Viking Warrior Was A Woman Summary

566 Words2 Pages

With the advanced development of technology, specifically DNA analysis, the process of how historical research is conducted can divert from a traditional approach to a scientific method which can potentially avoid usual historical evidence. The article “Famous Viking Warrior Was a Woman, DNA Reveals”, by Judith Jesch, discusses an uncovered Viking grave that contained a skeleton along side items that are normally buried with warriors, and the skeleton's DNA was later tested to discover that the skeleton was a woman. With the found information, and DNA evidence, the archaeologists concluded that the skeleton was that of a great female Viking warrior leader. The analysis is debated through the article “Let's Debate Female Viking Warriors Yet Again” by a series of …show more content…

The author initially notes how the archaeologists did not included a language or text specialist, but they do refer to “historical records” which might just be mythological legends. The second point is that the bones that were tested may not have been the actual bones from the tomb. There is the potential that the bones came from a different site due to errors that occurred during the 19th century, and this information is left out of the main article. Two of the following points are based on the speculation that because the body was buried with certain items that it implies the role, or life, that the woman experienced. The main article assumes that the game pieces mean that the woman was a warrior leader, and that her tomb included weapons that she was a warrior. The debate article notes that the skeleton showed no sign of serious injuries, or even typical indications that this woman had any type of warrior experiences based on her

Open Document