Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical dilemma of organ trade
Cause and effect of organ sales
Commercialisation of organ transplantation ethical issues
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical dilemma of organ trade
The issue brought before us today is whether the commercialization of organ transplants is both ethical and beneficial to the economy and populace as a whole. There are many issues which are centered on this decision on which I hope to shed some light and allow for better resolutions to be made. In nearly every country in the world, there is a shortage of kidneys for transplantation. According to Corydon Ireland, in the United States 73,000 people are on waiting lists to receive a kidney. About 4,000 can pass away every year before receive a lifesaving organ. (Corydon Ireland, Harvard News Office. February 14, 2008) Some of the benefits of organ commercialization are increased revenues and jobs, as it would open a whole new arena of business, more widely available organs to those in need, and a wider method by which under-performing citizens can create temporary cash flow. There are many arguments against the allowance of organ commercialization, they include the fact that many consider it unethical to sell body parts, concern over the safety of these procedures, and doubt as to how those who donate will be treated medically post-sale. The final, separate issue which would need to be addressed is how health insurance companies are to handle those who sell organs and any post-op health issues that relate to the sale.
The benefits of organ commercialization can be seen quickly, many patients requiring organ donations spend substantial amounts of money on medical procedures to extend their life till they can receive the organ. By being able to obtain aid from a company who can legally and quickly locate and deliver the required organ, many patients who may not have been able to obtain an organ that quickly can more readily provided...
... middle of paper ...
... before, and everyone can receive what they need. The limitation on this is strict guidance would be required to make sure people do not prey on those who are truly in need.
Overall I believe that the commercialization of human organs would be a beneficial policy to enact provided that the proper regulation is performed on the industry. Morally I do not find an issue with the idea of people providing required medical organs to those who need them, and being compensated for it. The industry would need to be held to a level of ethics, but provided that all parties involved act ethically, it would be beneficial to all parties. Overall, I feel the pros outweigh the cons, and that we should enact the policies suggested and allow the formation of companies with the sole purpose of buying and selling human organs in an ethical manner in order to better serve those in need.
Joanna MacKay says in her essay, Organ Sales Will Save Lives, that “Lives should not be wasted; they should be saved.” Many people probably never think about donating organs, other than filling out the paperwork for their drivers’ license. A reasonable amount of people check ‘yes’ to donate what’s left of their bodies so others may benefit from it or even be able to save a life. On the other hand, what about selling an organ instead of donating one? In MacKay’s essay, she goes more in depth about selling organs.
Yearly, thousands die from not receiving the organs needed to help save their lives; Anthony Gregory raises the question to why organ sales are deemed illegal in his piece “Why legalizing organ sales would help to save lives, end violence”, which was published in The Atlantic in November of 2011. Anthony Gregory has written hundreds of articles for magazines and newspapers, amongst the hundreds of articles is his piece on the selling of organs. Gregory states “Donors of blood, semen, and eggs, and volunteers for medical trials, are often compensated. Why not apply the same principle to organs? (p 451, para 2)”. The preceding quote allows and proposes readers to ponder on the thought of there being an organ
Death is an unavoidable factor in life. We are all expected to die, but for some of the people the end does not have to come too soon. Joanna MacKay in her article Organ Sales Will Save discuss how the legalization of the organs sale, possesses the capability of saving thousands of lives. MacKay in her thesis stipulates that the government should not ban the human organs sale rather they should regulate it (MacKay, 2004). The thesis statement has been supported by various assertions with the major one being that it shall save lives. The author argues that with the legalized sale of organs, more people would be eager to donate their kidneys.
It is clear that a large demand for organs exists. People in need of organ donations are transferred to an orderly list. Ordinarily, U.S. institutions have an unprofitable system which provides organs through a list of individuals with the highest needs; however, these organs may never come. A list is
The selling of human organs for transplants is a highly debated topic in the healthcare industry today. The National Organ Transplant Act of 1984 prohibits compensating organ donors for their donations. Over 100,000 Americans have kidney or liver disease, and are in need of transplants to survive. The average waiting time for a kidney transplant, once on the list, is 4.5 years, while, liver disease is less common with a waiting time of 430 days. Nonetheless, the fact is that there are not enough organs donated annually to meet these high demands. By creating a regulated market for buying and selling human organs, it would increase the number of lives saved, help families with expenses, and greatly ease the anguish that many sick individuals endure while in hope of a transplant.
In the year 2012 in the United States of America alone, 95,000 men, women, and children were on the waiting list for a transplanted kidney. This issue is discussed in the articles: “Cash for Kidneys: The Case for a Market for Organs” and “When Altruism Isn’t Moral”. The authors of “Cash for Kidneys: The Case for a Market for Organs” Gary S. Becker, a professor of economics at the University of California, and Julio J. Elias, a professor at the Universidad del CEMA in Argentina, don’t agree fully with the author of “When Altruism isn’t Moral” Sally Satel, a psychiatrist, who received a transplanted kidney herself. She explains in her article how selling one’s bodily organs for a profit is unethical (Axelrod and Cooper 225). They may not agree on how to solve the transplantable organ deficit, but both agree that it is a major issue. The transplantable organ deficit is a problem at an all-time high and providing money as a form of compensation, though it may be unethical, may be
Organ donations are crucial for people in emergency situations. For years organ donations have saved the lives of millions. The problem with people needing organs is that there are not enough organs to be supplied to everyone who needs it. There are many people who die because they are not able to obtain lifesaving organs. The need for organs exceeds the supply given. Thus, leading me to ask this essential question, “Should organ donation be a part of the market?” To support this question I have prepared three supportive claims, but since my answer is no my reasons will revolve around this argument. First, I will state why I do not agree with such a thing, and then I will support my claim by stating why it is so bad, and to end my paper I will state what place(s) legalizes trade.
Selling organs should remain illegal because it corrupts morals, fosters criminals to steal organs, and exploits innocent people. An organ market would allow people to put such a high price on organs would make it so that only the wealthy would be able to afford it. Creating a legal organ market would encourage criminals to steal organs and sell them for a profit. By putting a price on human parts you are devaluing a human life and crippling morals. By supporting the legalization of selling organs you are putting a high price on the parts dramatically making the whole
Throughout history physicians have faced numerous ethical dilemmas and as medical knowledge and technology have increased so has the number of these dilemmas. Organ transplants are a subject that many individuals do not think about until they or a family member face the possibility of requiring one. Within clinical ethics the subject of organ transplants and the extent to which an individual should go to obtain one remains highly contentious. Should individuals be allowed to advertise or pay for organs? Society today allows those who can afford to pay for services the ability to obtain whatever they need or want while those who cannot afford to pay do without. By allowing individuals to shop for organs the medical profession’s ethical belief in equal medical care for every individual regardless of their ability to pay for the service is severely violated (Caplan, 2004).
People in support of organ transplantation argue the cost/benefit ration and have determined their arguing points to be these: Social Responsibility, Improves the Quality of Life, alleviation of familial grief, encourages hope to live, lessens the cost of patient care, improves research and research methods. The opposing side offers an alternative view, offering these augment points: Risk of complication during and after surgery, degradation of health in the long run, adverse physiological effect on donor’s family, financial burden, objections based on religious belief, unethical trade and harvesting of human organs, and finally, the donor has no rights to choose the recipient.
Today, 120,000 people are waiting for organ transplants in the United States. On average eighteen of these people die every day because they did not get the organ donation because of an absence of available organs for transplant. There is a large and increasing shortage of organs for transplant patients not only in America but in the whole world. Currently, the only organs that a transplant patient can legally receive are from cadavers or living relatives. This leaves patients with a very small chance of getting the help they need if they do not have a living relative with a compatible organ. If there were a free market for organs, it is believed by many experts that up to half of these patients would be able to get the transplants they need, at a lower medical cost (Adams, Barnett, Kaserman). The heightened medical costs, anguish of waiting, and thousands of needlessly lost lives could all be remedied by a free market for human organs.
In the 21st century, people face many diseases and problems that they cannot simply solve even with the technological developments that they have today. One of the most common transplantations in the United States is the kidney transplant. This is mainly because of the high demands of organs for renal disease patients with such short supplies. Since 2008, the worldwide illegal organ sales have increased dramatically. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there were approximately 107,000 donated organs worldwide in 2010; 10% of the number was from the black market. Many people argue that the organ sales should be legalized and regulated by government properly. For example, the article “Organ Sales Will Save Lives” by Joanna MacKay
Selling organs will saves lives in many different ways also. People are dying because they are illegally selling their organs in the black market or even selling there organs in insane prices to other people. As in Germany, it will coast around $3500 to donate a liver. But in other i...
In class my classroom debate, I was much undecided about what side I should be for or against the organ sale. However, as I sit down I think about what if it was one of my family members or myself, I would like someone to help us out, in the time of need. Organs are the pathway to life. Organs are a group of tissue all working together to perform a task like pumping blood around the body. Moreover, organs are equipped to take on 10 times its capability. This is huge; the human body can withstand a lot of wear
Compensating donors for their organs is meant to help increase the amount of organs available and decrease the recipients waiting time. However, banning “poor people” from donating their organs is not going to complete either of the previously mentioned goals. Instead, the compensation would make transplantation more expensive and less affordable for the