Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Link between education and development
Why education is the key to development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Link between education and development
Zambia’s current economic plight is one that has been influenced by globalization and overseas donations. The clothes that we send as donations and that we hope helps unfortunate people in both our local areas and in the world, becomes a source of commerce and profit in poorer countries. As much as 95% of donated clothing from the U.S. are sold to poorer countries. This has created a climate in which other industries are failing to thrive in Zambia. Second hand clothing selling is the only business that is making money, which also limits the ventures that people in Zambia can go into. People who were once teachers, nurses, and civil servants have lost their jobs and have only the second hand clothing business to turn to to survive.
We must first take a look at Zambia’s past to understand the current situation. Up until the mid-eighteen hundreds, few people other than portuguese explorers and traders had ever set foot on Zambian soil. But starting around 1880s, British commercial and political leaders began becoming interested in Central Africa, and many went to seek mineral mining rights from local chieftains. In the same time period, Northern and Southern Rhodesia (modern Zambia and Zimbabwe) became seen as a British territory. Southern Rhodesia was annexed formally and was given the right to self govern in 1923. The governing of Northern Rhodesia was transferred to British colonial offices in 1924. In 1953, entered into a federation with Nyasaland (Malawi) and this caused a lot of internal turmoil as Africans struggled with the white government to gain more independence/involvement in their government. The British feared that they would lose control of the territory if they gave in.
Zambia finally gained independence in 19...
... middle of paper ...
...’s economy due to unfair policies. Instead, the Fund and Bank should provide the people of Zambia with economists and other professionals who could provide guidance and assistance to get the economy up and running. Secondly, Zambia needs to reinstate the tariff on used clothing to jump start the textile industry again. Thirdly, Zambia must above all else begin to seek professionals to educate their population, because as everyone knows, education is the most precious factor in getting out of poverty. It opens doorways that would otherwise be closed.In addition to these steps, Zambia’s debt on the basis of unfair and shady dealings should be forgiven and forgotten. The country was only seeking assistance because of its new independence, I honestly don’t think that its right for them to be continually punished and coherced out of the precious little money they have.
In the article, “Haiti doesn’t need your old T-shirts,” Charles Kenny explains why donating old clothes or food to countries in need doesn’t help those countries, but rather hurts their own economy. Charles Kenny is a developmental economist and has written a plethora of journal and magazine articles, books, and blog posts. Kenny is able to inform and influence his audience by including examples of the problem, people of authority, and a solution to the problem he writes about in his article.
Linda Lim, a professor at the University of Michigan Business School, visited Vietnam and Indonesia in the summer of 2000 to obtain first-hand research on the impact of foreign-owned export factories (sweatshops) on the local economies. Lim found that in general, sweatshops pay above-average wages and conditions are no worse than the general alternatives: subsistence farming, domestic services, casual manual labor, prostitution, or unemployment. In the case of Vietnam in 1999, the minimum annual salary was 134 U.S. dollars while Nike workers in that country earned 670 U.S. dollars, the case is also the similar in Indonesia. Many times people in these countries are very surprised when they hear that American's boycott buying clothes that they make in the sweatshops. The simplest way to help many of these poor people that have to work in the sweatshops to support themselves and their families, would be to buy more products produced in the very sweatshops they detest.
Focusing on different perspectives, Charles Kenny’s “Haiti Doesn’t Need Your Old T-Shirt” and Tate Watkins’s “How Oliberte, the Anti-TOMS, Makes Shoes and Jobs in Africa” both discuss the ways to help the poor. Kenny pays attention to the way of donation while Watkins cares about the enterprises’ behaviors toward the poor. By comparing these two essays, we can come up with a better solution for helping the poor---giving loans. Giving loans to the companies in poor countries can boom indigenous economy, making up the shortcomings of other solutions.
Personal Interview. 4 February 2003. Rhodesian Independence. 26 January 2003. http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/allan.winrow/udi.htm.
Americans do not realize the amount of clothing we wear on a daily basis is actually made in Cambodia, such as Adidas and even the Gap. The women that work for these sweatshops in Cambodia sew for 50 cents an hour, which is what allows stores in America, such as H&M to sell inexpensive clothing (Winn, 2015). The conditions these Cambodian workers face are a noisy, loud, and extremely hot environment where people are known for having huge fainting attacks. When workers were on strike a year ago, authorities actually shot multiple people just because they were trying to raise their pay. There is plenty of evidence of abuse captured through many interviews of workers from different factories, and is not just a rarity these places see often or hear of. Factories hire children, fire pregnant women because they are slow and use the bathroom to much, scream at regular workers if they use the toilet more than two times a day, scam hard working employees with not paying them their money they worked for and more, and workers are sent home and replaced if 2,000 shirts are not stitched in one day. Expectations are unrealistic and not suitable for employees to be working each day for more than ten
There are many things that cause poverty in Africa. The main reason is that the rich in Africa hog all the money and resources causing a country where there are rich people and poor people, there is ...
For a country like Sierra Leone that is heavily reliant on importation and exportation of goods, having these systems backed up can be detrimental to the economy. As I mentioned in the first section of this essay, Sierra Leone’s exports and imports compose of 59.2% of the nations GDP. When 59.2% of a country’s economic income is wiped out over night it becomes difficult for the country to rebuild without external help. Thankfully help is being provided by organizations like the UNDP, however, it is not coming fast enough and the people of Sierra Leone are still struggling.
The essay, “The Noble Feat of Nike” by Johan Norberg basically talks about the effects of Nike going into third world countries, particularly Vietnam. Norberg explains how Nike’s factory gains from being in its desired location, Vietnam. Vietnam being a communist country comes to Nike’s advantage, because if they were located elsewhere they would have to pay workers higher wages and use more of their machines. Workers in these countries are provided with an air conditioned building with regular wages, free meal plans, free medical service, and training/education to operate the machinery within the factory. The workers find all of this beneficial and in their own favor because of the fact their earning double to five times the amount in wages than if they were working outdoors on a farm. This great deal, blinds them to notice the meaning behind the company’s location in Vietnam. The Nike factory was rather clever in making their location in that specific area to gain benefits for Western owners. The catch Nike gains from is simple. The owners pay factory workers only a small monthly sum from what they make selling the shoes to customers. Globalists state that the company doesn’t pull this fast one on the Western population because of our advancements compared to the Eastern countries. Western people would protest and strike to demand better wages for their work, but the people in Eastern countries have no choice but to deal with the injustice in order to support their families and educate their children.
The overriding challenge Uganda faces today is the curse of poverty. Poverty, ‘the lack of something”(“Poverty.”), something can be materials, knowledge, or anything one justifies as necessary to living. Associated with poverty is the question of what causes poverty and how to stop poverty? The poverty rate in Uganda has declined from the year 2002 from the year 2009, which shows the percent of residents living in poverty has decreasing. Yet, the year is 2014 and the poverty rate could have drastically changed over the course of five years. One could assume the poverty rate would continue to decrease, which would be astounding and beneficial, but does poverty ever decrease enough to an acceptable level or even nonexistence? Poverty is a complex issue that continues to puzzle people from all across the globe. Poverty could possible be a question that is never truly answered.
The independence of Zambia in 1964 from the British left Zambia with an overabundance of copper reserves. These copper reserves together with the earnings from them stimulated a lot of wealth in the country. Zambia became the economic power house of the African region and as a result, a lot of labourers from neighbouring African countries began to move to Zambia for the employment opportunities presented by the. Despite this however, Zambia inherited from the colonial government a lot of social, political and economic problems hence the new government faced major challenges in trying to address these problems inherited from the colonial government.
The harmful impact of globalization on South Africa has been apparent , through the financial squeeze and through market- oriented policies that have silent economic and reorganization, in job losses, crisis in schooling, closing of hospitals, make wider loopholes in the social security net, water cut offs, the degeneration housing shortage, and unrelenting starvation and poverty in a perspective of deepening discrimination in what is already the second most disparate nation on the globe.
The selling of secondhand clothing or ‘oboni wawu ’ in Ghana has only negative affected the country. Employment in textile and clothing has fallen by 80% between 1975 and the 2000s (Rodgers,2015). It seems strange that the selling of secondhand clothing can have such an effect on a country 's economy. Here in the U.S, everyone has bought secondhand clothing but at the same time the buying for the clothing hasn’t put a dent in the economy. It is almost parallel to what happened in the past, jobs disappeared in order find cheaper ways of making things. In the US, many clothing factories shut down or moved overseas leaving many unemployed and in Africa markets are selling used clothing in the effect many jobs have been lost in the clothing industry. The biggest difference, the clothing that we buy is brand new and no one has worn it whereas in Africa, they are buying the ratty, unwanted used clothing. "The long-term effect is that countries such as Malawi or Mozambique or Zambia can 't really establish or protect their own clothing industries if they are importing second-hand goods," says Andrew Brooks from King’s College (Kermeliotis,2013). The problem is there isn’t a way for the companies to compete with the second-hand trade especially if they come in at such a high volume and are sold cheaper. In order to protect their nation’s textile industries many African countries have banned the import of second hand clothing (Kermeliotis,2013). The clothing industries aren’t able to compete with the used clothing market because it is sold for
Globalization, love it or hate it, but you can’t escape it. Globalization may be regarded as beneficial from an economic and business point of view, but however cannot be perceived the ditto when examined from the social sciences and humanities side of it. Globalization can be argued as a tool for economic growth, advancement and prosperity through co-operation between the developed and developing countries. The pro-globalization critics argue that the benefits that globalization brings to developing nations surpasses or outcasts the negative impacts caused by globalization and may even go a step further to state that it is the only source of hope for developing nations to prosper and stand out. However, the real question to be asked is as to what extent are the positives argued upon without taking into account the negative aspects of globalization towards developing countries. Moreover, how many developing countries out of many are exactly benefiting or even prospering from globalization is another question to consider. Therefore, my paper will dispute that indeed growth and advancement provided by globalization to developing countries is beneficial in short-term, but in the long-run, it will only bring upon negative impacts and challenges due to the obstacles involved such as exploitation of labour and resources, higher increase in poverty, and effects of multi-national corporations on local businesses and the economy, and to an extent the effects on the developing country itself.
Effective communication abroad can be difficult to achieve because of the lack of understanding between different cultures. But there are many companies out there who are effectively promoting their products in multiple countries. So, how do they do it? To be able to communicate abroad takes excellent leadership skills from multiple parties.
Using 1997 financial crisis and other examples, discuss how globalization is important to the modern business journalism. Introduction