mortuary in Old Montague Street on the morning of 31
August 1888, born 1835, Mile End New Town. Inmate of the
Whitechapel Workhouse, described as a laborer and dock
laborer. Died of pthisis (A disease characterized by the
wasting away or atrophy of the body or a part of the body.
Tuberculosis of the lungs). in Whitechapel in 1896. Advanced
as a suspect by M. J. Trow in the 2009 book – Jack the Ripper
Quest for a Killer, and the accompanying Discovery Channel
documentary, Jack the Ripper Killer Revealed. Trow used the
1988 FBI profile as the foundation for his theory. Mann
helped James Hatfield wash and lay out the body of Mary
Ann Nichols in Old Montague Street Workhouse Infirmary.
The police were criticized for allowing the body to be washed
without adequate
…show more content…
police supervision. Inspector Helsen insisted he had left strict instructions the body was not to be touched. These instructions were disregarded, and James Hatfield, or Robert Mann instigated the washing of the body. At the inquest the coroner Wynne Baxter instructed the jury to disregard Mann's evidence, as he was unreliable and had fits. st RICHARD MANSFIELD Richard Mansfield was an American actor, though was actually born in Helgoland, Germany, on 24 May 1857. The son of operatic soprano, Erminia Rudersdoff, and her second husband, English violin-playing wine merchant Maurice Mansfield. His father died when he was 4 years old. Educated in Derby, England, he studied painting in London, though when this work failed to support him he turned to acting. He became a light comedy actor and singer with the D'Oyly Carte (Gilbert and Sullivan), provincial touring company. At the time of the Ripper murders he was starring in a production of Robert Lewis Stevenson's Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde at Henry Irving's Lyceum Theatre. He came under attack and suspicion after many believed his convincing on stage transformation from a gentleman into a mad killer incited murder. His on stage transformation was achieved by the method of prepainting the required face altering shadows in actors grease paint, this would be undetectable under normal stage light, then by the process of gradually introducing a colored filter to the lighting, while simultaneously contorting his facial features, the monstrous visage of Hyde would eerily become apparent. In an attempt to stem criticism of him, Mansfield offered to present a special benefit performance for the Suffragan Bishop of London's home and refuge fund, who were trying to raise money to open a laundry for the employment of reformed prostitutes. The newspapers said Mansfield wisely selected Prince Karl a comedy in four acts for his benefit performance. Mansfield unfortunately however suffered financial loss due to falling audience attendances and canceled the show. He died from liver cancer 30 th August 1907 at the age of 50. At the time of his death The New York Times claimed, 'He was the greatest actor of his hour, and one of the greatest of all times'. MARY OF BREMEN* A male German hairdresser named Theophil Mary, born in th Alsace, was mentioned in the Scotland Yard files, 27 September 1888, and 19 October, having been arrested several times in Germany for assaulting women in Strasbourg and Bremen, stabbing them in the breasts and private parts with a sharp instrument. He had also in 1881 attempted to rape a 12 year old girl in his barbershop. The young girl was able to give a very good description of her assailant, and he was arrested the following day. Suspecting they had a possible Ripper suspect the British police contacted their German colleagues, only to find that Mary, having just served a seven year prison sentence, had been rearrested immediately and was now serving a further twelve months at Oslebshausen prison for the Strasbourg assaults, and was not due to be released until August 1889; therefore was in prison when the Whitechapel murders occurred. ARTHUR HENRY MASON* Mentioned in a Scotland Yard file which is now missing dated 18 th December 1888.
At 10.20 p.m. 16
November, 1888 John
Hemmings of 11 Youngs Buildings, Kingston, and William
Shulver of 201 Aspen Road, Starch Green, Middlesex,
informed PC 548T, Robert Large, they were drinking inside
the White Hart public house, Hampton Wick, Middlesex, and
were talking about the 'Whitechapel Murders' , when another
man Arthur Henry Mason who was in the public house and
upon hearing their conversation became excited. Mason's
strange behavior caused the men to become suspicious of him.
They thought his description matched that of the Ripper in the
newspapers, and dually informed PC Large. Mason lived at 12
Portland Road, Spring Grove, Kingston, and was employed as
a compositor at Kelly and Co, Kingston. He was described as
32 years of age, 5ft 9 inches tall, fresh complexion with a thin
face, whiskers and mustache. He was interviewed by the
police and his statement was proved to be correct.
th
th
THOMAS MASON
On the 28
April 1895 the Chicago Sunday Times published a
story in which it claimed the medium Robert Lees had
received a psychic impression of the Whitechapel murderer.
Seventeen murders later? The police asked for his assistance.
Throughout the night Lees followed a psychic trail
which ended at the house of an eminent Physician. The story goes on to say that the police questioned the doctor and his wife, eliciting the admission that the doctor suffered from occasional losses of memory, and had on one occasion regained it to find his shirt blood-stained. Proof of his guilt as Jack the Ripper was found in the house and he was committed to an asylum in Islington under the name Thomas Mason 124. Author Stephen Knight identifies Thomas Mason with Gull though miss-dates Mason's death as 1896. The real Thomas Mason was a 71 year old retired bookbinder whose address was given as Bookbinders' Alms Houses, Balls Pond, Islington. Mason who was born in 1817, had no connection with Gull, or Jack the Ripper, and was never incarcerated in an asylum. He died in 1902 from bronchitis in Islington Infirmary. th OLIVER MATHEWS* Mathews aroused the suspicion of Richard Watson, of 21 Old Square, Lincoln's Inn who while sitting next to him in the Trevor Music Hall, Knightsbridge, noticed that Mathews had in his possession a small black bag. Watson informed the police of his suspicions and Mathews was questioned and his bag searched. When his bag was opened it was found to contain only clean linen. Mathews, who had resided at 14 Wharton Street, Kings Cross, for over a year, and whose appearance did not answer that of the Whitechapel murderer was able to satisfactorily prove his innocence. JAMES MAYBRICK James Maybrick, born 25 th October 1838, in Liverpool, was at the time of the Whitechapel murders a 50 year old Liverpool cotton broker. He was named as Jack the Ripper after a diary, purporting to have been written by him, came into the possession of Michael Barrett, an unemployed, invalid, former merchant seaman and scrap metal dealer from Liverpool. Barrett had been given the diary in a pub by a casual friend Tony Devereux, who told Barrett to do something with it. Despite questioning from Barrett as to the diary's provenance, Devereux died shortly after from heart failure without ever revealing its true origins. After researching the 63 page handwritten journal, Barrett discovered that the writer, who signed the diary Jack the Ripper, was James Maybrick. Publication rights to the diary were secured by Smith Gryphon Limited, who published the diary in 1994 amid worldwide interest and intense debate among Ripperologists as to the diary's authenticity, a debate that continues to this day. On 27 June 1994 Michael Barrett told the Liverpool Daily Post that he had in fact forged the diary, using a scrapbook bought from an auctioneer's and ink from the Bluecoat Art Shop, only to retract his confession, then confess to forging the diary once more, a claim he maintains to this day. In July 1994 Barrett's estranged wife Ann Graham, in a statement said she had had the diary in her possession since 1989, and that it was given to her by her father, Billy Graham now (deceased), who in turn had received it in 1950 along with a pile of other books from his stepmother. She had passed it to Tony Devereux to give to Barrett in the hope that he would write a story around it, as he seemed to have lost his purpose in life. She had not thought that he would attempt to publish it. Another story relating to the diary's provenance is that workmen found it under floorboards that had been lifted for the first time in over a century at Battlecrease House, Maybrick's old home. Whatever the true origins of the diary may be makes little difference, for it is littered with errors. The writer of the diary th claims to have placed Mary Kelly's body parts around the room, left farthings at Annie Chapman's feet and attempted to remove Mary Ann Nichols head, all these claims are false, and the inaccuracies within the diary are almost endless. The writer of the diary claims two further murders in Manchester England, no records of any such murders have to date been found. If the provenance of the diary was not enough to contend with, a ladies 18 caret gold half-hunter watch, made by Henry Verity of Lancaster in 1846, supposedly owned by James Maybrick, was discovered shortly after the diary's appearance. Purchased by Mr. Albert Johnson (d. 2008) from Stewarts the Jewellers of Wallasey, Cheshire in July 1992 the watch Johnson noticed had the words, I am Jack - J. Maybrick, and the initials of his five victims scratched upon the inner case. Like the diary the watches authenticity is hotly debated. Without the diary Maybrick would not be a Ripper suspect, he did not fit any of the eyewitness descriptions, his known hand writing does not match the writing in the diary, his health did not begin to fail until 1889, so there is no explanation as to why the murders suddenly ceased. Until the emergence of the diary there is no evidence that James Maybrick was ever suspected or associated with the Ripper case. James Maybrick died in dubious circumstances on 11 May 1889, his wife Florence stood trial for murder and in a sensational trial was convicted of poisoning him with arsenic. Initially sentenced to death her sentence was commuted to life imprisonment. She was released in 1904 and died 23 October 1941. MICHAEL MAYBRICK Named as Jack the Ripper in the 2009 book – The Diary of Jack the Ripper another Chapter by James Stettler. Stettler in his book makes the following claims - that the Ripper diary was not written by James Maybrick, but by Michael Maybrick. That Michael Maybrick was homosexual or at least bisexual. That Michael disliked women and hated his sister in rd th law (Florence Maybrick) and was jealous and envious of his brother's relationship with a beautiful wife. It was this envy Stettler claims drove Micheal to murder. Michael Maybrick was the younger brother of Ripper suspect James Maybrick. The fourth of seven sons of William Maybrick an engraver, and parish Clerk at St Peters Church Liverpool, and his wife, Susannah who died 1 May 1880. William died in in 1870 and is buried in Anfield Cemetery. Michael was Born 31 st January 1841 at 8 Church Alley, Liverpool. A keen amateur cricketer yachtsman and cyclist, he was also a Freemason. From an early age he had a talent for music. Composer and singer best known under his pseudonym 'Stephen Adams' as the composer of 'The Holy City'". On 9 March 1893 he married his forty-year-old housekeeper, Laura Withers, and settled with her at Ryde on the Isle of Wight. Maybrick became chairman of the Isle of Wight Hospital, was a magistrate and was five times mayor of Ryde. His friends spoke of his charming personality, but others thought him arrogant and vain. He had been at Buxton for three weeks being treated for periodic gout when he died in his sleep of heart failure on 26 th
“Under the Skin,” and “The Suspect.” Next, the author uses time order in the story.
After reading ‘The Murder of Helen Jewett” it gave me insight on how crime in New York City was in the 1830’s and another view on how life for men and women differed. The book starts off talking about Dorcas Doyen famously known as Helen Jewett and how she was highly thought of but then the news comes out of nowhere with several stories about her past some twisted to make her seem as bad as a prostitute who has bounced around a few times could be seen. But her actual story was that she was born in 1814 in Temple, Maine to a regular working family. She lost both of her parents at a young age her mother died when she was at the early ages of her life and he father who was an alcoholic died shortly after her mother. She was put in a home, orphaned
On November 16, 2017, Horace Verbermockle was found lifeless as he laid down in the bathroom floor at his house. What happened to Horace Verbermockle?, his wife Minnie Verbermockle claims that Horace must have slipped on soap before she found him unconscious on the floor and alerted the doctor, who stated that Horace was dead when he got there. Minnie was the major suspect in the investigation by the fact that she was the first and only witness of the body. However after reviewing the evidence found at the scene, it is positive that Minnie Verbermockle murdered her husband Horace Verbermockle.
Grains, Bruce. “Inside the Mind of Joran Van de Sloot”.Crime Library.com. Web. 20 April 2014.
While reading the case about Mr.Hossack 's murder i saw the wife, Mrs.Hossack, as innocent at first. The children all claimed that the two did not argue for over a year, so why would she kill him now verses a year ago? When the youngest child, Ivan Hossack, came to the stand and "told his story in a straight, unhesitating manner" it made it easier for me to believe in Mrs. Hossack 's innocence. The child even said that he saw his mother aiding his father when he called out for help. If she had been the one to swing the axe, why would she help him and risk getting in trouble? Most importantly, if he was conscious and talking, why wouldn 't he say who to murderer was? He could have easily identified his wife in the dark after being married for over twenty years, and yet he didn 't identify who had tried to kill him. Dr. Dean first stated that the axe did not hit the speech portion of the brain, so he could have been conscious and yelling out for his wife. Dean later stated that the fatal blow from the axe would have left Mr.Hossack unconscious. The murder weapon had blood on in and apparent hairs stuck to one side; "Prof. John L. Tilton of Simpson college... was unable to say definitely that the hair had been
Buckman, Adam. “Following Footsteps of a Killer.” New York Post (Nov. 2002): 124: Proquest. Web. 28 Feb. 2014
Kappeler, V. E. & Potter, G.W. (2005). The mythology of crime and criminal justice (4th ed.).
Murder on a Sunday morning is a documentary of an unfortunate mishap with the legal justice system that happens one of many times. In Jacksonville, Florida the year of 2001, May 8th there was a horrific scenery at Ramada hotel. A women named Mary Ann Stevens and her husband were tourists, while leaving their room early Sunday morning around 9AM a gunshot fatally killed Mary Ann and ended the couple’s vacation. When cops arrived at the scene and investigated they took notes on what the suspect looked like from the husband, “ The suspect is skinny black male dark shorts unknown shirt on foot running south bound…. Fishlike hat on.”- cop at the scene. When the cops were driving around they’ve spotted an African American
The article “The Murder They Heard” written by Stanley Milgram and Paul Hollander is a response to the article that Martin Gansberg “38 Who Saw Murder Didn’t Call the Police”. Milgram and Hollander explain why they do not agree that the neighbors of Catherine Genovese should have called the police. Milgram and Hollander give reasons why they disagree with Gansberg, and why I should agree with what they are saying. After reading both articles, I felt very conflicted with who I agree with, but after much deliberation, I realized that I agree more with Milgram and Hollander. The neighbors should not be blamed for Genovese’s death. We should try to understand why they did not call the police. There are a few things you need to take into consideration,
Jack Laidlaw is a universe apart from other examples of detectives, he examines the more intriguing issues of how and why people can commit the reprehensible crime of murder and the harrowing aftermath of crime and violence. Jack Laidlaw can deeply understand people more than anyone could ever imagine. Jack Laidlaw is an odd sort of detective, and this is an odd sort of novel. He lives and works in the gloomy, cheerless heart of urban Glasgow; and he keeps the works of "Camus"," Unamuno" and "Kierkegaard"in his top desk drawer, "where other detectives would normally rather keep their secret stashes of liquor." Unlike many other detectives with uppity tastes in literature, no one congratulates him for this or encourages him in any way; the whole world tells him that However, he persists in trying to understand crimes as well as solve them: “You want to live as if the rest of the world was just a necessary evil and that you have to be a monster to be a criminal,it's not true, it's all in peoples concealed heads. That may be a nuisance to you.
Berns, Walter. "Getting Away With Murder." Commentary 97.4 (1994): 25. MAS Ultra - School Edition. Web. 14
Brown, S & Esbensen, F & Geis, G,. Criminology, Explaining Crime and it's Context. 7th ed.
Michaud, S. G., & Aynesworth, H. (2000). Ted Bundy: Conversations with a Killer. Irving, Texas: Authorlink Press.
Agatha Christie depicts a descriptive, fictional murder mystery in the novel ABC Murders. With the help of the narrator, Captain Arthur Hastings, Hercule Poirot solves the murders of four victims who are killed in alphabetical order by Franklin Clarke, more commonly known as ABC. The story elicits copious high points but the rare low point as well. Examples of these aspects can be found within the plot, setting, characters, conflict, and theme of the book. According to Stanford’s Suggested Reading List, the book is considered a “must read.” ABC Murders definitely holds up to the reputation placed upon it by Stanford and would be a favorable choice for anyone wishing to read a well written novel.
Muncie, J., and Mclaughin, E. (1996) The Problem of Crime. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publication Ltd.