Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of discrimination on the LGBT community
Introduction on gay adoption
Gender equality canada past to present
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of discrimination on the LGBT community
Gay, lesbian, heterosexual, homosexual, transgender, means we should all be treated equally. We are all humans of the same race and deserve a right to freedom. Which means we should be able to choose who we want to marry. Love is a powerful word and as well as marriage,. They both contradict eachother. Some say if you are in love you do not need to be legally married to show it. Others may say opposite. But the questions that many ask is should same sex marriges be aloud in Canada? My answer to this question is yes. Society is equal so people should be treated equally. Canada is known for using equality in its Constitution since John Diefenbaker. He was the 13th prime minister of Canada and he established the Canadian Bill of Rights. He introduced the Bill of Rights on August 20, 1960. The Rights included that any women and man had the right to Freedom of speech and freedom of religion (now in Section 2 of the Charter) . He also included that in Section 15 of the Bill of Rights that everyone had equality rights male or female. Under section 15 he includes racial equality and sexual equality. In its correspondence, it has played a mnajor right in gay rights in Canada. These rights are were and are gaurenteed to "Every individual,". During the start of 1987 Trudeau officially legalized gay rights. Pierre Trudeau, then Canada's Minister of Justice, introduces an Omnibus Bill to overhaul Canada's criminal laws, which includes decriminalizing of homosexual acts. Trudeau famously tells reporters, "There's no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation," and "What’s done in private between two consenting adults doesn’t concern the Criminal Code."[2] After 18 months of debate, the bill becomes law in 1969. ... ... middle of paper ... ...has the right and choice to create a family. Therefore gay couple cannot create their own child, they will have the choice to adopt one. There are many homeless and starving children all over the world wanting to be loved and this is what society can now do since gay marriages are legal. Marriage, gay or not encourages people to have family values. For example with AIDS spreading more and more with people having unprotected sex. Isn’t what we want is for people to settle down and have a lifestyle where STD’s and AIDS isnt an option? Isn’t this what takes up our news? Well, shouldnt it stop and shouldnt society be encourage=ing gay marriage no discouraging it. Part of society is encouraging it where is the other half? The churches, the people who say you hhave to be pure till marriage. Marriage of homosexuals is no different then the marriage of a man and a women.
Since 1914, Canadian Human Rights laws have had a positive impact on helping to shape Canadian identity as one that is welcoming to various minority groups. Being a Canadian citizen provides you with the freedoms to travel, and settle in Canada at your own will and desire. Also, the freedom to express your sexual orientation is welcomed and well supported in many communities. Modern discrimination against categorizing human beings is very slim and everyone of all ethnic or cultural backgrounds are welcome with respect and good intentions. Canada is an extremely welcoming and protective place, in which nearly everything is done to promote equality, and a safe country.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was enacted under the Pierre Trudeau government on April 17, 1982. According to Phillip Bryden, “With the entrenchment of the Charter into the Canadian Constitution, Canadians were not only given an explicit definition of their rights, but the courts were empowered to rule on the constitutionality of government legislation” (101). Prior to 1982, Canada’s central constitutional document was the British North America Act of 1867. According to Kallen, “The BNA Act (the Constitution Act, 1867) makes no explicit reference to human rights” (240). The adoption of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms significantly transformed the operation of Canada’s political system. Presently, Canadians define their needs and complaints in human rights terms. Bryden states, “More and more, interest groups and minorities are turning to the courts, rather than the usual political processes, to make their grievances heard” (101). Since it’s inception in 1982 the Charter has become a very debatable issue. A strong support for the Charter remains, but there also has been much criticism toward the Charter. Academic critics of the Charter such as Robert Martin believe that the Charter is doing more harm than good, and is essentially antidemocratic and UN-Canadian. I believe that Parliament’s involvement in implementing the Charter is antidemocratic, although, the Charter itself represents a democratic document. Parliament’s involvement in implementing the Charter is antidemocratic because the power of the executive is enhanced at the expense of Parliament, and the power of the judiciary is enhanced at the expense of elected officials, although, the notwithstanding clause continues to provide Parliament with a check on...
For Canada to become a fully mature nation, it needs equality among both genders, women’s rights should be equal to men’s rights. At the beginning of the twentieth century, Canadian women were subordinate to Canadian men, not only in politics, but in most aspects of living. Most men believed that women were not able to accomplish anything a man could, or be wise enough to vote. In 1914, Manitoba Premier Sir Rodmond Roblin said that “the majority of women are emotional, and if given the franchise would be a menace rather than an aid." (Women Get The Vote ) Seeing that this man was in an authoritative position, his statement was an example of a typical and common viewpoint at the time. Many men agreed with him, and Canadian society did not legally allow women all the rights men had. Women made up a majority of the Canadian population, yet they did not have the right to vote, which made Canada an immature society at this time. By 1914...
In recent years, same-sex relationships have become more encompassing in US society. State legislation is changing such as accepting gay marriages, enforcing anti-discrimination laws, and legal gay adoptions; the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community is becoming public. Gay-headed families, like heterosexuals, are diverse and varying in different forms. Whether a created family is from previous heterosexual relationships, artificial insemination, or adoption, it deserves the same legal rights heterosexual families enjoy. Full adoption rights needs to be legalized in all states to provide a stable family life for children because sexual orientation does not determine parenting skills, children placed with homosexual parents have better well-being than those in foster care, and there are thousands of children waiting for good homes.
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms has fundamentally shaped Canadian society since its inception through the Constitution Act of 1982. Promising egalitarian, linguistic, religious as well as other basic rights, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is one of the primary doctrines in which Canadian law is founded upon. Many have argued that the advent of the Charter has transformed Canadian society into one that is preoccupied with that of rights. The rise in social movements, specifically in areas of women’s rights, indigenous rights and homosexual rights, are indicative of this. The Charter has created a divide amongst those who believe that this rise in a “rights culture” is ultimately beneficial if not necessary for Canadian society, especially in preserving the voices of the marginalized citizenry who until recently remained invisible in the eyes of parliament, and those who believe that Canada as nation has become preoccupied with preserving the right of gays, lesbians, women and other minority groups that it has sacrificed its majoritarian values. The word preoccupation, especially used in this context, holds a negative connotation suggesting some sort of obsession, and to describe Canada as a nation “preoccupied” with rights is an overstatement. Canada’s recent Charter revolution has often been seen as a means by which minority groups enact their own changes which may or may not be seen as desirable by a majority of people. However, because the Charter is important in preserving the rights of marginalized or minority groups, this can ultimately be beneficial for those whose world views have historically been persecuted. The subsequent paragraphs will further discuss how Canada’s recent Charter revolution has transformed Canada...
This includes the fact of homosexual, bisexual, or heterosexual. Until the 1969, there has been an offence in the criminal code of Canada in terms of sexual orientation (Young, 2012). The government of Canada refused to accept the idea that some individual living in Canada is being marginalized based on their sexism. This violate sections 15 of the Canadian charter of rights and freedom which states that “Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability”. To this day, the human rights in Canada including all the government offices such as, federal, provincial, territorial and, in some places, municipal claim that there is no place for sexual orientation (Hulbert,
Everyone and anyone in Canada is able to enjoy the rights set out by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Regardless of race, colour, sex, ethnic origin, or sexuality, everyone has the rights and freedoms contained in the Charter (Your Guide to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 2016). The Charter states that no individual is to be discriminated against. Every individual in Canada is to be considered equal, and the government must not discriminate against its citizens in its laws or programs (Your Guide to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 2016). The Charter also provides the citizens of Canada with fundamental freedoms.
Homosexuality is becoming more and more accepted and integrated into today’s society, however, when it comes to homosexuals establishing families, a problem is posed. In most states, homosexuals can adopt children like any other married or single adult. There are many arguments to this controversial topic; some people believe that it should be legal nationally, while others would prefer that is was banned everywhere, or at least in their individual states. There are logical reasons to allow gays to adopt children, but for some, these reasons are not enough. The main issue really is, what is in the best interest of the child? This type of problem isn’t really one with causes, effects, and solutions, but one with pros and cons. Like any other adoption situation, a parent prove themselves to be responsible and capable enough to raise a child on their own, or with a spouse.
Explaining the meaning behind being Canadian is not a simple task as there are various things that contribute to this nationality. Nonetheless, the most crucial aspect of being Canadian is the sense of equality present within all members of society. This equality can be found in numerous aspects of the present society and it can even be found when examining Canadian history. Equality is present for women in this country as people before had fought for the rights to vote, work and even attend school. This sense of equality is found through the quality of the education system Canadians are provided with as various countries fail to provide their members with the same level of education.
There is an abundance of children in the U.S. lacking a home and a family, that of which a gay couple could provide. Some states have legalized joint gay adoption, while others are still on the fence about it, and would rather not pass the law. A reason why those states should pass the law is, because of the foster care system. Many children, whether it’s a boy or girl, can jump to and from at least twenty homes before they turn 18. Some would be against the gay adoption, because they feel like the child would choose their sexual orientation based off what they see their adoptive parents doing. Those people fail to realize that having gay parents wouldn’t affect the child’s sexual preference. Just like having hetrosexcual parents cannot change a child from being gay. Lastly, another reason why gay adoption should be legalized nationwide is because, many people use their judgement from religious background to vote “NO” on joint gay adoption. When the 1st amendment clearly states that there needs to be a separation between church and
Canada has also been known to be rather progressive when it comes to concerns of the LGBTQ community, as you can even see Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, along side his family, in LGBTQ community walks in support. “The Canadian Human Rights Act forbids discrimination based on sexual orientation... Canada lifted their ban on gays in the military in October of 1992...in 2003 the provinces of Ontario and British Columbia granted full equal marriage rights to same-sex couples...and in 2013, a bill was introduced to include transgendered and gender variant Canadians in the Canadian Human Rights Act, (Cason).” In comparison to Canada the US was not quite as progressive as early as Canada, with Massachusetts being the only state in the US to grant legalization of same-sex marriage to couples in 2003. Since 2003, same-sex marriage has been legalized nationwide, which took place in June of 2015.
Marriage is a “socially recognized and approved union between individuals, who commit to one another with the expectations of a stable and lasting intimate relationship. It begins with a ceremony known as a wedding which formally unites marriage partners. A marital relationship usually involves some kind of contract, either written or specified by tradition, which defines the partners’ rights and obligations to each other, to any children they may have, and to their relatives. In most contemporary industrialized societies, marriage is certified by the government,” (Skolnick, 2005). Marriage is also an important institution because of the impact it has on society. Marriage is the main way that reproduction of human life occurs. In some societies it is tradition for family heirlooms or things of value be passed on through marriage. Marriage also serves as a healthy way to have intimate relationships with an individual. In most places a marriage exists between two people of the opposite sex. However, the legal definition of marriage is currently being challenged by many. According to Skolnick’s article a marriage can be defined by responsibilities that a couple would share, some examples are: living together, having sexual relations, sharing money and financial responsibilities, and having a child together. The issue is that homosexual couples can do these things like heterosexual couples.
...same-sex marriage often argue, everyone has the equal right to marry any consenting adult of the opposite sex. In a state that has not legalized same-sex marriage, homosexuals have equal rights in marriage as heterosexuals, but such a law is still discriminatory based on sex. These are just a couple of many ways in which men and women might be treated differently, but equally in modern Western society.
Homosexual love relationships is exactly the same to that of a heterosexual couple. Marriage is a commitment that two people make when they love each other, they are willing to spend the rest of their days together, with the person who can be themselves and not have the fear of being judged for what they are, the person which you know is there at all times in good times and in bad times. Not with a person that you 're with only because society is so agreeable. In the United States in 2004 Massachusetts became the first state to legalize marriage be...
Any person who wants to raise a child should be able to, who they choose to raise the child with should not be the reason why they cannot have their own family. This topic is very important because there are many people in the gay community and many of them would want to or currently want to have a family. Religions are only important in this matter for the people who believe in it, not everyone else. Same sex couples should not be denied their right to have their own family just because they are the same sex, they can raise a child with no need of the opposite gender and there is no evidence of them being bad parents. No one should be denied a family just for loving someone of the same gender, homosexuals are no harm to children or anyone else and are apart of our society and should be treated equally as they are human beings like every other