Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Good effects war had on literature
War's effect on literature
Literature affected by wars
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The importance of the historical culture of a text is, more often than not, underestimated. Values of a society during differing time period’s significantly shape a text’s composition, crafting a piece that ultimately is a product of its times. However, throughout time, adaptations of a text are created to enhance, heighten and challenge the cultural, historical and social contexts of the past which undoubtedly parallels with the modern world. George Orwell’s novel ‘1984’ and James McTeigue’s film ‘V for Vendetta’ illustrates this idea through the significance of how power can ultimately shape an individual. The post war contextual makes it possible for one to understand the significance and value of both texts. Orwell and McTeigue effectively …show more content…
capture this idea and touches on the possibility of this nightmarish story becoming our reality. Orwell’s text paints an obnoxious interpretation of totalitarianism by establishing the imperative nature of the government through the dictatorship of Big Brother, which manipulates the individual into surrendering their privacy, individuality and liberty to achieve total control. Winston Smith, a worker in the Ministry of Truth, is unable to reveal his desire for autonomy under the watchful eye of the antagonistic Big Brother, yet, conscious of the fact that any disloyalty to the party will result in death; Smith begins to ponder the illogical views of the party. On the other hand, V for Vendetta eludes the idea that the party will override defiant individuals through V’s victory in defeating the state. The man, V, lives in a world of fascism, where the Norsefire Party indoctrinates individuals into society’s ideology. Using terrorist tactics, he opens the eyes of those who are blind to how society is run by blowing up the parliament. He saves a woman named Evey and soon discovers he has an ally in his battle with the oppressors of the world. Together, the ideas that the abuse of power in society is crucial to maintain complete control of the citizens, allows us to differentiate the main values expressed in the texts. In 1984, Winston is very much like the other citizens. He puts on a mask of a quite optimistic supporter to please the Party and he conforms to society’s etiquette. The notion of control in 1984 is most prominent in the quote ‘War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is knowledge’. This slogan is featured numerously throughout the text, representing the ability of the party to bend the citizen’s knowledge at their will, deteriorating their humanity. Winston’s resentment of his society stems from the absence of the past. Through propaganda, the party rewrites history to their will and eradicates any traces of the past that may contradict to the party’s authoritative leadership. The party replaces the past as a time of depression and claims that they have liberated civilians from hunger and slavery, motivating the people to work harder for the party. Winston’s fascination of the past is seen in his adoration of his glass paper weight sold to him by Mr Charrington in the antique store.
“The inexhaustibly interesting thing was not the fragment of coral but the interior of the glass itself…the paperweight was the room he was in, and the coral was Julia’s life and his own, fixed in a sort of eternity at the heart of the crystal.” Suggests Winston’s limited understanding of the past and his inability to reconnect with the past. The paper weight serves no particular purpose besides its beauty, which Winston was initially drawn to. The impractical paper weight is a representation of the idyllic past and foreshadows how naive Winston’s goal to overturn the government …show more content…
is. Orwell incorporates a popular 18th century British nursery rhyme ‘Oranges and Lemons’ which embodies the irrecoverable past that Winston romanticizes and to recall ominous memories of the Christian past. Throughout the novel, Winston struggles to uncover the remaining verses since Mr Charrington introduced them, until the thought police arrests him and Julia. Charrington quotes the end of the rhyme during the arrest “And by the way, while we are on the subject, ‘Here comes a candle to light you to bed, here comes a chopper to chop off your head’’ signifying the betrayal of the past to Winston, represented by Mr Charrington’s duplicitous character. Upon further analysis, this line from the rhyme exemplifies the Party’s ultimate goal in eradicating knowledge exhibited in the line ‘Here comes a chopper to chop off your head’. The party is literally sending individuality and free thought to bed, seen in the first half of the verse. Hence, the manipulation of the past further enforces control, evident in Big Brothers slogan ‘Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past’. Similarly, in V for Vendetta, the idea of using false history to weaken the individual’s sense of independence manifests in the film, aiding the nature of the text’s values. McTeigue uses a British school children rhyme to effectively evoke a distant memory from a religious past, making a direct link with religious beliefs. The rhyme ‘Remember, remember the fifth of November. Gunpowder, Treason and Plot. I see no reason why Gunpowder Treason, Should ever be forgot’ connects terrorism and violence to Christianity in modern society. The blowing up of parliament in V for Vendetta, makes a religious reference with the 9/11. A major historical influence on V for Vendetta was the Gunpowder plot of 1605. During 17th century England, King James ordered all Catholic priests to leave the country. Guy Fawkes’s inherent distaste towards the King resulted in an attempt to end his reign, however, he was caught and hung. Following his death in the 1600’s, Fawkes became a stand in for the Catholic Church. V’s Guy Fawkes mask denotes the notion of identity vs the ideal. Through his hidden identity, V becomes the ideal as he is not limited to one character. This concept allows individuals who lack power to take part in V’s fight. The cross cutting scenes between the civilians intently watching the Party propaganda to the empty seats in front of the televisions contrasts V’s empowerment throughout the community. A panning scene of individuals wearing the mask, opposing the Party’s usual regulations reflects V’s ultimate purpose to avenge for the liberty of everyone. “He was all of us” symbolizes V as the embodiment of rebellion and free thought. Towards the ending, an extreme long shot of everyone wearing the mask symbolizes the unity through Guy Fawkes mask, as each individual removes the mask, it illustrates the representation of V’s character. This challenges V’s character as Winston’s character in Oceania draws on Orwell’s past experiences during his time in Spain’s era of fascist regime. Winston’s strong willed passion to revisit the past ceases when the people he trusted and believed most betrays him. It is likely his concern for his personal sanity overweighed his goal of liberating himself after Big Brother’s torture. “Do it to Julia! Not me! I don’t care what you do to her. Tear her face off, strip her to bones.” concludes Winston’s final betrayal of his loyalty to Julia when he is faced with his biggest fears. However, V persists regardless of his personal emotions, evident in the ending with the close up shot of V’s death. Another aspect which contrasts with V for Vendetta, is Winston and Julia’s broken relationship which validates the level of control that the party enforces to the extent in which their personal identities are wiped.
On the other hand, V and Evey’s relationship enhances the rebellion. The drastic alteration of Smith’s identity portrays the Party’s domineering control and manipulation over its citizens. A final quote concluding Winston’s futile determination is “He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother”. Orwell’s disturbing ending shows Winston falling into the hands of Big Brother and his absence of logical reasoning after the torture, is he to genuinely accept the Party’s political perspectives, which was Orwell’s intentions on Winston’s so called
victory. Together, the political dystopia of 1984 and V for Vendetta provides a critique of the political context of the time and shadows events in our society. The 2006 film V for Vendetta popularized the Guy Fawkes mask, evident in the 2011 Occupy Wall Street protest, where many protestors adopted the idea of the mask. Director McTeigue comments on this as “I think they got the ideas of questioning the government”. Furthermore, both texts parallel with the modern world. Propaganda tactics are evident in numerous modern countries such as North Korea, where media and the internet are censored. Censorship is a form of control to manipulate the public’s opinion and actions evident in the telescreens in 1984 and the media channels in V for Vendetta. A striking similarity between North Korean societal regulations and the ideas present in the text are further seen through a quote from a defector, “In North Korea, life only gets better if the state helps you. But these days, the state doesn’t. We’re on our own” which challenges V’s quote “People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people”. Thus, the differing endings of both texts reflect the values Orwell and McTeigue are imposing. This is seen in the repressive nature of Oceania, influenced by the age of totalitarianism that Orwell wrote in and Orwell strictly illustrates the dangers of a totalitarian society throughout the novel. Whereas, McTeigue focuses on the concerns of the individual and the state. Hence, using the similar landscape of a totalitarian regime from 1984, McTeigue adopts his views to parallel and relate to his dystopian vision of the future through the contrasting character development of V compared to Winston.
Julia instructs Winston how to return to London. The two arranged meetings where and when they would meet again. Julia reveals that she is not interested in the revolt. Although, she is a personal rebel. Winston reveals information to Julia about his wife Katherine which he decided weather to not killer her or not. Winston returned to Mr. Charrington’s offer: he had rented the room above his shop in order to spend some private time with Julia. Winston reveals his fear of rats.
In “1984,” Orwell portrays Winston’s secret struggle to undermine the totalitarian rule of Big Brother and the Party in Oceania. The different government agencies, such as the Thought Police and Ministry of Love, exercise unrestricted totalitarian rule over people. Winston actively seeks to join the rebellion and acquire the freedoms undermined by the Party. On the other hand, Heinlein’s brief narrative, “The Long Watch,” depicts a contrasting struggle championed by Dahlquist against the power hungry Colonel Towers and the Patrol. In his struggle to prevent the total domination of the world by the Patrol, Dahlquist chooses to sacrifice his life. Le Guin’s “The Ones who walk away from Omelas,” illustrates a communal form of injustice tolerated for the benefit of the entire city but necessitating the inhumane imprisonment of a child. He portrays the ambiguity of human morality and the individual struggle to determine right from wrong. The authors address social change and power in different ways, reflective of their individual perceptions. Hence, in each narrative, the author illustrates the individual’s role in effecting social change and the conditions under which such change becomes possible.
... due to his unorthodoxy, such as maintaining a secret and promiscuous relationship with Julia, and the political ramifications of the sexual act; and lastly, the deconstruction of his individualism at the hands of the Party, due to its hunger for power over the mind. It is not surprising then, that among the imposing doctrines of the government of Big Brother, the character of Winston Smith was eventually wiped out. In conclusion, a passage from Winston’s diary:
George Orwell creates a dark, depressing and pessimistic world where the government has full control over the masses in the novel 1984. The protagonist, Winston, is low-level Party member who has grown to resent the society that he lives in. Orwell portrays him as a individual that begins to lose his sanity due to the constrictions of society. There are only two possible outcomes, either he becomes more effectively assimilated or he brings about the change he desires. Winston starts a journey towards his own self-destruction. His first defiant act is the diary where he writes “DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER.” But he goes further by having an affair with Julia, another party member, renting a room over Mr. Carrington’s antique shop where Winston conducts this affair with Julia, and by following O’Brien who claims to have connections with the Brotherhood, the anti-Party movement led my Emmanuel Goldstein. Winston and Julia are both eventually arrested by the Thought Police when Mr. Carrington turns out to be a undercover officer. They both eventually betray each other when O’Brien conducts torture upon them at the Ministry of Love. Orwell conveys the limitations of the individual when it comes to doing something monumental like overthrowing the established hierarchy which is seen through the futility of Winston Smith’s actions that end with his failure instead of the end of Big Brother. Winston’s goal of liberating himself turns out to be hopeless when the people he trusted end up betraying him and how he was arbitrarily manipulated. It can be perceived that Winston was in fact concerned more about his own sanity and physical well-being because he gives into Big Brother after he is tortured and becomes content to live in the society he hated so much. Winston witnesses the weakness within the prole community because of their inability to understand the Party’s workings but he himself embodies weakness by sabotaging himself by associating with all the wrong people and by simply falling into the arms of Big Brother. Orwell created a world where there is no use but to assimilate from Winston’s perspective making his struggle utterly hopeless.
In 1984 and V for Vendetta, the different behaviours of the anti-heroes, Winston and V, illustrate their approach to attaining freedom from the totalitarian government. George Orwell’s 1984 and James McTeigue’s V for Vendetta use the anti-heroes’ behaviour to identify their approach to their cause—liberation from the totalitarian government. For example, Winston is the typical citizen who rebels against the government in a quiet and peaceful way, whereas V is a revolutionist in an excited and violent way. This comparison helps classify the key behaviours, which explains the different approaches the anti-heroes took towards liberation.
The dystopian novel “1984” and the movie “V for Vendetta”, share a variety of differences and similarities. Both have a totalitarian government in which they have absolute power over politics, religion and human rights. Extensive speech, critical thinking, thoughtful writing, and voice of opinion has either been restricted or limited in 1984’s Oceania and V for Vendetta’s future London. The protagonists in both novels and films have “resisted” their government. However, the methods used to employ their “rebellion” are quite different.
In dystopian literature, the future of society and humanity is presented in a negative standpoint. Utopian works frequently illustrate a future in which the everyday lives of human beings is often improved by technology to advance civilization, while dystopian works offer an opposite outlook. Examples of dystopian characteristics include an oppressive government, a protagonist, and character nature. Although the novel Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and the film V for Vendetta directed by James McTeigue display different perspectives of a dystopian society, both share similar dystopian characteristics, which include a government who asserts power over citizens, a protagonist who questions society, and characters who are isolated from the natural world.
A dystopian text is a genre that is an allegory written by the author to demonstrate the dangers within our current political climate, often exaggerated in a future context. Using techniques of oppression and a totalitarian regime ruling groups are often able to take control of societies. Today I will compare George Orwell’s iconic dystopian text 1984 and Peter Weir’s film, The Truman Show. Written in 1949, 1984 is set in society which is terrorised by the ideologies of a totalitarian government. Orwell focusses on parallels between Stalin’s Soviet Union and the Party in 1984 in relation to the toxic nature of the totalitarian regimes. Similarly, The Truman Show depicts a man that’s unknowingly the star of a TV reality show about his own life.
The novel 1984 and film “V for Vendetta” both stories use torture as a way to brainwash the victim, to keep control over them and to take their identity away from them. Replacing it with another identity that is more beneficial to the party of the interrogator. The meanings of torture start of the similar, for the purpose of the creation of a new identity, but each story leads on to a different take on the verdict of a dystopian society run by a totalitarian government. Despite the themes expressed in each story and the purpose of torture being similar, the meaning and overall message conveyed to the readers from 1984 differ from those of “V for Vendetta”.
As Winston does lose his identity and beliefs it does give some hope and optimism. Not to Winston but to the public. To the readers of Nineteen Eighty Four, George Orwell the author of this political novel wrote this novel to inform and by this grim ending he has done this. Big Brother and the party has control over everything, they control families, control language, control media and even the control of history. This creates full control over every act, thought and belief of a person. Consequently with Winston this is done so therefore Orwell’s point is made.
”The values, beliefs and attitudes of George Orwell’s can easily be seen in the novel 1984, as no text is neutral. These values attitudes and beliefs have shaped the novel to reflect socio-cultural context and by the use of certain discourses, ideologies, and historical influences support the idea that) “The explanation of a work is always sought in the man or women who produced it “Bathes Roland (1977).
A dystopian government is “futuristic, imagined universe in which oppressive societal control and an illusion of a perfect society are mainstreamed through corporate, bureaucratic, technological, moral, or totalitarian control (1984 Unit Essay Prompt). The book 1984 is a dystopian novel written by George Orwell that was published in 1949. V for Vendetta is a 2006 American-German political thriller film directed by James McTeigue. This paper will be comparing these two fictional dystopian governments to the United States on how they are similar and different. Even though these are fictional novels they are very similar to how the United States of America function today. The US is similar to a dystopian government because the citizens think
To accomplish this, Orwell utilizes the theme of individuality versus tyranny, foreshadowing, and irony, in order to fully extract all possible motives behind Winston’s actions.Many countries, such as the United States, are founded on principles of individuality reigning over tyranny, more specifically, the freedom of choice. However, in the futuristic Oceania, run by “Big Brother”, such freedom and individuality is, for the most part, completely suspended. To act impulsively, or choose to oppose Big Brother, is a “thoughtcrime” of dire consequence. This is the basis behind the Inner Party’s control of Oceania. Winston however, from the commencement of the novel, showed that he was not willing to conform to such a tyrannical society. From his writing “DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER” in his diary as the novel opened, to his relationship with Julia, which was considered sexcrime in Oceania, Winston proved his thoughts were antiparallel to those of the Inner Party.
After reading the book and watching the movie 1984 there were similarities and differences between the two. The novel is about manipulating people in believing in something that isn’t really there and about erasing history. Both the book and film focused on: authority, government, and war. The book and film follow the theme of conformity to control society.
In this case, the government has to use severe actions to ensure they will never act in this way again. Winston Smith, is a minor member of the ruling Party and is aware of some of these extreme tactics. Since Winston is not completely brainwashed by the propaganda like all the other citizens, he hates Big Brother passionately. Winston is one of the only who realize that Big Brother is wiping individual identity and is forcing collective identity. He is “conscious of [his] own identity”(40-41) . Winston continues to hold onto the concept of an independent external reality by constantly referring to his own existence. Aware of being watched, Winston still writes “DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER, DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER”(21) in his diary. Winston believes whether he writes in his diary or not, it is all the same because the Thought Police will get him either way. Orwell uses this as a foreshadow for Winston's capture later on in the novel. Fed up with the Party, Winston seeks out a man named O’Brien, who he believes is a member of the ‘Brotherhood’, a group of anti-Party rebels. When Winston is arrested for thought crime by his landlord, Mr.Charrington, who is a member of the Thought Police. Big Brother takes Winston to a dark holding cell, to use their extreme torture strategy to erase any signs of personal identity. Winston's torturer is O’Brien, the man he thought to be apart of the brotherhood. Winston asks