More handpicked essays just for you.
What, of this goldfish, would you wish for? by etgar keret character analysis
The impact of death on a family
What, of this goldfish, would you wish for? by etgar keret character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Etgar Kerets short story "What, of, This Goldfish, would you wish?", there are two main characters, Sergei and Yonatan. At the beginning of the story, the author begins to show Sergei is an egocentric person. But, as the story progresses, he becomes a warm-hearted character. On page 7, it explains that he did not want to use his last wish on Yonatan, because Sergei had used his two other wishes on his sister, who had cancer, and Sergei also used his other wish on his girlfriend at the time son. On page 8, Sergei seems obsurd because he thinks he can cover up the murder of Yonatan by mopping up the blood in his kitchen, and Sergei was going to drag Yonatan out of his house at midnight, and put him at the end of his fishing poll. Then, as
His character showed a longing for an absolute meaning of love and happiness. In order to find the absolute meaning, the creature experienced sufferings. I think that he was able to realize what is true love, and what is real happiness because of Karloff’s advice: “Underwater, my friend. Water is your natural milieu” (Bailey). Because the Creature is similar to a human, I can understand his feelings which made me feel that I am part of the story.
The incident happened long ago, but nobody ever seemed to remember. Except for Michael. After all these years, every piece of the pain was carved in his memory, as if he was always there, always making the mistake. He was eleven, an appropriate age to start to learn things.
When the story of Vladek is not being told, the reader often sees the relationship between the author, Art, and his father. For the most part, these instances are often disagreements between the father and son. Because Vladek thought Art’s jacket was raggy and unacceptable, he threw it in the garbage and gave him a new, up to date, jacket: “Such an old shabby coat. It’s a shame my son would wear such a coat! ... “I have for you a warmer one. I got at Alexander’s a new jacket, and I can give you my old one; It’s still like new” (69). Despite the fact that Art is not very pleased with his father throwing away his jacket, the reader can find humor due to the fact that Vladek thinks that the jacket is so torn up and old, not actually realizing that the style of jacket is a part of Arts culture, therefore it is how Art wants to look. Another instance in which the father and son divide happens is when Vladek compares his son to the famous cartoonist, Walt Disney: “Yah. Someday you’ll be famous. Like what’s-his-name...You know... the big-shot cartoonist... Walt Disney!” (133). Even though Art takes offense to this because he and Walt Disney are not the same type of cartoonist, the reader can find humor in this because Vladek is oblivious to the difference between what Art does versus what Walt Disney
The story begins by describing the effects of desiring something which one cannot obtain – a child. The author offers a sympathetic view of Rumplestiltskin’s character by portraying him as a solitary individual, desperate for affection as opposed to
Ivan Ilyich was an intelligent and prosperity Russian high court judge; he never considered that personal relations play an important role in human being. He lived his life without knowing the essentials values of a human being which are compassion, love, honesty, and sincerity, sencibility. He never question to himself about what is more important in life money or personal relations. He never thought about the true of life, it will end one day. Keeping this point in mind, the narrator in this story explains that money would make the journey of life easy. Money can be earned with lost of hard work and, money can buy things, materials, which for a moment make you, feel happy, but it is momentary.
When two people decide to have an affair, they usually do not follow through with it, leaving maybe after a month. This decision to stay or not to stay has a lot to do with the events and places surrounding the affair. When it occurs in a literary story, those events and places are called setting. The setting for “The Lady with the Dog” played a pivotal role in how Dmitri Gurov and Anna Sergeyevna handled their affair with each other. The key settings were their personal lives, most importantly their history of infidelity, and the places that they met up.
Fish is a book about the importance of a good attitude in the workplace. The book stresses that you must choose your attitude each day that you go to work. Attitude was at the center of the book’s message, but it was only a part of that message. There were four steps in the fish philosophy of a happy workplace: choose your attitude, play, make their day, and be present. Choose your attitude tells the reader that you must choose what you are going to make of each day. If you go to work unhappy you will make everyone else around you unhappy and your time there all the much longer. If you go to work happy and looking forward to the day, others will be happy and your time there will go by faster. The second step is play. You can bring fun into almost any job. The benefits of having the play step in the workplace are enormous. The employees will be happy, the customers will enjoy the atmosphere, and it will make everyone’s life a little bit easier. Third in the fish philosophy is “make their day.” Including customers in the fun and games will create happy, satisfied customers. The final step in the philosophy is to be present. You must be fully present at work for your fellow employees as well as the customers. Being fully present includes making the customer your number one priority. The message that I got from the book is that if you follow the fish philosophy you will have a more productive workplace that you will enjoy coming to each day.
“ And each of us can practice rights ourselves, treating each other without discrimination, respecting each other's dignity and rights.” (Bellamy) Discrimination is constantly seen in our everyday lives, despite the fact that it is illegal in the United States. According to pewresearch.org, “About half of Hispanics in the U.S. (52%) say they have experienced discrimination or have been treated unfairly because of their race or ethnicity.” Society fails to acknowledge the disadvantages many receive when they decide to exclude others who are different from themselves. The potential case of breaking the laws of the United States, producing harm, and causing others to feel insecure are reasons why people should accept others who are different
Same: Devouring their way up to California and gobbling the population of the seven sea. Who are these creatures? Well these creatures have caused similar problems.
The crown-of-thorns starfish, its scientific name being Acanthaster planci, is a multiple-armed sea star that is most know for preying upon hard, or stony, coral polyps, which is more often referred by marine biologists as Scleractinia. The crown-of-thorns starfish receives its moniker from thorn-like spines that are full of venom which cover its upper surface, hence it’s name. It is also well known as a supreme coral predator. The main reason the crown of thorns starfish is such a massive hunter of coral is because of its skill removing the polyps and leaving the corals bleached and dead for consumption. When there is a large amount of coral in one certain area, the crown of thorns can have itself a feeding frenzy. However, since it feeds on so much of our ocean’s coral, it is a main contributor to
Arthur Ashe once said, “From what we get, we can make a living; what we give, however makes a life.” Such is the case in Nikolai Gogol’s short story The Overcoat. Gogol takes a man without a friend in the world and gives him a new overcoat. The new overcoat represents a new life and a new identity for the man and instantaneously he is much happier. The man, Akaky Akakievich, basis his “new life” upon the love that he gives to his overcoat, and what he feels it gives him in return. Before long, Akaky begins to care more about his beautiful coat and less about the people around him. Thus is the theme of the story. Often material things are more important in our lives than people, resulting in the emptiness of one’s heart and soul. One cannot be truly happy with his possessions alone. He needs more than that. He needs people his life, whom he can call friends.
Etgar Keret’s short story “What if This Goldfish, Would You Wish” and W.W. Jacobs’s short story “The Monkey’s Paw” shares a similar theme of be careful what you wish for. In both stories the characters are given three wishes to use. In “What if This Goldfish, Would You Wish” Sergei does not want to use his last wish. Sergei wants to use it for a better cause like he did with his first two wishes. In the text it states “No,” Sergei says. He’s shaking his head from side to side. “I can’t,” he says. “I’ve been saving it. Saving it for something.” “For what?” the fish says. But Sergei won’t answer.”, and “You killed him, Sergei,” the goldfish says. “You murdered someone—but you’re not a murderer.” The goldfish stops swishing his tail. “If, on
In the short story “The Death of Ivan Ilych” by Leo Tolstoy, the narrator desribes how Ivan, a government official who has a horrible illness and is painfully dying while at home, while being very lonely. Ivan has a very small-minded personality, and on top of that he does not have a very good family life at home or with his close friends Peter and Schwarts. Somehow Gerasim catches Ivan’s interest and eventually becomes one of the only people that Ivan is nice too because he actually understands what Ivan is going through. Ivan’s friends and family know that he is dying, but they try very hard to not think about his death. In this short story, Tolstoy gives insight to how people change after Ivan dies and examines the relationships he had with his wife, two kids, friend peter and Gerasim.
From being told “say cheese” to taking my own pictures that look decent ( but a lot of people say my pictures are really good).
Though many would regard Andrei as a contender for main character, without Natasha he would have been unable to complete his quest to find perfection. Consequently, readers would never have experienced divine love -- Andrei’s ultimate contribution to the novel. To understand Natasha’s significance in Andrei’s fate, the essence of his quest must first be established. Throughout War and Peace, Andrei attempts to use his career, titles, and battle glory to discover perfection. Perfection, he presumes, will allow him to escape his constant intellectualizing and overcome the cold, disinterested approach to life he maintains. Certainly, Andrei cannot intellectualize perfection as it is beyond reproach and so he seeks it above all else. He constantly moves from one quest to another, repeatedly abandoning his endeavours when he has inevitably discovered a flaw. Andrei's largest disappointment came after the Battle of Austerlitz upon suffering a wound in an attempt to turn the tide of the battle. Seeing an opportunity for glory, Andrei grabs a fallen Russian standard thinking “Here it is!” (280) which refers both to the standard itself and the situation’s potential for glory. Andrei runs towards French forces, inspires hundreds of men to follow him, and soon after suffers a nearly fatal wound. As he lays dying on the battlefield, he looks into the sky and