Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contractual liability and legal obligations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contractual liability and legal obligations
Applying Hadley, in Victoria Laundry (Windsor) v Newman Industries claimants claim for the exceptional profits from some highly lucrative dying contracts but there was no way the defendant can reasonable foresee about this. Hence court of appeal disallowed this exceptional loss from failure to profit from highly lucrative dying contracts. Here, damages awarded does not put the claimants in the position they should have been had the contract been performed, which is without the delay as this exceptional loss of profits is held to be the same as the normal loss of profits. In Heron II , Victoria Laundry was criticised and where in order to separate between remoteness rule in tort and contract, courts consider remoteness based on whether …show more content…
This is so because once non-breaching parties successfully taken steps to reduce losses, damages received are small amount of reliance losses, but if they do not take these steps, they may not get full compensation. This shows that contract law is being harsh towards non-breaching parties to limit claims of damages. In Payzu Ltd v Saunders, as defendants’ cheque for their first batch of silk was not received, the claimants breach the contract by claiming that they would not continue delivering silks unless claimants pay in cash. However, the claimants refused this suggestion and claim damages for difference of contracted and market price. It was held that the claimants should have mitigated their loss. They are only given damages consisting of their loss if they had accepted the defendants’ suggestions. This shows claimants being undercompensated because claimants seem to be forced to co-operate with breaching parties in mitigating defendants’ loss and get less compensation. A best example to show that mitigation principle prevents damages from giving non-breaching parties full compensation is where those expenditure unreasonably spent cannot be recovered. In Compania Financiera ‘Soleada’ SA v Hamoor Tanker Corpn Inc , where a loan with very high interest rate to release detained ship was not recoverable as it is unreasonably
The decision in Equuscorp is significant, as it has made clear several principles that were once ambiguous under Australian law. It ratifies that restitutionary remedies are unavailable for a claim for money had and received where recovery would reduce coherence in the law. Furthermore, Equuscorp has confirmed that a bare cause of action can be assigned where the assignee has a genuine commercial interest in its enforcement.
In my opinion, if the jury in this case subtracted the contractual claims against the profits, they would have arrived at different damage/entitlement amounts. My guess is Main Line would have been entitled to much less than what was awarded in this case.
It is my opinion that the law as currently written (both legislative and common) does not provide the protections for the aggrieved as I assume was envisioned in its intent. For a rich party to merely pay a reset damage in order to capitalize (perhaps in light of market changes or new information) in breaching a valid agreement seeing it as merely a cost of enrichment is an affront to the stability of contract law and enforcement. The ability to award damages for “profit realized” would do well to cement the theory that an agreement is enforceable and legally binding. This is good for business internationally as our global markets will know that an agreement formed in the United States will be honored and the civil laws guaranteeing its enforcement has
This means that damages are unlikely to be awarded, and instead the claimant will be entitled to a remedy such as recission, the setting aside of the contract. This limit on outcome can be seen as slightly unfair as some parties may wish for the transaction to remain in place, and they just be compensated for their loss. This would particularly be the case when there are collateral contracts in existence, meaning that a whole chain of transactions must be set aside for the original wronged party to achieve any sort of justice. In case law we see that the party is effectively hamstrung from a remedy. In The Atlantic Baron [1979] QB 705, shipbuilders increased the price of a ship they were building by 10% due to currency fluctuation. They had no contractual basis for doing so, but as the owners had a contract for the ship 's charter in place, they had to make the payment. This affirmed the contract, meaning that they could not then have it set aside. If damages were awardable, they could have sought the 10% monetary value back from the builders. Instead they were barred from a claim. The lack of flexibility here is therefore questionable justice for the wronged party, who must, for commercial or other reasons, keep the contract intact. It does not appear at all fair that some of contract law is restrained in this way whilst most other aspects are not. It is the submission of this writer that complete justice will only be found in this area when the innocent party can opt to receive damages in lieu of the recission of the contract. The law in this area requires expansion in order to be entirely
Throughout the novel Howards End, E.M. Forster presents readers with a multitude of extremes, ranging from femininity vs masculinity, passion vs practicality, and maturity vs immaturity. These extremes appear to be completely irreconcilable. However, upon a closer look, it becomes apparent that Forster’s main point in describing these extremes is to work to bring them together, uniting them in one middle ground, or finding balance and proportion. This is accomplished through the behavior and attitudes of three essential characters; Helen Schlegel, Margaret Wilcox nee Schlegel, and Henry Wilcox.
When Cherry Valance states that “Things are rough all over” she meant that it was not easy being a soc despite the money and the cars. The first piece of evidence that proves that the socs have it rough is when Cherry is talking to Ponyboy and tells him, “We're sophisticated--- cool to the point of not feeling anything. Nothing is real with us. You know, sometimes I'll catch myself talking to a girl-friend, and realize I don't mean half of what I'm saying.” (Hinton 38). This proves that socs have it rough because nothing is real with them. The socs can't be themselves and have to play a fake role in order fit in. The socs constantly need to focus on fitting in and they cannot be themselves. This is a super hard and rough lifestyle. So when Cherry says this, readers are
If you’ve ever been to a clothing store before, you have probably seen this phrase on a tag, one size fits all or one size fits most, but do you think one size really fits all? Whether too small or too big the reality is, one size does not fit all or most, “one size fits no one.” Companies each day are manipulating clothing by “vanity sizing” or “insanity sizing” which is a term that means, companies are manufacturing articles of clothing to be small or smaller than the normal size in order to increase sales. “Vanity sizing started off as a marketing tool.” Original sizing charts never had sizes 0 or 2 on them, until now because we are finally realizing that there are millions of sizes in the world. So companies are adding
The death of John Wright, to some, might seem tragic and unacceptable, but for one person in particular, Minnie Wright, it was beautiful and freeing. When you are oppressed and treated poorly your entire life, and your husband takes away everything that you hold dear, then something has to give. Can justice has been served in an unusual way? With the help of Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters, Minnie just might get away with serving up her slice of justice.
Dress code, probably one of the most talked about topics by teenagers. Most teenagers believe that dress code is “witless” or “incompetent”. Why do we think this? Well, most adults believe that keeping a strict dress code keeps us educated because apparently our clothes are “distracting”. Now I can see how wearing booty shorts and a tank top would be distracting, but how is wearing sweatpants distracting? If anything wearing sweatpants keeps us comfortable, because I know that being uncomfortable is way more distracting than wearing sweatpants. When I wear sweatpants I can lay back and relax while the teacher talks, but if I am uncomfortable I am more likely to move around and fidget with my clothes rather than listen to the lesson.
It might seem a little strange that it 's taken until 2015 for us to finally have a movie about cooties - the fictional childhood illness that you "get" from members of the opposite sex - but there you have it. Now we do have one, appropriately titled "Cooties," although it has decided to take schoolyard sickness, make it a reality, and turn its victims into savage cannibals. Oh, and keeping with the spirit of its real-life "inspiration," the only people who are affected by it are those who haven 't gone through puberty. What we have on our hands, folks, is a killer children movie - and maybe a zombie movie, if you want to call its antagonists "zombies." See, it 's scary because children are already creepy and evil, and now they 're also cannibals. There are worse horror movie premises.
Denise and Sally may be liable to a range of different crimes. Denise’s liability may include, Assault, Robbery, and Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH). Sally may also liable to some of these offences, as she was an accomplice in many circumstances. There are a few defences that may be available to Denise and including self-defence and duress by threats to absolve her criminal liability. 1.
The famous Polish poet Anna Swir has written some of the most beautiful and deeply stirring poems I have come across. That is “I wash the Shirt”, the poem dives deep into the frailty and the power of a woman's spirit. I admired the way this poem was written and I also found that it was very emotional and appealing to the senses. Throughout the poem, the shirt is symbolic of the remnants of a personal relationship between a father and daughter, following the father’s death. The alliteration in “the shirt smells of sweat” conveys strong aromas which appeal to our senses and further alludes to the personal connection the girl has to the shirt, through the conditioning of its smell of sweat which she so closely associates with her father.
Fashion Emergency There is a very important decision that needs to be made at my school. To enforce wearing uniforms or not to enforce wearing uniforms. After a lot of thought I have decided that our school should absolutely not have school uniforms enforced. If they did enforce them there would be to many negative things that would have a bad impact on student life. Such as attendance, cost, and confidence.
The objective of this essay is to evaluate the effectiveness of the defence of change of position in protecting a defendant from hardship. The defence of change of position is made available to a defendant who has been unjustly enriched, but in good faith of the receipt of the enrichment, later suffers some changes in their personal circumstances. Unjust enrichment is not based on a wrong. Its imposition of strict liability is merited so long as an innocent defendant is not required to ‘put its hands in its pockets’. This makes sense so long as the defendant is overall no worse off by having received the initial enrichment. The defence of change of position is one that is concerned with a loss of benefit, also known as disenrichment and not with the general hardship of the defendant. It can be viewed as the same as estoppel minus the representation. The defendant must have detrimentally relied on the benefit being his to keep. Birks wrote that the defendant succeeds if he can show that he acted to his detriment on the faith of the receipt. It will not apply in circumstances where a defendant is initially enriched and subsequently encounters a loss or detriment so that overall the defendant had not been enriched. For example, a defendant, unjustly enriched, receives a sum of money and later loses the money due to unavoidable circumstances, cannot be made to pay the claimant for the initial unjust enrichment. The defendant would face a hardship or difficulty to pay the claimant, however, this does not constitute a defence to restitution. The defence ensures that the defendant is no worse off by having to make restitution. While disenrichment is to some extent dealt with by the traditional estoppel defence, that defence does not go...
Retro styles come and go in today’s fast-changing fashion world. So, when things are changing so fast, how do you keep up? You definitely don’t want to pick an outfit from the 80s only to discover it doesn’t provide you with that cool, trendy look you were going for. Here are our favourite picks of adding retro clothing to your wardrobe while maintaining your cool and fresh style.