What ideas are being explored in Wilfred Owen’s ‘Disabled’? How does the poet skilfully use language and structure to get across his ideas?

873 Words2 Pages

IGCSE English Language Coursework
What ideas are being explored in Wilfred Owen’s ‘Disabled’? How does the poet skilfully use language and structure to get across his ideas?
In this essay, I will be critically analysing and evaluating the ideas that are explored in ‘Disabled’ by Wilfred Owen. This poem is about a very young soldier who joins WWI and the drastic effects the war brings to the life of him. I will be commenting on the underlying subtext, literary devices, and craft of the writer as well as making connections between Owen’s personal experiences and this poem. Owen bases his poems on personal experiences, as he fought in the trenches, at a young age during the First World War. He had witnessed the brutality of war as well as had strong opinions about how the society functioned during that time period. He held a tense grudge against society and his poems were very clearly identified as being anti-war. The fact that his poems were written from his own involvement in the war contributes greatly to the overall effectiveness in promoting his anti-war message. There are many major ideas that Owen explores in ‘Disabled’, and I will be focusing on who is to blame for the protagonist’s losses; the myth of war in contrast to the reality of war; and the importance of female affection.
--
One of the predominant ideas Owen explores in ‘Disabled’ is who is to blame for the protagonist’s losses. Owen contrasts the immaturity, naivety and foolishness of the young men who signed up for war with the knowledge and experience of the older recruitment officers. Owen first blames the protagonist as the instigator of his own losses, however, he then shifts the blame to the recruitment officers, and society as a whole, suggesting perhaps th...

... middle of paper ...

...had stopped him from joining the war, he would not have suffered his tragic losses. Owen seems to suggest that they would have had the knowledge and experience to act with integrity, but they fair the young recruits. Underlying this idea, Owen also condemns the society as a whole, as he attempts to use this example to criticise how the society at that time only cared about the numbers of those fighting, rather than the humanistic perspective of each individual young man, and the everlasting impact on their lives. Moreover, Owen deliberately spares the use of personal names here. The protagonist is only referred to “he”, rather than given a name. This parallels with the previously suggest idea regarding the fact that the recruitment officers did not take individuals into account, and that they were only concerned about the numbers of soldiers on the battlefields.
--

Open Document