Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The strengths and weaknesses of augustine’s theodicy essay
David Hume the argument from evil
David Hume the argument from evil
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Explain the Theodicy of Augustine (25 marks)
The main purpose of a theodicy is to defend God, whilst explaining the existence of both natural and moral evil. Both Epicurus and Hume argued the unsatisfying logic behind there being an omnibenevolent God which allows evil to intervene in individuals lives on a daily basis. Epicurus outlines the trilemma of the problem of evil “is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? But then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? The he is not omnibenevolent?” Hume later cited this in ‘Dialogues concerning Natural Religion’ to illustrate his ‘inconsistent triad’. The inconsistent triad is the way that the attributes we believe God has: omnibenevolence an omnipotence are inconsistent with the
…show more content…
Also, he considered Gods creation to be harmonious and so evil is not a separate entity, but a deviation from good. Augustine’s view is that evil came into the world through the ‘fall’. He said that angels were all created perfect, but misused the freedom God had provided for them and as a result decided to turn from God, the Highest Good, to ‘lesser goods’. Adam and Eve were then tempted by Satan, a fallen angel, in the Garden of Eden. By breaking Gods command, and eating the forbidden fruit, Adam brought original sin into the world. Sin was now seminally present in Adam, and so therefore every generation is guilty due to them inheriting his guilt for disobeying God. The reason being that when Adam was teste4d in the Garden of Eden he was representing the entire human race, therefore all humans- including innocent babies, deserve to suffer. This is emphasised by Paul, who came up with the idea that sin was present ‘in the lions of Adam’. He wrote in ‘Romans 5:12’: “therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death came through sin, and so death spread to all because all have …show more content…
An example of the expression would be how blindness is the privation of eyesight. This is the idea that evil does not exist in itself, but it the lack of where good should be, in the same way darkness is a privation of light. In ‘The Enchiridion’ Augustine explained how evil is the ‘parasite on the good’. However, philosophers such as Schleiermacher criticised this concept as he stated that either the world was not created perfect in the first place, or God made it go wrong; so God is to blame and not humans. Furthermore, another critic would be how the idea of evil being a privation of good does not explain or more so justify the historical events such as the Holocaust as just an incident which was a ‘lack of kindness’. Modern Platonist expanded on this, by stating that there is a substantial evil which he called ‘surd evil’ and J.S. Mill compared God to an artist who is limited by its
John Calvin’s doctrine of predestination was often conflicting on the grounds that it made God as unjust. However, Calvin, clarifying his conception of justice in the process, strongly answered such arguments. One objection to his doctrine was the portrayal God as tyrannical, which condemned people before creation who had done nothing wrong. A second related objection was that if God willed humanity’s fall in Adam—as Calvin maintained —why did he doomed those in the sinful condition he willed? Moreover, were such people
7-12- Again Augustines thoughts on God reflect that of the religious teachings of his day, namely those of the Neoplatonists. For example he refuses to speculate on how the soul joins the body to become an infant and even follows Plato when he suggests that this life could possibly be some kind of “living death”. He then goes into an examination of his infancy, which he depicts as a quite pitiful state. He described himself as a sinful and thoughtless creature who made demands on everyone, wept unceasingly, and gave everyone a hard time that took care of him. Though very brutal in his self examination, he later states that he does not hold himself accountable for any of these sinful acts because he simply can’t remember them.
In Augustine's Confessions, the early church father puts forth a complex theodicy in which he declares evil to be nonexistent. Such a leap may seem to be illogical, but this idea stems from the understanding of what is substance and what is not. According to Augustine, the duality of good and evil is false, because anything that is good is substance and what humans think of as evil is simply the absence of the good (Confessions, 126). Vices for example, are just the display of the absence of the good. Pride is the absence of humility, unrighteous anger the absence of temperance, and so on. This idea is evident as he writes that the ability to be corrupted is what makes something good, not i...
Throughout the world, most people believe in some type of god or gods, and the majority of them understand God as all-good, all-knowing (omniscient), and all-powerful (omnipotent). However, there is a major objection to the latter belief: the “problem of evil” (P.O.E.) argument. According to this theory, God’s existence is unlikely, if not illogical, because a good, omniscient, and omnipotent being would not allow unnecessary suffering, of which there are enormous amounts.
The problem of reconciling an omnipotent, perfectly just, perfectly benevolent god with a world full of evil and suffering has plagued believers since the beginning of religious thought. Atheists often site this paradox in order to demonstrate that such a god cannot exist and, therefore, that theism is an invalid position. Theodicy is a branch of philosophy that seeks to defend religion by reconciling the supposed existence of an omnipotent, perfectly just God with the presence of evil and suffering in the world. In fact, the word “theodicy” consists of the Greek words “theos,” or God, and “dike,” or justice (Knox 1981, 1). Thus, theodicy seeks to find a sense of divine justice in a world filled with suffering.
Augustine is fixated upon the idea of evil and its origins in Christian theology. He struggles to come to terms with the doctrine of sin. A popular counterargument to the belief in God is that a good, kind, and loving divine power would never command the wholesale slaughter of nations. According to Christian belief, God created everything, and everything He created is good because He Himself is righteous. Augustine claims that God pervades the entirety of the universe and all it contains. So, how can things outside of God, such as evil, even exist? He asks this in various forms of rhetorical questions, such as, “Where then is evil? What is its origin? How did it steal into the world?...Where then does evil come from, if God made all things
When Augustine joined the Manicheans he was faced with questions about evil and its origin which allowed the group to teach Augustine the Manichean ideas of evils source. The Manichean belief is not explicitly explained by Augustine (maybe because the people of Augustine’s time already knew about the Manicheans). The texts glossary explains the allusion by explaining that the Manicheans attributed evil to an evil force (Satan) that is in combat with God (Confessions 330). This evil is thought to have elements which are also evil and in one of these, the human body was included, meaning humans are inherently evil (Confessions Glossary. 330). The inherent evil conflicts with Augustine’s view which attributes the origin of evil to a will favoring lesser things, because this claims that “Human beings therefore, are not ultimately responsible for their own actions” (Confessions Glossary. p. 330). This would mean that God had created evil things, which is in direct conflict with Gods good nature and evil is caused by the divine. Augustine ultimately rejected the M...
“Please tell me: isn’t God the cause of evil?” (Augustine, 1). With this question to Augustine of Hippo, Evodius begins a philosophical inquiry into nature of evil. Augustine, recently baptized by Saint Ambrose in Milan, began writing his treatise On Free Choice of the Will in 387 C.E. This work laid down the foundation for the Christian doctrine regarding the will’s role in sinning and salvation. In it, Augustine and his interlocutor investigate God’s existence and his role in creating evil. They attempt not only to understand what evil is, and the possibility of doing evil, but also to ascertain why God would let humans cause evil. Central to the premise of this entire dialogue is the concept of God, as relates to Christianity; what is God, and what traits separate Him from humans? According to Christianity, God is the creator of all things, and God is good; he is omnipotent, transcendent, all-knowing, and atemporal- not subject to change over time- a concept important to the understanding of the differences between this world and the higher, spiritual realm He presides over. God’s being is eidos, the essence which forms the basis of humans. With God defined, the core problem being investigated by Augustine and Evodius becomes clear. Augustine states the key issue that must be reconciled in his inquiry; “we believe that everything that exists comes from the one God, and yet we believe that God is not the cause of sins. What is troubling is that if you admit that sins come from… God, pretty soon you’ll be tracing those sins back to God” (Augustine, 3).
... effects of a corrupting entity, what then is Christ’s work? How can a physical sacrifice save the world from sliding into nonexistence? The answer comes from another adjustment; Christ comes to pull creation back towards the eternal God. Salvation through Christ is does not look like Him coming as a warrior to vanquish the evil forces, but Him coming as a loving servant to heal the corrupted beings (i.e. sinners) back to their original state of grace. Thus, the idea of there being a war between forces of God and Evil is not compatible with truth of the Gospel; rather that God designed the world in harmony and wishes it to return to this state. This proves that, in the end, Augustine’s answer to the problem of evil is correct in accordance to Christian Confession.
..., the closer he was really moving toward God. He began to realize that God is all good, so nothing he creates will be of evil. “God does not create evil but it is of the world” (Augustine 230-31). Once he took responsibility for his personal life and spiritual walk, Augustine began to uncover the truths to his life. He reveals one must take responsibility for their actions and confess to develop a stronger connection with God. He then comprehends; God allows bad things to happen in your life to show you that you need him. Evil is not a lesser good, but it is a reflection of ones moral well-being. In order for one’s well being to be saved one must confess their sins to Christ.
The role of free will in the problem of evil emanates from Augustine's explanation of the origin of sin in his 'Confessions'. ' He is now certain that he has a free will, but the problem how evil comes to be in his will is unsolved.' This sentence is a summation of the chapter titled 'The Problem of the Origin of Evil'. Even after deep analysis of the origin of evil, Augustine still cannot give a definite answer to the question. In the context of the free will, the question that arises is, if God is benevolent and omniscient, why does He allow humans to sin.
A major critique of Augustine’s theodicy is that if we went wrong we couldn’t have been perfect in the first place. Something that is perfect doesn’t have the capability to go awry. It also brings up another question as to why an all-loving God would punish and continue to punish His people, even those who were not responsible for the original abuse of freedom. Another criticism of this theodicy is that modern science and Darwin’s ideas of evolution tend to oppose the belief that the universe was created perfectly. Instead, humans are an improvement the more imperfect beings they developed
Augustine is smart, well read, and had a knack for philosophy. Why then is he struggling internally with truth and good and evil? The problem is right under Augustine’s nose. His lust is the thing holding him back from free thought and wisdom. His lust iss holding him back from God. Nevertheless, he asked God,“Grant me chastity and continence, but not yet.” (8.17) Augustine knew what his problem is, but disregards it. However, he realizes that his sin “was this, that I looked for pleasure, beauty, and truth not in him but in myself and his other creatures, and the search led me instead to pain, confusion, and error. (I.20.1)” His way out of the cave, is through
Adam possessed all human nature and through his sin became dirty and guilty. Naturally, each individual part shares this guilt and dirt. “Augustine’s conception of an inherited sin provided a principle explaining human solidarity in sin with Adam. This principle is the core element of the classic doctrine of original sin. like Paul, Augustine’s primary interest was with Christ, not Adam…Augustine’s starting premise was the necessity of Christ’s redemption for all humankind, not original
Even though Adam and Eve did not encounter evil until the fall, they still had the potential for evil intrinsically within themselves. Likewise, although Lucifer was not wholly evil at the time of his formation, his pride and thus capacity to sin was part of his identity. If all of these characters developed the evil within them even though they were made good, one could question whether God is the creator of evil and is thus partly evil himself. Milton himself says that God “created evil, for evil only good / Where all life dies, death lives” (2.623-624). This seems in conflict with the earlier claim that God is omnibenevolent and free of