Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender roles in literature
Gender roles in literature
Gender roles throughout literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender roles in literature
The Little Engine That Could, written and illustrated by Watter Piper, was first published in the United States in the 1930’s by Platt & Munk. Being considered a classic children’s book, it is used to teach children about the importance of hard work. While children may see this as the overall message of the book, there’s also an underlying theme of misogyny. In The Little Engine That Could,there’s a clear difference between the description of the female vs.the male train. The original train the carrying the toys and treats to the children over the mountain was a girl and at the very start of the book she was described as a “happy little train.” This train is one of the two only female trains in the book. Once the first train breaks down the clown and the dolls wait for other trains to pass by so they could ask for help. The first train that rides by is described as a “shiny new engine” and of course it’s a male train. The second train that passes is also a male train who is described as a “big engine.” Although the last male train was smaller than the others and old he was not described by his size but described as a “kind engine.” The last train to …show more content…
The blue engine also had a job that could be interpreted as being stereotypical.Her job was staying at the yard as a switch train, which could be looked as women being expected to stay home. The male trains were given important and specific jobs; passage engine and the freight engine. The male trains also thought that there job was too important to help the little engine, when asked for help the male trains “snorted” and “bellowed”with smart remarks refusing to help. The males are portrayed as being superior to the
witness to the murder of this man. You can't believe what he said. The train
The men in the factories looked at the women coming in as just an extra pair of hands. They were mostly indifferent. Even so, the women could not date the men. This rule was more of a control effort and a bit of the women not being seeing as respectable women. Yet, the bosses were at a lost because they were not used to women working. The bosses tried to enforce rules; when they were broken, the bosses did not know how to punish the women because they were women. The women had to wear hats, even if their hair was longer than the men. The women did not like this because they felt as though they were being discriminated against. They would wear slacks and carry tools because the men had to, but the men did not wear head coverings. Also, everyone that worked in the factories, besides the factory women, viewed them as girls because a true woman would be at home taking care of the house. They had to trade in their smooth soft hands for rough hands filled with
Moreover, the trip in the train gives an example of the loss of the humanity. In the train, a
“I envied the people in the train because they seemed to be going somewhere” (Lesley,7).
Young girls were not allowed to open the windows and had to breathe in the dust, deal with the nerve-racking noises of the machines all day, and were expected to continue work even if they 're suffering from a violent headache or toothache (Doc 2). The author of this report is in favor of employing young women since he claimed they seemed happy and they loved their machines so they polished them and tied ribbons on them, but he didn 't consider that they were implemented to make their awful situations more bearable. A woman who worked in both factory and field also stated she preferred working in the field rather than the factory because it was hard work but it never hurt her health (Doc 1), showing how dangerous it was to work in a factory with poor living conditions. Poor living conditions were common for nearly all workers, and similar to what the journalist saw, may have been overlooked due to everyone seeming
In 1912, women still didn’t have the right to vote (this would come four years later). This was merely one of the inequalities women had in society at this time. Another inequality between genders was their wages. Even in 2015, men, on average, earn around 9.4% more than women. This is nothing however compared to the gap in 1912. The reason Mr Birling’s factories didn’t have any men working their, just “girls”, was because it was a huge amount cheaper to employ women. Women worked at rates so low, they could barely feed themselves let alone a family. Eva was one of these “girls” and because she needed more money, she decided to ask for more. Mr Birling “refused, of course”. This shows to the audience that in 1912 British society, there wasn’t just a class gap in equality, but a gender gap as
The treatment of females from the 18th century through the 21st century have only gotten worse due to society’s ignorant judgment of the gender. Of which, is the change from the previous housewife like actions to the modern day body figure. This repulsive transaction is perceived throughout literature. From the 19th century’s short story, “The Story of an Hour” written by Kate Chopin in 1894 and the 20th century’s poem, “Barbie Doll” composed by Marge Piercy in 1971.
Do you love your car the same way you love your mom? Hopefully, the average rational human being would be a little more heartbroken if his/her parent stopped breathing, rather than an engine not working. In the short stories “The Birthmark” by Nathaniel Hawthorne and “A Doll’s House” by Henrik Ibsen a similar theme is shared. The Birthmark takes place in the late 1700’s where a devoted scientist named Alymer is married to his lovely wife Georgianna. But one day Alymer suggest to Georgianna about removing the blemish, but the birthmark becomes the center of attention, and Aylmer’s shutters toward his wife’s beauty mark began to drive Georgianna insane to the point where she would rather die than face Aylmer’s perfectionist expectations. A doll’s
Though the boys sing together, the words of the song have a different meaning for each. The train, which Wright mentions on several occasions, is a reminder of the trip they will all take to the afterlife. For everybody but Big Boy, this ascension to Glory comes sooner tha...
In Katha Pollitt’s essay “Why Boys Don’t Play with Dolls,” she explains the differences between the genders and she argues how feminist movements are hardly appreciated. Pollitt further demonstrates that women’s have the same power as any men have, but society doesn’t let women get higher than men. Pollitt explains that, “It’s twenty-eight years since the founding of NOW, and boys still like trucks and girls still like dolls” (544). From here, we can infer that the author is comparing the activities of boys and girls, and their choices of toys. Since, I am able to read and see the World, I saw that all the time that boys are more rivalry. There have always been presumptions in society that boys are very outgoing and bold, on the other hand, whereas girls are a little laid back sometimes. Girls play quietly and with non-hunting objects. However, boys always make noises. In addition, Pollitt keeps using the word “feminism” throughout her essay, and talks about how women and men should have equal rights. For example girls can do the same things as boys can do or vice versa. I can relate to this story as I grew up with two brothers who always played with cars, trucks, and other toys like dragons, but I was expected to stay away from their things and go play with my, so called, girly stuff.
Girls are supposed to play with dolls, wear pink, and grow up to become princesses. Boys are suppose to play with cars, wear blue, and become firefighters and policemen. These are just some of the common gender stereotypes that children grow up to hear. Interactions with toys are one of the entryway to different aspects of cognitive development and socialism in early childhood. As children move through development they begin to develop different gender roles and gender stereotypes that are influenced by their peers and caregivers. (Chick, Heilman-Houser, & Hunter, 2002; Freeman, 2007; Leaper, 2000)
In the story the signalman is shown as being powerless to stop the horrible accidents involving the train just like humans are powerless to prevent train crashes from happening.
He starts off wanting to know all about this train he keeps hearing. He says, "I read in the papers about the Freedom Train. I heard on the radio about the Freedom Train." He wants to know everything he can about this train. Its almost as if everybody knows there is such thing as a train, but its almost as if no one knows what the train is.
This is apparent in the scene where Curtis and other revolutionaries reach the car where young children are being indoctrinated to worship the engine and fear the outside. One girl, upon seeing the tail enders, states, “I heard old tail sectioners were lazy dogs who slept all day in their own ***” (Snowpiercer). The upper class have been dehumanizing the tail enders and teaching their children to do the same. The dehumanization of the tail enders continues into the latter parts of the film, where it is revealed young Timmy and Andy are manually operating parts of the train to keep the engine going. The dehumanization of Timmy can also be related to his Blackness and the historical dehumanization and enslavement of Black people: “Life is disallowed especially with regards to Timmy…
“Girls wear jeans and cut their hair short and wear shirts and boots because it is okay to be a boy; for a girl it is like promotion. But for a boy to look like a girl is degrading, according to you, because secretly you believe that being a girl is degrading” (McEwan 55-56). Throughout the history of literature women have been viewed as inferior to men, but as time has progressed the idealistic views of how women perceive themselves has changed. In earlier literature women took the role of being the “housewife” or the household caretaker for the family while the men provided for the family. Women were hardly mentioned in the workforce and always held a spot under their husband’s wing. Women were viewed as a calm and caring character in many stories, poems, and novels in the early time period of literature. During the early time period of literature, women who opposed the common role were often times put to shame or viewed as rebels. As literature progresses through the decades and centuries, very little, but noticeable change begins to appear in perspective to the common role of women. Women were more often seen as a main character in a story setting as the literary period advanced. Around the nineteenth century women were beginning to break away from the social norms of society. Society had created a subservient role for women, which did not allow women to stand up for what they believe in. As the role of women in literature evolves, so does their views on the workforce environment and their own independence. Throughout the history of the world, British, and American literature, women have evolved to become more independent, self-reliant, and have learned to emphasize their self-worth.