Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of war on the national economy
Effects of war on the economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of war on the national economy
One of the more enduring myths in Western society is that wars are somehow good for the economy. Many people see a great deal of evidence to support this myth, after all World War II came directly after the Great Depression. This faulty belief stems from a misunderstanding of the economic way of thinking. The standard "a war gives the economy a boost" argument goes as follows: Let's suppose that the economy is in the low end of the business cycle, so we're in a recession or just a period of low economic growth. The unemployment rate is high, people may be making less purchases than they were a year or two ago, and overall output is flat. But then the country decides to prepare for war! The government needs to equip its soldiers with the extra gear and munitions needed in order to win the war. Corporations win contracts to supply boots, and bombs and vehicles to the army. Many of these companies will have to hire extra workers in order to meet this increased production. If the preparations for war are large enough, large numbers of workers will be hired reducing the unemployment rate. Other workers may need to be hired to cover reservists in private sector jobs who get sent overseas. With the unemployment rate down we have more people spending again and people who had jobs before will be less worried about losing their job in the future so they'll spend more than they did. This extra spending will help the retail sector, who will need to hire extra employees causing unemployment to drop even further. A spiral of positive economic activity is created by the government preparing for war, if you believe the story. The flawed logic of the story is an example of something economists call The Broken Window Fallacy. The Broken ... ... middle of paper ... ... a factor of production which will certainly help economic growth. 2. Stability and Economic Growth in the Middle East If peace can somehow be established in the Middle East, the U.S. government might not have to spend as much money on the military as they do now. If the economies of the countries in the middle east become more stable and experience growth, this will give them more opportunities to trade with the United States, improving both the economies of those countries and the U.S. Personally I do not see those factors outweighing the short term costs of the war in Iraq, but you can make a case for them. In the short term, however, the economy will decline due to the war as shown by the Broken Window Fallacy. Next time you hear someone discuss the economic benefits of the war, please tell them a little story about a window breaker and a shopkeeper.
One pro to entering the war is there would be more job opportunities available. With all the men leaving for war, jobs will open up. This could be an opportunity for unemployed people to get a job including some women. The United States getting involved in the war will also increase the need for supplies and weapons. Some things we will need will be guns, airplanes, and tanks. These will have to be made by United States’ people which will lead to new job opportunities.
Third, during the war the US economy plummeted as we were still recovering from the great depression. We didn’t have much time since the great depression to the war. The unemployment rate since the great depression was low, but the war started to change that. “The United States was still recovering from the impact of the Great Depression and the unemployment rate was hovering around 25%”(Impact...KLRU). A lot of men were sent off to war so there jobs were not getting done and someone had to get them
From War to Prosperity: 1940 - 1980. (2008, November 20). In Land of Contrast: A History of
Horwitz, Steven, and Michael J. McPhillips. "The Reality of the Wartime Economy: More Historical Evidence on Whether World War II Ended the Great Depression." Independent Review Vol. 17, No. 3 (2013): n. pag. Questia School. Web. 2 May 2014.
"The Visible and Invisible Effects of War." The National Interest. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2014.
President Roosevelt was concerned that the American economy, which was in a state of depression, would prevent the United States from successfully preparing for war. However, he knew that American involvement was inevitable, so he and his advisors agreed that the best way to rapidly mobilize the economy was to give industry an incentive to move quickly. One way the government encouraged companies to help prepare for the war effort was through cost-plus contracts. These contracts meant that the government covered the cost for a company to produce military goods as well as paid them a percentage of the profit. The goal of the cost-plus contracts was to encourage companies to switch the production of their businesses to help manufacture mo...
World War II began in 1939, and one definitely can’t say that it was enjoyable. Food was rationed, luxuries were removed, taxes were high and work was dangerous. But the war employed about 16 million people, 22 percent of the pre-war labor force, to work in the military. But that didn’t fully solve the problem, because war is expensive. Funding World War II made the national debt rise from $49 billion in 1941 to about $260 billion in 1945. There’s no evidence that wartime spending restored the labor market to health. So it basically just postponed the recovery of the economy.
WWII had a major effect on the United States economically. For starters, WW2 was right after the Great Depression so the citizens of the US were in the process of recovering from this crucial setback in the US economy. Ironically, WWII helped the county crawl out of this horrific depression. For example, businesses boomed because they were mass producing supplies for the war including many weapons and materials. Also...
First, in order to claim that the U.S. benefitted from the war, we have to ask, against what? The primary objection to benefit from the war are two numbers: the number 116,516, which is the total number of U.S. war deaths to battle and accidents, and the number 204,002, which is the total number of non-mortal woundings (VA pdf). What could these young men – and a few women – achieve in their lifetime if they were not drawn overseas to participate in and be killed or maimed
Pascall, Glenn R., and Robert D. Lamson. Beyond Guns & Butter: Recapturing America's Economic Momentum after a Military Decade. Washington: Brassey's, 1991. Print.
Should the government decrease military spending or should it increase military spending? This is a question that many Americans wrestle with, and politically speaking, is a point of great contention since to many, military might evokes a sense of security. However, when considering this question from a foreign policy standpoint, does current military spending really match the current level of threats faced by the United States, or are too many dollars being allocated for an unnecessary level of military strength? There are certainly cons in making the decision to drastically lower military spending, but they are minimal when compared to the positive ramifications such a decision would have. This paper aims to explore these pros and cons
What does the United States have to gain from a war with Iraq? Supporters of a war with Iraq say it will help prevent the risk of an attack by a weapons of mass destruction developed by Iraq. Critics of a military action that say nothing will be gained, and the U.S. just wants to obtain the oil that Iraq controls. They claim that casualties will be too costly for America to afford. Nonetheless, America should act while others will not for fear of disturbing global peace. Iraq poses a “clear and present danger” to the security of the United States and the security of countries around the world.
(“Military invention” debate.org”) Military can save 100, 000 thousands of young men and women. Also can save older people and protects our country. (“Military invention” debate.org”). When governments and terrorist hurt civilians the military can often decrease the damage. (“Military invention” debate.org”). Also Military intervention can make foreign government to step down saving the harmed countries. (“Military invention” debate.org”). Military intervention causes deaths of soldiers which a cause of them possible dyeing which is an effect of them not seeing their family and having to leave them that’s another reason they should get paid more than they do. (“Military invention”
...al advancements in the terms of civil, medical, and defensive advancements. At the same time, it has a galvanizing effect on economy through not only new innovations, but a lower unemployment rate and higher per capita output. War has saved economies from disaster, promoted the welfare of health, and the quality of life for not just humans. War may be hell, and it may be wrong, but war is certainly necessary.
Although, nothing can be further from the truth. Wars are expensive. The cost of the Second World War is estimated at about 1.944 trillion US dollars worldwide. Large wars create a shock to the economy of the participating countries. Even though there can some short term positive effects, in the long run, war generally cuts off economic development and undermines prosperity.