWH has no choice but intervene into the lives of his children, and set the rules for the pl...
The message that the author is trying to convey in Amos 9:5-10 is that YHWH has proven himself to the people to be a trustworthy and loyal God. He helped resurrect Israel, the Philistines and the Arameans. In turn these people, particularly the Israelites, have betrayed his trust by acting sinfully toward the kingdom of Israel. The Lord YHWH will judge those people of Israel who are called to do right but who choose to do wrong. The wrongdoers being those that have acted sinfully.
'I saw him at the end, like as if I saw him down a perspective-glass'
In the first line, it describes Jael going for the “tent peg” so that she can kill Sisera. The second line, however, says the same thing but emphasizes that she uses her “right hand” and grabs a “workman’s hammer”. The change is subtle, but it is very telling of the actions Jael is about to take. By changing “hand” to “right hand”, by looking at different instances in biblical texts, “right” can be taken to mean that which is correct and proper. This might not necessarily mean that this is correct and proper, but this is what the author is trying to convey in using this parallelism. The change from “tent peg” to “workman’s hammer”, this demonstrates that this a not just a tool, but a task that Jael must take on for herself, a duty that she has. This parallelism also introduces a consequentiality through intensification of description of both the hand and the hammer. The next two lines also show a synonymous parallelism. The third line describes the moment when “Jael struck Sisera” and “crushed his head” while the fourth line emphasizes the action by translating to “shattered” and “pierced his temple”. This more than exaggerates the action Jael takes and for good measure in order to show that it was very violent through its
...ill leave them to be destroyed in the hands of the false prophets and corrupt leaders of the land. God tells them that he really does not want it to come to this, because the passage ends with a prophecy about what will become of the worthless shepherd. I think this is a message to false prophets that eventually no one will believe them, and also to the leaders or kings that they will lose all of their power and military strength. God reminds them that he really is helping protect them from the full effect of their sins even if they don’t realize it. In other words, things could be a lot worse, but God loves humans so much that he won’t let it get worse. The general message is for the people to clean up their act and repent so these bad things won’t happen.
The definition of a rhyme according to Yourdictionary.com is a poem composed of lines with similar ending sounds or to speak in words or phrases with the same ending sound. An example of a rhyme being used outside of “The Lamb” is to say the words bike and like, or another example of rhyme is the children 's poem “Humpty Dumpty”. In “The Lamb” the author William Blake uses rhymes to make his poem more expressive. For example “ Little lamb, who made thee?/ Dost thou know who made thee?/ Gave thee life and bid thee feed,/ By the stream and o’er the mead;” (Lines 1-4). The author uses the words thee, feed, and mead, all rhymes that give the poem The Lamb much rhythm. The definition of rhythm according to Yourdictionary.com is a recurring movement of sound or speech. Another example is “Gave thee clothing of delight,/ Softest clothing wooly bright;” (Lines 5-6) . Last example I will use from “The Lamb” is “He is meek and he is mild,/ He became a little child:” (Lines 15-16). These are all examples of rhymes that the author uses to create rhythm and make the poem
The poetic conventions used by this poet include two half-lines in each verse, separated by a caesura or pause. The half-lines are joined by the oral stressing of alliterative words in the half-lines, both consonants and vowels (Tharaud 34). “At least one of the two stressed words in the first half-line, and usually both of them, begin with the same sound as the first stressed word of the second half-line” (Donaldson 67). When a word was stressed in the first half-line, its alliterative counterpart was stressed in the following half-line; the words could either complement each other, like holy/heaven or sin/enemy, or they could contrast each other like happy/wretched or warm/winter.
He did, though, follow a standard pattern in verses 1 through 8. This was done by rhyming the first and last word of verse 1 and 4; he rhymed the words arms and harms. Verse 5 and 8 rhymed the words charms and warms. Verse 2 and 3 rhymed the words sease and please whereas these and seas rhymed in verses 6 and 7. This follows the pattern abba and abba. In verses 9 through 14 a different pattern was used a as resoluti...