Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The ‘Virginia Satir’s Family Therapy Model’
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The ‘Virginia Satir’s Family Therapy Model’
Virginia Satir was known as an author, psychotherapist and Director of the Mental Research Institiute (MRI) in Palo Alto, California. During her career, Virginia worked with many influential people in the field marriage and family therapy, such as: Jay Haley, Salvador Minuchin and Carl Whitaker. Satir focused on emotional experiencing, self-esteem and made significant contributions to the communication model of family therapy (Rasheed, Mikal, & James, 2011). According to Satir (1983), the family attempts to balance relationships through repetitive, predictable and circular communications patterns. Satir believed she could identify a positive correlation between communication and health or illness (Mislove, 1995). She theorized that dysfunction in families occur because people with low self-esteem marry people with low self-esteem. She also emphasized that low self-esteem is indicative inner dialogue (Satir, Stachowiak, Gerber & Gamori, 1991). She believed every human strives toward growth and betterment of self (Bermudez, 2008). Banmen (1986) identified Satir’s change model as a five-step process. The first step is Status Quo or homoeostasis. This is where the family is at before the process of change begins to occur, typically at the detriment of one or multiple member of family. During the second stage of change, a Foreign Element or concept is introduced. The family will initially reject the new piece of knowledge. After accepting the new information, the family moves into the third stage, Chaos. During chaos, individuals try to comprehend the knowledge being introduced and they choose accept the knowledge, or stay within the bounds of the status quo. In the fourth stage, the new information is integrated to make change. The... ... middle of paper ... ...o one another and to emphasis how a decision from one family member effects the group as a whole. The family should be in the chaos stage of change. The family should be accepting the new information coming in and trying to apply to their daily lives. During the final stage of therapy, the family will develop a new status quo changing the homeostasis and dynamic of the family. At this point, the family will be communicating openly and honestly with one another and each family member will be valued for the individuality (Rasheed et.al. 2011). In reviewing the techniques and theories of Virginia Satir, her personal style of therapy is not a good personal fit for me. Despite believing communication is the foundation in any relationship, I personal feel her model of family therapy puts too much emphasis on communication while neglecting the role of the extended family.
For Bowen, the family is the unit of observation and the emphasis is put on emotional forces that are common to all families, this helps to reduce the significance of which family member is causing the problem. Bowens approach to change is understood within the context of striving to understand life’s forces, the very principal that gives coherence to Bowens approach to therapy. (Friedman, 1991). When attempting to achieve change within a client the source of the issue is less important, but rather trying to locate the systematic forces within a family as well as those that are transmitted from generation...
According to smith and Hamon (2012), Families are considered as a whole in society. However, they believed that couples have many components in which makes up the family, if one component is missing, the family as a whole can get unbalance (Smith & Hamon, 2012). In the Brice’s family, communication was the component that was missing. The couple was not able to communicate their differences, which was what caused Carolyn and David to verbally insult each other. Smith and Hamon (2012), also explain that a person who expresses his or her feeling is considered as someone who is breaking the functions of their family system; especially if the person is focusing on the individual who is causing the problem, rather than the problem itself. In the Brice family, Carolyn could be considered the one that cause the dysfunction in the family structure because she was focusing on David as the problem of their marriage, rather than focusing of the elements that are causing their problems. Smith and Hamon (2012) explain that individuals should focus on how to solve a problem, rather than trying to find who is causing the
Family therapy is often needed when families go through transitions such as separations between parents and divorce. According to research, “the power of family therapy derives from bringing parents and children together to transform their interactions” (Nichols, & Davis, p.18), as problems need to be addressed at their source. The children who are the most vulnerable, when parents decide to separate, exhibit symptoms which are exaggerations of their parent’s problems (Nichols, & Davis, p.18). Frank and Walt Berkman are the examples of how children cope and adapt to the stressors of family separations such as marital separations and
All of the family members were present for the sixth meeting including Janice, Leon, Beatrice, Kat, and Guy. The family was introduced to Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT). DBT was defined to the family and each family member was encouraged to practice using DBT skills in their daily lives. In addition the family was made aware of the benefits of using DBT. The family was in agreeance that the individual goals of Kat would be the focus of the session.
For many, change is a cause for ignorance. Most of us fear the idea of change. When one is faced to deal with c...
Gurman, A. S., & Kniskern, D. P. Research on marital and family therapy: Progress, perspective and
Currently, families face a multitude of stressors in their lives. The dynamics of the family has never been as complicated as they are in the world today. Napier’s “The Family Crucible” provides a critical look at the subtle struggles that shape the structure of the family for better or worse. The Brice family is viewed through the lens of Napier and Whitaker as they work together to help the family to reconcile their relationships and the structure of the family.
Furthermore, “the central premise of this theory is that one must resolve all emotional issues with the family of origin, rather than reject reactively or accept passively that family, before one can become a mature and healthy individual” (Charles, 2001, p. 280). Bowen believed that the change in the self occurred through the change in relationships with others, so he encouraged the client to reconnect with the nuclear family members and resolve all emotional issues with them. This is because Bowen believed that unresolved conflicts with the family of origin would catch up with the client and affect his or her present relationships. Also, conflicts do not exist in the person, but in the family system. The necessary changes must take place in the self as well as in the larger system.
Substance use affects not only the individual who is using but the whole family unit. The family can be an important key factor in an individual's life when they choose to seek treatment. The family can help the individual who is addicted or they can negatively contribute to them relapsing. Family therapy is treatment that can reduce substance use and improve the family dynamics in a household. Brief Strategic Family Therapy is a common therapy used to treat substance use in families. This paper will explain why family therapy is important. It will also explain what Brief Strategic Family Therapy is and the process that families go through in it.
“individuals cannot be understood in isolation from one another, but rather as a part of their family, as the family is an emotional unit. Families
Assuredly though, Kevin’s family is supportive of him, and this is a valuable basis for an on-going alliance. Furthermore, the learned problem-solving and communication strategies equip each individual to navigate through potential future conflicts, reducing the need for repeat-therapy. Lastly, though it is unknown whether Kevin is medicated for his depressive disorder, young people have an improved outcome with a combined treatment approach of pharmacotherapy and either CBT or systemic family therapy (A. Hall, personal communication, 17 April 2014; March, 2006; The Werry Centre, 2010; Nayar, 2012). All safety and appropriateness considered, this approach would improve Kevin’s mood and ability to engage in therapy and as a consequence, also improve his other social relationships (Nayar, 2012).
In the case of Virginia and Tom the main issue underlying marital crisis that was caused by dishonoring of vows. The case outline that Virginia has discovered that her husband Tom has been having not one, but several affairs throughout the course of their marriage. According to Tom he believes that his numerous affairs did not get in the way with his wife because these acts were not meaningful. Tom thinks that his wife should not dwell in the past because he loves her and he does not want his marriage to come to an end. Tom also, explains that he was not in a committed relationship with the women he come in contact with it was only for sex. Virginia is willing to forgive her husband, but she finds it to be difficult to continue living with him because she is aware of his extra marital affairs in the past. Virginia major concern is that her husband provides no reassurance and tries to use his action as a defensive mechanism.
I found many concepts that could be considered key to her approach such as having an emphasis on the role that love place in the therapeutic process and the human need for personal space and validation. Satir also believed that any encounter could be a healing encounter. I find that family life, communication (functional vs. dysfunctional), and family roles are the most important concepts in Satir’s therapeutic approach. Satir felt that rules helped the family system interact and prosper and felt that the most important rules governed communication. Those being, “Who says what under what circumstances?”, “What rules are spoken and unspoken?”, and “What rules are about protection and which are about control?” Satir felt that while
Gladding, S. T. (2011). Family Therapy: History, Theory, and Practice, Fifth Edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Banner, J. (1986). Virginia Satir's family therapy model. Individual Psychology: Journal of Adlerian Theory, Research & Practice, 42(4), 480-494.