Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How sweatshops and globalization are linked
Impacts of sweatshops
Impacts of sweatshops
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How sweatshops and globalization are linked
Sweat shops in other countries are most of the time looked on as bad from our point of view and not the locals. In the Book Where am I Wearing, by Kelsey Timmerman the narrator explains through his stories that life in poor countries is hard. The narrator also explains that the sweat shops and low paying factory jobs may not help the individual citizen but it does help the country as a whole. Kelsey Timmerman had discussed in his books on how sweatshops can be bad but they also bring good to the people that work for them. For example long hours with little pay in china and cambodia but it brought the country’s economy and exports up significantly. In the countries China and Bangladesh low wages and long hours plague the working class in these countries. In china the narrator Kelsey Timmerman was traveling around looking to see if he could find the company that made his flip flops. During this encounter he met a couple that showed him around their daily life in China. They told him at first that they didn’t mind …show more content…
working 16 hour day and sometimes not even getting paid for overtime or otherwise they would lose their job. This couple also had to sacrifice their preferred life of living in the country side with their son and parents. In Bangladesh the narrator met a man name Dalton who was a very refined man but had come from a very poor lifestyle. Dalton took Kelsey to his home village to see what life was like for him when he was younger. Kelsey found out that an average monthly salary for someone that lives in Bangladesh in 67$ a month. Kelsey spent that much treating the children of the village to an amusement park and pizza. In Cambodia children and teenagers have very little education because they start to work at a very young age. The narrator when in Cambodia saw many children that in America would be in school but since they lived in Cambodia they worked. Kelsey saw children at the age of four and five by themselves begging on street corners for money. Cambodia is not just bad because of four year olds by themselves begging it is the memory of war that is still around. Cambodia was at war for a long time so farmers have to watch their step a lot of the time because they may be stepping on a land mine. This is not isolated either it is spread across the entire country. These old military dangers can affect development, farming and progress for a country that’s trying to expand and grow. In Levi factories in cambodia there are machines called sandblasters that take perfectly good jeans and tear holes in them because that’s what the westerners want. These machines give off an intense amount of heat and since there is poor ventilation in the factories it creates a dangerous temperature of heat that can cuase the works to fait and pass out. These are one of the ways factories in others countries were dubbed the name sweat shop. Globalization has its good sides and its bad sides.
Kelsey Timmerman tries to explain to us that even thought the work conditions are bad the people in these countries do not seem to mind because they enjoy getting paid to provide for their families. By europe and north america putting factories in very poor countries the labor is cheaper so it is cheaper to make jeans so it is cheaper for us to buy jeans. Outsourcing the product to other countries also help the other countries economy. The Cambodian economy exports 90% clothing all over the world. This enormous amount of exports helps this country grow out of a poverty state and into a modern and well structured country. The problem with having a country exports 90% clothing they do not have any diversity to their economy. This can be very dangerous because then if the clothing demand goes down or a cheaper country is found to make products then the countrys whole infrastructure could
collapse. Kelsey Timmerman did a very good job explaining the good and bad parts of globalization. He explained that there are such places as sweat shops but this doesnt mean that they are bad. The people there are getting enough money to feed and clothe themselves and their families. He also showed that their can be dangerous condition in factories if they are not attended to but most of the factories he visited were not that bad bosses to their employes. Kelsey Timmerman did a good job providing the pros and cons of globalization and he let us decide if it still was a really bad thing.
It is often said that products made in sweatshops are cheap and that is why people buy those products, but why is it behind the clothes or shoes that we wear that make sweatshops bad? In the article Sweat, Fire and Ethics by Bob Jeffcott is trying to persuade the people and tell them how sweatshops are bad. Bob Jeffcott supports the effort of workers of the global supply chains in order to win improved wages and good working conditions and a better quality of life of those who work on sweatshops. He mentions and describes in detail how the conditions of the sweatshops are and how the people working in them are forced to long working hours for little money. He makes the question, “we think we can end sweatshops abuses by just changing our individual buying habits?” referring to we can’t end the abuses that those women have by just stopping of buying their products because those women still have to work those long hours because other people are buying their product for less pay or less money.
Some of the arguments against sweatshops raised by Americans is the they take jobs away from the American people. In the job force it is becoming harder to find an open position any where. Instead of keeping the factories here the companies are shipped over seas, causing millions of job opportunities for Americans to be lost. Some arguments raised by the United Students Against Sweatshops (USAS) are the poor working conditions, low wages, long hours, and children in the factories. The damp, dark, and cold environment can depress the workers even more than they may be, causing rates in suicide to increase. Low wages is another concern USAS have. The workers barley get enough money to survive.
Look down at the clothes you're wearing right now, chances are almost every single thing you are currently wearing was made in a sweatshop. It is estimated that between 50-75% of all garments are made under sweatshop like conditions. Designers and companies get 2nd party contractors to hire people to work in these factories, this is a tool to make them not responsible for the horrendous conditions. They get away with it by saying they are providing jobs for people in 3rd world countries so its okay, but in reality they are making their lives even worse. These companies and designers only care about their bank accounts so if they can exploit poor, young people from poverty stricken countries they surely will, and they do. A sweatshop is a factory
...e their product. Sweatshops are found usually all over the world and need to make a better decision as in more labor laws, fair wages, and safety standards to better the workers' conditions. It should benefit the mutually experiences by both the employers and the employees. Most important is the need to be educated about their rights and including local labor laws.
What are sweatshops? The Miriam-Webster dictionary defines sweatshops as: A shop or factory in which employees work for long hours at low wages and under unhealthy conditions. These factories are mainly located in Third-World countries, although there are still a few in the United States. Many popular, name brand companies like Nike, use sweatshops around the world. Today there is much controversy about sweatshops and whether they should be banned and closed. In reality, the conditions of these factories are terrible. The employees are paid very little, even after working long, hard hours. The supervisors of these shops are often cruel, malicious, and brutal. Sadly, these factories are often the only source of income for Third-World workers. As bad as these sweatshops might be, they have pulled many countries and individuals out of poverty. So, are sweatshops beneficial?
Some people of North America know about these sweatshop workers, they feel bad and some also protest. They set up NGOs, send funds and donations but they never try to break the tradition of sweatshop working. They all assume that this is best for the society. An Idea can be drawn from William
In China, Kelsey Timmerman spent time with a couple who worked at the Teva factory, traveled to the countryside to meet the couple’s son, insert name, who hasn’t seen his parents in three years due to his parents working long hours and it being expensive to take a train ride. In the US, the author visited one of a few clothing factories in the US to talk to the workers about his shorts, and the decrease of American garment factories. Timmerman wants the consumer to be more engaged and more thoughtful when mindlessly buying clothes. By researching how well the brands you want to buy from monitor their factories and what their code of ethics details, you can make a sound decision on if this is where you would want to buy your clothes. The author writes about brands that improve employers lives like SoleRebels, a shoe company who employs workers and gives them health insurance, school funds for their children, and six months of maternity leave. Brands like soleRebels that give workers benefits most factory workers have never even heard of help improve the lives of garment workers and future generations. From reading this book, Timmerman wants us to be more educated about the lives of garment workers, bridge the gap between consumers and manufacturers, and be a more engaged and mindful consumer when purchasing our
They explained that they, like most ‘Westerners’, initially agreed that the workings of these garment industries were unpardonable and cruel, however their opinions changed after interviewing the workers of such factories in Thailand. Countless people explained to the two reporters how grateful they were for the work. The article made it abundantly clear that the workers were not “indifferent to their own affliction; but that they simply had a different perspective from the West when it came to what constituted desirable work.” Often times, as members of the Western Society, we forget the importance of circumstances, and the perspective they provide – including different norms and expectations for all ways of living. In due course the article “came to appreciate outsourcing as a clear sign of an industrial revolution that is beginning to reshape the Global South and that boycotting certain clothing in protest only digresses the effort made in
The film Mardi Gras: Made in China was produced, directed, and edited by David Redmon, thoroughly highlights corruption within the working class of China. An impressive look at the effects of cultural and economic globalization, Mardi Gras: Made in China is a movie that relies on the factual stories of Mardi Gras revelers and Fuzhou factory workers. The overall working gender within the working class in China is 95% women and 5% men, this demonstrates the fact that women workers are much easier to control than men within the industry. This film focuses on the true stories of the factory workers and offers special access to a bead-making factory. The working conditions are depressing, the lifestyles of the workers are awful, and the chronic
Americans do not realize the amount of clothing we wear on a daily basis is actually made in Cambodia, such as Adidas and even the Gap. The women that work for these sweatshops in Cambodia sew for 50 cents an hour, which is what allows stores in America, such as H&M to sell inexpensive clothing (Winn, 2015). The conditions these Cambodian workers face are a noisy, loud, and extremely hot environment where people are known for having huge fainting attacks. When workers were on strike a year ago, authorities actually shot multiple people just because they were trying to raise their pay. There is plenty of evidence of abuse captured through many interviews of workers from different factories, and is not just a rarity these places see often or hear of. Factories hire children, fire pregnant women because they are slow and use the bathroom to much, scream at regular workers if they use the toilet more than two times a day, scam hard working employees with not paying them their money they worked for and more, and workers are sent home and replaced if 2,000 shirts are not stitched in one day. Expectations are unrealistic and not suitable for employees to be working each day for more than ten
... then, but these new sweatshops sound better and more desirable to work in. If workers are happy and the company is happy with what’s going on then I don't think it should be a big deal because there are more important things that the U.S. needs to keep their focus on.
Sweatshop is a common term used to refer to factories that typically produce apparel; that have very low wages by modern U.S. standards, long working hours, and unsafe or unhealthy working conditions; that often don't obey labor laws; and that would generally be considered
Christopoulos, D. (2007). “The problem with sweatshops is that there are not enough of them” . Hamilton Institute Weekly. Retrieved from www.hamiltoninstitute.com/index.php?option=com_content&task
While Cindy feels miserable and homesick, trying to adjust to her new life, her family is forced to leave the river which they have lived by for years growing crops to survive. Effects of China’s Economic Reform on Family, Social, and Educational Structure Family
These concerns typically include the rights of the children, the responsibility of the parents and employers, and the well-being and safety of the children. In Stefan Spath’s “The Virtues of Sweatshops,” it is made very clear that he, like many others, feel that the general public is highly misinformed on what sweatshops are and what they actually contribute to their respective communities. In the eyes of someone from a developed country, sweatshops and child labor that takes place in them seem primitive and are interpreted as simply a means by which companies can spend less money on employers. He states that when labor unions claim that companies which establish operations in developing nations create unemployment in America, they aren’t really explaining the whole story. The author claims that those who are adamantly protest sweatshops are only telling half the story with a claim like this. He points out in this part that the American people can rest assured that high skilled jobs will not be taken over to developing countries because “– high-skilled jobs require a level of worker education and skills that poorer countries cannot