Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why social capital is important
Why social capital is important
Impacts of social networks
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why social capital is important
The term “small world phenomena” can be defined as the principle that all people are linked by short chains of acquaintances. Both Stanley Milgram and Duncan Watts can be accredited with the discovery and affirmation of this principle. The idea came to Milgram after numerous observations that when at a party or a large social gathering, strangers often meet and end up talking about who they know. Usually, it isn’t long until they realize that they both know someone in common. Milgram wanted to find a way to test how prevalent and accurate this observation was. The way that Milgram tested his “small word hypothesis” is as follows: he gave letters to a couple hundred people in Nebraska. They were tasked with having to send this letter to a target …show more content…
The intensity of ties (eg: weak, strong, etc) can be characterized by intimacy, time, and reciprocal services. Hence, it is clear that a weak tie would have limited characterization of the variables mentioned previously. So why do sociologists claim that weak ties are responsible for the majority of information transmission and social network structure? This can be summed up by the “strength of weak ties” phenomena. This idea states that weak ties are so important because they bring in novel information, as well as allow people to “connect” through the weak ties of mutual friends. Because weak ties require little maintenance, this allows a wide range of accessibility for networking. Often, weak ties fill in “structural holes”, or gaps between network clusters. Weak ties are also imperative regarding the concept of social capital. Social capital is the information, knowledge of people/things, and connections that help individuals enter, gain power in, or otherwise leverage social networks. The saying, “It’s not just what you know, but whom you know” is extremely true, and having many weak ties is the starting point for the pursuit of having a good social capital. However, often high social capitals are defined by dense, embedded ties. This is because if one wants to have a strong social capital, they must have many strong ties that are closely linked via multiple facets. In doing this, a community is created based on trust, reciprocity, and
In his article, he provides excerpts from his experiment to solidify his concepts. For example, Gretchen Brandt continuously askes if the "Student" is ok; however, when the "Experimenter" says to continue, she does so but not without saying she "...doesn 't want to be responsible for anything happening to him" (80). Another example Milgram provides is of a man by the name Fred Prozi. Prozi proceeds through the entire experiment. That is, until he runs out of word pairs.
Milgram's study however did not entirely lack in validity since it had good ecological validity. This is because Milgram created several variations for the experiment. For example he created situations where the victim (confederate) could not be seen or heard, or when the victim could be heard, or also when the victim could be both seen and heard. These variations were also carried out in a run-down office instead of a laboratory, therefore changing the results they got dramatically.
To fully understand why social, economic, and cultural capital could lead to success or failure, it is essential to know the difference between the three. Social capital is defined by the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development as “the links, shared values, and understandings in society that enable individuals and groups to trust each other and to work together” (OECD, 2015). Social capital can be multiple things including family members, colleagues, and strangers who have the
He used his research to try to find what motivated some of the Germans citizens to participate and acquiesce with the mass exterminations that the Nazis were doing in World War II. He wanted to see what how far people would go just to obey authority and what it would take to get them to disobey. In his experiment the participants were divided in “teachers” and “learners”. Just like in Asch’s experiment he had his assistants act as real participants and the “learners” in the experiment. The real participants or the teachers were told they were participating in an experiment about memory. So they were instructed to read off a pair of words and if the learner got it wrong they were to give them an electrical shock. The shocks weren’t real but the learners were hided from the teachers so they didn’t know that they weren’t really being shocked. For each answer the learners got wrong the teachers were to increase the voltage of the shock they were given. The different voltage levels were labeled “15 volts - slight shock” to “450 volts - danger, severe shock” and they were instructed to go all the way until it reached the highest voltage. As the shocks got higher in voltage they would have the learner scream louder and louder, yelling things about his “bad heart”. If the teachers tried to quit the experiment Milgram's assistants, who were acting as the scientists, told them to continue no matter what.
... and social networks flourish, individuals, firms, neighborhoods prosper economically. Social capital can help to mitigate insidious effects of socioeconomic disadvantage (Putnam, 2000).
The notions of "Strong ties" and "Hierarchies" seem to be a bit over exaggerated in Malcolm Gladwell's essay "Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted." Gladwell terms every successful thing on the basis of strong ties and hierarchies, and every unsuccessful thing on the basis of weak ties. Strong ties as termed by Gladwell are those which have personal connections, whereas he mentions the example of social media as a weak tie. However, through Zadie Smith's "Speaking in Tounges," we are able to interpret that weak ties also do have the strong power to transmit an idea or behavior from one person to another. The deepest problem lying in Gladwell's assumption is that he doesn't bother looking at the positive side of social media,
Social capital is defined as the “features of social organization such as networks, norms, and social trust that facilitate coordination and cooperation for mutual benefit” (Putnam, 9), which supposedly creates positive effects for the society. If the social networks in the society are strengthen, the bonds maximize their security since there are strong connections, including family bonds, neighborhood bonds, and friends that could help each other in term of employment search, housing, education. On the other hand, social isolation may also be caused by the development of telecommunication and transportations. This creates an obstacles to create a consistent face-to-face network. In their articles,
Social capital, however, inheres in the structure of their relationships. Thus to possess social capital, a person must be related to others and it is those others, not himself, who are the actual source of advantage. In order to address this question I will firstly compare and contrast the definitions of social capital... ... middle of paper ... ... how this situation can be improved.
“Social” networks and loneliness are two very unlike things to be discussed simultaneously... The two are complete opposite of one another: “social” is associated to relating to one’s society, loneliness can be defined as “a complex and unpleasant emotional response to a feeling of isolation” (Ye and Lin 166). While loneliness can mean solitude, it also includes feelings of isolation and disconnection to other people (Ye and Lin 166). John Cacioppo is labeled as the world’s leading expert on loneliness. He proposed a thought provoking analogy: a car can be used to pick up friends, but one chooses to ride alone. Did the car make the person lonely? (Marche 68). Absolutely not. The car is simply a tool in the person’s everyday life. This relates
I immediately thought about the theory of 50 degrees of separation. This [unproven] theory pos-tulates that anyone on the planet can be connected to any other person on the planet through a chain of acquaintances that has five or less intermediaries.
...ely and directly convertible into money and may be institutionalized in the form of property rights. When I stated I went to high school the students and I also had a similarity which was being “well endowed” as cultural capital, Cultural Capital is fluid and can be supported by economic capital to expand one cultural community for example the more money I have the more likely my community that I involve myself with will be just as financially endowed and may be institutionalized in the form of educational qualifications; and as social capital going into a company or organization I stated that I got in contact with one of the alumni at my local high school who so happens to working for the company or as an executive officer in that organization I get hired and the cycle starts again making me the central figure for economic capital, given me a title and prestige.
The purpose of this literary analysis is to determine if social networks are helpful or harmful to relationships. As social networking evolves, different aspects of communication suffer. Such as the social penetration theory, which “describes people as onions with several layers of information”. pressed tightly together in the cuff. The outermost layer consists of the kind of information you would get.
Arts & Entertainment Editor, Melissa Nilles describes a nightmarish dream of disconnect and isolation using modern technology by texting and e-mailing, later revealing that it was in fact reality rather than just a dream, as most interaction has taken on an impersonal feeling during advances in technology. Phone calls, texting, instant messaging and e-mailing are more simple forms of communications and they’re achieved at great personal costs. This informality spills from our personal lives into our professional lives, forcing examination of the quality of our connections, focusing us less on the quantity. Citing examples from Facebook where people employ thousands of ‘friends’ lends merit to evolutionary psychologists research indicating a smaller circle is perhaps more effective; further proving technology cannot make lasting connections.
How would you explain social capital to someone else? Social capital refers to the collective values of people who live and work in a particular society, where there is an inclination that arise from these network to
Social Network theory dates back to the 1950’s where Barnes (1954) is credited with coining the term. Social Network Theory is the study of how the social structure around a person, group, or organization affect beliefs or behaviors (Dunn, 1983) The theory views relationships in terms of nodes and ties. Nodes can be defined as individual actors within networks, while ties are the relationships between the actors. (Dunn, 1983). These nodes and ties are often displayed in a diagram which shows the connection between them. Unlike traditional sociological studies, Social Network Theory does not assume that it is the attributes of individual actors, but rather the attributes of the individual are less important, but rather the relationships and ties with other actors within the network is what is important.