What Are The Pros And Cons Of The Cold War

1160 Words3 Pages

The cold war, an issue of global importance in 1947-1991 that prompted the creation of the H-bomb in 1949 when the Soviets had successfully detonated an atomic bomb (The First hydrogen bomb test, 2011). By using the previously developed formulas and techniques that made the atomic bomb, the combination of nuclear fission and fusion created the H-bomb, a weapon of significantly higher destructive power than the nuclear bomb during this time (The Development and Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, n.d.). While the atomic bomb used fission to get its destructive power the thermonuclear bomb used a combination of both. Fission would work as a trigger to the fusion. For the process that the H-bomb goes through it is necessary to have fission happen …show more content…

On one hand it means the mass destruction and murder of millions, but on the other could it help keep peace? The most common argument heard from the pros side is that these weapons can help keep peace. And in terms of ethics this reason for creating a weapon of mass destruction more powerful than the atomic bomb itself is correct as it keeps the people of all involved parties safe. The top two arguments for ethically correct are that the possession of these prevents other countries from attacking and that it makes negotiation the first choice instead of all-out war to begin with (7 Biggest Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons, 2015). If the goal of nuclear weapons is to win a war and save your own country then the nuclear weapons today and the H- bomb have done just that. The most ethical way for a country to use their atomic weapons is to use them as a means for negotiation. The countries power is implied through how many nuclear weapons it has and thus if the purpose is to save lives and prevent war the creation of these weapons can be seen as ethical (List of Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons, 2015). The argument proceeds to suggest that without the threat of mass destruction to your country more wars would break out without even the slightest thought. However because certain countries do have the …show more content…

The effect after the explosion too supports this argument as it makes the conditions of survivors limited. After the cold war the US and Russia decreased their number of armed nuclear weapons this by many sources being the honorable thing to do (List of Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons, 2015). But when it comes to the use and ownership of nuclear weapons this is viewed as highly immoral and unethical no matter what the country is trying to protect, it has the potential to murder millions. The physicist at the time, 1949, even questioned the ethics of the project, the creation of the H-bomb (). The matter of fact is that the use of the H-Bomb and nuclear weapons in general not only murders millions but also affects the lives of those around the explosion and the future generations of said country. Survivors will forever be affected and the future generations will suffer the long term effects of the explosion. This is supported by research done on survivors of the bombings in japan which suffered from various cancers and their children were born with birth defects (Harris, n.d). Due to the fact that It kills so many innocent people or citizens and because it not only has an effect on the country when the bomb explodes but also on the future generations the ownership and use of the

More about What Are The Pros And Cons Of The Cold War

Open Document