Was Cleopatra Responsible For The Political Collapse Of Egypt

3623 Words8 Pages

Introduction.
Cleopatra was the last pharaoh of Egypt before its political collapse and has been immortalized by her legend of great beauty and wit. However, did Egypt actually fall into the hands of the Roman’s because of Cleopatra? To what extent was Cleopatra personally responsible for the political collapse of Egypt during the years 41BC-30BC, due to her close and personal involvement in Roman politics?
Cleopatra is also famous for her affairs with the powerful Romans, Julius Caesar and Marc Antony. This is why it is interesting that Cleopatra ended up committing suicide and letting Egypt fall into the hands of the Roman’s. That is why this essay with investigate the significance of Cleopatra’s involvement with these Romans considering …show more content…

Egypt had a great agricultural value, which was important to Rome because Egypt could (and did) supply Rome with grain. Egypt also exported other valuables to Rome such as, papyrus, glass, minor crafted arts, minerals, ores, fine stones which could be used for sculptures and architecture. Not only was Egypt important because of the goods it produced, but it also opened a gateway for Rome to trade with central Africa, India, Arabian Peninsula, and sea routes through the Red Sea. Above all Egypt was rich in culture and goods, and its influences traveled through Alexandria to Rome. This made Rome "the first city of the civilized world" in the first century B.C as described by Greek historian Diodorus of Sicily. Both Cultures were evolving with the influence of each other and we can still see today the effects of it …show more content…

Cleopatra took a risk when she got herself involved with Rome and she paid a heavy price, her life, and the political power of Egypt. There is no true way to know how much of it is Cleopatra’s fault, but through looking at sources it was clear that her choice of interacting with the Romans played a significant role in the political collapse of Egypt. It started when she used Julius Caesar to regain her position as the Queen of Egypt. When he paraded her family in the streets of Rome as war prizes, it was a clear sign that Cleopatra ended up giving up some of Egypt’s power. However, by being internationally recognized as the Egyptian goddess ‘Isis’ she was actually able to recover political power and gain more influence. With the power also came the danger, when Caesar was assassinated Cleopatra needed someone with power to protect her. This is where Marc Antony comes in as one of the most powerful Roman’s. By getting involved with Antony, Egypt loses money, power, influence, sovereignty, and end up belonging to Rome. Nonetheless, Egypt was also able to gain valuable land that they could use for the construction of ships. Or course none of it made much of of difference when Antony and Cleopatra went to war with Octavian and lost. Regardless of how it's looked at, it is difficult to dispute that Egypt

Open Document