Watson And Rayner Essay

767 Words2 Pages

Watson and Rayner (1920) began by arguing that experimental evidence that supported the prospect of conditioning certain variations of emotional responses was lacking. However, if Watson and Morgan’s (1917) theory that infants’ emotional reactions are few (i.e., fear, rage, and love), then there should be a good chance that stimuli could evoke these emotions (Watson & Rayner, 1920). If the theory is untrue, then Watson and Rayner (1920) argued that the intricacy involved in adult emotional responses could not be accounted for. Therefore, Watson and Rayner (1920) created an experiment to determine whether or not Watson and Morgan’s (1917) theory is true. Watson and Rayner (1920) first provide a background for the only child who had undergone experimental work of this kind, Albert B. Watson and Rayner (1920) purported that, at nine months of age, Albert was healthy and stable, which is why he was chosen for the experiment. At nine months, Albert underwent emotional tests to determine whether or not …show more content…

Specifically, Albert was forced to look at a moving hand that sharply struck a steel bar with a hammer. Upon seeing this three times, Albert began crying. Although a reaction was evoked using loud sounds, Watson and Rayner (1920) stated that the removal of support (i.e., quickly taking away the blanket he was laying on) did not evoke a fear response in Albert, but stated that this action usually evokes fear responses in younger children. Finally, since the sound stimulus was effective in eliciting a fear response, Watson and Rayner (1920) developed four subsequent hypotheses to test: a) can the fear of an animal (e.g. white rat) be classically conditioned, b) if so, will there be a transfer to other animals or objects, c) how does time effect the conditioned responses, and d) if the conditioned responses do not subside, how can they be

Open Document