What Is The Iniquity In The Scarlet Letter

1078 Words3 Pages

Sin and iniquity are universally possessed, but universally denied. In The Scarlet Letter, though not realized at the time, the townspeople all had sin but did not admit it to themselves or each other, and instead used the evident wrongdoings of others to justify the sin they hid. The minister of the community’s church hid their sins from the people while they publicly shamed those who committed the same sins. The characters continued in a cycle of underserved self-justification. In The Scarlet Letter, a fictional tale about the evident adultery between a woman and the church’s minister, Nathaniel Hawthorne used Hester’s public sin, Dimmesdale’s hidden sin, and the later vindication of Hester’s actions to reveal that the justification of …show more content…

After Hester’s sin was exposed to the public, the characters used her iniquities as a basis of morality. Because Hawthorne used Hester’s iniquity as a public mark, and displayed her for public shame upon the scaffold, she “[became] the general symbol at which the preacher and moralist [pointed], and in which they [vivified] and [embodied] their images of a woman’s frailty and sinful passion” (Hawthorne 75). Hester was portrayed as an example of what not to do; she was referenced as someone who made a mistake and was sentenced to live in agony. The scarlet letter turned Hester into a transgressor despised by the public. The townspeople believed that it was Hester who “had brought shame upon [them] all, and ought to die” (Hawthorne 49). Hester was viewed as so sinful she was deserving of death; the townspeople regarded her sin as worthy of death, while not acknowledging their own and using Hester’s to justify their sins that they considered less sinful than Hester’s. A balance was formed using Hester as a reference point of iniquity. The morals of the people were set on Hester as a reference for bad, and themselves and the ministers of their church as good; it was for this reason Dimmesdale hid his adultery from the

Open Document