Frankenstein Vs Oliver Twist

1303 Words3 Pages

As the art of a language, literature is an integration of author’s thoughts and hard work that reflects one’s understanding about the humanity. A literary masterpiece not only reflects issues within a society through describing a fictitious one, but also stands the test of time. Oliver Twist, an epic novel written by 19th-century author Charles Dickens, is, without a doubt, a literary masterpiece. Using well-portrayed characters, Dickens unveil a corrupted society, which the noblemen oppress the paupers, by his pen. With effective use of satirical tone, Dickens emphasizes the issue while making the readers think rather than just letting the readers take in his words. Compares to other literature such as A Modest Proposal by Jonathan Swift, …show more content…

The monster is characterized as “monster! Ugly wretch!” (Shelley 122). Obviously, creatures like that have never existed throughout history; thus, it has no connection to the actual society at all, creating a prejudice in readers’ mind that the story is fictional, causing them to have a difficult time reflecting the story to actual life. On the other hand, characters from Oliver Twist are connected to the society, illustrating a social issue at that time. Although Swift’s A Modest Proposal illustrates a social issue, it fails to do that by using character; more specifically, it doesn’t have any character in the novel at all. The absence of any character would cause making connections from reader to the book difficult, leaving the story full of superficial stories with no real life connections, lacking readability. Novels such as Frankenstein, whose character has no good other than developing the story, or A Modest Proposal, whose has no character development at all, are not as good as Oliver Twist, which addresses the depraved society through the development of …show more content…

Throughout the novel, the use of satire increases the readability of the text, intriguing readers’ thoughts, and, ultimately, emphasizing the adverse social condition; thus making the novel appealing. When Oliver was born, Dickens wrote, “Now, if, during this brief period, Oliver had been surrounded by careful grandmothers, anxious aunts, experienced nurses, and doctors of profound wisdom, he would most inevitably and indubitably have been killed in no time” (Dickens Chapter I). Dickens is connoting the fact that those who are in adversities would fight for living, while those who are not don’t even need to fight, highlighting the social inequality that exists at that time. Other than that, Dickens described that authorities’ reaction to “let the paupers go to sleep” as “a novel illustration of the tender laws of England”, using a sarcastic tone to make the point that paupers were not expected to sleep in that time, underscoring the ruthlessness that those who are in lower class were suffering not only in the novel but also in the corrupted society during Victorian Era (Dickens Chapter II). Dickens successfully illustrated a brutal society that once existed. Other than the innuendos, the way that the author delivers the story also makes the novel remarkable. Throughout the narration, Dickens constantly “tells” the story in the first person.

Open Document