Why A Person Doesn T One Remain The Same?

2006 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The relationship between mind and body

A person may change throughout their lives whether that be physically, mentally, emotionally, and/or psychologically; however, regardless of the fact that a person has changed, they still feel as if they are the same person. But how is it that we are the same person if we have changed? How is it possible for a person to change yet remain the same? Are you now the same person you were 15 or 20 years ago? What is it that makes us the same despite these changes? Some may say that a person stays the same due to their memories and past experiences that allow them to keep a part of who they were and used to be with who they have become. Memories from childhood experiences, family members and friends that are always there for looking back or reminiscing. …show more content…

One may ask how this is possible, but the question simply isn’t how, but rather why not. Why can’t a person change permanently from who they once were without having to still be the same? What makes a person the same? Could the answer be their name, sex, DNA, or physical appearance? Unfortunately no because those things can change. Some believe that what makes a person the same is their memory and their soul. Our memories and past experiences should not determine the fact that who we once were will always be part of who we will become, and that there is a possibility for our souls to change, allowing us to break free from the chains that once held us captive to our past. If someone were to commit a crime or had possibly done something in their past, should that dictate their future regarding the fact that they have transformed themselves and have become a new man? If the answer is no, why shouldn’t the answer be yes? People from this side of the spectrum might believe no simply because no person can be held accountable for something they did not do. Why did they not do this someone might ask? The answer lies within the fact that they are not the same person they once were 15 or 20 years ago; therefore, who they have become truly did not commit the crime and should not regret that something from their past they are not responsible for. Parmenides of Elea was an early …show more content…

Why is this the case? Perhaps because no matter how we change or when we do, there is a piece of us that remains inside which makes us who we are. But what makes us who we are and how are we able to identify ourselves? People who believe although we change we still remain the same might say that it is because of our soul. A person can change their physical appearance, or their name, etc., but who we are will always and forever stay attached to its true owner. Just as a finger print stays the same for every single individual despite any other changes that may occur to that person; therefore, those who believe in this theory would conclude that we never really change. Let us take the previous example if someone were to commit a crime or had possibly done something in their past, should that dictate their future regarding the fact that they have transformed themselves and have become a new man? If the answer is rather yes than no, why shouldn’t the answer be no? People from this side might say no because your past is always a part of who you are; therefore, no matter how much time has passed, a person will and should always be held accountable for their actions. If not that person then who? Should an innocent, single father of two young children be the answer to this question? What about a lonely, old woman who uplifts people through her words of encouragement? If

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of A Death In Texas By Steve Nobles

    758 Words  | 2 Pages

    Anybody can write and persuade a certain audience, based on how the writer wants their audience to look at the situation. In Steve Earle’s essay “A Death in Texas”, he persuades his readers that he wants to believe that Johnathan Wayne Nobles was rehabilitated. In the essay, Nobles was a changed man within faith from becoming a religious man within the prison walls. Prison guards learned to trust Nobles with his quick-witted charm and friendliness. Steve persuaded himself that Johnathan was a changed man from the words that they had exchanged over the years on paper. Reality states that no matter how much someone changed in the present, it doesn’t change what they have done in the past. Earle describes in the essay “There he will be pumped full of chemicals that will collapse his lungs and stop his heart forever” (Earle 73). He’s persuading the audience with horrid emotion with facts of a lethal injection that will happen to Johnathan. What Earle doesn’t describe is how gruesomely Johnathan’s murders were. In this world everyone has a chance to know right from wrong, even if someone was brought up wrong in the society. Johnathan was not rehabilitated, maybe at one point accepted his past, but he was still a murderer and a

    Read More

  • The Changeable Nature of Life in The Bean Trees by Barbara Kingsolver

    515 Words  | 2 Pages

    Life is constantly changing, like clouds in the sky; always shifting and turning. People never really know which way life will turn next, bringing them fortune or failure. When you look at how things change it is best to compare it to something that you can relate it to. The changeable nature of life can be related to the novel 'The Bean Trees.' This is a book written almost entirely on dealing with changes in the characters lives.

    Read More

  • Donald Peattie's Short Story 'The Rattler'

    1132 Words  | 3 Pages

    people and things around you, maybe even changing the way you see yourself as well. In the

    Read More

  • Understanding and Accepting Parfit's Nature of Persisting Persons

    1765 Words  | 4 Pages

    Here is a brief summary of the argument of persisting persons. Parfit, with the help of the work of David Hume, believes that there is no enduring self. That is to say, that the person I am when I was born of the mother’s womb is not the person I am today, and the person I am today is not the same person ten years, ten days or perhaps ten minutes from now. Parfit argues for a perduring self. People are able to persist through time through overlapping psychological mental states. This is similar to Hume’s Bundle Theory, which argues that the self is made up of a bundle of overlapping experiences, conscious events, rather than a central person. When Parfit talks of persistence, what he means by persistence is these ongoing psychological states. For people seeking answers about the big life and death questions about identity, Parfit does not provide any answers here. In fact, he wants people to get over the idea of identity through time because it assumes that there is a right answer concerning identity. Essentially, it is a waste of time to worry if you are going to be the same person or not.

    Read More

  • The Effects Of Change In The Movie 'The Goonies'

    1334 Words  | 3 Pages

    From our first breath to our last, every person on Earth is in a perpetual state of change. Some of this change is physical, some of it is mental, and all of it is important. One of the most obvious instances of human change is seen throughout adolescence. During this time, both our bodies and our minds change very rapidly, nearly transforming us into completely different versions of ourselves. While it is true that this period of the human life does contains the largest amount of both physical and mental change, it should not be thought of as the only time in our life where change is acceptable. At any other time, though, change is usually looked at as negative. In many texts, when an adult changes, they are usually viewed as fickle or even

    Read More

  • Psychological Continuity Theory: The Persistence Of A Personal Identity

    1013 Words  | 3 Pages

    To answer the question of whether a person can persist through time, it is important to consider what is meant by a ‘person’. This consideration seems trivial at first, and if one were to take the physicalist route, it would be – a person persists through time by existing as the same human animal. However, it is in fact a lot harder to pinpoint what the ‘self’ actually consists of if we were to take the psychological route and consider the voice inside our heads, the voice that thinks and experiences and suffers. What is this mysterious immaterial phenomenon that we hold to be our personal identity? And what makes it the same entity as the one yesterday? Although these questions don’t have an explicit answer yet, in this essay I will attempt to give an insight on how they could be answered, offering a psychological

    Read More

  • Personal Identity In The Memento Movie

    1338 Words  | 3 Pages

    The personal identity continues to be same since a person is the same rational thing, same self, and thus the personal identity never changes (Strawson, 2014). Locke also suggests that personal identity has to change when the own self-changes and therefore even a little change in the personal identity has to change the self. He also provides an argument that a person cannot question what makes something today to remain the same thing it was a day ago or yesterday because one must specify the kind of thing it was. This is because something might be a piece of plastic but be a sharp utensil and thus suggest that the continuity of consciousness is required for something to remain the same yesterday and today. John Locke also suggests that two different things of a similar type cannot be at the same time at the same place. Therefore, the criteria of the personal identity theory of Locke depends on memory or consciousness remaining the same (Strawson, 2014). This is because provided a person has memory continuity and can remember being the same individual, feeling, thinking, and doing specific things, the individual can remain to be the same person irrespective of bodily

    Read More

  • Libertarianism Essay On Libertarianism

    1242 Words  | 3 Pages

    The reason I would say yes is everybody got the ability to choose between something. If do not matter if it was cause by agent or it uncase everybody have some control over their action. It hard to believe that everything a person do is already determine beforehand. There are many future a person can take to by their action. An example would to a choice to rob a bank or not. If you broke and you need the cash to help the person you care about an operation you still have a choice to rob the bank or find another way. One future would be you jail if you rob the bank or you find the money another way. It hard to believe that it do not matter what happen you will rob the bank nor matter what or in jail no matter what you decide to

    Read More

  • Great Expectations

    825 Words  | 2 Pages

    Going through life we will meet people who make us change.Some changes are for the better of the individual, others not so much. These changes can be caused by money, a new groups of friends, or just trying to change for yourself. For example, in the novels Great Expectations and To Kill A Mockingbird, both Pip and Jem experience life changes that affect the perspective on our world. Pip and Jem are similar as they both look up to their dad and neither have a mother figure. Throughout the novels, both boys experience hard times but still manage to pull through.

    Read More

  • Graduation Speech: Importance of Change

    444 Words  | 1 Pages

    Change is a word that I have constantly heard throughout my high school years. It is a transformation through which everyone goes whether it's for the better or for the worse. For me the meaning and value of change has helped me to focus on the goals I have to accomplish. For others, it is simply just a phase we go through. All of us here have been able to learn and develop from our changes to be come a better and successful person.

    Read More

  • Philosophy Paper #1: Personal Identity

    1056 Words  | 3 Pages

    What is personal identity? This question has been asked and debated by philosophers for centuries. The problem of personal identity is determining what conditions and qualities are necessary and sufficient for a person to exist as the same being at one time as another. Some think personal identity is physical, taking a materialistic perspective believing that bodily continuity or physicality is what makes a person a person with the view that even mental things are caused by some kind of physical occurrence. Others take a more idealist approach with the belief that mental continuity is the sole factor in establishing personal identity holding that physical things are just reflections of the mind. One more perspective on personal identity and the one I will attempt to explain and defend in this paper is that personal identity requires both physical and psychological continuity; my argument is as follows:

    Read More

  • Dementia In Everyday Life

    1614 Words  | 4 Pages

    The human life cycle begins at birth and ends with death. In between these two major life events, there are numerous thoughts, experiences and relationships that shape who a person is and what their identity is. As we progress through the life cycle, our bodies begin to decline physically and cognitively. Throughout all these changes, when does a person become a new person?

    Read More

  • Memory and Personal Identity

    750 Words  | 2 Pages

    The problem of personal identity is difficult to solve, especially since there is ambiguity in the terms. Identity may mean the same person or how one sees oneself. Anyhow, philosophers wish to assess this issue and find a suitable explanation, one motivation being responsibility. Humans will hold others responsible for acts such as murder, theft, and fraud. However, the person who will face the consequences must be the one who truly committed the wrongful act. A second motivation is interest in the future. An individual may become concerned or excited for an event that will occur in the future. Surely, these emotions entail that they will be the same person once that event occurs. The last motivation for resolving personal identity is immortality; basically, what will connect a person to whatever lives on after their physical death. Something can be identical in two ways: quantitatively or qualitatively. To be quantitatively identical is to be numerically identical, and to be qualitatively identical is to share exact qualities. There are two criterions on which personal identity is based, but the most important is the metaphysical criterion, which attempts to explain “being” or existence, without the necessity of physical evidence ...

    Read More

  • Free Narrative Essays - Change

    465 Words  | 1 Pages

    My whole life, I have been presented to a single element called change. Change occurs in many different forms and is carried out in many different ways. However, just recently, I have come to the realization that change can be the deepest of all subjects. I always assumed that change occured when you moved to a new town or when you lost someone close to you. Those are elements to change, yes, but change doesn't have to occur over a single dramatic event. It can just happen overnight when your brain determines it's time to do something different.

    Read More

  • Personal Identity Essay

    1058 Words  | 3 Pages

    The philosophical problem of personal identity pertains to questions that arise about ourselves by virtue of our being persons. There is no single question that will sum up the problem, but rather a multitude of questions that are loosely connected to each other. Within this essay, the four most prominent problems will be explained and addressed. One of the most familiar is the question of “Who am I?” This regards to what makes one a unique individual. Another familiar question is, “What is it to be a person?” This concerns the necessary criteria for something to count as a person as opposed to a non-person. There is also the problem of persistence, relating to personal identity over time. An example of this would be to glance upon an old photograph of a childhood class, point and say, “That's me.” The questions arises of, “What makes you that one instead of one of the others?” The last problem to be explained is the one of evidence. How do we find out who is who? There are two separate sources of evidence used often in philosophy: first-person memory, pertaining to one remembering an action or event and therefore being the person who did such, and physical continuity, where if the one who performed the action or witnessed the event looks like you, then it is you.

    Read More

More about Why A Person Doesn T One Remain The Same?

Open Document