Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Industrialization in russia
Industrial Revolution in Russia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Vydrino, Russia is a small “dying” town in Eastern Siberia on the shore of Lake Baikal. People who live in this town struggle to make a living and survive everyday. Vydrino has one major employer, a timber mill that used to be a typical example of Soviet-era industrialization. Twenty-four years ago, this mill shut down and most people in the town lost their jobs. Today, the mill is a sad look into the past and a good example of a troubled country that is Russia. Broken glass covers its floors, most of its entire contents have been looted, it is a cold and empty place that used to contain hundreds of workers that have long disappeared. Surprisingly, this town today still has a small population of around five thousand people that had a difficult time relocating unlike the two thousand five hundred civilians that abandoned the town in the past decade. …show more content…
Since 1991, or the end of the Soviet-era, Russia’s population has decreased by nearly ten million people. It seems that more and more reasons to depopulate gloom over its inhabitants as the years continue. A once powerful country is now struggling to sustain itself because its own people have been forced to abandon it just to live a better life. For such a territorially large country, its population is similar to that of countries like Nigeria and Bangladesh. Depopulation is one of the biggest problems Russia is facing today mostly due to Russia’s unique transition from a communist regime to a federal republic that has sparked health care issues, political turmoil, poverty, spreading of disease, and economic
He goes with some other workers to a state run farm outside of Magnitogorsk to help repair tractors he remarks, “everything, in fact, had been thought of, he said, 'except good land and men to work it'.”7 This was the issue with Stalin's “revolution from above” be built these grand cities that were essentially just large plants like Magnitogorsk, but the people lived in horrible conditions, the collectivized farms that were meant to support the food supply for the workers of Magnitogorsk had bad land and nobody to work to the farms. In theory Stalin's plans could work, but the people, the land, the infrastructure could not feasibly attain the end result that was needed, it just wasn’t possible. For Stalin's plans to have worked he needed to be in the right place and the Soviet Union, and the unforgiving landscape just was not it. Things got so bad that Scott writes, “ the new Bolshevik government sent inspectors to every village to look for hoarded bread.”8 Scott writes, “ during the early thirties the main energies of the Soviet Union went into construction. New plants, mines, whole industries, sprang up all over the country” but he also recalls, “the new aggregates failed to work normally.
It is a long-with-standing stereotype that Italians love to gamble. This is true. My great grandfather, Pasquale Giovannone, played the riskiest hand of cards when he immigrated to the United States as an illegal stowaway at the age of thirteen. He forged a life for himself amidst the ever-changing social and political shifts of the early nineteenth century. The legacy he left would later lead to the birth of my father, John Giovannone, in Northern New Jersey in 1962.
In terms of employment, the former Soviet Union had the largest percentage of women in the labor force than any other comparative society. This still remains the case in the present day Russia. Unemployed women in Russia will be quickly employed. They have a very high success rate of reemploying women if they were to lose their jobs. “Compared to Western women, although Russian women have a much higher representation in law, medicine and engineering as well as in the skilled trades, such as metalworking and construction,...
Any signs of innovation and improvements were saved for cities, while conditions in the villages drastically worsened. Villagers like Matryona would listen about new inventions and Earth satellites through radio as if they were some useless magic wonders, and then they would go on loading peat with forks and eat plain potatoes and barley kasha. Soviet ideology infiltrated Matryona’s life through a wall poster and a radio, but it was unable to change her peasant soul into sophisticated and progressive New Soviet Man. Villagers’ life was a struggle of surviving the winter and finding food to eat, leaving no place for abstract concerns about ideological
Starting 1928, the Stalinist economic policy was characterized by a rupture with Lenin’s quasi-capitalist New Economic Policy. The need to protect the Union from eventual capitalist and imperialist wars necessitated the creation of a self-sufficient industry and agriculture freed from the constraints of the market. The industrial policy resembled that of a war economy focused on heavy industries such as steel, weapons and the industrial centers were relocated in remote areas such as the Urals and Siberia, rich in natural resources. In 1937, the part of small industries had fallen from a third in 1913 to 6 percent (Davies 1989, 1029). This process revealed to be extremely successful on a macroscop...
Dowler, W. 2004. Russian Heritage: Land, People and Culture. [online] Available at: https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/citd/RussianHeritage/5.NOB/5.L/5.XII.16.html [Accessed: 23 Feb 2014].
Here, Vertov dictates spectators to assume a participatory role in giving interpretation to the finished film. For instance, Vertov constantly uses stop-motion and substitution splicing. These techniques are used to make the chairs of the movie theater fold down supernaturally as if to greet his viewers. And even though the film does represent Soviet society positively in terms of being modern, growing, and advantageous to the proletarians whose labor is now accurately valued and compensated with beach trips organized by the government, the film does have room for interpretation and even components of social critique. For example, one might question why, in a progressive soviet society where there is a beneficial unification of technology and human labor seemingly at every turn, where there is an emphasis on public services (ambulances, fire brigades, medical services, health and hygiene in general), there are still homeless people young and old sleeping on park benches or the ground. In addition, Vertov illustrates these same industrial workers abusing the efficient mass production of consumer goods: during their leisure time, certain wayward workers drink champagne to excess in a bar where rows and rows of champagne bottles are shown being opened. While simultaneously, the viewers see a class hierarchy prevalent in the Soviet Union. For instance, a wealthy family in a car has a driver who carries their bags inside as a barefoot, probably homeless child crosses paths with them entering the building. We also see wealthy men and women satisfy themselves lazily in a salon being shaved and having their hair washed, while the proletarians work hard in the polluted and hazardous factories or mines for their own welfare. The inevitable summary is that for all its commendable characteristics and progress, Soviet society still has challenges to overcome before classless equality becomes a reality. The key to
After the October Revolution of 1917, Soviet Society was dramatically changed in the countryside. Prior to the revolution the countryside consisted of family plots that allowed them sustain themselves. On these family farms women from a young age worked alongside men. The self-sustaining family plot was one in which every member of the family had their share of the work. Howeve...
Viola, Lynne. "Factory and Community in Stalin's Russia: The Making of an Industrial Working Class." Journal of Social History 32.4 (1999): 985+. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 13 Apr. 2014.
Since the late 1980’s the Russian people have experienced one of the most drastic transitions seen in the world to date, a transition from an attempt at communism to a workable capitalist system. As one would expect, this transition has not been painless and has been the impetus of many distressing problems for the Russian people. One such problem is organized crime. This paper will explore how organized crime during Soviet rule and the Russian Federation has created obstacles in this transition to a functioning market economy. It will illustrate how organized crime has done this by analyzing its transition from the USSR to the Russian Federation, the reasons behind its existence today, and how its operation impairs Russia’s attempts at a market economy. It will also provide some possible solutions for the crises organized crime has created, which currently plague the Russian people. Organized crime has worked its way through openings provided by the transition economy to become a setback to the Russian society and economy. Its existence disables successful economic reform by influencing important issues such as competition, entrepreneurship, capital flight, the shadow economy, and violence.
Russia, a vast country with a wealth of natural resources, a well, educated population, and diverse industrial base, continues to experience, formidable difficulties in moving from its old centrally planned economy to a modern market economy. President Yeltsin's government has made substantial strides in converting to a market economy since launching its economic reform program in January 1992 by freeing nearly all prices, slashing defense spending, eliminating the old centralized distribution system, completing an ambitious voucher privatization program, establishing private financial institutions, and decentralizing trade. Russia, however, has made little progress in a number of key areas that are needed to provide a solid foundation for the transition to a market economy. Russia, spanning 11 time zones and serving as home to about 150 million people, possesses tremendous natural and human resources. Demand today for imported consumer goods, capital equipment, and services remains remarkably strong, with imports representing an unusually large percentage of the national market.
It is almost impossible to feign innocence, even for the most cunning of killers. An example of this would be the death or possible murder, of Arthur Volupides. One night Arthur and his doll of a wife, Queenie Volupides, got into a bit of an argument resulting in Queenie taking all her five feet six and a hundred and ten pounds dressed to impress, to the country club party without him. Shortly before one in the morning she invited a few friends to follow her home and finish the party there. The friends arrived ten minutes after Queenie to meet her at the door and hear of the terrible misfortune. According to Ms.Volupides, Arthur had slipped and fallen down the stairs while coming down for another drink. He was at the base of the stairs, dead
Russia is the largest country in the world in terms of area and the world’s ninth most populous nation with 143 million people. Due to its large area the country is situated in 4 different climate zones and has vast natural resources. Russia also has a unique geographic position with the 14 border countries, bounded by 3 out of 4 world oceans, facilitating the build of international and domestic supply chains. Russia is one of the most technologically advanced economies in the world with a very big and well-educated work force and one of the largest consumer markets. The Russian economy is commodity-driven and is the world’s largest producer of oil (12%), natural gas (18%) and nickel (20%).
... industrial sector but would experience many setbacks simply due to the size, diversity, and traditional ways of Russian workers.
Social change raced through Russia during this play, as “mankind is advancing, perfecting its powers.” (Chekhov 116) After feudalist Russia collapsed, members of the lower class became more motivated to increase their social standing. (Complex) Although it was a time of great joy and hope for the peasantry in Russia, this time period, roughly 1861-1917, was full of uncertainty. Russian peasants did not know how the government would support and defend their ability to grow higher in society. The Cherry Orchard reflects Russian peasants’ fears regarding these social changes. Lopakhin is the paragon (12) of a Russian peasant who rose from the ranks of peasantry to a successful businessman. (Simple) He notes, “I’m rich, plenty of money, but if you think it over and work it out, once a peasant, always a peasant.” (Chekhov 70-71), as he reminisces about his upbringing in the lower class. This way of thinking speaks for all the peasants in this time of social change; even if a peasant moved up in social standing, he or she would not forget or bury their past. Lopakhin remarks that at one time “my father was your [Lyubov] grandfather’s serf”, (Chekhov 85) which shows how muc...