Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Principles ethical leadership
What controls should have been in place to prevent the scandal at Wells Fargo
5 principles of ethical leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Principles ethical leadership
Empowerment is commonly confused with incentivizing employees. In many cases, there are no consequences for employee empowerment gone wrong, but some actually have severe consequences for the business. A recent example of this phenomenon is the Wells Fargo fiasco. Wells Fargo employees were incentivized in a way that made them behave unethically to meet standards and gain rewards. This skill application, will discuss Wells Fargo could have used other methods of empowering and engaging employees, which probably would have had a less harmful effect on their business and how they should act in the future. Incentives are often a way for employers to motivate and empower their employees to be successful. Unfortunately, however, incentives can sometimes lead to lying or cheating in order to get ahead. This strategy coupled with unattainable goals is a recipe for disaster. Recently 5300 Wells Fargo employees were fired for opening fake accounts in order to meet sales quotas, but also to receive incentives for …show more content…
exceeding these quotas. When developing empowerment, an employer should first articulate a clear goal.
For instance, in determining their sales quotas, Wells Fargo should have ensured that their goal was not only specific, measurable, and time-bound, but also aligned with the organizational culture and realistic for employees. The difference in those two types of goals is that Wells Fargo did have a sales quota that was specific, there was a time marker set on it, and it could be measured by whether or not their employee opened the amount of accounts expected. However, what Wells Fargo did not take into account in putting forth this goal was whether or not it would be realistically attainable for their employees and if it aligned with company values and goals. Because an overwhelming number of employees felt the need to lie and cheat in order to meet the quota, I would conclude that the goal was not realistic and it did not align with company values because of the unethical
outcomes. Beyond articulating a clear goal, when empowering employees an employer also needs to provide opportunities to foster personal mastery, model the correct behavior, and provide support. Wells Fargo did not provide opportunities to foster personal mastery in this case because they gave their employees, including new hires, a large task at the beginning rather than smaller quotas at the start of the year and celebrating small wins each month or quarter to ensure that their workforce was ready to take on such a large quota. This may have overwhelmed employees and made them fear they might not meet the organizational standards. Additionally, the company did not model successful behaviors. Since so many employees took part in this fraudulent activity while leaders of the company knew and never addressed it, the leaders were not modeling successful behaviors or demonstrating successful task accomplishment. By ignoring this behavior, they actually positively reinforced bad and unethical behaviors. Additionally because company leaders positively reinforced these unethical behaviors to meet quotas, support was not given for employees to accomplish this task in a fair and ethical manner. Even though Wells Fargo missed some of the steps in building an empowered workforce, one could argue that the organization did connect employees to outcomes through these large incentives for opening accounts, even though employees did not take the proper steps to receive those incentives. Overall, if Wells Fargo had taken a different path to empowering their employees, I believe that they would not have found themselves in this situation. In the future, Wells Fargo should focus more on ensuring that they are articulating a clear and realistic goal, but also breaking down quotas into smaller time-spans in order to celebrate small wins throughout the year and reassess what the standard is for employees at a given time. I believe this would make employees feel more confident and supported, and hopefully in turn refrain from breaking the law and company policies.
Companies say they empower their employees and communities to do more or be better. What does that truly mean? According to The World Bank (2015), “Empowerment is the process of increasing the capacity of individuals or groups to make choices and to transform those choices into desired actions and outcomes” (para 1). Lowe’s introduced a program in 2014 to develop its women leaders, pairing vice presidents with women store managers to develop and expand Lowe’s leadership team. In 2015, the company will leverage the program with a new group of store managers and launch a new mentoring program to pair women and minority store managers with market directors
First of all, they will not be able to buy tangible properties such as house, car and etc. because of that their credit ratings got a huge hit. Moreover, only 5,300 of the employees that were fired from the Bank, 10% were Managers. What could have motivated them to engage in this sham? This is not an attempt to imply all were of malicious but certainly most them led the way. The aggressive sales goals pushed employees to break the rules. “On average one percent 1 percent of employees have not done the right thing, and we terminated them. I don’t want them here if they don’t represent the culture of the company,” says John Stumpf, the company’s longtime chief executive, in an interview with The Washington Post. It is obvious that simple employees and managers could not break the law if someone from the top did not allow them to do so. But the executive board of Wells Fargo claimed that they only fired 1 percent of below employees and some managers for fraudulent accounts, however they also might be involved in that business crime although to build a case against a company executive, prosecutors would have to show “they knew there was a plan to create false accounts to drive up sales,” said Brandon L. Garret, a professor at the University of Virginia School of Law. Even if it appears that the executive purposefully attempted to avoid knowing about the fraud, prosecutors may be able to build a case. Because they don’t have to participate if there is willful
Within this discussion it is explained that incentives sometimes lead to cheating, because "something worth having is something worth cheating for". I think the incentives placed in daily life those that we can control, let's say, in our business should be established wisely, in order ...
They violated the trust of its customers and deceived and abused them. The bank and its affected personnel are paying and will continue to pay, the legal price for such flagrant wrongdoing, including perhaps, imprisonment of certain personnel (Cavico Mujtaba 17). According to Frank J. Cavico and Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, the authors of “Wells Fargo’s Fake Accounts Scandal and its Legal and Ethical Implications for Management,” the lesson to be learned from this scandal is “that if an organization sets unrealistic sales goals and then ties the employees’ compensation and their jobs to meeting these goals, then unethical and illegal behavior is likely to occur, harming the organization and its stakeholders” (Cavico Mujtaba
The reading that was investigated consisted of a case study from Marianne Jennings entitled “Fannie Mae: The Most Ethical Company in America”. Jennings (2009a) writes about how Fannie Mae’s ranking was number one in the United States of America in 2004 as being the most ethical company. Jennings (2009a) writes that CEO Franklin Raines challenged his employees to double Fannie Mae’s earnings per share (EPS) within five years from $3.23 to $6.46. Consequently, this enabled employees and managers to be eligible for an award under incentive plan (AIP) provided they met the five-year goal Mr. Raines created. Employees and managers were enthusiastic about the ability to influence their salaries, but then human greed took over and things went horribly wrong for Fannie Mae. Jennings (2009b) writes that the government audited Mr. Raines and found that he was behind the altering company’s earnings to meet forecasted projections. After the government’s investigation into Fannie Mae it was determined that Raines created a culture of arrogance and unethical behavior. This paper examines five discussion topics, which Jennings (2009a) poses in a case study that links to the article “Fannie Mae: The Most Ethical Company in America”.
Many of Harrah’s employees deemed the goals set by Winn’s current incentive program to be unrealistic; on the other hand, others felt a sense of entitlement for bonuses. Therefore, Winn’s job is to provide a recommendation to Gary Loveman, on how to motivate and get employees energized. In order to motivate the employees, Winn had implemented an incentive pay plan to rewards Harrah’s employees in all of its properties for improving customer service. The company’s purpose for incentive program was to implant a competitive mindset in its employees as well as to show the employees that they are core of the...
This concern of integrity and organizations like Wells Fargo to do what is right stems from our personal ethical framework. We all have one which helps us decide what is right and what is wrong. It is this decision that is a concern for organizations that must be managed on a day to day basis. Company’s such as Wells Fargo are so big that bad ethical behavior may be overlooked and not dealt with until the damage has already been done. Other organizations need to learn from Wells Fargo and start addressing their own organization ethical framework. This would include the organizational culture, business strategies, employee ethics concerns and the overall ethics and decision-making
It is clear in reviewing the FM case that the corporate executive’s personal morals were overrun by their desire to attain personal incentives and bonuses. Lack of internal controls allowed the executives to control what was reported to ensure the goal was attained. (Jennings, 2009) Retaining control and limiting devolution kept those below the executive ranks largely in the dark. The executive team used the corporate goals to manage behaviors from the top down, ignoring and or eliminating those who questioned their processes. (Marken, 2004) Reviewing the impact of how goals and incentives are communicated and calculated is a valuable lesson in understanding the balance between personal morals and attaining corporate goals. (Schultz & Wehmeier, 2010)
Once these conditions are identified it is important to employ those strategies which will help the organization reach its desired goals also which will in turn help to achieve self-efficacy in employees. The process of empowerment can be structured into 5 stages including psychological state of empowering experience. The first stage involves identifying the conditions within the organization where empowerment is required. In the second stage strategies according to the need is formulated by the managers. The employment of these strategies is aimed not only at removing some of the external conditions responsible for powerlessness, but also at providing subordinates with self-efficacy information in third stage. After getting these information the employees feel empowered in stage four. The behavioral effects of empowerment are noticed in the fifth stage. Empowerment processes may allow leaders to lessen the emotional impact of demoralizing organizational changes or to mobilize organizational members in the face of difficult competitive challenges. These processes may enable leaders to set higher performance goals, and they may help employees to accept these goals. Empowerment practices also may be useful in motivating subordinates to persist despite difficult organizational environmental
“Empowerment is the process of enabling or authorizing an individual to think, behave, take action, and control work and decision making in autonomous ways. It is the state of feeling self-empowered to take control of one 's own destiny” (Heathfield, 2015). An organization can empower its employees by removing barriers, listening and respecting to an employee’s contributions and concerns, and giving them a say in certain decisions. An employer can create an environment that encourages employees to become empowered but ultimately it’s up to the employee to take control of their own destiny. An employee who is empowered will desire to use their strengths to benefit the organization and be more inclined to offer creative, innovative ideas on how
Empowerment is another feature of post bureaucracy. It represents organizations awarding power and authority to those lower in the organizational hierarchy (Knights & Willmott, 2007). To some extent empowerment could be beneficial to a organization because empowerment would allow the workers to work...
Empowerment has been shown to have a significant impact on a company’s bottom line, their employees and their customers who have a greater sense of satisfaction with the services and products that they receive. It is for these reasons that I assert that employee empowerment is a positive agent for change. Wouldn’t it be inspiring to see all organizations embrace and achieve employee
Thus, to be effective in the empowerment process, empowerment requires that managers and staff members, who play a critical and essential role in the entire empowerment process, must define their empowerment, not assume or guess at their roles. Managers should never permit ambiguity about the power or its exercise. The consequences of its expression (both positive and negative) should also be clearly defined at the outset of the empowered relationship between managers and staff (Rapp, et al., 2006; Porter, 1998). The core of employee empowerment process is: show people what they have to know, teach them how to do it, give them the tools they need, and they will do a job that will meet, and often exceed, expectations. The key words here are "show," "teach" and "give." So if you want empowered employees, you have to prepare them for the job. This means that empowerment is a process of things linked with each other to form empowerment at the end (Gresham,
Individual Factors- Empowerment, Recognition and Rewards, and Career Support are respective of individual employee. These incentives are based on employee participation and involvement in response to organizational benefits. The common denominator is that the employee has the power to determine to what degree they can feel empowered to reap the benefits that the organization offers to the employee as it relates to reward programs and to career opportunities.
According to Dr. William C. Byham,“the successful organizations will be the ones best able to apply the creative energy of individuals toward constant improvement” (5). Yet, constant improvement is a value that cannot be imposed upon people. It has to come from the individual. The only way to get people to adopt constant improvement as a way of life in doing daily business is by empowering them. Empowering employees definitely motivates them to take ownership of their jobs so that they take personal interest in improving the performance of the organization. Formal training in empowerment skills and related areas are conceived via personal and organizational success. Personal and organizational successes are achieved through good advertisement as well as excellent relations with the public. Both of these rely heavily on one’s ability to communicate thoughts and ideas effectively.