Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive and negative impact the internet has on education
The role of motivation in the learning process
Positive and negative impact the internet has on education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There are many different generations currently living in the word today thanks to the advances in medicine and technology to help prolong the lives of the individuals. While this may seem like a good idea, it causes conflict between the generations. The older generations keep proclaiming that they are smarter than the young ones these days. They thoroughly believe that with each passing year the youth of the world get dumber and dumber. If this is the case, then what would be the cause? It would be the ineffectiveness of the older generation at teaching the younger generations. So, who really is the dumbest generation? The answer is it is not either generation; the older generation needs to understand that. While the older generation may …show more content…
What the older generations refuse to admit is that it makes life easier. The internet has databases that have access to resources that make research quicker (Carr). The “[r]esearch that once required days in the stacks or periodical rooms of libraries can now be done in minutes (Carr).” The older generation should learn just because our generation does not spend hours working on a project does not make it any less influential. Because of the internet, people are writing more than ever before (Thompson). People these days write more than any other generation before ours according to the writings of Clive Thompson, a writer for Wired, which is a technology magazine. In a study done by Andrea Lundsford -- a professor of writing at Stanford University -- it was discovered that out of all of the writing her students did, 38% of it did not happen in the classroom, but rather in the students’ daily lives (Thompson). Whether the writing was on a blog, in a text, or even creating a tweet, the influx of the internet has been improving this generation's writing -- bringing it back to the “ ...Greek tradition of argument than the asynchronous letter and essay writing of 50 years ago …show more content…
The change from a generation that was required to memorize to a generation that can focus more on personalised subjects may have caused the confusion. These new forms of communication and information that actually let the younger generation become knowledgeable in certain fields and some of that knowledge could even surpass the adult’s knowledge in the same field (Ito). While the older generation knew to respect their elders and conform to society, the influence of all that the newer generation has to offer has a great impact on the lives of the newer generation by giving them the opportunity to learn from each other. They respect and gain knowledge from their peers when there is not an adult who is experienced in certain fields in their areas of interest (Ito). Likewise, the older generation is the one that defined the classroom setting and while they may think they know what is best to help the children learn, their ways may be outdated. The youth of today have a different goal than the youth of the past. In a study done in 2008 study of the effects of media on the new generation, they discovered that youth are more motivated if they learn from their peers and “[the youth’s] efforts are also largely self-directed, and the outcome emerges through exploration, in contrast to classroom learning that is oriented
In the article “Clive Thompson on the New Literacy,” writer Clive Thompson argues that the widespread use of technology and social media does not make kids illiterate and unable to form coherent sentences, but instead, keeps them actively writing and learning. Thompson’s article is based off of a study done by Andrea Lunsford, a writing professor at Stanford University. Thompson agrees with Lunsford that the use of social media and the Internet allow students to be creative and get better at writing. In his article, Thompson quotes John Sutherland, an English professor at University College of London, to inform the audience of the opposite side of the argument. He states, “Facebook encourages narcissistic blabbering, video and PowerPoint have
Clive Thompson is a journalist, blogger and writer. He mainly focuses his writing on science and technology but this one chapter from his book Smarter than you think, “Public thinking,” has put a spin on writing and technology. Multiple times he talks about writing in many different forms. For example, he speaks of writing on blogs, on internet short stories (or fan fiction novels), in schools, in studies, and even on a regular basis. Thomson is trying to explain to his readers how writing, and the sharing of information across the internet, is beneficial to our society and ones well-being. In my readings of Thompson’s excerpt, I will examine Thomson’s examples and show how they are relevant and that it is beneficial.
The internet is no longer just a source for research, as Cascio has said “ the digital systems we rely upon become faster, more sophisticated, and capable too” (Cascio). What he means by this is that we can rely more on technology to help us because it’s developing to become efficient to our daily needs. For example, there are tasks we can now complete on the internet that used to require plenty of time. Things like going to pay rent, purchasing groceries, or going to the bank are all things that can now be done online due to the faster, more capable power of the internet. Once time consuming or complex tasks are now simple to complete with just a few clicks. This is a beneficial concept to those who have busy schedules, have difficulties with transportation, disabilities that don’t allow them to maneuver much, or anyone who just doesn't have the time, patients, or ability to stand in long, never-ending waiting lines. According to the previously mentioned study done by Nanjing University of Science and Technology with the University of South Australia “elderly people are increasingly using mobile devices to conduct online banking, find jobs, access medical help, and obtain entertainment information” (Ma). This research goes to at the least provide an example of one group of people who have benefited from using the internet to make their life
While preparing for one of his college lectures, Dennis Baron, a professor and linguistics at the University of Illinois, began playing with the idea of how writing has changed the world we lived in and materials and tools we use in everyday life. This lecture slowly transitioned into “Should Everybody Write?” An article that has made many wonder if technology has made writing too easy for anyone to use or strengthens a writer's ability to learn and communicate their ideas. Baron uses rhetorical strategies in his article to portray to his audience his positive tone, the contrast and comparison of context and his logical purpose.
Bauerlein begins his piece by asserting that “digital diversions,” which is anything technological that distracts the younger generation from finer past times, are in fact cutting the younger generation off from culturally enhancing mediums and is in turn making the teenagers less intelligent. Bauerlein continues to claim that it is the responsibility of adults to guide the younger generation towards meaningful topics. The author adds that teenagers live life minute to minute and because of that suggests that the younger generation is not concerned with the past. Bauerlein states that because of technological advances, including cell phones teenagers are in constant contact with each other. The author states that this constant contact with peers makes it very difficult for adults in the younger generation’s life to guide them toward cultural topics. Bauerlein then adds that if the younger generation continues to indulge in “digital diversions” and is not guided by adults to finer pastimes by the time they are in college they will never take part in high culture. Bauerlein concludes that “digital diversions” and lack of adult guidance will result in a less intelligent generation.
A few years back, there was some concern over the fact that texting may be affecting the writing composition of teenagers. John McWhorter from Times Magazine wrote, “Is Texting Killing the English Language” on this very phenomenon, with the rhetorical aim to persuade people that this wasn’t the case. In the article, McWhorter refers to historical texts to persuade his audience, middle-aged
Like Gladwell, Nicholas Carr believes the internet has negative effects. In his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Carr attempts to show as the internet becomes our primary source of information, it diminishes the ability to read books and extensive research. Carr goes on to give a very well researched account of how text on the internet is designed make browsing fast and profitable. He describes how the design for skimming affects our thinking skills and attention spans. He wraps up his argument by describing what we are losing in the shift toward using the internet as our main information source. Carr suggests the learning process that occurs in extensive research and through reading is lost. While the learning process can be beneficial to scholars and intellectuals, not everyone has the capability to follow through with it. The internet offers an education that anyone can have access to and understand. Also if Carr believes the learning process is better, this option is always available for people who want to learn according to this scholarly principal. However, for the rest of the population the quick and easy access has allowed the average population to become more educated, and to expose themselves to aspects of academia that previously is reserved for
Mark Bauerlein the author of The Dumbest Generation, claims that people under thirty are the dumbest generation in modern history. Many people call us the dumbest generation because we have the Internet. The Internet does not make our generation “dumb”, it makes us one of the most advanced generation yet. There is much evidence to support both side however it is clearly evident that this generation is not the dumbest.
I can relate to this because every time that I have been asked to do research for a paper, the first thing I turn to is the internet. I don’t think that I have ever once gone out to find or discover my own information. The closest I have ever gotten to actually going out to find information was once in my cols class when we were all assigned a college resource to go to and ask someone working there what they are “all about”. I love that Schlesinger is concerned about this issue, I am too, and this worries me because one day my generation will be running the whole world and if we believe the answer to everything is on the internet what happens when we come across a question that the internet can’t answer? Will we leave it unanswered and simply forget about it or will we be able to go out and find the answers for ourselves. Kind of like Schlesinger askes “will we grow accustomed to only asking questions that we know we can answer by using out cell
Have you ever wondered if our generation is the dumbest? Well, there’s some evidence to prove so. Generation ‘Y’ is considered to be the dumbest generation of all. This is based on numerous experiments, polls, surveys, etc. While everything else in this world is rising, intellect of each generation is falling. With the ignorance of facts, by choice, and lack of some education, Generation ‘Y’ is considered to be the dumbest generation.
Mizuko Ito's article, Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project, states that the youth are exploring brand new ways of expressing themselves through series of trial and error. We are now able to learn new skills our parents and grandparents never learned in school such as creating websites or making power points. For instance, we will never learn to use shorthand. Learning different subjects than our
...s they make up for in their own ways, Intelligence is not based off of knowledge, but how you apply that knowledge and Generation Y just has a different way of doing so. This generation uses their knowledge and skills to skip a step. They understand that time is ticking away, and they do not have the time to waist memorizing information that is useless to them.
The under 30 generation is the dumbest because technology limits opportunities to retain information which makes us weaker than the past generations.
The Internet has created a generation of the most efficient multi-taskers ever born. Many people will have at least four tabs open as a time (Google, Facebook, Youtube, Pandora, Wikipedia, Gmail, etc.). People are constantly jumping from one web page to the next, clicking on links and opening new tabs and browsers. The method through which knowledge is gained has transitioned from deep reading to fast skimming. Every time a web page is opened the viewer is bombarded with information, almost every page has advertisements or links to additional information lining its sides. The Internet has made mountains of information available to almost anyone. It is fast and easy to find information and facts. Essentially the Internet has become the fast food of knowledge. It is convenient but it skips the element of effort.
Penelope Trunk said, “the type of writing that students do--via IM, Twitter, Facebook, and so forth-- is actually great for building communication skills” (Trunk 2). The reason behind communication skills being built through social media is our generation is practicing with our reading, and writing constantly while on social media. “The fact that students today almost always write for an audience gives them a different sense of what constitutes good writing” (Thompson 2). Our generation has a diverse audience of people that “likes” what we post, making it tempting to come up with a status or post that is well written and appeals to the audience. No matter if it’s an debate, opinion, or planning something with a friend, social media has made us adapt to writing for an audience of different people that we want to impress. It has also helped the generation with code switching, because based on the intended audience we have adapted to making changes in the way we communicate to appeal to a person or group of people. Verbally, our generation takes the skills learned from social media and speak the way they type on social media, appealing to whoever is listening to