Why did Victor Frankenstein create life, and why did the narrator of Shadow over Innsmouth investigate the town? How does the technological advancements affect how Frankenstein and Lise appear to the public? How does the advancement of Artificial Intelligence affect the ability for Lise and Ava to transcend? All the following themes will be explored throughout the essay.
Throughout many stories, dangerous knowledge is a theme and two of the best stories that display this is Shadow over Innsmouth and Frankenstein. The narrator in Shadow over Innsmouth went out of his way to stay at Innsmouth to gaze at the architecture and uncover some clues about the mysterious disappearances even though he was discouraged by fellow travelers, both dangerous truths led to transformations that consumed their lives, whilst, In Frankenstein, Victor’s inevitable passion to find out the secrets of the unknown leads him to creating life, despite Mr. Krempe warning him about studying alchemy.
…show more content…
Two notable stories conversing on the advancement of A.I. are Ex Machina and the Winter Market. In the story, Ex Machina, the duality of A.I. is expertly represented through the story of Mary and the black and white room where Caleb brings up the concept that AI in which the robot is aware of emotional stimuli but can never feel true emotions. In Winter Market, Casey has similar woes about Lise’s transformation into complete A.I., He believes that she that can never truly transcend because she had not fully explored what all of life was willing to offer, Ava, however, has made it out of the black and white room, and has transcended to the other side of the looking glass because one thing her designer. Nathan designed Ava’s mind in a way to be fluid but imperfect, patterned but chaotic, which was designed perfectly to replicate individualism of every
In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley tests the motives and ethical uncertainties of the science in her time period. This is a consideration that has become more and more pertinent to our time, when we see modern scientists are venturing into what were previously unimaginable territories of science and nature, through the use of things like human cloning and genetic engineering. Through careful assessment, we can see how the novel illustrates both the potential dangers of these scientific advancements and the conflict between that and creationism.
To begin our analysis, I will look to how Mary Shelley positions Victor Frankenstein's motivations to create life against natural laws within the ideas of individualism, as Victor can correlate directly to the educated human at the center of Enlightenment, Industrialism, and Romanticism values. With the burgeoning interest in scientific discovery during the Industrial Revolution "transform[ing] British culture" and "changing the world"(Lipking 2065), many concepts of society were also changed, which Shelley looked to explore through Victor's actions. Rooted in the scientifically curious spirit of Industrial England, Victor's attempt to create life can show many examples of how an importance of the individual acquisition of knowledge and accomplishment can disrupt society. Victor's...
The desire to discover and to comprehend the obscure concepts of life is one of our timeless dreams. Many literary works present some of these dreams and demonstrate their result on individuals.. Mary Shelley’s novel , Frankenstein, follows the adventures of a scientist with divine ambitions which ultimately lead him to pursue miraculous capabilities of God. Victor, the protagonist, attempts to attain a status higher than God in order to control life. Dignity, Victor’s primary motivation, emerges throughout the novel along with his exorbitant use of science. The knowledge Victor obtains through his observations and lessons ultimately result in his solitude and defeat.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a nineteenth century literary work that delves into the world of science and the plausible outcomes of morally insensitive technological research. Although the novel brings to the forefront several issues about knowledge and sublime nature, the novel mostly explores the psychological and physical journey of two complex characters. While each character exhibits several interesting traits that range from passive and contemplative to rash and impulsive, their most attractive quality is their monstrosity. Their monstrosities, however, differ in the way each of the character’s act and respond to their environment. Throughout Frankenstein, one assumes that Frankenstein’s creation is the true monster. While the creation’s actions are indeed monstrous, one must also realize that his creator, Victor Frankenstein is also a villain. His inconsiderate and selfish acts as well as his passion for science result in the death of his friend and family members and ultimately in his own demise.
From a young age Victor Frankstein identifies that he enjoys pursuing the knowledge of the “world,” it is clear that Victor’s defiention of the “world” is extremely biased, and as the novel progresses his intereaction with the world outside science becomes increasingly isolated. Frankenstein creates a monster whom he eventually rejects due to the monster not reflecting his original idea. The monster lacking guidance and a moral compass is thrown into society, navigating his own journey and searching for a way to connect with others. In this essay, I will discuss how Frankenstein the monster can be considered as a foil or in another words a reflection of Victor Frankenstein, as the monster gains human-like traits Victor gains monster-like traits. I believe these shifts are intiated due to the schooling, both formal and informal that the Franksteins experience. While Victor Frankenstein learns through a structured and systematic schooling method this is not available to the monster due to prejudice, who gains knowledge either indepentently through books or from Victor Frankenstein. These shifts cause the reader to feel conflicted, gravitating towards the monster feeling empathetic for him while being disappointed in Victor Frankenstein. Resulting in the reader questioning their conformation to society.
Although “Frankenstein” is the story of Victor and his monster, Walton is the most reliable narrator throughout the novel. However, like most narrator’s, even his retelling of Victor’s story is skewed by prejudice and favoritism of the scientist’s point of view. Yet this could be attributed to the only view points he ever gets to truly hear are from Victor himself and not the monster that he only gets to meet after he comes to mourn his fallen master.
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein was a literary piece that touched on many different issues, not only in her time, but also today. The creation of life in Frankenstein was Shelley’s symbolic warning to the new industrialized era. “It also [can] be seen to be warning about the dangers of uncontrolled application of technology and its use without proper morality” (Brachneos). The warning in Frankenstein applies today more than ever because of the creation of AI (Artificial Intelligence) and computers that “think for themselves” The two are connected in a sense. Some would argue that Victor, the character that created the monster wanting to play od, is like the programmers of AI computers today.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, explores the monstrous and destructive affects of obsession, guilt, fate, and man’s attempt to control nature. Victor Frankenstein, the novel’s protagonist and antihero, attempts to transcend the barriers of scientific knowledge and application in creating a life. His determination in bringing to life a dead body consequently renders him ill, both mentally and physically. His endeavors alone consume all his time and effort until he becomes fixated on his success. The reason for his success is perhaps to be considered the greatest scientist ever known, but in his obsessive toil, he loses sight of the ethical motivation of science. His production would ultimately grieve him throughout his life, and the consequences of his undertaking would prove disastrous and deadly. Frankenstein illustrates the creation of a monster both literally and figuratively, and sheds light on the dangers of man’s desire to play God.
In the gothic novel Frankenstein, humans have a bottomless, motivating, but often dangerous thirst for knowledge. This idea was clearly illustrated throughout the novel by Mary Shelley. The three main characters in the novel shared the thirst for knowledge that later led to their downfall. In the novel, knowledge is a huge theme that led to atrocious life for anyone that tried to gain it. Knowledge is hazardous; therefore, I support Dr. Frankenstein’s warning about knowledge being dangerous and that knowledge shouldn’t be gained.
With the advancement of technology and science, we are now able to genetically modify animals. Mary Shelley found a way to make science an epitome, and confirms what could happen if science is taken too far. In conclusion, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is considered to be a historical novel, based on scientific advancements. In this novel Shelley depicts her own definition of human nature, by showing the creature and the ways that humans react to him. The novel also showed the differences between morality and science.
Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” is about Victor Frankenstein’s excessive knowledge in the sciences and his refusal to accept his own creation. Frankenstein starts with a healthy curiosity in the sciences that eventually turns into an unhealthy obsession he can no longer control. He undergoes a drastic transformation because of making experiments that eventually result in his biggest one yet; the monster. Shelley applies the themes: the danger of too much knowledge, ambition, monstrosity, isolation, and Nature vs. Nurture throughout the novel with the characterization of the monster and Frankenstein.
Mary Shelley’s novel demonstrates the type of language and intricate structure rarely found in novels today from which students in the twenty first century can learn much from. Mary Shelley puts forward timeless lessons of one’s confrontation with one’s self taking responsibility for your own actions, the result of being shunned from society and the dangers of tampering with nature. The novel foreshadows our very real fears of the double-sided nature of scientific ‘progress’ making it relevant today and proving the statement: “Students in the twenty first century have little to learn from Frankenstein.” very wrong.
In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley highlights on the experiences her characters undergo through the internal war of passion and responsibility. Victor Frankenstein lets his eagerness of knowledge and creating life get so out of hand that he fails to realize what the outcome of such a creature would affect humankind. Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, highlights on how Frankenstein’s passion of knowledge is what ultimately causes the decline of his health and the death of him and his loved ones.
Victor Frankenstein is ultimately successful in his endeavor to create life. This, however, does not stop the underlying theme of obsession. Shelley’s shift from Victor’s never-ending quest for knowledge is replaced with an obsession of secrecy. “I had worked har...
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein has become almost a myth in our culture; it so deeply probes the collective cultural psyche and our fear of science and progress. “Frankenstein is our culture’s most penetrating literary analysis of the psychology of modern ‘scientific’ man, of the dangers inherent in scientific research, and the exploitation of nature and of the female implicit in a technological society” (Mellor, 1988:38). The interesting thing about Frankenstein is that there can be multiple readings of the text. It can be seen as a conservative criticism of science, a Promethean belief of the unlimited progress of science, the feminist anti-female principle angle to the story, even a religion versus science story. What I will explore through this essay is each of these readings and shed some light on this wonderful novel. “The value of Mary Shelley’s novel lies not in presenting a clear morale but encouraging the readers to make up their own” (members.aon.at.htm).