Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Legalize the sale of human organs
Ethical issues with organ donation
Ethical issues with organ donation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Legalize the sale of human organs
The Market for Organs
Today, 120,000 people are waiting for organ transplants in the United States. On average eighteen of these people die every day because they did not get the organ donation because of an absence of available organs for transplant. There is a large and increasing shortage of organs for transplant patients not only in America but in the whole world. Currently, the only organs that a transplant patient can legally receive are from cadavers or living relatives. This leaves patients with a very small chance of getting the help they need if they do not have a living relative with a compatible organ. If there were a free market for organs, it is believed by many experts that up to half of these patients would be able to get the transplants they need, at a lower medical cost (Adams, Barnett, Kaserman). The heightened medical costs, anguish of waiting, and thousands of needlessly lost lives could all be remedied by a free market for human organs.
The federal government prohibits the sale, as opposed to the donation, of human organs. Under the National Organ Transplant Act of 1984 (NOTA), it is a felony to give or receive compensation for them. Legalizing sales has been discussed in some circles, but proposals to let people sell their own organs as they see fit do not appear at the top of the list of most discussed issues, or anywhere close to the top (Jason). Recently, as the danger, rarity, and cost of organ transplants have gone down, the number of available organs has followed.
The National Organ Transplant act was enacted in 1984 as a free market for organs began to arise in America. Congress was concerned about the injustice that could arise from impoverished donors being pressured into selling their organs (Ci...
... middle of paper ...
...o rules out medical and religious ethics. Many people are not willing to donate an organ if they do not receive any personal gain to it. However, many more people would be willing to donate if in turn they could save the life of a family member.
Raja Mishra puts forward the idea of death row prisoners being able to donate an organ for a life sentence. This creates the argument that the race to meet the growing demand for organs is outweighing important moral values. Ethicists say this is a slippery slope and amounts to a de facto organ sale. But Mishra argues “it is a chance for murderers to give back exactly what they've taken: a life.” These valuable organs should not be allowed to needlessly go to waste in such a large shortage. The organs of these prisoners are valuable and could put a sizeable dent in the ever growing list of those needing organ donations.
Yearly, thousands die from not receiving the organs needed to help save their lives; Anthony Gregory raises the question to why organ sales are deemed illegal in his piece “Why legalizing organ sales would help to save lives, end violence”, which was published in The Atlantic in November of 2011. Anthony Gregory has written hundreds of articles for magazines and newspapers, amongst the hundreds of articles is his piece on the selling of organs. Gregory states “Donors of blood, semen, and eggs, and volunteers for medical trials, are often compensated. Why not apply the same principle to organs? (p 451, para 2)”. The preceding quote allows and proposes readers to ponder on the thought of there being an organ
In her article, Satel criticizes the current methods governing organ sharing in the United States, and suggests that the government should encourage organ donation, whether it was by providing financial incentives or other compensatory means to the public. Furthermore, the author briefly suggests that the European “presumed consent” system for organ donation might remedy this shortage of organs if implicated in the States.
In the essay “A Moral Solution to the Organ Shortage” by Alexander T. Tabarrok, Tabarrok presents the idea of paying organ donors and, or, only allowing registered organ donors to be able to receive an organ, in other words be compensated for the donation to help end the shortage. The essay’s thesis is, “Despite a prominent advertising campaign with Michael Jordan as spokesperson, and a national campaign of pastors, rabbis and other clergy supporting donation, the supply of donors remains far below that necessary to save everyone on the waiting list.”
...uld be unmoral and unethical to carry out. Even with the technology available today, the humanistic nature of people to be greedy will overcome their kindheartedness to give the gift of life to one another. The resale of human organs from living donors should continue to remain illegal around the world.
It is clear that a large demand for organs exists. People in need of organ donations are transferred to an orderly list. Ordinarily, U.S. institutions have an unprofitable system which provides organs through a list of individuals with the highest needs; however, these organs may never come. A list is
There are laws against the sale of human organs around the world, but limited enforcement of these laws. If the patient is willing to pay for an organ that would save and potentially extend their life, there will always be a black market for organ donation. In addition, if the donor is living in poverty or below, if an organ trafficking ring approaches this person with a promise to a gr...
In conclusion, although there are some valid reasons to support the creation of an organ market based on the principles of beneficence and autonomy, there are also many overriding reasons against the market. Allowing the existence of organ markets would theoretically increase the number of organ transplants by living donors, but the negative results that these organ markets will have on society are too grave. Thus, the usage of justice and nonmaleficence as guiding ethical principles precisely restricts the creation of the organ market as an ethical system.
Since the National Organ Transplant Act was signed in 1984, it has been illegal to buy and sell human organs for transplantation. Even after this act was put in place, there is still an ongoing debate about whether it should become legal and about the ethics that come along with such a practice. This debate proposes the question, should the selling and purchasing of organs be legalized and is there a way to make this practice ethical? The answer to that question is, no! It should not be legal because the buying and selling of organs is unethical due to its ability to create an economic class war, lead towards exploitation of the poor, and cause the qualities of organs to decrease.
First of all, selling organs shouldn’t be legal for two main reasons, which are saving lives and stop people from selling organs illegally in the black market. The world should understand that in many cases if someone didn’t get the organ they need they will suffer and have to die in some cases. This doesn’t means that the donors will have to give up their lives but, they can and will live healthy. For example if someone is dyeing and in need of a kidney and there is no chance for that person to live unless he gets one. Legalizing selling organs will saves this person’s life because he would easily buy an organ and complete the rest of his life without and problems. But in the case of that kidney that is in need, other people could sell theirs without having and problems that would affect them. Humans have two kidneys and one kidney that wills saves other person live is going to kill this person or even hurts.
Organ transplantation is an amazing accomplishment of modern science which grants the recipient a prolonged life. Sadly, today the demand for organs is not being closely met, leading to the world’s organ shortage. Thus far, solutions aimed to increase organ donors have failed, which seems to have lead ultimately to what is referred to as the organ trade. With the problem of the organ shortage people have become desperate, to the point where they have come up with the solution of removing their own organs and even the organs of people who have been trafficked in order to sell them in the organ trade. Not only an ongoing problem in the United States, the organ trade is a problem being faced all over the world. Imagine going out with friends but waking up in a
The nature of organ allocation and transplantation raises a number of particular ethical issues and dilemmas, primarily because donated organs are a scarce resource that has the potential to dramatically improve the health and life of recipients. This scarcity of organs requires clear eligibility and allocation criteria to ensure a fair and equitable system for access to this limited resource.
F “According to the current United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) report, kidneys from living donors have about half the failure rate of kidneys from dead donors.” (Cihak 40-3). G This is a sad but true fact, and what makes that worse is that right now only about 36 percent of organ transplants are from living donors (Cihak 40-3). H If look at the one year survival rates for both live and dead donations it only further supports this fact. After one year, only 2-3 percent of living kidney donations had been rejected, but over 10 percent of dead donations had been rejected (Cihak 40-3). I J K Through this information you can see that if organ selling was legal then there would been an increase in live donations thus increasing the success of organ transplants
After fatality, one registered organ donor can save up to 50 lives with the donation of organs, tissues and body parts (Facts About Organ Donation, n.d.). It is unknown how many people are saved each year after organ transplantation due to many different factors such as different recipient matches and available donors. But, transplantation does save or prolong the lives of many individuals each year. Not only does organ transplantation have life changing differences to the recipient, the success rate for transplantation is between 80 and 90 percent (Facts About Organ Donation, n.d.). If this process is beneficial to the recipient and the donor with high success rates and many saved lives, then organ sales should be allowed if an individual chooses to do such a
One issue with organ transplantation is the difficulty to get a organ that is useable. It is hard for people to find usable organs that they can safely transplant into another individual. According to Caplan (2002) “Two basic strategies have been proposed to provide incentives for people to sell their organs when they die” (p. 2).
More than 110,000 people are on waiting lists for organs they may not ever get in time (mantel). This has caused an organ black market in which people are trading their or other individuals’ organs for illegal money. In case making criminals out of normal people. In 2009, the FBI arrested a Brooklyn rabbi for illegal organ trade, he was buying organs from overseas for a mere ten thousand dollars and selling here in the black market for upwards of one hundred sixty thousand (Krauthammer). An organ trade of some sort needs to become legal and people need chances to be compensated for their organs. Also with the market becoming legal, patients will be in better hands pre-operation and post-operation.