In societal past and present, the barrier between men and women’s prevents social equality. Virginia Woolf recognizes the social discrimination women face in her passages by comparing a man and woman’s college meal. In the two passages, Woolf’s varying syntax and contrasting imagery conveys her attitude towards the discrimination of women in society. Woolf’s long and flowy syntax and descriptive imagery in her first passage conveys the higher status and respect given to men in her society. The men at the college enjoyed every meal of various gourmet soups, meats, puddings, and wines with ease. Woolf’s lengthy syntax describes part of a meal over several lines, “ the lunch… began with soles,sunk in a deep dish, over which the college cook had …show more content…
spread a counterpane of the whitest cream… with brown spots like the spots on the flanks of a doe” mirrors the meals themselves. Through lengthy syntax and will describe dishes wolf creates a overwhelmed mood amongst her audience of women. The meals at the men’s college were fit for a king with potatoes “then as coins” and “ sprouts foliated as rosebuds but more succulent”. These men are served with respect in both society and the college, they have a “silent serving-man” and are treat as royalty. Woolf portrays the respect and superiority have in society through their meals at the college. The meal in the reword second passage from the women’s college Woolf had short and blunt syntax and bleak imagery, representing the lack of importance and respect given to women in society in the 1900s.
Woolf starts the passage with “Here was my soup”. This simple sentence showed showed no joy or complexity of emotions just disappointed. Woolf’s meal at the women’s college had “the soup… plane gravy soup… The plate was plain… prunes and custard followed. That was all. The meal was over”. Compared to the men’s king like meal this one seemed fit for a peasant. Woolf seemed to be disappointed that the lack of respect even appeared in the women’s meals at the college which were bland and simple compared to the men’s. Compared to the descriptive imagery of the Men’s meals the women’s is just as dull and bland as the food. The dullness of the food mirrors the dullness of a women’s life prior 1900s, when being a good wife, doing house chores, and bearing children was all that was expected. After being served a plain and bland meal of “plain gravy soup”, curled yellow sprouts, “prunes and custard”and drier than dry biscuits “everyone scraped their chairs… the hall was emptied”. Woolf bleak imagery evokes a rushed mood as the descriptive imagery of the men’s meal evoked a leisurley
mood.
Society continually places restrictive standards on the female gender not only fifty years ago, but in today’s society as well. While many women have overcome many unfair prejudices and oppressions in the last fifty or so years, late nineteenth and early twentieth century women were forced to deal with a less understanding culture. In its various formulations, patriarchy posits men's traits and/or intentions as the cause of women's oppression. This way of thinking diverts attention from theorizing the social relations that place women in a disadvantageous position in every sphere of life and channels it towards men as the cause of women's oppression (Gimenez). Different people had many ways of voicing their opinions concerning gender inequalities amound women, including expressing their voices and opinions through their literature. By writing stories such as Daisy Miller and The Yellow Wallpaper, Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Henry James let readers understand and develop their own ideas on such a serious topic that took a major toll in American History. In this essay, I am going to compare Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper” to James’ “Daisy Miller” as portraits of American women in peril and also the men that had a great influence.
They would both agree that this inequality feeds the other motifs described in their own works, such as: the individuality of truth, the importance of monetary means, or the hatred and ridicule that society directs at women writers. Woolf might not have agreed with all of Stael’s beliefs, but she would find Stael’s views on gender inequality and the causes of these inequalities to contain the essential oil of truth she was desperately searching for. Gender Inequality was what Woolf emphasized as the major downfall of women writers, and Stael shared those views on this subject.... ... middle of paper ...
In Virginia Woolf’s two passages describing two very opposite meals that was served at the men’s college and the other at the women’s college; reflects Woolf’s attitude toward women’s place in society.
In Passage one, Woolf’s diction greatly contributes to the elegant scene that she portrays. Woolf uses words like “whitest,” “rich,” “sharp,” and “sweet” (passage I) to portray how ornate the meal is. These words all suggest positive connotation, making the reader visualize the beauty of the meal. On the contrary, Woolf manipulates the language in passage two to portray how much worse the conditions are at the Women’s college. Words that suggest negative connotation in passage two are “plain,” “transparent,” “muddy,” and “dry.” These words were strategically placed by the author to vividly portray the differences between the colleges. Woolf’s word choice emphasizes women’s lower place in society to the reader. Virginia Woolf offers contrasting tones when describing the different colleges. For the men’s college in passage one, Woolf develops an elegant tone when describing all of the details of the lavish feast. For the women’s tone in passage is very crude. She offers little detail, and keeps everything very simple and plain. There seems to be sadness in her transparent description. This portrays her viewpoint on the unequal treatment of women.
Throughout Virginia Woolf’s writings, she describes two different dinners: one at a men’s college, and another at a women’s college. Using multiple devices, Woolf expresses her opinion of the inequality between men and women within these two passages. She also uses a narrative style to express her opinions even more throughout the passages.
Woolf’s pathos to begin the story paints a picture in readers minds of what the
In the excerpt “Two Cafeterias,” by Virgina Woolf she uses imagery of the meals that are served, her tone, and the behavior of the individuals to illustrate the men and women’s different place in society. In the first passage she is in the men’s cafeteria, in the second passage she is in the women’s cafeteria. She observes the meals and the people throughout the excerpt, comparing and contrasting them in more ways than most would think. We must take into consideration that women had a much lower place in society compared to men, the men were the higher ups, this is perceived through “Two Cafeterias.”
The way they were served. The way the waiter refilled their wine classes, “wineglasses had flushed yellow and flushed crimson; had been emptied; had been filled” The way they were relaxing after dinner. “no need to be anybody but oneself.” Everyone is happy to be who they are because there is no reason not to. They all get to experience the joy of a pleasant dinner. While the women do not receive the same joy. Instead the woman’s hall seems cold, and not in the sense of temperature but, in the sense of enthusiasm and eagerness. When the biscuits came she stated “these biscuits to the core “, dry and common, Nothing fancy about it. With the biscuits came the necessity of water. Which came in a big water jug that was passed around. Unlike the men, who had been served their drinks, in the hall close by. When dinner was done and all was consumed, “everybody scraped their chairs back” this statement portrays the vagueness and the lack of energy in this dining hall. They all got up, not a word to another person as they walked through the doors that swung
In Moments of Being by Virginia Woolf, a number of literary devices are used, such as; sensory imagery, diction, and tone. Woolf also connects the memories of her past to her present life. The images Woolf describes convey a sense of excitement because of the diction and vivid detail that is used. For example, when she describes “the line thrilled in one’s fingers as the boat tossed and shot . . .”(Woolf, Lines 14-15) the reader feels a sense of joy from visualizing the imagery due to the dramatic verbs that she uses. Additionally, she uses a great amount of detail when describing her brother steering the boat into the harbour, “ . . . flushed with his blue eyes very blue, and his mouth set . . .”(Woolf, Lines 7-8). In that moment the reader
Blackstone, Bernard. Virginia Woolf: A Commentary. London: Hogarth Press, 1949. (An older but excellent essay.)
Born in 1882 Virginia Woolf is a noted novelist and essayist, prominent for her nonlinear prose style and feminist writings. Her essay “Professions for Women” designed as a speech to be given at the Women’s Service League in 1931, informs her audience of the powerful internal dispute she and other women face in an attempt to live their everyday lives as women living in a masculine controlled society, especially within the careers they desire. Woolf adopted an urgent and motherly tone in order to reach her female audience in 1931 during her speech and in response her audience gathered. As a result of her distinct and emotional writing in Professions for Women, Woolf created an effective piece, still relevant today.
Katherine Mansfield belongs to a group of female authors that have used their financial resources and social standing to critique the patriarchal status quo. Like Virginia Woolf, Mansfield was socioeconomically privileged enough to write influential texts that have been deemed as ‘proto-feminist’ before the initial feminist movements. The progressive era in which Mansfield writes proves to be especially problematic because, “[w]hile the Modernist tradition typically undermined middle-class values, women … did not have the recognized rights necessary to fully embrace the liberation from the[se] values” (Martin 69). Her short stories emphasized particular facets of female oppression, ranging from gendered social inequality to economic classism, and it is apparent that “[p]oor or rich, single or married, Mansfield’s women characters are all victims of their society” (Aihong 101). Mansfield’s short stories, “The Garden Party” and “Miss Brill”, represent the feminist struggle to identify traditional patriarchy as an inherent caste system in modernity. This notion is exemplified through the social bonds women create, the naïve innocence associated with the upper classes, and the purposeful dehumanization of women through oppressive patriarchal methods. By examining the female characters in “The Garden Party” and “Miss Brill”, it is evident that their relationships with other characters and themselves notify the reader of their encultured classist preconceptions, which is beneficial to analyze before discussing the sources of oppression.
Alex Zwerdling states that “Woolf gives us a picture of a class impervious to change in a society that desperately needs or demands it. She represents the governing class as engaged...
Woolf presents three characters who embody three different gender roles. Mrs. Ramsay is the dutiful wife and mother. Mr. Ramsay is the domineering patriarch. Lily Briscoe is an independent, aspiring woman. Woolf sets these three roles in contrast with each other. She allows the reader to see the power and influence each character has. Mrs. Ramsay’s submissive and supportive nature arouses admiration. Mr. Ramsay’s condescending manner provokes animosity. Lily Briscoe’s independence enables her to find meaning and fulfillment in her life.
Woolf divided this thought into three categories: what women are like throughout history, women and the fiction they write, and women and the fiction written about them. When one thinks of women and fiction, what they think of; Woolf tried to answer this question through the discovery of the female within literature in her writing. Virginia Woolf Throughout her life Virginia Woolf became increasingly interested in the topic of women and fiction, which is highly reflected in her writing. To understand her piece, A Room of One’s Own Room, her reader must understand her.