Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the definition of happiness
Essay on defining happiness
The definition of happiness
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on the definition of happiness
Boethius’ discussion of happiness is carefully crafted and begins with discussing Fortune, and all of the things Boethius has won and lost throughout his life at the turn of her wheel. For Boethius, it is the reversal of fortune that seems to lead to his unhappiness. “In all adversity of fortune, the most wretched kind is once to have been happy” (61). Lady Philosophy corrects his thinking, however, by demonstrating that the many things men believe will make them happy can never actually achieve that promise. Chief among these false paths to happiness are wealth, rank, and power.
Speaking on Wealth, Lady Philosophy says, “wealth cannot make a man free of want and self-sufficient, though this was the very promise we saw it offering” (83). Moreover, Philosophy points out that the gathering of wealth does not stop people from taking that wealth away (83). Indeed, by its very nature, wealth seems contradictory. If we collect wealth, we believe we will be self-sufficient and free of want, so we hoard it; But “being miserly always makes men hated” (65). In its acquisition, wealth takes away from others, as it is a limited thing, and only brings hatred and paranoia to those who gather it. “[I]t is only when money is transferred to others in the exercise of liberality and ceases to be possessed that it becomes valuable” (65). The acquisition of wealth, then, is folly and can never grant true happiness.
To escape the detestation of others such as wealth might breed, men seek instead positions of rank that promise them honor and prestige. Philosophy counters this supposition by asking, “Surely such offices don’t have the power of planting virtue in the minds of those who hold them, do they?” (85). A person achieving a rank or office that co...
... middle of paper ...
...tion was not uncommon in Boethius’ day and doesn’t look to be something that will change. Power and beauty, now as then, are fleeting and double-edged blades. Both breed resentment and create a veil of stereotypes around those who possess them. Power is seen as a tool of tyrants and rarely looked upon for very long with respect. On the other hand, the idea that looking inward is the road to happiness rings with truth and does not necessitate a belief in the divine, but only a higher ideal of existence. Even if the mythology of the Christian faith fails a Western thought in the modern day, many alternative spiritualities and philosophies foster this rejection of external means of happiness and instead promote a cultivation of internal ones.
Works Cited
Boethius, and Victor Watts. The Consolation of Philosophy. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1980. Print.
A well-known expression is that money can’t buy happiness, yet people fantasize of winning the lottery, living in their dream house, and possessing enough tangible objects to feel satisfied with their lives. Most are under the preconceived notion that the absence of wealth and power translates to hardship and despair. This, however, is not the case, because a self-effacing lifestyle is not an indication of a lower quality of life, and often is better than one of great fortune. People yearn to have the financial independence and capabilities of those in higher ranking positions, and are willing to abandon their morals and own personal well-being if it means being successful. It seems that by reaching a level of wealth in which money is no longer
In the Consolation of Philosophy, while wallowing in his sorrow, Boethius is interrupted by Lady Philosophy who seeks to help him in his hour of need. Driving away the Muses, Lady Philosophy begins her treatment of Boethius. She does this by walking Boethius through a series of discussions, eventually leading to conclusions that should comfort Boethius. While Lady Philosophy attempts to logically show that all fortune is good, in an effort to comfort Boethius, she also shows that humans are incapable of fully understanding this and therefore complete comfort in this knowledge is impossible without faith. She attempts to show Boethius, through the explanation of Providence and Fate, that their bad fortune does not exist but at the same time also gives him several reasons why he will not be able to understand it. She makes it very clear that man cannot understand Providence’s working out for good because man only sees confusion and disorder and they cannot know peoples inward motives and inclinations. This means that Boethius cannot find comfort in logic and reason alone, but must have some form of faith.
Effectively addressing the central issues found in The Song of Roland, such as the seeming cruelty of fortune and whether any good can come from war, requires seeking answers and points of comparison from major philosophy of the age. By placing the principles of Boethius’ Consolation of Philosophy and the motivations and actions of Roland in The Song of Roland into conversation, it is possible to extrapolate the applicability of principles within Boethius to Roland’s actions, and to the role of Fortune in the battle and its aftereffects.
Stark asserts, “Peace isn’t a commodity that can be bought or even coerced. An inner desire for peace has to be in the individual hearts of the warring parties.” Therefore, anything that can be taken away was never truly in one’s possession. This is in exact accordance to what Lady Philosophy is trying to teach Boethius: “ you will realize that you neither had, nor have lost, anything of worth through your association with [Lady Fortune]” (Boethius 19). Furthermore, Boethius is told that he has “no right to complain as if [he has] lost what is indisputably [his]” (Boethius 21). Lady Philosophy reminds Boethius that returning something you were lent is no reason to grieve. “If happiness is the highest good of a rational nature, and if what can be taken from you in any way cannot be the highest, it is obvious that the fluidity of Fortune cannot hope to win happiness” (Boethius 27). The only thing of true value cannot be taken away for you. Therefore, true happiness comes form within ones self and is eternal; his only true possession is his
Boethius was wrongfully accused of treason and imprisoned, leading him to question as to why God would allow bad things to happen to good people and how you can not be completely happy and there is never true happiness. The fear of losing happiness destroys happiness. "No man is so completely happy that something somewhere does not clash with his condition. It is the nature of human affairs to be fraught with anxiety; they never prosper perfectly and they never remain constant" Boethius (30). This quote represents the fear of losing happiness destroys happiness in my
Initially, the prisoner finds it difficult to separate the painful events of the recent past from the direction of the present discussion: “’But it is also true that the worst kind of misfortune is one that befalls someone who has previously known happiness’” (Consolation, p. 37). Boethius cannot at first break away from the idea that Fortune has such an enormous impact on his life because he has just undergone one of the worst experiences of his life. Although Lady Philosophy urges him to relinquish his passion for the contrived “good” of man in favor of a larger, more wholesome good, the student defaults to the more immediate bitterness of his situation. Eventually, however, Lady Philosophy’s calm appeals to logic soothe Boethius’s emotional resistance. As the teacher progresses with her Socratic questioning, his resistance eventually slips: “’I can’t remember a time when I wasn’t worried, no…’ ‘So you desired the presence of some things and the absence of others?’ ‘That’s right.’ ‘Now everyone lacks something he desires, isn’t that right?’ ‘Of course,’ I had to agree” (Consolation, p. 66). One might perceive a hint of resignation throughout this excerpt, especially within Boethius’s final thought. He slowly realizes that he cannot find a flaw in Lady Philosophy’s logic even though he still feels emotionally primed to reject her attempts to get him to see reason. Nonetheless, Boethius reaches a point where his emotional attachment to the past no longer hinders his ability to internalize Lady Philosophy’s lessons: “’…It occurs to me to ask you whether you find any room at all in your theories for the operation of pure chance. Is there such a thing? And if so, what is it?’” (Consolation, p. 146). The prisoner’s progress is apparent here, involving a movement from his initial struggle to accept the Lady’s advice to an earnest appreciation of the
Boethius stresses that what people want is different from what seems to be the best means to attain happiness; fame and office are regarded as the means for happiness by relating it to dignity and nobility. However, neither fame nor office grants the benefits people assume. For one thing, if it is the case that fame “creates merit”, then nobility is glorified and personal merits are ignored. Consequently, nobility means to be praised solely on the merits of one’s forefathers (as opposed to being actually noble) and yet people seek happiness in office and fame because t...
Despite Boethius’s initial resistance, Lady Philosophy shows that because Boethius did not own his wealth or position, he was subject to Fortune’s transitory...
It is also believed that wealth should be non-existent. This is only possible if cl...
Boethius stands firmly against the advantages of fame in The Consolation of Philosophy. Boethius maintains that fame, like every worldly achievement, is taken away some time after death: “Should you believe extended life will surely dawn/ Through tidings of your earthly fame,/ Mere lapse of time this expectations will dethrone./ a second death waits you to claim” (Boethius 37). Lady philosophy proves this by asking, “How many men, highly famed in their own day, have been expunged from our memory…?” (Boethius 36). Philosophy asserts that not only is fame temporary, it is also relative to where you live. She inquires Boethius to think, “Perhaps you have not learnt of the flight of Anaxagoras, of the poison forced on Socrates, of the torturing of Zeno, for these took place abroad; but at any rate you have been able to acquaint yourself with such figures as Canius, and Seneca, and Soranus, for the tradition about them is still fresh and famous” (Boethius 7). Corroborating her argument, Boethius was only aware of the events that happened in close proximity to him. Now that she has proved that fame is only temporary and relative to proximity, Lady philosophy goes of to show that fame does not have any real value in the grand scheme of the
For example, Boethius is sad because of being removed from his temporal goods as a result of being jailed on trumped up charges. These goods such as the power from his office, and the fame he gets for being a public figure, and away from the wealth he has been accumulating which brought him happiness. Comparably, Harvey Dent experiences some of the same things. He enjoys these false goods such as the attainment of power from being the district attorney, being in love with Rachel, and the fame from being the white knight of Gotham. However, achieving all of these brings him no closer to being truly happy or self-sufficient. It is not until after speaking with Lady Philosophy in the cell that Boethius realizes that the goods he was pursuing were false goods, and that true happiness does not lie within them. Rather it lies with the one true Good that is all encompassing instead of individual
Although it has been said that money is the root of all evil, many people actually believe that they would be happier if they were wealthier. Could this be correct? This essay will support the thesis that not only does the pursuit of wealth not lead to happiness; it may actually make us unhappy.
According to Webster dictionary the word Happiness in defined as Enjoying, showing, or marked by pleasure, satisfaction, or joy. People when they think of happiness, they think about having to good feeling inside. There are many types of happiness, which are expressed in many ways. Happiness is something that you can't just get it comes form your soul. Happiness is can be changed through many things that happen in our every day live.
All of us want to make money to gain some status, some comfort and some luxurious. This money has brought; is bringing; and will bring so many differences between some of you and me. These differences will be later named as differences between the rich and the poor. If I ask you ‘Do you know what is happiness? You would thrillingly and pleasingly answer me YES, OF Course Then lets share some examples of the happiest man. One would experience happiness when a leads a luxurious life. One may also experience happiness when he had expanded his business almost across the globe. One may also experience happiness when he had his meal in the most famous and expensive hotel. One may also experience happiness when he attends honorable parties.
Happiness is a state of mind. The dictionary definition is "feelings of joy and pleasure mingled together”. A feeling of happiness is more than just an experience of joy or pleasure. It is a state of mind where the individual feels that “life is good”. As Aristotle says, “happiness is the meaning and the purpose of life, the whole aim and end of human existence.” I believe that everyone wants to be happy in life. One is abnormal if he prefers to be sad and alone.