Vincent Chin Intersectional Model

1346 Words3 Pages

In 1982 Vincent Chin, a twenty-seven-year-old Chinese-American, was killed in a race-motivated crime in Detroit by two white autoworkers. His killers, Robert Ebens and Michael Nitz, mistook him as being Japanese, believing that it was Japanese peoples fault for the state of the auto-industry and that they were laid off work. After the unexpected conviction of fining Ebens and Nitz, three thousand dollars and serving three years probation, a pan-ethnic Asian American movement began to combat the social injustice, institutional racism, and oppression felt by Asian-American communities in America (Chin & Lam, 2009). To understand and make sense of what occurred during this period, I will analyze Chin’s case through using the intersectional model, …show more content…

Chin’s case however only involves three of the five forms of oppression, which include marginalization, powerlessness and violence. Marginalization is the exclusion of whole groups of people from useful and meaningful participation in society (Mullaly, 2010, pp. 57). This can be seen in the marginalization of Asian-American communities for the majority of America’s history. Exclusion leads to a lack of cultural competence and understanding and therefore Chin’s killers, and subsequently the judicial system afterwards, valued his life less than an individual belonging to the dominant group. It is due to this marginalization that after Chin’s death, and following the unfair verdict of his killers, Asian-American communities came together to push back against systemic discrimination. Quite similar to marginalization, powerlessness consists of processes that, because of racialized groups status, inhibit the development of people’s capacities, reduces their decision-making power, and exposes them to disrespectful treatment (Mullaly, 2010, pp. 57). The disrespectful treatment of Chin in how Ebens and Nitz blamed him for their time of strife, the lenient conviction produced afterwards and also the inability of the pan-ethnic Asian-American activists and rallies to change the judges verdict, all …show more content…

99). The issue, however begins when race is constructed and believed to operate as a social category or biological grouping, therefore leading to whiteness. Whiteness pertains to the power of the privileged that do not recognize their privilege over those who must live in a society constructed by and for the privileged (Dumbrill et al., 2014, pp. 43). Whiteness therefore, plays a large factor in the way dominant groups interact, view, and deal with subordinate groups within society. To further unpack whiteness it is first beneficial to understand how oppression works in relation to it. Oppression does not only involve the conscious and intentional acts of one group against another. Like privilege oppression works by creating systemic constraints that hinder subordinate groups, operating either covertly or unintentionally (Mullaly, 2010, pp. 53). Therefore whiteness has the ability to function unknowingly, unintentionally, and as a result of privilege, will remain unacknowledged as it assumes power, situates itself as the norm and constructs subordinate groups as the ethno-racial “other” (Yee & Dumbrill, 2003, pp 101). Whiteness and its inability to acknowledge itself in the greater themes of this case, allowed for the judge to

Open Document