Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Culture contributes to personal development of an individual
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Human Development Essay This essay will be discussing how the societies, cultures, and families influence children in their early childhood development. And links to three theorists’ perspectives of human development. Vygotsky(Berk,2007) is well-known for his Socio-Cultural theory that children are influenced by culture, education, family and religion, and society makes great contributions to an individual development. He believed that children are actively involved in their learning process and he stressed the interactions between the developing children and the societies in which they live in. In Vygotsky’s Socio-Cultural theory, young children’s development is closely related to their social activities, a lot of children’s learning is socially …show more content…
As a result, they gain dramatically in reasoning and problem solving(Berk, 2007, p. 23).Children learn from both more competent adults and peers through their social interaction. According to Vygotsky, social interaction—in particular, cooperative dialogues with more knowledgeable members of society-in necessary for children to acquire the ways of thinking and behaving that make up a community’s culture(Rowe&Wertsch,2002).The Socio-Cultural theory is linked to the term scaffolding. Early childhood teachers support children when they need help to achieve goals. Scaffolding is the support provided when a child cannot do something independently, it is used to advance and extend a child’s development, and helps the child to achieve his/her potential capabilities. The teacher can gradually begin to remove this support so that the learner has the ability of completing …show more content…
It is formed from the interaction and activities in the child’s the most direct surroundings, therefore, it has the most direct influence on development. According to Bronfenbrenner, we need to be aware that all relationships are bi-directional in order to understand the microsystem. For example, “adults affect children’s behavior, but children’s biologically and socially influenced characteristics—their physical attributes, personalities, and capacities—also affect adults’ behavior”.(Berk, 2007, p. 24). A well-behaved child is more likely to provoke a parent’s
This reading reminded me about how Vygotsky’s theory is mostly based on the interactions and influences help children to learn. I really do believe this theory is very accurate, because students can learn from each other. If a teacher is having trouble explaining a complex topic to a student, another student can explain it in more relatable way. Also, I was fascinated when I read about what cultural tools, were and how they related to Vygotsky’s beliefs. Learning about what cultural tools were, helped me to broaden my understanding of how crucial cultural tools are to student’s learning process. Also, the chapter did a great job of elaborating on how these tools can help to advance and grow in the understanding of student’s thinking process. Another aspect of this reading that interested me was the elaboration on private speech and the Zone of Proximal Development. Each of the definitions displayed help me to advance my own thinking on what it was and how it is used in regards to the education of students. The description of what private speech and how it is basically the inner narration of their thinking process helped me to understand how this aspect can help with students learning. Also, the Zone of Proximal Development helped me to make a connection to both what is and how it relates to private speech as well. The Zone of proximal development plays a crucial role in the
Lev Vygotsky’s theory of learning begins with the idea that cognitive development occurs from sociocultural origins, that through social interaction children learn how to think (Duchesne, McMaugh, Bochner & Krause pp. 84) and how to use and access language and communication skills specifically as members of their culture and society.
Leo Vygotsky was born in 1896 and died at the young age of 37, so a lot of his theories are incomplete simply because he hadn’t had the time to do the research. His theory is a cultural- historical theory, the main focal point of the theory is the role of culture and social interactions the child has with others which able him/her to develop. The first main assumption of Vygotsky’s theory is that when a child communicates with an adult, the adult is able to channel how their culture thinks and feels about the world on to the child. An example of this from my own experience is that with no conversation with any adult, me being a child had no idea about food and how food differs from country to county until it was explained to me. As a child my parents would often explain what types of food belong to our country and what different types of food belong to other countries as well as where the specific foods came from. From having types of food explained to me from an adult, only then I began to understand our food culture. Vygotsky would explain this by me developing an understanding of food because of knowledge that someone else is reflecting on to
Lev Vygotsky stages of development were not defined by age or biology. Social and cultural experiences were the basis for his theory. Consciousness was an end product of social interactions (Kearsley, 1994-2010). The history of the child’s society and his own personal history determine how the child thinks. Language is crucial for development as it is with words that a child conceptualizes and makes sense of the world (Schütz, 2004). A precept of Vygotsky’s theory wa...
Lev Vygotsky and Jean Piaget are the two most influential developmental psychologists in history so one might think they would have very similar theories but this could not be more wrong. Piaget (1896-1980) Piaget 's theory stems from the idea that children develop in mostly solitary and are unable to see others perspective and progress through four stages of development(book). A major challenge to Piaget’s theory is Lev Vygotsky’s (1896-1934) sociohoristic theory which suggests that children acquire the tools of thinking and learning through social interacrtion with family and peers (seans book). Both of these psychologists’ theories are very similar in a number of ways but have a few crucial differences which separate them. (BOOK)
Vygotsky believed that children developed by what belief and culture they brought up in. He strongly believed that children would learn more from hand on experience and that children would develop better with people around them so they were continuously socialising and communicating.
Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory was his main focus and it helped him make sense of a person’s cognitive development through the way they interaced with others and emphasised on one’s social interaction (blabla). Vygotsky focused on how learning consisted of gathering knowledge and skills from the social community and the different attractions a person observes (v2); a process known as internationalization. His theory was based on two key concepts, first that knowledge can be developed through the experiences a child lives (v1), and an example would be a child seeing his parents arguing over their beliefs; he’d learn how he should have his own belief...
Henderson, Joyce Many, H.P. Wellborn, and Joy Ward (2006), there are six main deviations of scaffolding; these deviations include of “modeling, contingency management, giving feedback, instructing, questioning, and applying cognitive thinking.” Though there are different variations, the teacher is allowed to choose which one (s)he would like to instill on their student. If the instructor knows what specific area the student is struggling in, they can decide which will be the best fitting scaffolding method and apply it to the student. It was discovered that early childhood development depended heavily on social interaction. It is crucial for the advancement of knowledge in a child to be “centered in a social support system that encourages communication and interaction” (Henderson et. al
Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory will be applied throughout this essay to delve into the reasoning behind particular behavioural issues. According to Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory, an individual has multiple environments known as their ecological systems (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). Bronfenbrenner (1994) suggests that a developing child is influenced by the relationships surrounding them and the best way to understand a child’s behaviour is to look at the numerous aspects of the child’s environment and how they interact with each other. The relationships and environments that the child interacts with have been separated into layers known as the microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem and the overarching chronosystem (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). The microsystem is the environment where the child has direct face-to-face relationships such as at home, day care and school (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). The relationships formed within the microsystem directly impact the development of a child (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). It is through the processes of repeated interactions with people, objects and symbols that the human develops (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). The second layer in the ecological model is the mesosystem, which is the interaction between two of the microsystems such as the relationship between a parent and a teacher (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). The exosystem is an external environment, with which the
Lastly, there is a zone of proximity that Vygotsky believes in. This goes along with his group aspect of learning. He believes that one learns better through life interactions. (Woolfolk, 2004) Similarities in Piaget and Vygotsky In the article we were supposed to read for class this week it says “there are seven similarities: 1) a genetic, i.e., developmental, perspective; 2) a dialectical approach; 3) a non-reductionist view; 4) anon-dualistic thesis; 5) an emphasis on action; 6) a primacy of processes over external contents or outcomes; and 7) a focus on the qualitative changes over the quantitative ones.”
It stated that, "Sociocultural approaches to learning and development were first systematized and applied by Vygotsky and his collaborators in Russia in the 1920s and 1930s. They are based on the concept that human activities take in cultural contexts, are mediated by language and other symbol systems, and can be best understood when investigated in their historical development (John-Steiner & Mahn, 1996). " At the core of this theory, "Vygotsky focused on the way that a child co-constructs meaning through social interaction, and the role word meaning plays in the development of thinking(Mahn, 1999). " It seems as though Vygotsky's socio-cultural theory is continuous. This theory is continuous due to the emphasis it places on the need for social interaction in the growth of humans mentally, linguistically, and socially.
The organismic view of human nature is based on a living system rather than a machine (Miller, 2011). It sees humans as an active and organized whole that is constantly changing. The organismic view in Piaget’s theory can be seen through his stages of development. As children progress through each stage they gain new knowledge, hence the constant change. The contextualist view is based on how any one behavior has meaning and can only be explained through a social-historical context (Miller, 2011). The contextualist view in Vygotsky’s theory is seen through the emphasis of culture on the development of children. Although Piaget and Vygotsky had different worldviews they both used a wholistic approach and believed that children were active beings. Piaget emphasized the whole as a sum of its parts (Miller, 2011). He believed that an individual could only be understood by looking at them as a whole, rather than their parts alone. Vygotsky not only emphasized the whole rather than its parts, but also believed that the “whole is greater than the sum of its parts” (Miller, 2011). He believed that human nature could only be understood through a cultural context in order to have meaning. Once the
Vygotsky’s Sociocultural theory is one similar to Piaget’s, emphasizing the importance of the child to interact with their environment to learn. While being similar to Piaget, their theories have some core differences. Piaget’s theory put a stronger significance on children learning purely on their own, and having teachers around only to observe. Vygotsky’s theory builds off that, stressing the role that teachers play is quite important. While learning through interaction is crucial, his theory states adult guidance is too. “...the classroom applying Vygotsky’s theory seeks to find a balance between teacher-directed and child-initiated activities. Teachers are figures of authority-- similar to parents. In an ideal situation, students generally hold a secure attachment with them, and invest their trust in them. Teachers assist children and give them challenges in order that children may attain the top level within their zone of proximal development.” (Tzuo, 36). Vygotsky’s theory places more importance on teacher’s roles in children’s lives, much more than being an observer. Ultimately, in Vygotsky’s perspective, teachers play a crucial role in challenging and pushing a child to grow to their full potential-- as they often carry parent-like
Vygotsky believed that learning and cognitive development were significantly influenced by social interactions that occur with in a particular sociocultural environment. There are four major influences on cognitive development.
Throughout the history of early childhood education educators have used various theorists’ theories to develop children’s learning and development. One of the most significant theories is the socio-cultural theory by Vygotsky. His theory consists of how private speech is used by children and the importance of the zone of proximal development. Vygotsky’s theory is well used in the education environment today and educators use it to be able to provide activities that aren’t too difficult for the children to engage in. Therefore Vygotsky’s theory has enabled educators to have a better understanding of how children learn and develop.