What Specific Arguments Might Stanton Use To Criticize The Concept Of Manhood?

1990 Words4 Pages

1. What is the difference between a. and a. Why are you interested in looking at this speech and/or this person? What questions do you have about that person and/or the speech? I am interested in analyzing this speech because the title, "The Destructive Male," is quite provocative and suggests a potential critique of traditional gender roles. I am curious to understand: What specific arguments does Stanton use to criticize the concept of "manhood"? How does she define womanhood and its potential role in society? What challenges might Stanton anticipate in presenting such a critical perspective, especially considering the historical context? How might Stanton's arguments resonate with, or differ from, the views of other leading feminists of …show more content…

She may need to carefully choose her language and arguments to avoid alienating potential supporters. Benefits: The speech is delivered at a national convention, potentially reaching a wider audience and garnering media attention. The recent passage of amendments granting rights to Black men might create a more receptive climate for expanding voting rights. 4. What is the difference between a.. Have any scholarly secondary sources been written about the speech you are looking at? If so, what do the sources say? If not, think about why this might be, and write down some thoughts on why this speech SHOULD be analyzed. While there appears to be a limited amount of research specifically focused on "The Destructive Male" speech, several scholarly works analyze Elizabeth Cady Stanton's work and contributions to the women's suffrage movement. The lack of dedicated research on this specific speech could be due to the following reasons: Its provocative title and potentially controversial arguments might have attracted less scholarly attention compared to other, perhaps more widely accepted, works by …show more content…

She emphasizes the potential for women to be a "conservator of woman's love" and a counterpoint to destructive forces, implicitly inviting those who value peace and harmony to join her cause. Claim 2: Stanton implicitly excludes individuals who hold traditional patriarchal views or who are resistant to the idea of expanding women's rights. Proofs: The speech title and overall tone are confrontational, potentially alienating those who disagree with her characterization of masculinity. She uses strong language like "slavery, slaughter, and sacrifice" and "dishonor, cruelty, and brutality" to describe the historical and ongoing effects of male dominance, potentially provoking opposition from those who hold different viewpoints. Her focus on the need for a "new evangelism of womanhood" suggests a potential dismissal of alternative perspectives on femininity and gender roles. 7. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? If you only read the speech itself, what does it suggest about the political, social, economic, and/or cultural context of the

Open Document