Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
2015 Volkswagen scandal
Volkswagen industry background
What is the relationship between centralization and decentralization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: 2015 Volkswagen scandal
In the Fall of 2015, Volkswagen was accused and found guilty of cheating on emissions tests that were put in place by the United States government in order to regulate the amount of harmful gases released when driving vehicles. In the aftermath of the scandal, their CEO Martin Winterkorn was replaced by Matthias Muller who found himself in need of drastically changing the corporate culture in order for VW to once again be a reputable automobile manufacturer. In order to understand why the scandal occurred in the first place an analysis of the historical culture that had dominated the company until recently. Volkswagen was established by the Nazi’s with help from Ferdinand Porsche and the majority of the company continues to be held by his descendants. Nazi Germany is infamously known to have been extremely authoritarian with orders being strictly followed coupled with a unparalleled sense of self-righteousness. This culture inevitably influenced how VW operated and led to it’s CEOs demanding perfection, setting …show more content…
Volkswagen used to be “burdened by bureaucracy” with Winterkorn being obsessive about making all of the decisions all the way down to the angle of the windshield. Alternatively, Muller only focuses on the “big picture” decisions and those leaves concerning individual products to those who are in charge of that particular product line. This shift to a decentralized firm contrasts with the strategy implemented by John Chambers at Cisco Systems who wanted to add bureaucracy; he accomplished this by establishing “councils and boards” that accounted for making 70% of the decisions. The reasoning behind the strategy offers an explanation to why each CEO chose the path they did: Cisco was attempting to break into many new markets and did not want to miss any opportunity whereas Volkswagen had to empower employees to act in the “right” way to remove the tarnish from their
As a CEO I would want my company to be up to date in all aspects of technology so that we aren’t left behind. It seems that Atkins, the CFO, may have an old school way of thinking and wants to leave things as they are in working order. Atkins has the best interest of the company but will need to rethink certain things and accept that technology is a way of the future, and will not be going away. Vargo needs to identify that Devereaux is a risk taker, even at the expense of the company. Peterson, the Vice President of property and casualty, has said that the underwriters think that there’s too much judgment involved with their job, so the expert systems may not cut. The employees saying this may be valid reasoning, or a plea to keep from losing their jobs to artificial intelligence. More testing will be needed before the expert systems is fully in place.
In this paper, we have examined our company of choice, TM Berhad, utilizing each of these four frames as a “spectacle” to determine the leadership approach of its management, and then detailing the more prominent of the frames used.
General Motors became a “centralized organization, so decision-making authority is concentrated in the hands of top-level managers, and little authority is delegated to lower levels” (Ferrell et al., 2015, p. 199). Centralized organizations have little upward communication and top-level manager may not be aware of problems and unethical activities. According to Ferrell et al., (2015), it has been noted that “centralized organization may exert influence on their employees because they have a central core of policies and codes of ethical conduct” (p. 201). Conversely, to survive at GM employees praised the CEO intelligence and carried out their orders by keeping a low profile, and never made waves. GM rewarded employees who followed the old traditional ways and those that challenged their thinking lost promotion opportunities or their jobs. However, General Motors experienced conflict between corporate management responsibility and social responsibility. Consequently, General Motors “attempted to implement a new mentality upon its management in a short period of time” (Goussak, Webber, & Ser, 2012, p. 49) by changing the company’s environment, but
Roth was in charge of emergency of Nortel, be that as it may it was affected by both individuals and capital business sector forms. Roth settled on the choice to change Northern Telcom to Nortel and put resources into the web notwithstanding doubt and uncertainity from numerous individuals. The Board of Directors of this organization didn 't know about the money related status of the association which demonstrates that the executives, Roth as CEO, and workers didn 't know about great business hones. Business includes a system of human communications (Collins, 2011). The ascent of Nortel was to some degree from the consideration the organization got from the media and the financial specialists. This consideration affected the choices that Roth
Arrow Electronics is a distributor of electronic parts, including semiconductors and passive components. It was founded in 1935 and has reached number one position among electronics distributors by 1992. Arrow’s North American operations were headquartered in Melville, N.Y. Sales and marketing functions were divided among five operating groups. This case study focuses on the largest of Arrow’s groups, Arrow/Schweber (A/S).
...se of pride, participated in deviant acts to reward themselves and the company. All of this behavior occurred under a veil of fantasy imagery, so employees neutralized feelings about unethical behavior allowing them to accept and reproduce it. Facilitated by organizational conditions such as the rank-and yank' system and the wider political economy, this unique configuration of ritualized practices contributed to the company's implosion.
According to the text, “Control is defined as any process that directs the activities of individuals toward achievement of organizational goals. It is how effective managers make sure things are going as planned (Bateman, pp 520, 2007).” The combination of these two concepts, leadership and control help formulate an ideology that becomes an integral part of the success or failure of any business entity. This paper will give Team D an opportunity to delve into Sears Holdings’ leadership and control mechanisms. The focal point of this paper will be to identify the current CEO of Sears Holdings, and gain insight on his background, i.e., training, education, and previous employment. To identify his style of leadership, evaluate the effectiveness of this leadership style based on Sears Holdings’ performance, and to explain the various control mechanisms used in the organization to determine the effectiveness.
There is a contrast between the leadership styles of Jeff Bezos of Amazon and Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook reading the two articles. Both companies are successful and achieved their victories in different ways. In the “4 Former Amazon Employees on What It’s Like Working for Jeff Bezos”, describes Bezos leveraging technology to make employees aware of potential issues with an email (Upadhyaya, 2013). While Zuckerberg in “Take It or Leave It: Zuckerberg’s Approach to Advising Instagram After Acquisition” employed a more hands-off approaching allowing the leaders at Instagram to lead using their judgment (Carr, 2013). The obvious answer to their communications and leadership approaches could relate to generational and educational differences.
Mr. Olds had a management style of controlling and strategy. He knew what needed to be done and he did it. He knew when to start merger and acquiring early in the game he established General Motors (general Motors ,2014). His vision and management style gave him the outcome that he was seeking
Organizations must operate within structures that allow them to perform at their best within their given environments. According to theorists T. Burns and G.M Stalker (1961), organizations require structures that will allow them to adapt and react to changes in the environment (Mechanistic vs Organic Structures, 2009). Toyota Company’s corporate structure is spelt out as one where the management team and employees conduct operations and make decisions through a system of checks and balances.
Going into Siemens Peter Loscher was faced with many challenges mainly the bribery scandal. Many wondered how he was going to turn the company around. Loscher went back to the basics, transforming an organizational tall structure to a flat structure to ensure better control of the organization and to make efficient decisions through more effective communication. Depending on his cross-cultural leadership style, meaning he contains the ability to motivate and influence members of different cultural groups into achieving the valued outcome. The first thing he did was ask for 100 days before making any decisions. Loscher was quoted saying “When in business the underlying principle is trust.” That’s exactly what Loscher did with his first 100 days as CEO. He spent his time getting to know the company and engaging with individuals. He was assessing the need for change. Traveling around the world from China to India to Japan to Brazil to the U.S., he settled into a routine meeting with customers over breakfast, politicians, high-potential Siemens employee at lun...
Last Sunday, the company’s then CEO, Martin Winterkorn, issued a brief statement declaring that the Board of Management at Volkswagen AG “takes these findings very seriously.” The findings revealed that the automaker used “defeat devices” to fool emissions testing, effectively concealing the reality that certain cars spew emissions some 10 to 40 times the legal limit.
When Kleinfeld's efforts at Siemens he has an idea in his mind to get the company restructured in a new and appropriate way. He planned to restructure the company by aligning the lines of responsibilities as it was done previous at Jack Welch at General Electric. Kleinfeld has tried a lot to make the structure as simple as possible and to make it less bureaucratic. He wanted it because of the fact that the decisions can be made more quickly and smartly. He wanted to turnaround the business units which are underperforming and giving no chance to earn revenues and incomes. Finally he thought to make simplified the structure of the company in order to reduce complexity and to gain competitive advantage (Armstrong,2006).
Corporate culture is the shared values and meanings that members hold in common and that are practiced by an organization’s leaders. Corporate culture is a powerful force that affects individuals in very real ways. In this paper I will explain the concept of corporate culture, apply the concept towards my employer, and analyze the validity of this concept. Research As Sackmann's Iceberg model demonstrates, culture is a series of visible and invisible characteristics that influence the behavior of members of organizations. Organizational and corporate cultures are formal and informal. They can be studied by observation, by listening and interacting with people in the culture, by reading what the company says about its own culture, by understanding career path progressions, and by observing stories about the company. As R. Solomon stated, “Corporate culture is related to ethics through the values and leadership styles that the leaders practice; the company model, the rituals and symbols that organizations value, and the way organizational executives and members communicate among themselves and with stakeholders. As a culture, the corporation defines not only jobs and roles; it also sets goals and establishes what counts as success” (Solomon, 1997, p.138). Corporate values are used to define corporate culture and drive operations found in “strong” corporate cultures. Boeing, Johnson & Johnson, and Bonar Group, the engineering firm I work for, all exemplify “strong” cultures. They all have a shared philosophy, they value the importance of people, they all have heroes that symbolize the success of the company, and they celebrate rituals, which provide opportunities for caring and sharing, for developing a spiri...
Through Dupont analysis, we have been able to see the specific strengths and weaknesses of BMW and Audi’s management. BMW’s lower profit margin and asset turnover indicate less efficient cost management and asset management. Their debt multiplier indicates that they’re taking advantage of debt, but the benefit of this isn’t realized because of their problems with cost and asset management. Due to Audi’s more efficient use of their assets, and better cost efficiency, it can be said that their management has performed better than BMW’s over the past year.