Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Teen suicide conclusion
Teen suicide conclusion
Suicide among the youth
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Teen suicide conclusion
Quinton L. Edwards Jr. November 22, 2014 Instructor: Trisha Kipps ADJ 228 Psychiatric Prescription Abuse Research Guy Says Zoloft Made Him Kill His Grandparents According to an article on the website www.foxnews.com entitled, Teen in Zoloft Trial Gets 30 years by Associated Press, there was a 15 year old boy named Christopher Pittman that said that the drug Zoloft caused him to kill his grandparents and burn their house down. The article stated that the murder took place in 2001. Pittman was only 12 years old when the murders took place. The article said that Pittman used a shotgun to murder both of his grandparents while they were sleeping. After he murdered them he set the house on fire and left the home driving his grandparent’s vehicle. The article on the website www.foxnews.com also stated that a month before Christopher Pittman killed his grandparents he had been hospitalized because he had threatened to kill himself. Physicians prescribed him the drug Paxil and later he was …show more content…
prescribed Zoloft. The article states that during the trial a psychiatrist had testified in the defense of Pittman saying that Zoloft made him kill his grandparents. The article also stated that a former Food and Drug Administration official testified that the murders were chemically induced. The article said that one of Pittman’s lawyers said that Zoloft impaired his ability to think properly so he should not be held responsible for the murder. The article on the website www.foxnews.com stated that earlier Pittman had been disciplined by his grandparents because he choked another student on the school bus.
The article also said that during the trial the prosecution argued that Pittman’s decision making was not impaired by the drug Zoloft. The prosecution felt that he was just angry at his grandparents for discipline him. The article stated that Pittman’s age should not be a factor in the case because of the maliciousness of the crimes. Pittman shot his grandfather in the mouth and shot his grandmother in the head while they were sleeping. In this case I would have agreed with the prosecution because I do not believe that Zoloft would make anyone so impaired that you would commit murder. Pittman was convicted and sentenced to 30 years. The article stated that his lawyers stated that they would file an appeal questioning if the state was in violation of the constitution for trying a juvenile for murder in an adult
court. According to an article on the website www.chronicle.augusta.com entitled New Trial granted for SC man in Zoloft case by Associated Press, in July 2010 a judge ordered a new trial in the Pittman case. The article stated that Judge Roger Young stated that the defense team for Pittman made a lot of errors. The article said that his defense team never explained to him that if he agreed to a plea deal that he could possibly get a shorter jail sentence. The article also said that Judge Young said that Pittman’s defense attorneys also did not tell a lawyer appointed as his guardian ad litem about the possibility of the deal. The article also stated that Judge Young also said that Pittman’s defense team did not look at the unlikeliness that the Zoloft defense would result in an acquittal. In the article Young stated that his defense team did not consider negotiations of a plea deal to voluntary manslaughter. According to the article no new trial date has been set for Pittman. I believe that Pittman should have been convicted and sentenced to 30 years without the possibility of parole. I do not think that Judge Young should have granted him a new trial. I do not believe that his age should have been a factor in the case. I believe that at the time of the murders Pittman knew exactly what he was doing. I do not think that the drug Zoloft caused him to commit the murders. If Zoloft caused Pittman to not be in his right state of mind and interfered with his decision making, why was it that his mind was clear enough for him to know that he needed to cover up the crime? He burned the house down to make sure that there was no evidence that he committed the crime. His mind was also clear enough to know that he needed to get away from the home because he drove his grandparents car away from the crime scene. I believe that the first 30 year sentence that he received was sufficient for the crimes that were committed. No new trial should have been granted. In conclusion, in the case of Christopher Pittman where he was convicted of killing his grandparents while they were sleeping, I think that the 30 year sentence was a sufficient punishment for the crimes that he committed. I also do not think that Judge Young should have granted a new trial. I also do not believe that the drug Zoloft caused him to commit the murders. Work Cited Press, A. (2005, Febuary 15). Teen in Zoloft Defense Trial Gets 30 Years. Retrieved November 22, 2014 Press, A. (2010, July 27). New trial granted for SC man in Zoloft case. Retrieved November 22, 2014
There was a presumption against the teenager’s plea for bail due to the fact the adolescent had partaken in an activity classified as a serious indictable offence. He was brought to the jurisdiction of Campbelltown Children’s court since his age was less than 18 years old where he was charged with the murder of Wayne Boyce.
Throughout the trial, defense attorneys attempted to argue Salvi was suffering from psychological disorders that would make him incompetent for trial. Ultimately, however Salvi was found competent to stand trial. After reading Salvi’s full psychiatric interview, the official court transcript of the four-day competency hearing, and the day-to-day summary; I have come to agree that the defendant, John Salvi was competent to stand trial.
He was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, but some thought he might actually be suffering from drug-induced toxic psychosis. He visited the emergency room for testimonials that bones were coming out the back of his head, someone stole his pulmonary arteries, his stomach was backwards, and his heart stopped beating sometimes. He was also diagnosed with hypochondria, where he believed his heart was in danger of shrinking until disappearance. He then came to the solution that drinking blood of animals or humans would stop the shrinking. He was also interviewed and said that he killed to stay alive. He was admitted to a mental institution and was prescribed antidepressants. He was allowed to leave anytime he wanted. He was left unsupervised and his mother told him that he did not need the
The appeal was filed based on the fact that Smith’s presentence investigation report(PSIR) revealed that he had an extensive juvenile record which included a history of at least twelve offenses. Smith argued that he was entitled to resentencing under MCR 5.913, rewritten as MCR 5.925(E). The information in the PSIR was supposed to be automatically expunged pursuant to former MCR 5.913(People v. Smith, 2016). The Court of Appeals considered two panels of discussion before deciding in favor of the
Zoloft was first introduced to the United States in 1980’s. Another name for Zoloft is sertraline and is in a group of antidepressants called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. At first Zoloft was made to treat major depressive disorder, but as the drug progressed over time it can now treat panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, and premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Zoloft is the most commonly used antidepressant because it works extremely well, it is safe, and its side effects are not as serious as other antidepressants.
Charles has agreed to medication protocol of Haldol injections and Resperadol. He adamantly refuses psychotherapy. While hospitalized Charles makes reference to being sexually abused he refuses to go into depth or give specifics. Prior to the diagnosis Charles’s mother reports became withdrawn at the age of seven Charles’s father died in a car accident.
The age of a criminal should not have an effect over the sentencing of the defendant. Adrian Jerry Gonzalez was charged with murder when he raped and killed an 8-year-old named Madison Middleton in a California beach town. In her article "California teenager, 15, charged in killing of 8-year-old girl appears in court", Nina Golgowski speaks about the charges Adrian jerry Gonzalez had to face and why he was facing those charges. Nina Golgowski states, "Once inside, he tied her up, sexually assaulted and killed her.." She also goes on to say, " The charges could send Gonzalez to prison in life." Gonzalez
If a family member was murdered, a family member was murdered, age should not dictate if the punishment for homicide will be more lenient or not. If anyone not just juveniles has the capabilities to take someone's life and does so knowing the repercussions, they should be convicted as an adult. In the case of Jennifer Bishop Jenkins who lost her sister, the husband and their unborn child, is a strong advocate of juveniles being sentenced to life without parole. In her article “Jennifer Bishop Jenkins On Punishment and Teen Killers” she shows the world the other side of the spectrum, how it is to be the victim of a juvenile in a changing society where people are fighting against life sentences for juveniles. As she states in the article “There are no words adequate to describe what this kind of traumatic loss does to a victims family. So few who work on the juvenile offender side can truly understand what the victims of their crimes sometimes go through. Some never
Every once in awhile, a case comes about in which the defendant confesses to a crime, but the defense tries to argue that at the time the defendant was not sane. This case is no different; the court knows the defendant is guilty the only aspect they are unsure about is the punishment this murderer should receive. The State is pushing for a jail sentence and strongly believes that the defendant was sane at the time of the murder. It is nearly impossible for the defense to prove their evidence burden of 51%. The State claims that the defendant was criminally responsible at the time of the murder. By using excessive exaggeration, premeditation and motive, the Prosecution will prove that the defendant knew exactly what he was doing and how wrong it was.
Throughout and for many years there has been a lot of controversy on how to trial someone who has committed a crime under the age of 18. A lie will be a lie even if it 's serious or innocent and that 's why just like a crime will always be a crime, no matter what the situation is. The age of a person who has committed murder shouldn 't be an issue or a complication. Many advocate that the juvenile is just a child, but despised that I believe that is no justification or defense for anyone who does a crime. America and the nation need to apprehend that juveniles that are being conducted to life in prison is not just for one small incident or crime, but for several severe crimes according to Jennifer Jenkins, Juvenile Justice Information
Psychotropic medications, also referred to as psychiatric or psychotherapeutic medications, are used to treat psychiatric disorders, such as: depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety disorders, and attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). They have been used for many years and oftentimes come with dangerous side effects. The side effects that often occur in children taking these medications can include: fainting, blurred vision, vomiting, extreme weight gain, and even death ("Seroquel information,” n.d.). The use of psychotropic medication to treat mental disorders in children and adolescents is highly controversial because of ethical viewpoints (i.e. parents “drugging” their children to calm them down) and potentially harmful side effects, but one has to take into consideration whether the risks outweigh the benefits when deciding whether or not to give this type of medication to children.
In summary, the article talked about the effects that antidepressant pills have on children. Immense publicity about antidepressants causing suicidal behavior in children is prompting more parents to hesitate to take their kids to psychiatrists. More doctors are hesitating to put their patients on antidepressant prescriptions. Last October, the Food and Drug Administration ordered black box labels, the most severe warning, on all anti-depressants. Some doctors think that these medicines are "speed bumps" and might end in more suicides. Other doctors think, "For children who really need treatment, a wait and see' approach could be dangerous." The percentage rate of children's antidepressant prescriptions has dropped within the last couple months. Psychiatrist Bruce Black says, "Kids are unhappy for a lot of reasons, and antidepressants often aren't the solution."
Not only was Perry Smith a male who massacred a family of total strangers, but he also had obvious signs of mental illness (Capote 366), a common characteristic of even the best serial killers (Forensic Science 563).... ... middle of paper ... ... Detroit: UXL, 2005.
Fatal complications occur from regular use, for example, liver damage, seizures, elevated blood pressure causing stroke, heart failure, or heart attack. Another growing fad in the United States is the abuse of prescription drugs. The abuse is being done by not only adults, but by teens. The most current trend today is the misuse of cough syrups and prescription medications to produce a “high.” Other medications abused today are stimulants (Ritalin), and benzodiazepines (Xanax).
She explained that his involvement in the crime was not excessive and that it was his brother who was the leader. She went on to describe his eight previous arrests for crimes like robbery and cocaine possession. Given his long history she said she was not surprised to see him involved in this kind of case. Because of his other charges I thought the prosecutor was going to suggest the higher end of the sentencing guidelines. However, as she continued I realized I was incorrect. Instead of focusing on his previous crimes she talked about how he needed rehabilitation. She emphasized recovery from his current lifestyle more than sending him to prison again. She brought up his involvement in his church and his successful marriage and questioned why he would throw all of that away. She also suggested that he turn to his church and his wife for support and to aid him in his battle with addiction. Throughout the case, the prosecutor was compassionate and seemed more like a disappointed parent to the defendant rather than angry. The one time the prosecutor did act somewhat harsh was towards the middle of her statement. She brought up the fact that the defendant had previous medical conditions such as a stab and shot wounds. She suggested that the defense had asked for these injuries to be taken into account when the sentence was decided on. She was adamant that the court should not take