Politicians should be allowed to post on social media. The Washington Post states, “Research has found that consuming news makes people more likely to vote.” There are several thousands of people on social media whether it’s Facebook, Twitter, etc. Although news is still comes on print newspapers and radio, it is more likely that people find their news on the internet. The Pew Research Center shows that over television, online, radio, and print, it is more likely that an individual reads the news online. Politicians being on social media sites makes themselves more available to voters. Voters unable to attend any type of forum the politician may be having can access the politician online. There are several politicians that will respond to their …show more content…
The individuals most likely not to vote are within the ages of 18 through 29. The Pew Research study shows, 17% this age is not registered to vote and they do not follow any type of political aspect. According to The Washington Post, “More and more people rely on social media for news and information.” A survey was conducted by Pew Research Center that shows, 35% of individuals between these age ranges believe social media is the most helpful way to gain information about a presidential campaign. Therefore, the politicians want to go where the nonvoters are, who have no opinion, to educate these people and gain their vote. Throughout the European Parliament elections individuals that were not engrossed in any type of politics became more interested once coming upon information about the elections on social media (Curry, …show more content…
Gottfried, Jeffery. Mitchell, Amy. Shearer, Elisa (2018). Pathways to News. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/07/07/pathways-to-news/
Curry, Kevin (2016). More and More People Getting Their News Via Social Media. Is That Good or Bad? Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/09/30/more-and-more-people-get-their-news-via-social-media-is-that-good-or-bad/?utm_term=.8b5843ac7938
Desilver, Drew (2014). The Politics of American Generations: How Age Affects Attitudes and Voting Behavior
Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/07/09/the-politics-of-american-generations-how-age-affects-attitudes-and-voting-behavior/ Duggan, Maeve. Aaron Smith (2016). The Political Environment on Social
A great example of social media being used for politics is with the recent presidential campaigns. Social media began being used in presidential campaigns by President Barack Obama. Obama’s campaign in 2008 was considered the “Facebook election” since he used the social media platform Facebook to connect with the public. Now, mostly all presidential candidates use at least one social media
In this article Mary Kate Cary opens up with the supreme court decision to not restrict the use of corporate funds in political advertising so that she can make her point that big money ads are not the most effective way for candidates to reach American constituents. She argues that social media is a new way for politicians to connect with citizens. Her five claim are that Americans can now, choose the media they wish to consume, share the media they choose the share, like posts they agree with and dislike posts they do not agree with, connect with others on social media, and donate to candidate campaigns online. With these claims she comes to the conclusion that politicians want to go around mainstream media so that they can connect directly with the voters.
In the current time, it seems like one cannot go a day without using at least one social media website. This might be especially true among groups of teenagers and young adults. Social media became a vital part of daily life that feeds people with several types of information constantly. Political news is a type of information that can reach the people through the means of social media. Since presidents are constantly seeking new strategies to increase their communication with the public in order to spread their political message, they utilize the different social media websites. Hence, social media became a platform to spread political message. It is not surprising that now the majority of political officials and candidates have social media accounts more than ever before, such as a Twitter account.
Many people today may not realize how much the media, Internet, and Social Media impacts their lives because of how reliant we’ve become on them. In “Of Losers and Moles: You Think Reality TV Just Writes Itself” by Derrick Speight, “Mind Over Mass Media” by Steven Pinker, or “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr., each story may talk or argue about some issue that society faces in relation to media. In the first article I read by Derrick Speight, the main goal was to explain to the audience that reality TV is real, but in the scheme of the production, the writers and producers must transform the reality of it into a story line. In the next reading by Steven Pinker, the purpose of
People, especially in democracies, need to be well informed of everything going on in their country in order to vote for ways to make it better. Social media gives citizens of democracies a better understanding of the events in their country and others because of social media’s unfiltered, raw
The researchers present findings that indicate that a politician’s popularity in the voting booth may be related to the frequency with which the candidate is talked about on social media. The researchers goes on to discuss how further research may conclude that social media has a bigger impact on voting outcomes than traditional forms of media, and how that could potentially shape the future of voting.
Winograd, Morley, and Michael D. Hais. Millennial Makeover [electronic Resource] : MySpace, YouTube, and the Future of American Politics. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 2008. DiscoverE. Web. 28 Mar. 2012. .
Miller, Zeke J. "The Politics of the Millennial Generation." 9 May 2013. Time.com. 25 November 2013 .
Schweitzer, E. J. (2012) The Mediatization of E-Campaigning: Evidence From German Party Websites in State, National, and European Parliamentary Elections 2002-2009, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17: 283-302.
While this initial stance kept politicians on the defensive, enough time has passed that individual politicians and even entire governments are starting to use social media to connect with their communities in new, open ways (Sniderman, 2011). However, as these social platforms are becoming more pervasive in society, studies of their influence on our lives has grown but have not kept pace with the use in government. Because social media is a relatively recent phenomenon, research on social media use in government is limited. Literature on the effectiveness of social media and government has increased but only in some areas. The purpose of this review is to understand governance through citizen engagement and provide a working context of the term social media. The literature review will provide a basis for what is known about the use of social media by government, in particular at the local level.
The changes in social media implied that many people got in touch with the political candidates either directly or indirectly. The people watched their potential leaders of the nation and were able to question them (Mutz 2001).
Social media including Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube, Flicker, internet websites, and blogs are becoming mainstream attracting a younger more technology savvy voter. Many candidates in the last elections learned to use these mediums so not to overlook tech savvy voters and learned how to use these to their advantage. Candidates took to the internet to raise awareness, state views, and even successfully raised donations. Social media was able to provide instant feedback on the standing of a candidate often days or weeks sooner than a more traditional poll.
Public Relations has acknowledged public involvement as the most essential factor of the practice since its creation. However, the means and methods of reaching the public remained significantly limited until recently. Over the last decade, public relations has welcomed the use of varied tools, including new media, to further their reach and cultivate relationships with its publics. The term “new media” encompasses a variety of non-traditional methods including social media. Social media has become a significant catalyst in the communication sector of public relations. The pairing of social media and public relations has helped create new opportunities for brands through two-way communication, social case study campaigns, and social sharing.
The media also helps bring attention to suspicious activity that could serve of relative importance to an election or at least used to portray a candidate in a better or worse light. The emergence of social media also has allowed voters, especially people who don’t normally follow the elections, to be informed on the latest news. According to a Pew Research Center survey as of June 2016 at least “24% of [U.S. adults] took to social media as their main source of information”. Social media however only allows people to see a small glimpse of the presidential race since so many sites and posts only focus on the best or worst point of the story depending on which candidate they side with.
Since the introduction of internet in the 1990’s, its importance worldwide has always grown tremendously. From the first email send to the domination of Facebook and other social media websites, it has changed the way people communicate. The use of social media is increasingly becoming the preferred way people share their daily activities, ideas and knowledge and that is why it’s the most talked about and used platform. Many companies are encouraging their employees to use various social media platforms and engage online for office productivity, posting opinions and presenting their thoughts. Corporations realize that Social Media tools such as blogs, forums, podcasts and social networking websites makes internal communications faster, more convenient and effective. Social media is a low-cost, high-impact tool that can also complement and reinforce your existing communications efforts. It gives a new dimension to internal communications in many ways: building relationship with employees, leads to diverse thinking and innovation, and reduce costs and Increase Productivity. Social media has impacted positively in the business world, but its downside has impacted teens in high school, with issues such as cyber bullying, and people using Facebook and twitter to get over their boredom and research proving that the more they use social networking websites the more envious they feel.