Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Bismarck's domestic policies
Imperialism in europe 1800s-1900s
Bismarck's domestic policies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Bismarck's domestic policies
Rudyard Kipling’s “White Man Burden” highlights the struggles that white men go through in order to protect non-Westerners. These struggles include lack of recognition when it comes to protecting non-Westerners, “…the blame of those ye better, The hate of those ye guard.” During the late 19th century we see a significant amount of European imperialistic influence in Africa as well as Asia. Many European powers were anxious to get a piece of Africa, increasing tension all over Europe. Chancellor of Germany at the time Otto von Bismarck called a conference of Berlin to ease the tension. During the years of 1884 and 1885 there were multiple meetings held, in which European nations agreed that “…control of settlements along the African coast guaranteed …show more content…
Before the presence of Europeans, Africans were doing just fine and were very much civilized people. In their hearts and minds, many Europeans thought they were fulfilling some kind duty or mission when colonizing Africa, as if they were destined for it. While many Europeans were making a life of their own outside Europe, the rest of them were dealing with the fall in birth rate. Cousin of Charles Darwin, Sir Francis Galton coined the term eugenics. Since European population decreasing, Galton used eugenics to inform Europeans that having children with other races is bad idea; white people should only breed with other white people, because they are the superior race. Galton and his followers created the Eugenics Education Society, “Their aim was practical rather than scholarly: to spread the wisdom of eugenics as widely as possible in society, with the aim of improving the population as a whole.”As a way of gaining popularity they began printing out pamphlets with images that could be easily understood by individuals. One of these images shows an attractive family of six who are wearing togas. These togas take us back to the times of classical Rome and Greece which was when the white race was the greatest; there was no other in comparison. Images like these plant seeds of incredible pride, as well as well as hatred towards other races. …show more content…
There was high competition amongst European leaders to see who can get the best resources in African and Asia. Nations like Germany and England already had open markets while France was still lagging behind, Ferry used the need for open markets to justify colonization. When Ferry went to address the French National Assembly in 1803 about his conquest to Africa and he received a lot of criticism in return. One of his critics, Jules Maigne felt that imperialism totally goes against France’s declaration of rights of men. Another critic, De Guilloutet argued that imperialism would bring back slavery and slave trade, which at the time was banned by France. Ferry did not let the critics sway his decision or opinion on colonization. He urged the importance of colonization by reminding the French men of how much more superior they are then black people. To Ferry, colonization meant a better economy for France, and he used that to sway his critic’s decision. Many of his critics felt colonization was morally and ethically wrong, but since it would be beneficial to France, they were willing to accept
In many accounts of the Africans, the Africans were in disagreement with the European's Scramble for Africa. Ndansi Kumalo an African veteran wrote in 1896 if many of them to give or keep their land. In a distrustful and agony tone he spoke of how the poor treatment of the Africans in the Ndebele rebellion against the British advances in South America to convince many others not to stay because it has impacted many Africans and many died in the process of it. He says “So we surrendered to the White people and were told to go back to our homes and live our usual lives and attend to our crops. They came and were overbearing. We were ordered to carry their clothes and bundles (Doc.4).” A German military officer in 1896 wrote in a newspaper article about the reactions of the Africans about the white settlers. In an awed tone he wrote about the 1906 account of the Maji Maji Rebellion in German East Africa and to give an example of how the Africans believed in a magic medicine would help them defend themselves against the white settlers (Doc.8). Mojimba an African chief in 1907 described a battle in 1877 on the Congo River against British and African mercenaries to a German catholic missionary. In an appalled and hateful tone he used this description to show that these whi...
The concept of eugenics was not initially intended to prevent overcrowding, however, it would later be used as a form of population control. Eugenics is the idea of improving society by breeding fitter people. Francis Galton was the first person to originate this term and was a major proponent of the concept during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The practice of eugenics was originally performed through the use of selective breeding. Eugenics was a progressive idea, driven by social perceptions. In fact, "many of its most strident advocates were socialist, who saw eugenics as enlightened state planning of reproduction."2 Fearing the degradation of society, the elite desired to prevent further social decay of the world by eliminating individuals who were considered unfit physically, mentally, or socially.
The term eugenics was coined in the late 19th century. Its goal was to apply the breeding practices and techniques used in plants and animals to human reproduction. Francis Galton stated in his Essays in Eugenics that he wished to influence "the useful classes" in society to put more of their DNA in the gene pool. The goal was to collect records of families who were successful by virtue of having three or more adult male children who have gain superior positions to their peers. His view on eugenics can best be summarized by the following passage:
Europe, in the late 1800’s, was starting for a land grab in the African continent. Around 1878, most of Africa was unexplored, but by 1914, most of Africa, with the lucky exception of Liberia and Ethiopia, was carved up between European powers. There were countless motivations that spurred the European powers to carve Africa, like economical, political, and socio–cultural, and there were countless attitudes towards this expansion into Africa, some of approval and some of condemnation.
because French colonists had only profits from their trade to live on. Those who were against slavery (documents 9, 15). used The Declaration of Rights of Man as their main source. in that it declared equal rights to all men, not just to whites. men.
He was in power during the Opportunist government. The Colonial Consensus was his way of justifying the empire. He illustrated several points that justified imperial rule: economic necessity, civilization, and power. He emphasized the importance of colonies from an economic standpoint. Colonies provided raw material, cheap labor, and a stable market for exports. It was also important for the French to spread their civilization to the native people of the colonies so that they may one day assimilate to French culture. The final point emphasized colonies as sources of power. A large empire would give France more power and allow it to keep pace with the other European nations. These justifications encouraged the government to actively begin colonization. France then conquered the entirety of Vietnam and overthrew the emperor; they then combined Laos and Cambodia with Vietnam and created French Indochina. In Africa the French already possessed Algeria, and they proceeded to take more of the Ivory Coast. When the expansion coincided with other European nations, the Berlin Conference was convened to prevent major conflict. France was officially given Algeria, West Africa, and Equatorial
The eugenics movement started in the early 1900s and was adopted by doctors and the general public during the 1920s. The movement aimed to create a better society through the monitoring of genetic traits through selective heredity. Over time, eugenics took on two different views. Supporters of positive eugenics believed in promoting childbearing by a class who was “genetically superior.” On the contrary, proponents of negative eugenics tried to monitor society’s flaws through the sterilization of the “inferior.”
This resulted in the decline of 70% of the Herero population.1 Nowhere else was colonialism quite so brutal, but almost everywhere it tended towards unrestrained brutality as soon as it was challenged.2 Warfare created considerable unrest among African people. Afterwards, the people of Africa came to the realization that the consequences of resistance against European colonists could be devastating. As well, the Europeans demonstrated that they had the technology and resources to gain control. Secondly, colonial expansion changed the face of Africa’s political structure. The Berlin Conference of 1884-85, attended by 13 European nations and the USA, set the ground rules for partition of Africa.
The idea of eugenics was first introduced by Sir Francis Galton, who believed that the breeding of two wealthy and successful members of society would produce a child superior to that of two members of the lower class. This assumption was based on the idea that genes for success or particular excellence were present in our DNA, which is passed from parent to child. Despite the blatant lack of research, two men, Georges Vacher de Lapouge and Jon Alfred Mjoen, played to the white supremacists’ desires and claimed that white genes were inherently superior to other races, and with this base formed the first eugenics society. The American Eugenics Movement attempted to unethically obliterate the rising tide of lower classes by immorally mandating organized sterilization and race based experimentation.
The beginning of the Eugenics Movement all started at Cold Spring Harbor, New York. The United States coined the term Eugenics from Great Britain in the early 1900s. In the year 1910, a man by the name of Charles B. Davenport founded the Eugenics Records Office (ERO). The funds for this building came from Mrs. E.H. Harriman (“Eugenics: Did the Eugenics Movement Benefit the United States?”). The movement was initially meant to purify the Gene Pool. One of the ways this was done was through immigration control. The mixing of genes (mixing of different races) was extremely frowned upon for the unknown outcomes that would eventually surface. One issue that was very high priority was “feeblemindedness” within the gene pool; the ERO wanted to remove this mutated gene to make the non-feebleminded people prosper, making them the “strongest” gene carriers (“Learning from History: Long Island’s Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, circa 1920.”). The bulk of the movement happened within three decades, in order to start the change towards fitter families (“Learning from History: Long Island’s Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, circa 1920.”).
According to his critics it was unfair for Ferry to make such remarks in a country which had had declared the rights of man. In addition, his critics argue that his remarks are only meant to give justification to slavery. However ferry answers their criticism by asserting that the law allowed him to impose regular commerce upon them, and that superior races had a right, because they had certain obligations. From Ferry's point of view France had a duty to civilize inferior races. On this point he receives more criticism from honorable M. Camille Pelletan. Pelletan such jeered in his own refined and clever manner. Additionally, he questioned how civilization could be imposed with cannon-balls. He dismissed Ferry's arguments as another form of barbarism. He questions whether the populations, with the inferior races, had the same rights as France did. Further he questioned whether the inferior races where not masters of their own houses. Pelletan in his argument also raised the question as to whether the inferior races had called upon France in their nations. He concluded his argument by claiming that if Ferry policies were to be followed then France would be acting against the will of the inferior races and instead of offering civilization it would be offering civilization it would be offering
At the time, Eugenics seemed like a very reasonable, intelligent thing to support. Looking back upon it today, we can see that it was flawed, unreasonable, and completely corrupt. Eugenics, according to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, is “a science that deals with the improvement of hereditary qualities of a race or breed”. The people of this movement believed that flawed qualities
Toward the end of the nineteenth century European countries tried to embark on new territories also called the new imperialism. It became a competition to obtain new territories for ports, coaling stations, and to keep the French, Germans, and Russians from setting up bases that harmed British interests. Imperialism also affected social Darwinism and racism. This led society to believe that some races dominated over others like in The White Man’s Burden by Rudyard Kipling and Black Man’s Burdens by Edward Morel. Kipling’s main argument in the poem is that the white man is superior to the other races.
Africa’s struggle to maintain their sovereignty amidst the encroaching Europeans is as much a psychological battle as it is an economic and political one. The spillover effects the system of racial superiority had on the African continent fractured ...
Throughout history, imperialism has led countries to extend their rule over weaker countries and then colonized those countries to expand their own power. Imperialism allows the ruling countries to use the weaker countries for their resources. Colonizing other countries would then lead to growth and a better reputation for the dominating country. There are many examples of imperialism throughout European history. When many European countries “scrambled” for Africa, it seemed as though Africa had no say in anything. During the 19th century, Europe found a way to use Africa for their own growth and power. Using Africa for their resources, the Europeans colonized Africa without a second thought. European imperialism in Africa had a negative impact because of social disarray, cultural loss, and death it caused.