Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cesar chavez and the united farm workers movement essay
Cesar chavez and the united farm workers movement essay
Cesar chavez and the united farm workers movement essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Viva la Causa is a short video that was created in 2008, but the story behind it is much more complicated than that. Viva la Causa or “Long Live the Cause” is the history of Mexican oppression in the farms of the American land. It tells the story of how the powerless stood up to the authoritative without the use of violence. Bill Brummel and Alonso Mayo created Viva la Causa in order to bring awareness to this factual event that happened forty years prior in 1965. This document style/reenactment video, narrated by George Lopez, explains the story of Cesar Chavez and his struggle to fight for human rights. In 1965, the Mexican farmworkers of Delano, California gathered together to discuss whether they wanted to join their fellow Filipinos. …show more content…
Prior to their gathering, the Filipinos had created a strike against the California grape manufactures. It was successful; they decided to collaborate with their counterparts who were feeling the same effects of inequality. They had dealt with the harsh working conditions for far too long.
The strike was about more than their wages, it was about the harmful pesticides that were being sprayed on them, the one can on water they were expected to share, the children who were making a dollar an hour and the idea that prosperity and security were something they were never going to attain. The NFWA (National Farm Workers Association) was formed and shortly after they began their nonviolent strikes. This type of action required the authorities to be creative with their reactions. The authorities responded with violence, arresting over a hundred women, men, and children. The NFWA ended the year strong with the boycott of Schenley industries; telling people not to buy their liquor anymore as it uses the grapes from vineyards that do not treat their workers justly. This is the event that caught the attention of the senate, Robert Kennedy specifically. Their movements were nationally broadcasted and conveyed the attention of many nationwide. The following year, Cesar Chavez and counterpart Roberto Bustos began a protest march with seventy others from Delano to the capital in Sacramento to raise awareness of the farm workers struggle. The walk was over three hundred miles long and with every stop they made along the way, they collected more …show more content…
volunteers.
After twenty-eight days they had made it to the capital with ten thousand people standing behind them. This is where Schenley Industries agreed to negotiate/sign an agreement. The UFWOC (United Farm Workers Organizing Committee) was created as a result and the national boycott of California grapes begun. The sales of California grapes significantly declined as customers across the nation, including Canada, stopped purchasing them in protest with the union. The authorities tried to take matters into their own hands with the use of violence, once again. Cesar Chávez’s, in response to the threats of violence, instigated a hunger strike/fast to rededicate his movement to pacifism. After twenty five days, and a court appearance that turned into a Mass, voice of violence settled down and Chavez ended his fast claiming his success. Disaster struck later that year, for them, when Robert Kennedy was shot and pronounced assassinated. However, they did not know that their efforts combined with Kennedys had already
reached millions. By 1970 more than forty cities had become aware of their struggle and began to boycott in front of their local stores that sold California grapes. Seventeen million people stopped buying grapes that year, resulting in grape manufactures printing the UFWOC symbol on their grapes. The ten year strike and boycott ended with a three year contract, containing assurance of wage increase, pesticide control, and water, was signed by Delano growers and the UFWOC. People have the ability to take their lives into their own hands with just the use of a voice. Margaret Mead, alive during Viva la Causa, once said “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has” and Viva la Causa verifies the truth behind these words. Viva la Causa demonstrates how powerful alliances and human rights movements can be. Their alliance did not include a multitude of people from one race, religion or class; it included a multitude of races, religion, and class from all across the nation. There is a certain power in numbers. The actions of the allies insured the farm workers that they were not alone and they were supported by virtuous people nationally.
3. Dolores Huerta was the main negotiator during the Delano grape strike. In 1965 Dolores Huerta and Cesar Chavez were approached by Filipino members of the Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee ("AWOC"). AWOC wanted higher wages from the Delano are grape growers. AWOC wanted to negotiate new contracts with their employers but they needed the help of Huerta and Chavez. The NFWA was still new and growing although Huerta thought that NFWA was not ready to attack corporate America she could not refuse to help AWOC. The two unions formed into one union called United Farm Workers union. Under this the union Dolores began the battle with the Delano grape growers. Dolores organized over 5,000 workers to walk off their job and to strike until they could reach an agreement with their employers.
Chavez was a major leader in the Chicano movement that all started when he was nineteen years-old when he joined the NFLU (National Farm Labor Union). From then, he moved on to the CFO, where he moved up in rank quite easily which he eventually quit. After his nine year stint with the CFO, he then founded the union of t...
“we do not hate you or rejoice to see your industry destroyed, we hate the agribusiness system...” this is trying to say to the audience that, they won’t hate the President because they understand that is not to hate the people who follow the orders but the system who want to treat the people differently, at the end of the letter Cesar Chavez stated “farm workers who intend to be free and human” meaning that he wants his people to be treated with rights and equal as everyone else. The author’s purpose for putting the Letter of Cesar Chavez so that the audience could see the struggle, the dedication, preparation and what they are willing to do to be treated as equals which was the African American people were trying to
In 1938, the Chavez family lost their farm due to the Great Depression. They were forced to relocate to California and become migrant workers. Chavez was distressed by the poor treatment that migrant farmworkers endured on a daily basis. His powerful religious convictions, dedication to change, and a skill at non violent organizing cultivated the establishment of the United Farmworkers (UFW). It was also referred to as “La Causa” by supporters and eventually became a vital movement for self-determination in the lives of California's farmworkers. The astounding nationwide lettuce and grape boycotts along with public support revealed the atrocities of California agribusiness and resulted in the first union hiring halls and collective bargaining for migrant workers. The details of the childhood of Cesar Chavez and how they would later shape his actions are a vital aspect of this book and the establishment of the farm workers movement.
Since 1962, Chavez created and maintained a union for farm workers called the United Farm Workers of America. He went through many hard times and had to make very hard decisions but nothing stopped him from giving up on his dreams to help other people. In Document A, Dick Meister talks about how he saw the UFW through his point of view, a highly skeptical reporter from San Francisco. He says ...
Chávez’s leadership was based on an unshakable commitment to nonviolence, personal sacrifice and a strict work ethic. He emphasized the necessity of adhering to nonviolence, even when faced with violence from employers and growers, because he knew if the strikers used violence to further their goals, the growers and police would not hesitate to respond with even greater vehemence. Despite his commitment to nonviolence, many of the movement’s ‘enemies’, so to speak, made efforts to paint the mo...
Even though, this is a fictional book, it tells a true story about the struggle of the farm worker to obtain a better life for themselves and their families. There are two main themes in this book, non-violence, and the fight for dignity. Cesar Chavez was a non-violent man who would do anything to not get in a fight while they where boycotting the growers. One, incident in the story was when a grower pulled out a gun, and he pointed it at the strikers, Chavez said, “He has a harder decision to make, we are just standing here in peace…” The picketer were beaten and put in jail before they would fight back and that is what why all farm workers look up to Cesar Chavez , along with his good friend Martin Luther King Jr. Non-Violence is the only way to solve anything. The growers in that time did not care about their workers, if people were striking, the growers would go to Mexico and bring in Braceros, mean that they would not have to sign the union contract and not take union workers, who were willing to work if the grower would sign the contract.
It is crucial to have an awareness of the early beginnings of his life in order to understand Cesar Chavez’s development into becoming the celebrated leader he is known as today. One of the noteworthy aspects of his life is that he was not what some would consider a “natural-born” leader, meaning that he was not born into a family of great wealth or power. Chavez was born on March 31, 1927 near the town of Yuma, Arizona to a humble, hardworking Mexican immigrant family. His grandfather, Cesario Chavez, for whom he was named after, had worked hard to save enough money to be able to buy land in Arizona and raise his thirteen children, which included Cesar’s father. His father, Librado Chavez, grew up, got married, and opened up a couple of small businesses to help provide for his family and build a better life for his own children. According to biographical accounts about Cesar, this is when and where he began to learn and...
With pure intension the people understood a bit more what Cesar Chavez was trying to do. They saw that he was not only fighting for equality but for other things as well. They also saw that he would do almost anything to be able to reach that goal. Cesar Chavez proved that he would do almost anything when they protested with the 250 mile
Cesar Chavez is now recognized as the Martin Luther King Jr. of the migrant farm workers, and of the Mexican People.
They believed that their approaches to making changes for the workers would work if they continued practicing the same method. Oftentimes their very own methods worked, and would result in the desired way. Sometimes however these methods would lead to quite a bit of anger from those that they opposed. The opposition would call on the courts to attempt to get the union leaders to stop whatever their union was doing. When the leaders did not do this, they were imprisoned. This was the main reason for Chavez's imprisonment. While this possibly partially led to Hoffa's imprisonment, his involvement with the mafia was most likely the main reason for his arrest.
One of the greatest civil rights activists of our time; one who believed the ways of Gandhi and Martin Luther King that “violence can only hurt us and our cause” (Cesar Chavez); a quiet, devoted, small catholic man who had nothing just like those he help fight for; “one of America's most influential labor leaders of the late twentieth century” (Griswold del Castillo); and one “who became the most important Mexican-American leader in the history of the United States” (Ender). Cesar Chavez; an American farm worker, who would soon become the labor leader that led to numerous improvements for union workers; it is recorded that Chavez was born near Yuma, Arizona on March 31, 1927 and died on April 23, 1993 in San Luis, Arizona. (Wikipedia) His life affected many others as his unselfish deeds changed the labor union force forever. This essay will discuss the reasons Cesar Chavez became involved in Union rights, the immediate impact he had, and also the legacy he left behind with his actions that influenced American society.
...d knight of labor. When they are all fighting the workers are still in bad conditions and nothing gets done. In 1895, the Supreme Court declared that the government has power from the Constitution to remover obstruction from the highway (Document H). This really tells us that the government has all the power and can replace the strikers when they get in the way. Since the government is more powerful, they have more control over the activists outweighing them all. So, because the activists are busy fighting, the government can take over and so the poor are left where they are.
The National Farm Association was co-founded by Cesar Chavez and Gil Padilla. The main purpose of this association was to seek and enforce Mexican-American labor laws. Such as reasonable work hours and pay an individual receives. To get their message across, many formed marches, boycotts, and strikes. With these forms of expression, people started to hear the voices of those wanting a change in El Movimiento.
Negotiating styles are grouped into five types; Competing, Collaborating, Comprising, Avoidance, and Accommodating (Colburn, 2010). Even though it is possible to exhibit different parts of the five types of negation styles in different situations, can see that my tendencies seem to default to, Compromise and Accommodating. In reviewing the course work and reviewing my answers for Questionnaire 1 and 5, I find that the data reflects the same assumption. The accommodating profile is one where relationship perseveration is everything and giving what the other side wants is the route to winning people over. Accommodators are well liked by their colleagues and opposite party negotiators (Colburn, 2010). When analyzing my accommodating tenancy in negations, I find often it is easier to give into the demands when they are within a reasonable range. I often consider it the part of providing a high level of customer service. It has been my experience that continued delaying and not coming to an agreement in a topic will only shorten the window in which you will have to meet the request since. The cons to this style are by accommodating highly competitive styles the accommodator can give up to much ground in the process. “Giving away value too easily too early can signal to your negotiation counterpart that you've very deep pockets, and your gift is just a taster of bigger and better gifts to come”. The other negations type I default to is compromising. Compromising “often involves splitting the difference; usually resulting in an end position of about half way between both parties’ opening positions” (Colburn, 2010). In the absence of a good rationale or balanced exchanged concessions, half way betwee...