Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between Israel and God in the mosaic covenant
Abrahamic and mosaic covenant
Isaiah 24 The eternal Covenant
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Everlasting Covenant The “everlasting covenant” referred to Isaiah 24:5 is interpreted by numerous theologians as the universal covenant made between God and man at creation or as Noahic covenant after the flood. Some believe the text is referring to Israel, and others believe it is in reference to the Mosaic covenant between God and Israel. Every one of these ideas although appealing runs into problems. For instance, the universal covenant sounds great in theory, but there is no record of it in Scripture. By all appearances, the Noahic covenant is a good choice, because it is universal, but doesn’t appear to be linked to the context of this chapter. Furthermore, Isaiah 54:9 specifically refers to the Noahic covenant, which seems to be different than the “everlasting covenant” of Isaiah 24, which obviously can be destroyed by man and if broken a curse occurs. The wording of Isaiah 24:5 implies the Mosaic covenant is suggested here. But, the Mosaic covenant isn’t exclusively mentioned in this verse and it doesn’t fit right within the context of this chapter. Despite, the continual sin Israel can deliver a universal judgment, other …show more content…
nations aren’t connected to God through the Mosaic covenant and hence can’t be judged by it. Isaiah 24:5 reference to the “everlasting covenant” is vague and adaptable to be suitable for a dual meaning.
The context in this chapter refers to the whole earth violating the Noahic covenant, which is called the “everlasting covenant” (Gen. 9:16), which was highlighted to demonstrate the serious ramifications if it was disobeyed. Simultaneously, Israel and Judah are included in the universal judgment that occurs in these chapters. Isaiah appears to have directed this at Judah and Israel violations of the Mosaic covenant especially against all the bloodshed that was occurring, that can be looked at as an extension of the Noahic covenant (which is called the “everlasting covenant” and extends to all people of the earth) which a number of nations broke through the sin of murder, slave trade, disrespect of human life,
etc. From early on in Scripture, God is making everlasting covenants with Noah (Gen. 9:16). Noah demonstrated faith in the promises of God by building the ark. Everlasting covenant is again mention with Abraham in Gen. 17:7, as God offers His covenant to Abraham and his descendants. In Exodus 19:5,6 God offers His covenant to the descendants of Abraham and Israel through Moses at Mount Sinai. Just like the everlasting covenant offered to Noah and Abraham, Israel’s is based on salvation by faith in the coming of the Messiah. However, Israel response was wrong, as they believed they could have the right relationship with God through obedience alone. Due to Israel’s belief that they could be right with God through their works, God repeatedly offers covenants again and they repeatedly failed time and again. God offers His children today an everlasting covenant, which is salvation through His only begotten Son Jesus Christ, who transforms us to be obedient to the Word of God because of what He did for us on the cross. When someone tries to earn their salvation through good works or by being obedient to the law this is an old covenant relationship with God. God offers us a new covenant only through the work of His Son, Jesus Christ. This is the only everlasting covenant. God the Father wants us to come to Jesus out of love. We can’t change God’s covenant with us. We can accept it and have eternal life with God (John 3:36) or reject it suffer eternal punishment in destruction (2 Thess. 1:9). Isaiah’s 24-27 There are two cities portrayed in Isaiah 24-27, “the wasted city” (Isa. 24:10) and the city of God. The wasted city will be destroyed by God to demonstrate His sovereignty and judgment over us. The wasted city is one of anarchy where man is fearlessly imposing itself over the destitute (Isa. 24:10; 25:2; 26:5). Some theologians believe that this wasted city was Samaria, Jerusalem, Babylon, an unnamed Moabite city. Accordingly, a lot more accurately picture this city as a symbolic city, representing all proud and arrogant cities in the world who oppose the authority of God and eventually being judged by Him. In addition, it appears this unnamed city is characterized, in the typical clichéd manner, of a proud city that goes against the Word of God and wastes its own potential (Isa. 24:11-12), and it typifies all the cities that have already been mentioned in Isaiah (13-23) and their destruction. Compare this to the future establishment of the City of God, the New Jerusalem, where God will reign, and where wickedness is gone and Christians are secure (Rev. 3:12). The “strong city” (Isa. 26:1), the City of God, this New Jerusalem, where the curse of the old earth will be gone (Rev. 22:3), will be a city of unimagined blessings. The city will be humble, open to all of God’s redeemed children, where all people know and delight in God and live at peace with one another (65:17-25; Isa. 2:2-4; 9:6-7). The New Jerusalem that God will set up will be a place of strength and security for the redeemed (Isa. 26:1-6). This new heavenly Zion represents God’s dwelling place where the residents will experience His presence through joy, peace and fellowship (Heb 12:22), and God’s gracious salvation will prompt nations to come to the New Jerusalem to be blessed and live by the rules of God’s kingdom (Isa. 2:2-4). Mount Zion will bring judgment on God’s enemies, and blessings on God’s people (Oba. 1:17) and God will bring the whole world to Himself (Isa. 49:14). Figuratively, the “strong city” could be any city that puts its faith and trust in God, however it appears to be Zion the New Jerusalem. Isaiah is deliberately vague in chapters 24-27 to give the reader a central idea for the passage that can be relatable to a wide range of readers. The “wasted city” parallel’s Babylon where those who oppose God will be destroyed and the New Jerusalem is the fulfillment of all of God’s promises, the literal heaven on earth. Therefore, these two cities demonstrate that mans behavior will influence what type of city they live in. This idea is the focal point of the book of Isaiah concerning to what happens to those who put their faith and trust in God. Those who put there faith and trust in God will prosper and be protected from evil, while those who do evil and oppose God will face His wrath and judgment. Leviathan Imagery The serpent Leviathan is mentioned sporadically throughout the Old Testament mostly in the book of Job (3:8; 41:1; 10, 12, 18, 25, 22, 31), and twice in the Pslams (74:14; 104:26), and once in the book of Isaiah (27:1). Scholars view the Leviathan as a deity, and other scholars see parallels with Ugaritic mythology who adapted to it when Baal defeated Lotan, which is associated with dragons and serpents. Day writes in “God and Leviathan in Isaiah 27: 1” of “the recurring cry ‘In that day’ binds the passage in its eschatological context together.” Webb states in “The Message of Isaiah” “The whole monstrous sum of the world’s evil is represented by Leviathan.” However, the prophet Isaiah applied this using an ancient Canaanite myth, in which Leviathan and the dragon (Rahab) were enemies defeated by the god Baal. This is very similar to Near Eastern mythology, and it is obviously clear that Isaiah was using terminology that was very familiar to his audience. Also, Isaiah is speaking metaphorically, to portray historical enemies of God. Furthermore, the prophet’s application of Leviathan is important in regards to the “end of times” because it provides Christians a preview of the eventual outcome of the annihilation of Satan. Day adds, “Isaiah here remolded the mythic symbol of Leviathan, the Great dragon, that Ancient Serpent, to refer to Satan, the great and final enemy of Yahweh whom He will defeat in the eschaton.” By Isaiah depicting the Leviathan as he did, Isaiah addressed every possible group that could oppose God, while displaying that God is omnipotence. Isaiah’s wisdom illuminates in the often-called “Little Apocalypse,” because it addresses God’s victory over and judgment of the world in the “end of times.” Set during the “end of times” Isaiah effectively employs the Noahic covenant, which demonstrates that God is holy and righteous who has a hatred for sin and He will not allow sin to go unpunished. He also provided a way for man to be saved from the wrath through His Son Jesus Christ. Bibliography Day, John N. “God and Leviathan in Isaiah 27: 1.” Bibliotheca Sacra 155, no. 620 (October - December 1998): 423-36. Accessed November 20, 2015.http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.liberty.edu:2048/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=c4b0b874-8cc1-4dde-b05b-050d0372b6f1%40sessionmgr114&vid=1&hid=124. Webb, Barry G. The Message of Isaiah. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 1996. Young, Edward J. The Book of Isaiah (3 Vol. Set). Grand Rapids: Wm. B Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1965.
Gentry, Peter J., and Stephen J. Wellum. Kingdom through Covenant: A Biblical Theological Understanding of the Covenants. Crossway, 2012. Google Scholar: Subject relevance
So by the end of this passage, man is bound by a new covenant with
An everlasting covenant is a promise from God that is characterized as eternal. Charles Spurgeon describes the significance of a covenant as, “the only ladder, which reaches from earth to heaven.” Covenants have historically connected to many passages all throughout the Old Testament; however, eternal covenant is mentioned in the New Testament as well (NIV, Hebrews 13:20). The reason eternal covenant is only mentioned once in the New Testament is because the Blood of the Lamb is the only needed element, as the work of the cross covers all sins for all people. An example of an Old Testament covenant is the Noahic Covenant , which is still significant today, is God’s promise to never flood the earth again (NIV, Genesi...
Isaiah was written before Messiah came, and wanted the people to be ready for when Messiah did come. I believe this passage fits in context with the book in that it serves as both an encouragement and a warning to the people. First, the people should be encouraged that Messiah is indeed coming to save the people. However, I believe Isaiah wrote this passage to warn the people that they needed to prepare themselves for the coming Messiah. Isaiah wrote this knowing that Jesus would be despised by many, and I believe he was trying to tell the people to be in expectance of him, in hopes that they would not turn against their Lord.
In the passage quoted from Jeremiah above, the prophet is predicting that a new covenant would be formed between God and his people, an agreement that would supersede the pact made between Moses and God upon Sinai and at the Red Sea. The first covenant, Jeremiah indicated, would become null and void because of the sins of the Jewish people. The new covenant would absolve these sins and reaffirm God's fidelity to his people.
Charlesworth, Matthew. "The Covenants in the Old Testament." Academia.edu. N.p., 28 Nov. 2011. Web. 10 Apr. 2014.
The common theme throughout the book of Isaiah is that the Lord is almighty. He is in control and He is worthy of trust. In chapters 7 and 8 of Isaiah we see one of the most misunderstood and well-known stories in the book. The setting of this story takes place during the split of Israel into the two kingdoms of Israel and Judah. There was already a great deal of stress between the two kingdoms, however this tension was intensified by the powerful nation of Assyria who threatened many of the surrounding smaller nations. This impending threat caused the king of Israel, Pekah, and the king of Syria, Rezin, to form an alliance so that they might able to defend against the Assyrians. Both Syria and Israel were pressuring Judah to join their coalition so they might benefit from Judah’s power and resources. However king Ahaz was not in favor of the alliance, for he wanted to keep his alliance with Assyria healthy. Consequently, Israel and Syria conspired against Judah, planning on besieging the city. We are told in Isaiah 7:6 that their desire was to replace King Ahaz with a man who would support them in their stance against the Assyrians. This man was to be “the Son of Tabeel”. Which means, “good for nothing”. This could mean that they just simply wanted to replace Ahaz with someone who would just be their pawn and would do what they say. On the other hand, according to some scholars, “Tabeel” is the name of an actual person or of a town in northeastern Palestine. Ahaz determined himself to never be replaced by that good for nothing. So he prepared the city to be besieged by Israel and Syria. The story really starts to take shape when the Prophet Isaiah is sent to Ahaz and he meets him at the end of the aqueduct of ...
...edge of Good and Evil did indeed produce the lustful Fall of Man, but it was in Christ that God fulfilled the covenant. “For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive” (King James Version, 1 Cor. 15.22).
The roles of Noah and Utnapishtim in the Flood Myths are quite similar. There are several differences regarding the two flood myths, but the general idea behind the two remains consistent. In the Mesopotamian Flood Myth, the Gods were overwhelmed by the amount of humans that existed on Earth and were unable to sleep due to the noise of men. So they decided to "exterminate mankind." While in the Hebrew story of Noah and the Flood Myth, God grew tired of the evil that had plagued mankind and engulfed the earth. So God decided to start the world over to undue the mistakes of man. Both of these stories display an attempt by the Gods to start the world over to cleanse the earth. Both Utnapishtim and Noah were spoken to by Gods and asked to build large boats from which all who were to be spared would seek shelter during the storm. Both men were allowed to spare the lives of their family via the safety of the boats. Also, the method used by the Gods in these myths are the same, the skies would rain down upon the earth flooding the land and killing all who were not ordered onto the boats.
Genesis 1:27-28, provides the scriptural foundation for this assertion and this Project. Within those verses are the first covenantal stipulations for humankind to adhere too and are the foundational texts for the creation, formation, and institutionalization of God?s divine stewardship covenant. The key phrases for this premise that support this claim are ?be fruitful, and multiply?fill the earth ?subdue? and have dominion over the ?sea?air?and earth.?[footnoteRef:10] Furthermore, the researcher contends that humanity has the attributes of God to develop, establish and participate in covenantal agreements with the Divine and each other because they are created in "the image of God." [9: David Noel Freedman et al., eds.,?Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (New York, New York: Doubleday, 1992), s.v. "Covenant," Logos Bible Software. According to Mendenhall and Herion, "a covenant" is an agreement enacted between two parties in which one or both make promises under oath to perform or refrain from certain actions stipulated in advance. As indicated by the designation of the two sections of the Christian Bible?Old Testament (= covenant) and New Testament?"covenant" in the Bible is the major metaphor used to describe the relation between God and Israel (the people of God). As such, a covenant is the instrument constituting the rule
John N. Oswalt affirms that (Isaiah 40:1-11), establishes the basis for the rest of the book. The theme shift from judgement to restoration which will be through God’s personal intervention. The description of God reveals him as caring for the needs of his people.60 Shalom M. Paul indicates that God is described as a shepherd which is an image of love whereby God will unwaveringly and meticulously take care of each lamb personally. God’s the one who punish Israel and now he will restore them by watching over them as a shepherd watches over his sheep.61 The coming servant has been described as Israel by J. Alec Motyer, who contends that the servant epitomize Israel, (41:8) the seed of Abraham (Gen 12:3;; 18:18; 22:18; 24:4). His will reveals
Isaiah 38:9-20 is a poem found in the book of the prophet Isaiah, and is part of the narrative about Hezekiah’s reign over Judah. Although the story of Hezekiah’s reign can also be found in 2 King and 2 Chronicles, this poem is only found in Isaiah’s version of the story. Prior to this poem, Isaiah 36:1-38:8 describes how during Hezekiah’s reign, Assyria defeated the kingdom of Israel and exiled its people. When Assyrians began to attack Judah, Hezekiah sends his officials to the prophet Isaiah, who promises the king that God will protect them from the Assyrians. The Assyrians then withdraw from Judah to fight the king of Cush but promise to return and take the land. Hezkeiahs prays to God in the temple, asking for deliverance. Isaiah makes a prophecy against the Assyrians after which an angel of God destroyed the Assyrian army and the Assyrian king is betrayed and murdered by his sons.
God created the testaments ultimately, he did not write them himself but he had created them. He sent his message through prophets so the word would spread. It is ironic that the Bible has two separate parts called testaments. The word testament means “covenant” and the Old Testament is filled with covenants with men and women. Some covenants God had made are with Abraham, Noah and Moses. God had made these covenants to prepare for the coming of his son, the messiah. “The principal purpose to which the plan of the old covenant was directed to prepare the coming of Christ, the redeemer of all and of the messianic kingdom, to announce this coming by prophecy, and to indicate its meaning through various types.” The books in the Old Testament
Flanders, Henry J, Robert W. Crapps, and David A. Smith. People of the Covenant: An Introduction to the Hebrew Bible. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
The bible is obviously broken up into two covenants, The Old Testament and New Testament. In the Old Testament the Holy Spirit wasn’t poured out among the people like it is today. This was a covenant that God made with his people for their salvation or also known as the Covenant of Law. In the New Testament we believe Christ’s death is our salvation. When you read the Old Testament, their culture is so different from ours. It was Law to follow the word of God where today you have a choice and through the son of God you may enter heaven. Many people read the bible and they forget that the Historical Culture isn’t always straight forward like they would like. For example in John 6:1-14 Jesus is sitting among a group of people and begins to tell