Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Attitudes toward war as reflected in poetry
Attitudes toward war as reflected in poetry
Attitudes toward war as reflected in poetry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Attitudes toward war as reflected in poetry
Siegfried Sassoon Biography With war on the horizon, a young Englishman whose life had heretofore been consumed with the protocol of fox-hunting, said goodbye to his idyllic life and rode off on his bicycle to join the Army. Siegfried Sassoon was perhaps the most innocent of the war poets. John Hildebidle has called Sassoon the "accidental hero." Born into a wealthy Jewish family in 1886, Sassoon lived the pastoral life of a young squire: fox-hunting, playing cricket, golfing and writing romantic verses. Being an innocent, Sassoon's reaction to the realities of the war were all the more bitter and violent -- both his reaction through his poetry and his reaction on the battlefield (where, after the death of fellow officer David Thomas and his brother Hamo at Gallipoli, Sassoon earned the nickname "Mad Jack" for his near-suicidal exploits against the German lines -- in the early manifestation of his grief, when he still believed that the Germans were entirely to blame). As said: "now he unleashed a talent for irony and satire and contumely that had been sleeping all during his pastoral youth." Sassoon also showed his innocence by going public with his (as he grew to see that insensitive political leadership was the greater enemy than the Germans). Luckily, his friend and fellow poet Robert Graves convinced the review board that Sassoon was suffering from shell-shock and he was sent instead to the military hospital at where he met and influenced . Sassoon is a key figure in the study of the poetry of the Great War: he brought with him to the war the idyllic pastoral background; he began by writing war poetry reminiscent of ; he mingled with such war poets as Robert Graves and Edmund Blunden; he spoke out publicly against the war (and yet returned to it); he influenced and mentored the then unknown ; he spent thirty years reflecting on the war through his memoirs; and at last he found peace in his religious faith. Some critics found his later poetry lacking in comparison to his war poems. Sassoon, identifying with Herbert and Vaughan, recognized and understood this: "my development has been entirely consistent and in character" he answered, "almost all of them have ignored the fact that I am a religious poet." Survivors No doubt they’ll soon get well; the shock and strain Have caused their stammering, disconnected talk. Of course they’re ‘longing to go out again,’ - These boys with old, scared faces, learning to walk. They’ll so forget their haunted nights; their cowed Subjection to the ghosts of friends who died, - Their dreams that drip with murder; and they’ll be proud
that it wasn't the case. He found out that war wasn't all fun and games. What it actually was
Jarrell also shows us, that the men fighting on both sides are in a way innocent much like children, who have been taken from their sleeping mothers, and forced to go to war, and face its horrors and possibly death. (Bassett)
from sharing some of his views on society and the war. At the time of
other hand, John Mc Crae was in the 2nd wave of poets. He viewed war
soldiers, and the unexpected experience of war. Lord Tennyson looks at the superior side of war and celebrates the beauty of war, although not knowing, the war had blundered and six hundred soldiers were now dead.
revisions the poet made as he struggled to understand the devastating effects of war, both
the human costs of the war, and he determined to devote his life to public
This allowed for him to inspire loyalty within his administration. I have your back if you have mine type mentality.
Both poems used different techniques to stimulate the readers’ evaluation and realisation of the adverse outcomes of war, especially its effects on the soldiers. Sassoon’s poem title gave the reader an immediate conclusion about the contents of the poem of the hardship that the soldier faced, which brought upon his suicide. Whereas Owen’s gave the opposite impression at first, as the Latin saying translates into “it is fitting and honourable to die for your country.”
World War One had an inevitable effect on the lives of many young and naive individuals, including Wilfred Owen, who, like many others, joined the military effort with the belief that he would find honour, wealth and adventure. The optimism which Owen initially had toward the conflict is emphasised in the excerpt, in which he is described as “a young poet…with a romantic view of war common among the young” (narrator), a view which rapidly changed upon reaching the front. Owen presents responders with an overwhelming exploration of human cruelty on other individuals through acts of war and the clash of individual’s opposed feelings influenced by the experiences of human cruelty. This is presented through the horrific nature of war which the
'Attack ', by Siegfried Sassoon, written on the First World War, is a poem considered by many to make a lasting impression of the brutality and chaos of war. Sassoon was a strong opposer of the war; after its completion, he went on to lecture on pacifism, and to become involved in the politics linked to that topic. Writing at a time when much of the poetry being written of the war was heavily romanticised, his poetry was criticised by some as "unpatriotic" or found his graphic depictions of war too extreme. His work still sold well, despite this. These graphic depictions are one of the many things that make this poem have such an impact; the imagery is extremely vivid throughout, and everything, down to the structure of the poem itself create
However he realized he had faulty intelligence when he received new information from the department of Foreign Armies East. He then realised things would not go according to the German’s pre-war
where every he falls during the war, no matter if it is in a shell
In one of poems in Awesome Nightfall, Saigyo expresses this distaste by enduring the “pain of looking at aftermath of war scenes as mental torture” ((Laleur 134). This traumatizing experience of executing violence may have had a profound impact on Saigyo decision to give up his desire to be a warrior in pursuit for buddhism. Living in solitude has given Saigyo a peaceful escape from this desire, which has allow him to avoid further karmic repercussions by becoming an anti-war
While satire isn’t necessarily a genre of writing in itself, it has proven to be a rather useful and unique form of writing in order to convey many different messages. For the most part, satire is the use of irony, sarcasm, humor, and even exaggeration to express a negative opinion against current events occurring around the writer. According to Megan LeBoeuf, a student at the University of Rhode Island, in an essay she wrote entitled The Power of Ridicule: An Analysis of Satire, she states, “Satire also has the ability to protect its creator from culpability for criticism, because it is implied rather than overtly stated.” Most writers use satire as an undercover and covert way to speak about social and political issues in order to evoke change, without the writer necessarily having to take the blame. In both Don Quixote de la Mancha, one of the first European novels by Miguel de Cervantes, and The Monkey and the Monk: An Abridgement of the Journey to the West, a Chinese novel translated by Anthony C. Yu, the use of satire gives both writers a voice against the religious and political issues of their time.