What Happened To Ellen Ternan's Death

1137 Words3 Pages

On June 9, 1965 Dickens was involved in the Staplehurst railway accident. He was travelling with Ellen Ternan, with whom he had a long standing affair, and her mother. They were all unhurt physically, but many people died in front of their eyes. Dickens even tried to help the injured so it was not surprising if the accident left serious consequences on him. He wrote to his friends: The close encounter with death left him with sudden sensations of horror. Peter Ackroyd wonders: “Was it as if some terror from his own imagination had now come alive, just as the dead had surrounded him at Staplehurst?…Not only had he been involved in a crash but that accident may have injured Ellen Ternan and certainly threaten to expose his ‘other life’ with her …show more content…

The story of his last novel takes place in “a city of another and a bygone time (The Mystery of Edwin Drood 12)” , the word “time” was used more than 200 times throughout the book and for the first time Dickens insisted that a clause be inserted in the agreement for publication of the novel This clause implies that Dickens, although publicly denying that he was ill, probably knew that he was dying. Roy Roussel suggests that in The Mystery of Edwin Drood Dickens’s “relation to his narrative is dominated by [..,] desire for completion (384)” but it seems that the story was not completed even in Dickens’s mind. He was trying to represent the events as if they had already taken place and he used past tenses to achieve that effect, but the novel was not written entirely in the past tense. Of twenty three chapters only fourteen are written using the past tense, while in others, Dickens either used the present tense exclusively or in combination with the past tense. It is obvious that …show more content…

It is so mad that, had the ties between me and my dear lost boy been one silken thread less strong, I might have swept even him from your side when you favored him.” (Dickens, The Mystery of Edwin drood150) Did he just confess killing Edwin? His intentions are not clear, therefore the event is not complete. The same happens in the twelfth chapter in which Jasper goes with Durdles on an unaccountable expedition. We do not know what exactly happened that night; the event is not complete hence the present tense. “The juxtaposition of these two tenses implies that the opposition between the narrative as a completed story and the narrative as an open-ended process was fundamental to Dickens' conception of The Mystery of Edwin Drood.” (Roussel 385) With this statement we return to the discussion from the Fruttero and Lucentini’s book, did Dickens intend The Mystery of Edwin Drood to be an open-ended detective novel or a completed psychological thriller? It appears that even Dickens struggled with that, he defined the story “a very strong one, though difficult to work (Forster and Lang 452)” he miscalculated the number of sheets he needed to write for each chapter so the first two chapters ended up being twelve pages too short although he was usually very accurate in his calculations. There was another issue with the book, Dickens was using up his plot much quicker than he

Open Document