Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Middle ages weaponry
Weapons during the middle ages
Weapons during the middle ages
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Middle ages weaponry
Throughout the Middle Ages armour evolved greatly and so the need to be able to kill the people wearing it also greatly increased, this was further fuelled by people wanting to secure their own piece of land. The fruit of all these conflicts was the crossbow an extremely powerful weapon that could kill a heavily armoured knight.
Major – What was the effect of the crossbow on the way medieval battles were fought? Small – Who invented the Crossbow and what was its original purpose?
There are numerous conflicting historical texts as to who invented the crossbow, the ancient Greeks used a much larger crossbow called a ballista (onager later replaced this) as a siege engine. Leonardo da Vinci (an Italian inventor) had also drawn up sketches for
…show more content…
They had a range of up to 650 feet and so could be used extremely effectively to deter or kill people attacking a hill fort or castle (3). One of the biggest assets to having crossbows readily available is that any untrained peasant can pick one up and be confident in using it in a matter of weeks or sometimes days. Some of the cons to using crossbows instead of longbows or bows is that taking a crossbows string of is extremely hard and so fighting in wet weather with them isn’t and option whereas longbows and bows strings can easily be slipped over the notches which have been made into their bow arms.
Small - Was the crossbow a crucial part to fighting in the Middle Ages?
While yes a huge benefit to whoever used it/had it on their side the crossbow was not a crucial part of medieval fighting as most battles were fought with hammer and anvil tactics, these being the infantry would tie up the opposition’s forces while cavalry snuck around the back for a charge that would inevitably crush the enemy’s morale and cause them to scatter and then the crossbows would come into play picking off retreating enemy’s or lending fire support to entangled allies that where facing heavily armoured
The Met museum said that the most popular used weapons were “spear, sword, axe, and the bow and arrow.” These weapons and tactics of fighting then became the backbone of weapons today, such as guns. Spears, bows and arrows allow knights to fight from a distance, such as hand grenades and guns used in today’s military.
Long distance weapons were essential to European combat. The main long distance weapons used by Europeans during that time were the longbow and the crossbow. Each form of weaponry had its unique advantages and their pejorative. The long bow (shown in figure 1) was the original form of distance weapons. The term ‘bow’ means to be made from wood, iron or steel. The Welsh, who inhabited England, were the first people to use longbows. Longbows were 6-7 feet long and had a range of 250 yards, and still had the ability to pierce a knight’s armor (Byam 12). A well trained archer could shot 10- 12 arrows in a single minute. Despite these pro’s the longbow had a lot of disadvantages as well. One draw back was only skilled archers, who were costly to train, could use a longbow. Another disadvantage was it didn’t have a ready loaded arrow (Edge 34). The crossbow (shown in figure 2) on the other had been emphatically different. The crossbow had a span of 2-3 feet and could kill a knight on horseback with one shot, because of good aim (Byam 30). Crossbows had ready loaded projectiles, while the longbow didn’t and the crossbow could be used by anyone since it didn’t require any skill. The crossbow did have a down side though, it had slow reloaded because of a crank and it was expensive. Crossbows were also used for other thi...
In relation to war, the most preferred weapon was the javelin, which could be used for both close combat and long range. The javelin was a highly effective weapon and it ensured that those using it were not easy to defeat. Furthermore, the javelin was often used alongside a shield, which was essential for not only blocking attacks, but also kept the enemy at bay while the javelin was used to strike. 'The horse' was also used but because of having to use both a shield and
* Throughout the next few tens of thousands of years, humans had PLENTY of time to refine their techniques. Fire-hardening arrow heads, fletching arrow shafts to improve their flight characteristics, "tillering" bows so that the upper and lower limbs had the same bend radius, etc. All of these improvements helped increase the efficiency and accuracy of the bow and arrow, and helped humans to survive and advance throughout the ages.
The ballista was like a much larger version of the crossbow used by besiegers. It got it’s power from being fired with sinew ropes and had two arms. Although the ballista was a great weapon it was hard to construct, therefore the Romans developed a new version called the Mangonel. It, like the Ballista also got it's power from sinew ropes but unlike the ballista which used two arms, the Mangonel only used one arm. To make the Mangonel easier to transport the Romans added wheels. It was very light and could hurl objects such as rocks and even burning projectiles.
The draw weight of the longbow was eighty pounds. That is a lot of weight. Soldiers hated the draw weight of the bow because they couldn’t pull back on it and thought they might get killed easier if they tried to pull back on it (longbowdynasty.org). King Edward I thought that if the bow had a great draw weight on it the soldiers might get stronger while there fighting. Another reason is soldiers could pull back on the bow and release quickly and kill people faster. This hypothesis proved to be true as the English soldiers did fire more quickly causing the opponent to die faster (historylearningsite.org). As soldiers used the bow more often they did get stronger and could draw the bow easier than they could when they first started using it. Soldiers preferred the longbow over the crossbow because the crossbow had a draw weight of 120 pounds. That is a significant amount of weight compared to eighty pounds (militaryhistory.org).
In medieval Europe there were many different weapons and types of fighting. It depended on the time period they fought in. “A soldier's choice of armor depended on the time during which he lived, the type of fighting he did and his economic situation” (Blackwell 1). Some types of fighting were hand-to-hand, which were swords, axes, and many more. Another type would be projectiles, like crossbows, javelins. The last one would be firearms which guns and others. “Many medieval soldiers wore armor to protect themselves from the weapons of their enemies” (Blackwell 2). Siege weapons such as catapults helped armies break into castles and towns. Most soldiers carried some blades in addition to their swords. “A dagger had a hilt like sword and a double-edged blade that was typically between 6 and 12 inches long” (Blackwell 1). Medieval soldiers used many weapons for hand-to-hand combat. All knights carried a sword with them and were expected to be skilled at swordplay. If you could afford swords then there was always something cheaper like the Quarterstaffs, which are long...
All in all, the Trebuchet was a fearsome weapon of mass destruction during the Middle Ages, a force to be reckoned with. Trebuchets only lost favor when cannons emerged, and the primary benefit of the cannon that the trebuchet lacked was not in fact power, but rather mobility. Smaller, more maneuverable cannons rapidly overran the position of the trebuchet in most armies across the world.
The crossbow is a weapon of antiquity. There is plausible evidence that the Chinese developed the weapon as early as 1500 BC Surviving examples exist in China from as far back as the third century BC These Han dynasty relics display a great deal of sophistication. The lock (chi) is comprised of a cast bronze box which holds a rotating nut and a two-lever seer and trigger that locks the release in a set position. Roman soldiers captured and ransomed in Sogdiana in central Asia in the first decades of modern reckoning are credited with bringing the technology of the crossbow to the West.
The favored bow was the small rifle, which had a lot of advantages over the larger ones. This bow could be carried while loaded and ready to fire. This was not possible with a longbow. The crossbow also required less skill and practice to use effectively while the longbow required constant practice and exercise so the soldiers could be strong enough to hold the string back. And even though the longbow was more work and required more skill the crossbow still had a lot more power and accuracy and worked more effectively than the longbow.
Medieval Weapons were (are) very dangerous. They Can kill, puncture, wound, hurt, or anything else. All weapons From the Middle Ages were looked upon as frightening and crucial Tools to kill. From a small dagger to a large cannon; all weapons Would kill, no doubt about it. A lot, in fact most of the weapons were used for siege and Defense against castles. Castles were the most integral part of the Middle Ages. They held the king, the servants and anyone else Important. If you wanted land or money, a castle was the perfect Place to hit. Movable Towers were just one thing used to lay siege on These castles. Not necessarily a weapon itself, it held Weapons…knights and peasants. Knights and (or) peasants carried many weapons depending On what specialty they had. Some carried bows-and-arrows, others Maces, some swords, some knifes, etc. A mace was a metal ball with metal spikes welded on the Ball. A chain was attached to a wood stick onto the ball. The Mace would not kill only torture. Other siege weapons included the ballista, a HUGE Crossbow- like slingshot that could send a huge tree trunk 3 football fields Long. The ballasta was manly for breaking down castle walls, or for scattering A heavily guarded area. The most commonly used weapon was the sword. It was a long metal Object that was very sharp on both sides. The sword could actually cut the Sheet metal on modern day cars. Imagine this power through your neck! Next to the sword, the "soldiers" held a small dagger in a pouch on Their belt. This was used to finish people off, as a last resort, or sometimes Even suicide missions. Trebuchet, the name strikes fear in people's eyes, a HUMONGOUS Slingshot that could send a big monkeys boulder 2 football fie...
3. Howey, Allan W. "Weaponry: The Rifle-Musket and the Minié Ball » History Net." History Net. Weider History Group, Oct. 1999. Web. 12 May 2012. .
First were the changes in warfare itself. Before the 14th century, battles were fought mostly by mounted knights. During the course of the hundred years war, the value of mounted knights was replaced with that of ordinary infantry, mostly of the peasant class, as demonstrated at the Battle of Crecy in 1346. This battle, which was won by an outnumbered English force, was the first time that infantry men, armed with longbows, won a major victory without the assistance of mounted knights (Rice, Jr. and Grafton, 1994; Keen, 2011). This period also saw the introduction of firearms. “By the end of the fourteenth century, firearms were being manufactured all over Europe…” (Rice, Jr and Grafton, 1994). The devastation and loss of life, especially in France were most battles were fought, was made even worse by the Black Plague that ravaged Europe during the war. The rise of peasants in war, which had been traditionally fought by knights and lords, contributed to the end of the feudal system that had been prevalent during the Middle Ages (Keen, 2011). A third consequence of the war, still felt today, was the rise of a national identity. Both sides had used propaganda against their enemy to help in raising the funds to wage war. The experiences of waging war as a state brought out a sense of nationalism in both France and England (Keen,
These bows are slim, sturdy and specifically designed for the Mongols. Many versions of the Mongol's legendary bows are still around today and are kept in museums for the whole world to see. These bows were a strategic find for the Mongols. They worked very well in Genghis Khans' favour, they were lighter and easier to use on horseback whilst also packing a punch. They were used in Mongol battles very often and they helped gain the Mongols' rule of China and a victory in the conquest of Kharezm.
Bow and arrow improved this long-distance effect, have mechanized it and made it more efficient. Now, the extended arm could reach farther and the distance to the target became larger and more secure. From the beginning, man has used this weapon not only for hunting, but also for armed conflict, murder and raids.