Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect and causes of divorce
Good and bad effects of divorce
The effect and causes of divorce
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect and causes of divorce
Introduction It is often said that ‘show me your friends and I will tell you who you are’. This translates to the fact that the friends of a person have a great influence on the kind of life that a person leads. That quote usually encompasses the basic life of a person including his love-life and relationships. However, there are some instances whereby, the friends do not determine the basic life of a person. In this case, consequentialism comes into play. Consequentialism may determine the life of a person in some way. This paper will give the general observation about life, love and relationships. As stated earlier, the friends of a person determine the kind of life that the person leads. For instance, one may witness how his friends at some point in life were negatively affected by the people that …show more content…
Consequentialism is the state in which people participate in actions which are morally correct and which will have positive results in the future. Basically, consequentialism largely affects the actions that people take in life (Hume, 1888). For example, most people will want to participate in actions or do things that will have positive results in future. Some may decide to have relationships which will lead to marriage. Others may decide to have many friends who can help them when they need help. Another example is when people decide to have a divorce. Based on consequentialism, some questions have to be asked. One can ask what the positive and negative impacts of the divorce are. The positive impact may be that the person will be finally free. The negative effects are not very predictable. One negative impact is that one will have broken a solemn vow. Additionally, the divorce may result to friends and members of the family not taking the vows seriously. Ideally, consequentialism may influence the life of a person including the love-life and the relationships that the person
Marion Winik’s “What Are Friends For?” expresses the characteristics of friendships and their importance in her existence. Winik begins by stating her theory of how some people can’t contribute as much to a friendship with their characteristic traits, while others can fulfill the friendship. She illustrates the eight friendships she has experienced, categorized as Buddies, Relative Friends, Work Friends, Faraway Friends, Former Friends, Friends You Love to Hate, Hero Friends, and New Friends. In like manner, the friendships that I have experienced agree and contradict with Winik’s categorizations.
Kai Nielsen defended consequentialism and showed how it can still agree with commonsense, deontological convictions in his article “Traditional Morality and Utilitarianism.” His article focused on closing the gulf between consequentialism and deontology by showing how closely they can agree, and he further evaluated the systems and found that consequentialism as he sees it should be practiced is morally superior to traditional deontology. First, this essay will explain his argument that consequentialism squares with the commonsense convictions of deontology, and second, it will show how Nielsen arrived at the conclusion that consequentialism is a good moral system while deontology is faulty.
asks “What are the costs?” and “What are the benefits?”. According to rule consequentialism, rules are selected entirely based on the goodness of their consequences and proceeds to claim that these rules govern what kind of acts are morally wrong. Basically, the rightness or wrongness of an action is contingent on whether it is obligatory or prohibited by an ideal set of rules. An ideal set of...
Consequentialism is a term used by the philosophers to simplify what is right and what is wrong. Consequentialist ethical theory suggests that right and wrong are the consequences of our actions. It is only the consequences that determine whether our actions are right or wrong. Standard consequentialism is a form of consequentialism that is discussed the most. It states that “the morally right action for an agent to perform is the one that has the best consequences or that results in the most good.” It means that an action is morally correct if it has little to no negative consequences, or the one that has the most positive results.
Planned Parenthood is a non-profit organization that is government funded and offers free health care, sex education, and family planning to millions of women all over the country. (“Who We Are”) The organization was founded by Margaret Sanger in the 1960’s. Her mission was to provide free health care to women all across the nation despite their race, ethnic background, income, etc. She also vowed to educate and care for women’s sexual health while maintaining their privacy. As of late, Planned Parenthood has been a target of controversy, with a possibility of being defunded. Why or why not should the government continue to fund this organization?
Consequentialism is ordinarily distinct from deontology, as deontology offers rightness or wrongness of an act, rather than the outcome of the action. In this essay we are going to explore the differences of consequentialism and deontology and apply them to the quandary that Bernard Williams and J.J.C Smart put forward in their original analogy of “Jim and the Indians” in their book , Utilitarianism: for and against (J.J.C Smart & Bernard Williams, 1973, p.78-79.).
Friends come and go, it’s the good ones that stay. In the book “The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-time India” The author convey many themes but friendship is one of the biggest. Throughout the book, Junior the main character talks about his life and how friendship is very important to him. He learns to make new friends and understand to let go of some.
Consequentialism is an ethical perspective that primarily focuses upon the consequences resulting from an action and aims to eliminate the negative consequences. Within this framework there are three sub-categories: Egoism, Altruism and Utilitarianism.
Let us discuss consequentialism first. Consequencialism focuses on consequences as the most important factor in the decision making process (Donaldson 3). For consequentialists, the motives of an act are not as important as what comes out of it. Utilitarianism is one of the branches of consequentialism. Utilitarianism believes in the greatest good for the number (Donaldson 3).
...ts. The consequential approach focuses on utilitarian, pragmatic outcomes of negative nature; non-consequentialism rejects stealing as something contrary to the inherent norms of morality. Both approaches should be used to fight stealing; however, certain principles seem more controversial when the consequential approach is applied. Non-consequential principles, although less pragmatic, help to make the right choice when non-consequential ones are less potent.
Moreover, in consequentialist normative principles " it require us that we first tally both the good and bad consequences of an action." Then, identify if the "total good consequences outweigh the total bad consequences." If based in our analysis the good "consequences are greater," then "the action is morally proper. In the given situation, stealing for food for a hungry child suggest plenty of good consequences when we try to focus on the true and good intention of the agent. We may think that he is good because he/she is trying to save only the boy from hunger or even from tragic death. Thus, millions of children around the world had died because of
The principle of utility influences people to act on the wrong terms and encourages its followers to make decisions solely based on what produces the best results. Consequentialists, Jeremy Bentham and John Stewart Mill believe that it doesn’t matter why a person does something or what motivates them to do so; but rather they think that the outcome is the most important factor in decision making. These two Utilitarian philosophers concluded that the greatest form of good in society was happiness, and that the absence of pain and the presence of pleasure should always be one’s number one priority and ultimately always one’s end goal. Encouraging members
A Non-consequentialist Ethical Theory is a general normative theory of morality that is not Consequentialist – that is, a theory according to which the rightness or erroneousness of an act, system of rules. That depends on something other than the goodness or lamentableness of the consequences. Conspicuously, Anti-Consequentialism implicatively insinuates Non-Consequentialism, but not vice versa. It is possible for a Non-Consequentialist to claim that the goodness or deplorability of the consequences of an act pertains to moral rightness or erroneousness.
In life friendships come and go. Some friendships are meant to be forever and others are meant to be temporary. Several friends are in a person’s life until they reach an obstacle. There are many reasons why people become friends and why people stop being friends. My friendship with Brittney escalated because of our proximity. However, our friendship de-escalated because of proximity. Furthermore, in this paper I discuss the escalation and de-escalation of the friendship with Brittney, I talk about how our friendship escalated because of proximity and also aided to decline our friendship, and lastly I conclude with a final reflection of my friendship.
In life we come across many people. Some will hate us while others will adore us. The ones who hate us can be referred to as enemies and the ones who show us adoration are referred to as friends. There are three types of friends. They are the aquaintinces we make in school, the friends we loose as one grows, and best friends who may stray, but never too far away.