More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion about the poem ozymandias by shelley
Percy shelley's ozymandias essay
Percy shelley's ozymandias essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Ozymandias: King of Kings
Ozymandias is a sonnet written by Percy Bysshee Shelley in the year 1818 and is one of the most famous poems in the English language. Though it is considered a sonnet, it does not have the simple rhyme scheme or punctuation that most sonnets have. The poem speaks of tyranny and how time makes a mockery of the boastfulness of even the most powerful and highly praised kings. Ozymandias is also an ekphrastic poem, meaning the poem is mostly about another work of art. Ozymandias was written in a result of a competition between Shelley and his friend Horace Smith. Ozymandias was the name by which Ramses II, a pharaoh famous for the number of architectural structures he caused to be erected, had been known to the Greeks.
…show more content…
The poem Ozymandias has a traditional structure of the fourteen-line Italian sonnet, which follows the abba, abba, cde, cde rhyme scheme. Shelley starts of Ozymandias with an octave, with its first lines, giving an opening predicament yet the unfortunate situation of the once hailed Pharaoh Ramses II’s magnificent structures, in ruins. In the words of David Mikics, “The power of Pharaonic Egypt had seemed eternal, but now this once-great empire was (and had long been) in ruins, a feeble shadow”. Shelley follows the octave with a sestet, delivering an ironic and sympathetic resolution the eight lines prior to the sestet. The narrator has an opening conversation with a “traveler from an antique land”. As the reader, we do not know the identity of the narrator and traveler nor the situation and incentive of both the narrator and the traveler. The traveler tells the narrator of the ruins of a statue in the desert. Two vast legs of stone stand without a body, and near them a massive, crumbling stone head lies “half sunk” in the sand. T he traveler goes on to describe the face of Ozymandias as if it was still to be recognizable, yet the traveler goes on to recount “Near them on the sand, Half sunk, a shatter'd visage lies, whose frown And wrinkled lip and sneer of cold command” giving the reader to imply that the once glorified representation of Ozymandias, is now in ruination. Imagery is used in this line and the lines prior to 'Two vast and trunkless legs of stone Stand in the desert.' Now, Ozymandias commissioned to have a vast sphinx sculptured to represent his believed eternal and everlasting glory and at the foot of the statue were words which reflected the arrogance and pride of Ramses II. Those words seem very hollow now as the magnificent statue is destroyed and none of the pharaoh's works have lasted, thus interpreting the line “My name is Ozymandias, king of kings: Look on my works, ye mighty and despair!” Ozymandias is a commanding sonnet.
Essentially, it is loyal to a single metaphor: the shattered, ruined statue in the desert wasteland, with its arrogant, passionate face and monomaniacal inscription (Look on my works, ye mighty and despair). The once-great king’s proud boast has been ironically contradicted; Ozymandias’s works have crumbled and disappeared, his civilization is gone, and all has been turned to dust by the impersonal, indiscriminate, destructive power of time and history. Of course, the pharaoh’s “works” are nowhere to be seen, in this desert wasteland. The kings that he challenges with the evidence of his superiority are the rival rulers of the nations he has enslaved, perhaps the Israelites and Canaanites known from the biblical account. However, the following line “Nothing beside remains. Round the decay” is obviously apparent that he is to be pitied, if not disdained, rather than be in awe and fear: The broken-down tomb is set in a vast wasteland of sand, possibly, Shelley’s way of suggesting that all tyrants and authoritarians ultimately end up in the only kind of kingdom they ultimately deserve, a barren desert or wasteland.
Though Ozymandias (Ramses II) was a mighty and flourishing ruler in his time as Pharaoh, he attempted to find fulfillment and recognition in his reign rather than display humility and modesty. The full irony of the poem is brought home by the final image of the boundless sands, stretching as far as the eye can see. If there is any or little left of the sculptor's work, there is enough, so far, to bear witness to tyranny. Of the tyrant's works, nothing remains. The poem is memorable for Shelley’s brilliant poetic rendering of the story, and not just the subject of Ozymandias and the story
itself. Ozymandias at one point in his life exhibited his glory and power, but now due to the toll of time, nothing but the power of art and words remain. A famous Proverb, “Pride comes before destruction, a haughty spirit before the fall” could best interpret the poem of Ozymandias by Shelley. To the reader, the statue can be interpreted as a metaphor for the pride and hubris of all of humanity, in any of its manifestations
The poem Ozymandias tells of a king who was very powerful, people feared him. He created statues of himself for people to admire. Now all that remains of his power are remains. What remains of him are memories that are now long forgotten and that the wind carries away. Sand that stretches for miles and miles until it
‘Ozymandias’ by Percy Shelley and ‘My Last Duchess’ have many links and similar themes such as power, time and art. ‘Ozymandias’ shows the insignificance of human life after passing time whilst ‘My Last Duchess’ speaks of his deceased wife in a form of a speech.
"Ozymandias" written by Percy Shelley, represents the psychological forces of the id as well as the superego, as a charceter in a poem, and as a poetic work. In the poem we encounter a traveler. He brings a message from the desert. There is a statue that exists alone among the rocks and sand. Stamped on the pedestal of that statue are these words, "My name is Ozymandias, king of kings: Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!"
When comparing and contrasting “Ozymandias”, written by Percy Bysshe Shelley and “Viva La Vida” by Coldplay, there is a strong contrast between the two. Ozymandias is a poem about a long-forgotten king who once had mighty power over his people, where as “Viva La Vida” is about a king who was overthrown. However, the similarities between the song and poem are astonishing. “Ozymandias” is similar to “Viva La Vida”because both texts mention a rockpile built upon sand for a king; because both texts show that the citizens are enemies of the king; and because they are both about a king who has lost his power.
Pride has been a heavily associated trait with the human race since the existence of time as if it is fused in the blood of the populations. Although not all individuals suffer from pride, it's effects can be commonly seen in a vast majority of individuals. Both Percy Shelley, author of "Ozymandias," and Dahlia Ravikovitch, author of "Pride," explore the effects of pride in relation to an individual's success or legacy. Percy Shelley wrote during the early 1800’s as a primary poet of the English Romanticism Movement. Dahlia Ravikovitch, an Israeli Poet, wrote primarily during the mid-1940s, however, “Pride” is special because it did not reflect her usual patterns. Through the use of literary techniques and tone, both authors present their poem with the intent to communicate that pride ultimately results in ruin.
Odysseus is the main character in an epic poem called the Odyssey. In the poem Odysseus has had some bad luck getting home, with some of the gods helping him and some hindering him; his journey towards home is a constant struggle. In this poem we see a man being broke and rebuilt, through constant irony his faith was damaged and without the help of Athena he probably would have given up on his journey. Through his hard work and wise spirit he finally does achieve his goal.
Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, illustrates the Romantic idea of the sublime naturalworld as an emotional experience for the characters of the novel. Within the text, Shelleyutilizes an allusion to the John Milton’s biblical story, Paradise Lost, to make a parallel betweenthe characters. Within the passage, the monster compares himself, as well as his creator, Victor,to the characters Adam and Satan. He comes to realize that he is more similar to Satan;ultimately, leading him to his reign of terror and the revenge he wishes to impose on Victor. Themonster realizes that he is similar to Adam in Paradise Lost in that they both do not want to bealone. The monster also realizes that there is good in the world that is deeply contrasted with
... Hades, Odysseus gets right to work on properly burying Elpenor’s body. Previously, he had disregarded his fallen comrade’s body and left it there to rot. After realizing he was wrong, he does his best to rectify the situation. Towards the end of the poem, Odysseus makes plans to make his huge sacrifice to Poseidon for he did much to anger the great sea god in the past. Through fatal mistakes, Odysseus is able to learn important lessons and change his ways.
All Shelley might be doing both here and in the ‘Mutability’ lines (as also perhaps in ‘Ozymandias’) is describing the imperfection and impermanence of worldly circumstances. Mary Shelley’s purpose in using her husband’s lines might be no more than a device to engender feelings of pathos in the reader’s heart at the series of losses suffered by the protagonist.
While immersed in its beauty, Victor and his creation escaped worldly problems and entered a supernatural bliss. In short, Shelley presents nature as very powerful. It has the power to put the humanity back into man when the unnatural world has stripped him of his moral fiber. In comparison to the pure beauty of nature, the unnatural acts of man are far more emphasized; therefore, the reader is clearly aware of man’s faults and their repercussions. Unfortunately, not even the power of nature could balance the work of man: “the cup of life was poisoned forever.”
This poem describes a story told you by a passing traveler of a ruined statue of a king, Ozymandias, seemingly in a desolate desert. On the statue in is inscribed, “‘My name is Ozymandias, king of kings: look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!’/Nothing beside remain” (“Ozymandias” 10-12). Upon examination of the surrounding land, we realize that the once vast kingdom around the statue has been taken back by the desert, leaving the ironic message on the statue. This poem shows Shelley’s ideas of how all is temporary, especially mankind and our achievements. Showing romantic values, Shelley believed nature is much greater than man and no matter how big your kingdom, mather nature will always take back what was always
It is nature that destroys humankind when the sun disappears and the volcano erupts in “Darkness” and in “Ozymandias,” it is the sand and wind that causes the statue to fall. In Byron’s poem, humans lose the fight for their lives, and in Shelley’s poem, Ozymandias’s statue is powerless because it is lifeless, emphasizing the importance of the themes of life and death to the shared topic of destruction. Although they explore destruction using different language, they share the use of ideas about the destruction of civilization, and the fall of humankind because of nature, life and
Ozymandias, the Greek name for Ramses II, is a sonnet written by Percy Bysshe. Shelley. In the poem, Shelley uses irony as a form of satire, mocking tyranny. The poem was published, according to Ian Lancashire (University of Toronto) in January of 1818.
The poem is based on Lord Tennyson describing of a huge sea monster that is
The various cycles of death and rebirth are examined with reference to the Maenads who were fabled to have destroyed Orpheus’s body and spread it around the world. This is the underlying theme to the poem with Shelley alluding to the breaking of Christ’s body on the cross and how that was essential for humanity to reach salvation. The onslaught of Autumn is the ‘Destroyer’ in one sense but also the ‘Preserver’ as it forms an intricate part of the cycle of life and death. Without the death of Jesus Christ the world would not have been saved and so for life to exist so too must death.