Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argumentative essay design
Argumentative essay design
Argumentative essay design
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1.Tyler Chiu arguments are clear to the points he is trying to convey using Keller's quote; however I think he should tie his points more together has a whole so his paper and his agreement with Keller can become stronger. A good example is that he talks about religion and culture which is a really good point but he does not based it only on that factor he moves on and talks about language and other great example. He only tie everything together it will be a great paragraph to Keller’s quote. 2.) Tyler makes valid assumption on the fact we are bind to society norms because we are tied down to are social status ,culture and other factors that leads to inequality or culture clashes which is the point he is conveying with Keller’s quote that
Helen Keller, against all odds, became a mouthpiece for many causes in the early to mid-twentieth century. She advocated for causes such as building institutions for the blind, schools for the deaf, women’s suffrage and pacifism. When America was in the most desperate of times, her voice stood out. Helen Keller spoke at Carnegie Hall in New York raising her voice in protest of America’s decision to join the World War. The purpose of this paper will analyze the devices and methods Keller used in her speech to create a good ethos, pathos, and logos.
The roles of diversity and uniqueness are a crucial part of society today. Without these qualities being enforced into the American character, people won't produce thoughtful ideas that could help shape America. Both authors illustrate the evil effect of conformity in society and support how one should be self reliant, not phony, and confident in their own beliefs and ideas.
The world is divided up into numerous things: Countries, states, cities, communities, etc. However, when looking at the big scope of things, one can group the vast amount of people into a society. This society is where the majority lie in the scheme of things - in other words, the common people. Individuals do exist in this society, but they are scarce in a world of conformism. Society’s standards demands an individual to conform, and if the individual refuses they are pushed down by society.
Furthermore, sometimes the desire to be accepted is stronger than prevailing conventions. This makes an individual to do things to make him feel accepted in the society. Krakauer compares the people in Alaska and McCandless. He writes, “And I’m sure there are plenty of other Alaskans who had a lot in common with McCandless when they first got here, too, including many of his critics. Which maybe why they’re so hard on him. Maybe McCandless reminds them a little too much of their former selves” (Krakauer 221). In today’s society, an individual confirms itself to what a society wants and expect him or her to be.
Firstly, the presence of individuality within society permits individuals to identify societal barriers because such choices are, essential. Tom’s essay speaks of how “historically, people have not been kind to that which is different”, yet however, she encourages this drive within individuals as she goes on to say, “this [in fact] is what has driven the evolution of society.” Though many historical events such as the Holocaust and the Trans-Atlantic slave trade have not been greeted with gratitude nonetheles...
Everybody wants to be accepted, yet society is not so forgiving. It bends you and changes you until you are like everyone else. Society depends on conformity and it forces it upon people. In Emerson's Self Reliance, he says "Society is a joint stock company, in which the members agree, for the better securing of his bread to each shareholder, to surrender the liberty and culture of the eater." People are willing to sacrifice their own hopes and freedoms just to get the bread to survive. Although the society that we are living in is different than the one the Emerson's essay, the idea of fitting in still exists today. Although society and our minds make us think a certain way, we should always trust our better judgment instead of just conforming to society.
How do the actions and words of a society affect the way people act? In Never Let Me Go, author Kazuo Ishiguro depicts a society in which individuality is threatened by the pressure to conform through methods such as peer pressure and social expectations. Without a doubt, peer pressure is most commonly found in schools today just as social expectations are suffocating the middle class’ desire to become their own unique person.
There comes a point in everyone’s life when they are pressurized by society’s demands. One is given the option to either conform or challenge these social norms in order to suit one’s life.
Doris Lessing uses this to state that individuals will conform to the majority because of society’s pressures and lose individualism. Lessing uses the fact that because of western societies are well educated in different ways, free to make choices that this makes the individual, but people never think to look at their lives and see that they are no longer and individual because they are conforming to the pressures of society. She uses the fact that people often socialize with “like-minded” people often forces to make decisions that our peers make. She declares that, “We find our thinking changing because we belong to a group. It is the hardest thing in the world to maintain an individual dissident opinion, as a member of a group.” She goes on to review several experiments that involved conforming to groups.
For example, when we vote, we are voting because we need someone in charge to lead us to a brighter future, some people are not going to stand for what you believe in, and some individuals might not even vote at all. Overall, I don’t believe that we, as society, should worry about what anybody else thinks of one another. Granted, it might sound selfish and conceited. Then again, so is being so desperate that some individuals would dress and apply themselves with gory tattoos or piercings for the shock value in our society than the comfort value. In the article, ¨Individuality vs. Conformity: The Healthy Middle?¨ the author resolves that there is a fragile balance between Conformity and Individuality, and that we are all there whether we like it or not. The author additionally remarks, ¨The real kicker is that this horrible teetering balance is everywhere. It exists in every form imaginable.¨ The author then claims that no matter how hard we try to be unique or a sheep in a herd, we can be different and similar at the same time from one
Society is ever changing and the people are just the same. Throughout history, it is shown that people change and mold to their surroundings. But when a deeper look is taken it is revealed that there is a minority that is unwilling or unable to fit these standards as most people do. These people tend to be forced into seclusion or made to fend for themselves. This is shown through the colonization of America and up into more recent times. The Native Americans are the first to make a life on this land, and when the English set up a new society, the Natives are forced onto smaller and smaller plots of land until forced to conform or to live on a reservation. The idea of this societal conformity is shown in “What You Pawn I Will Redeem” by Sherman Alexie, a short story author. Society's pressure to improve an individual living differently is hurting more than it is helping.
"Conformity is the jailer of freedom and the enemy of growth." John F. Kennedy. When we permit ourselves to comply with what our acquaintances, family or public opinion asks of us, we lose the capability to develop into our own person. Conformity, then again, is more than simply the young lady wearing UGG Boots and an Abercrombie hoodie to fit in. It is all the more then just lis...
...such as during the eighteen hundreds we were allowed to own slaves, or in the early nineteen hundreds men were allowed to beat their wives. The more individuals reach Kohlberg's post-conventional stage, the more we will advance as a society. Our identity and morals motivates our intelligence, aggression, and attraction are all fueled by our conscience and the society around us. Our conscience is motivated by our morals. Kohlberg's states, "the main experiential determinants of moral development seem to be amount and variety of social experience, the opportunity to take a number of roles and to encounter other perspectives," (Schellenberg, 55). Therefore, society has a major influence on our selves and through relation our morals.
The inability to conform in society can lead to unhappiness and the feeling of inequality
...man society was sane and normal,” and that he simply had “to come to terms with his society” because it was all he had (Head, When Rain Clouds Gather, p. 164).