Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The philosophy of socrates
Essays of socrates
The life and works of Socrates
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
10. Explain Socrates’ view that ‘to be wicked (or: unethical or immoral in some way) is to hurt yourself more than you hurt anyone else’. 4 points Socrates’s view that one’s wicked actions cause more self-harm than the harm caused to others, stemmed from the fact that Socrates placed more value on soul than on the physical body. By being wicked, or making unethical or immoral decisions, one not only harms others immediately but one will harm their soul by turning oneself towards wickedness and making it harder to seek out virtue. He believed that since being wicked is the worst thing that may happen to a person and that each person choose on their own accord to be wicked or virtuous. 11. Why does Socrates think it is important to continue …show more content…
to question people on philosophical issues? 4 points Socrates thinks it is important to question people on philosophical issues, using his ‘Socratic Method,’ to reveal to them that they may not, in fact, know as much as they believe they do, and that the answers to many questions, even the seemingly simple, can have very complex answers, that one may need to think about in greater detail.
Socrates also considered true wisdom to be the knowledge and acceptance of the fact that one ultimately knows very little, and he found many he came across to be very unwise. By continuing to question people on philosophical issues, I believe Socrates not only sought to gain clarity certain philosophically problematic issues, but to spread what he believed to be true wisdom by revealing to the people of Athens the boundaries of their …show more content…
minds. 12. Write a short paragraph describing differences between Rationalism and Empiricism. 4 points During the 17th century, the two philosophers, Descartes and Locke, both proposed their opposing theories regarding the acquisition of knowledge.
René Descartes, as a Rationalist, believed that the only indubitable knowledge that can be acquired, is the knowledge acquired through pure reasoning and with no physical experience necessary, while John Locke, as an Empiricist believed knowledge could only be gained by experience via the senses and then contemplation on such experiences. The philosophers’ hit another discord regarding their stances on innate principals. The Rationalist, Descartes, argued that there must be priori truths (those which are not learned through experience or observation, but are principals we are born with), while the Empiricist rejects this possibility emphatically. Locke believed instead that we are born with no innate knowledge, as a “tabular rasa” or a ‘blank slate,’ upon which impressions are made by the experiences we encounter. 13. Write a paragraph explaining Descartes’ ‘Method of Doubt’. 4 points In order to determine which principals are definitive, René Descartes set about his attempts to determine which of his beliefs, if any, were true. He did so by using his Method of Doubt, wherein he subjected his beliefs to the basis that, if they could be disproved, then the belief was flawed and subject to doubt. He concluded that the basis for most of his beliefs were doubtable, including his sensory experiences - based on his Dreaming Argument and
his Evil Genius Argument. 14. Descartes is an Empiricist. True or false? 2 points False. 15. The Rationalists believe some knowledge or concepts are innate. True or false? 2 points True. 16. Aristotle believes that virtue is something that is learned, not something one is either born with or without. True or false? 2 points True. 17. If you are a Virtue ethicist, you should practice virtuous acts because it will bring you money and power. True or False? 2 points False. (Although, it is suggested that these may come as the fruits of labor from a life of virtuous acts.) 18. How does Aristotle suggest one work out what the right thing to do is in any given situation? 2 points Aristotle suggested that one could simply ask, “What would a virtuous person do in this situation?” Then act accordingly. Having no specific procedure for every scenario one might encounter, Aristotle acknowledged that one must learn from other virtuous people and imitate their behavior. 19. ‘Eudaimonia’, for Aristotle, is a life full of only pleasure and doing as one pleases. True or false? 2 points False. 20. For Aristotle, we must aim our behavior at the ‘mean’ between excess and deficiency. What does that involve? 4 points As being virtuous is requires constant practice, to tread the at the ‘mean’ between excess and deficiency, means to actively and constantly make virtuous choices that also tread on the middle ground, as we become good through doing good and bad through practicing bad. We should avoid the Vices, and try to keep our behavior between the extremes of lack and excess of each virtue. At the ‘mean’ and in pursuit of ‘Eudaimonia,’ Aristotle believed the best way we can we lead a good life is by using reason to better our own character.
"Do we say that one must never in any way do wrong willingly, or must one do wrong in one way and not in another?"3 Socrates tries to help people understand that mistakes are human nature, however to do wrongful things on purpose should not be tolerated. Crito agrees with Socrates statement, "So one must never do wrong."4 Crito believes in what Socrates is expressing, yet he wants Socrates to perform an unreasonable action and escape from prison. A big thing for Socrates is trust and being loyal to his family and city. "When one has come to an agreement that is just with someone, should one fulfill it or cheat on it?" Crito believes one should fulfill it. Which Socrates then states "If we leave here without the city's permission, are we harming people whom we should least do harm to? Are we sticking to a just agreement, or not?" Socrates thinks that if you commit to something you need to be a man of your word and follow through. If you make an agreement with someone, you should keep your word to the fullest extent. Socrates thinks he needs to adhere to the agreement of being in prison. He believes he shouldn’t leave unless someone tells him otherwise and to the just thing by upholding the decision. Again, Socrates doesn’t want to offend anyone or show disrespect, which shows his strong desire to always to the right
Socrates put one’s quest for wisdom and the instruction of others above everything else in life. A simple man both in the way he talked and the wealth he owned, he believed that simplicity in whatever one did was the best way of acquiring knowledge and passing it unto others. He is famous for saying that “the unexplained life is not worth living.” He endeavored therefore to break down the arguments of those who talked with a flowery language and boasted of being experts in given subjects (Rhees 30). His aim was to show that the person making a claim on wisdom and knowledge was in fact a confused one whose clarity about a given subject was far from what they claimed. Socrates, in all his simplicity never advanced any theories of his own but rather aimed at bringing out the worst in his interlocutors.
The author of “The Apology,” Benjamin Jowett, supports his ideas of Socrates by explaining the judgmental views that were made towards Socrates. Socrates is forced to face the jury of Athens due to his gadfly role on the streets on Athens. The citizens of Athens were willing to tolerate persons who could give persuasive speeches and make great shows of rhetoric, but they had no room for Socrates, who was questioning and investigations threatened to undermine a public culture of conformity to traditional authority. Eventually, the practice of philosophy cost Socrates his life. “I would have you know, if you kill such a one as I am, you will injure yourselves more than you will injure me,” Socrates states. Socrates thought that no good man could be harmed; as long as you are doing good then harm cannot affect you. Socrates was told he was the smartest man in Athens, which motivated him to go on the streets to prove he was not. The author proves this point by stating what Socrates says to the jury, “Here is a man who is wiser than I am but you said that I was the wisest.” Socrates went...
(37) The problem is that many of the citizens of Athens who wanted Socrates dead, lacked that emotional intelligence and thought highly of themselves. So of course they become defensive when Socrates sheds light on the idea that they may be wrong. As someone who cared most about the improvement of the soul, Socrates would have made a constructive role model to the criminals of Athens, as he would go on saying, “virtue is not given by money, but that from virtue comes money and every other good of man…”(35) Socrates was able to benefit everyone alike as he had human wisdom- something that all the Athenians could relate
I totally agree that Socrates found it important to research about life’s morality and not just think the same way others do. That is a way of proving the knowledge of men. Ones sitting quiet in the corner usually have more knowledge than others that talk so much about what they know. Many men with a high position in life do not always have the most knowledge.
Socrates states to the jurors in his trail, “No evil can happen to a good man” (48). Socrates is examining the moral center of the man. Evil can occur to an individual from the outside. Socrates a good, even innocent, man was sentenced to death. Other characters in history and even today are identified as good, but they still have evil occur to them. Socrates is not talking about an outside evil or harm occurring to a good person. He is examining the soul and what is morally evil and morally good.
“Are we to say that we are never intentionally to do wrong, or that in one way we ought not to do wrong, or is doing wrong always evil and dishonorable, as I was just now saying, and as has been already acknowledged by us? (Dover p.49)” Socrates’ standard is that he refuses to see justice as an eye for an eye. He believes that logical arguments and persuasion should be the defense of the accused. Socrates believes that since he cannot convince the people who ruled against him that there is no other option then to pay the sentence that he was
The teaching of Descartes has influenced many minds since his writings. Descartes' belief that clear and distinct perceptions come from the intellect and not the senses was critical to his ultimate goal in Meditations on First Philosophy, for now he has successfully created a foundation of true and certain facts on which to base a sold, scientific belief structure. He has proven himself to exist in some form, to think and therefore feel, and explains how he knows objects or concepts to be real.
using certain truths. To arrive at these truths Descartes doubted everything and especially could not trust authoritarian knowledge. This was known in the four "D's" as doctrine. The other three "D's" included the deceiving senses (empiricism), dreams (intuition), and demons (innate putting wrong ideas into our minds). Originally he doubted empirical thought because he could not even trust his senses. He used his senses only as a tool for doubting. Through doubting he felt that he could clear prejudices, which would allow him to arrive at certain truths. The goal of this destructive process was to find one clear and evident intuition that could be 100 percent certain. What he originally arrived at for a conclusion, was that everything could be doubted except doubting. However, to arrive at a truth he had to begin with a clear, evident intuition (an innate idea). This would be followed by moving from universals to particulars through deductive reasoning. He moved from the simple onto the complex incrementally, or step by step. He discovered the "I" to be the only certain truth, as his mind had to exist for him to be able to doubt. As stated earlier, Descartes truths had to begin with intuition, or an innate idea. This was the beginning of his constructive program of certainties. The first certainty wa...
He went about doing that by questioning people. Socrates realized that he truly knew nothing, of importance. So he tried to seek the truth. To be able to do this he had an open mind, and told his followers they should also have open minds. This is why Socrates was falsely accused of a culture that was both strict and hypocritical.
The argumentation I am about to confront root from Meditation Three of the book. Descartes starts with the claim that, “I am certain that I am a thinking thing,” and that sensing and imagining are merely modes of thinking existing within him (24). Then, as he is certain about clear and distinct perceptions, he implies that “everything I very clearly and distinctly perceive is true (24).” Nevertheless, there still tends to be many things that he thinks he is certain about, but then finds them doubtful (24). After questioning himself, Descartes realizes that he us...
Socrates asks if a moral person can harm anyone and Polemarchus agreed that a moral person could harm an evil man. What Socrates was trying to get at was well if this man was really moral why is he trying to harm anyone. Socrates goes on saying many things but one main point he made was as follows “It is not the job of a moral person to harm a friend or anyone else, it is the job of his opposite, an immoral person. Polemarchus agreed to this, which basically went against everything he said in the opening of this conversation. Socrates says that the claim that its right and moral to give back to people what they are owed, if this is taken to mean that a moral person owes harm to his enemies and help to his friends, turns out to be a claim no clever person would make.
Socrates was a philosopher who set out to prove, to the gods, that he wasn't the wisest man. Since he could not afford a "good" Sophist teacher, surely a student of one had to be smarter than he. He decides to converse with the youth of Athens, but concludes that he actually is wiser than everyone he speaks with. He then realizes that their lack of intelligence is the fault of their teachers. Socrates understands that the practice of "sophism" leads to a lack of self-knowledge and moral values. Socrates was later accused of corrupting the youth of Athens and put on trial. In The Apology of Socrates he sta...
Philosophy can be defined as the pursuit of wisdom or the love of knowledge. Socrates, as one of the most well-known of the early philosophers, epitomizes the idea of a pursuer of wisdom as he travels about Athens searching for the true meaning of the word. Throughout Plato’s early writings, he and Socrates search for meanings of previously undefined concepts, such as truth, wisdom, and beauty. As Socrates is often used as a mouthpiece for Plato’s ideas about the world, one cannot be sure that they had the same agenda, but it seems as though they would both agree that dialogue was the best way to go about obtaining the definitions they sought. If two people begin on common ground in a conversation, as Socrates often tries to do, they are far more likely to be able to civilly come to a conclusion about a particular topic, or at least further their original concept.
When Socrates was brought to trial for the corruption of the city’s youth he knew he had done nothing wrong. He had lived his life as it should be lead, and did what he ne...