Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alienation as a Literary Theme Analysis
Alienation as a Literary Theme Analysis
Essay irony and its importance in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Alienation as a Literary Theme Analysis
The human ego has an undeniable knack for inserting itself into the world. Yet, even with this self-insertion, humans want to stay separate from nature, beings sentient yet dependant upon nature, a sort of parasite which feeds on the beauty around them and fuel their massive culture from it. Author Robert Finch in his essay, Very Like a Whale, uses profound ambiguity to illustrate the pull on humans to the somewhat forgotten natural world.
Finch’s ambiguity is due in part to his repetition of rhetorical questions. Asking “what were we looking at?” (8) “What was it we saw?” (10) and “yet we came — why?” (14) all at the surface level are attempting to analyze the pull the beached whale has on observers. But, deeper, it is a question of humanity and that which drives our humanity. His question is why is it that as humans we observe such acts of nature that are so uncommon in the scheme of human existence, but are not uncommon in the complexity of the natural world?
…show more content…
The answer to this question is the “crying need to confront otherness in the universe” (15).
Finch states that humans “need plants, animals, weather, unfettered shores and unbroken woodland… as an antidote to introversion, a preventative against human inbreeding” (17). This inbreeding which we must prevent from occurring is not an incestuous mess which would damage genetics and harm the gene pool, but the combining of human ideas without outside influence, that from outside our culture, which would damage our culture by leaving us without inspiration and ability to expand our consciousness and culture and leave us with nothing but stagnant remnants of old human existence. But there is more to needing nature than expanding the collective mind of
humans. We require nature because we need to view things unaffected by humanity. Without the whale, the desire to see what humanity cannot cause cannot be fulfilled: That is why we came to see the whale. Its mute, immobile bulk represented that ultimate, unknowable otherness that we both seek and recoil from, and shouted at us louder than the policeman’s bullhorn that the universe is fraught not merely with response or indifference, but incarnate asserration. (19) This otherness, the feeling that humans are not alone but part of a grand collective of things working together helps to occasionally quell the culture-wide self-aggrandizement that is the human ego. Seeing things as they are naturally, without the influence of humans helps us to see that we are great and separate beings, even though without these things we could not continue to thrive and diversify. Knowing otherness allows humans to expand the horizons of being human. It allows us to not only be part of nature, but to be outside of nature, acting upon it and drawing from it, at times parasitic, and others symbiotic. The basis of human culture is making sense of our world with what we experience it to be.
Blackfish is a 2013 documentary, directed by Gabriela Cowperthwaite, about the captive orca, Tilikum. The documentary chronicles Tilikum’s life in captivity while examining the conditions that SeaWorld’s orcas live under. Cowperthwaite argues that SeaWorld mistreats their Orcas and intentionally misinforms both their employees and the general public. Rhetorical analysis reveals that Cowperthwaite uses emotional appeals and juxtaposition to sway the viewer to her perspective.
Blackfish is a documentary based upon orcas who are at SeaWorld. Throughout the documentary Blackfish, there were many rhetorical devices used. The documentary displayed very empowering rhetorical devices. The documentary also gave a great representation on why orcas should not be held captive. I strongly agree with the filmmaker,Gabriela Cowperthwaite.
The transition from childhood to adulthood can be challenging. There are many things to learn and let go. Sometime teenagers can dramatize certain events to make themselves seem defenseless. Amy Tan, Chinese-American author, makes her Chinese Christmas seem insufferable. In Tan’s passage “Fish Cheeks”, Tan uses diction and details to exemplify the indignity caused by her Chinese culture.
The bubbling pool of acid: Acidification most disastrous event in the history of our planet
The state of Maine is a huge tourist spot known for it’s rocky coastline and seafood cuisine, especially lobster. Annually, the state holds the “Maine Lobster Festival” every summer, and is a popular lucrative attraction including carnival rides and food booths. The center of attention for this festival is, unsurprisingly, lobster. The author of the article “Consider the Lobster”, David Foster Wallace, mainly uses logos and pathos, and explores the idea of being put into the lobsters perspective by describing how the cooking process is done and informing us on the animal’s neurological system in a very comprehensible way. He effectively uses these persuasive devices to paint a picture for the audience and pave way for the reader to conjure
Scientists are constantly forced to test their work and beliefs. Thus they need the ability to embrace the uncertainty that science is based on. This is a point John M. Barry uses throughout the passage to characterize scientific research, and by using rhetorical devices such as, comparison, specific diction, and contrast he is able show the way he views and characterizes scientific research.
Our awareness, our perception within nature, as Thomas states, is the contrast that segregates us from our symbols. It is the quality that separates us from our reflections, from the values and expectations that society has oppressed against itself. However, our illusions and hallucinations of nature are merely artifacts of our anthropocentric idealism. Thomas, in “Natural Man,” criticizes society for its flawed value-thinking, advocating how it “[is merely] a part of a system . . . [and] we are, in this view, neither owners nor operators; at best, [are] motile tissues specialized for receiving information” (56). We “spread like a new growth . . . touching and affecting every other kind of life, incorporating ourselves,” destroying the nature we coexist with, “[eutrophizing] the earth” (57). However, Thomas questions if “we are the invaded ones, the subjugated, [the] used?” (57). Due to our anthropocentric idealism, our illusions and hallucinations of nature, we forget that we, as organisms, are microscopically inexistent. To Thomas, “we are not made up, as we had always supposed, of successively enriched packets of our own parts,” but rather “we are shared, rented, occupied [as] the interior of our cells, driving them, providing the oxidative energy that sends us out for the improvement of each shining day, are the mitochondria” (1).
From the lone hiker on the Appalachian Trail to the environmental lobby groups in Washington D.C., nature evokes strong feelings in each and every one of us. We often struggle with and are ultimately shaped by our relationship with nature. The relationship we forge with nature reflects our fundamental beliefs about ourselves and the world around us. The works of timeless authors, including Henry David Thoreau and Annie Dillard, are centered around their relationship to nature.
Edgar Allen Poe’s poem, "The Raven" starts off in a dark setting with an apartment on a "bleak December" night. The reader meets an agonized man sifting through his books while mourning over the premature death of a woman named Lenore. When the character is introduced to the raven he asks about Lenore and the chance in afterlife in which the bird replies “nevermore” which confirms his worst fears. This piece by Edgar Allen Poe is unparalleled; his poem’s theme is not predictable, it leads to a bitter negative ending and is surrounded by pain. To set this tone, Poe uses devices such as the repetition of "nevermore" to emphasize the meaning of the word to the overall theme; he also sets a dramatic tone that shows the character going from weary
The author speaks in first person through the eyes of a polar bear. He addresses the audience explaining how humans/mankind are killing off many species, such as the polar bear, by polluting the Earth. The author makes it clear, by addressing the audience directly, the positive and negative impact humans can make on the situation at hand. He uses words like “you” to talk directly to the reader and make them realize that they are not helping the problem. He uses many types of rhetorical devices in hopes to persuade and inform you to help stop the problem before it is too late.
In order to start the analysis the first step is to question what makes up the composition. In the composition, a pregnant woman with long dark brown curly hair is standing in pink sheer lingerie, white underwear, white above the ankle socks, and house slippers. She is standing on a cliff in rocky terrain, overlooking many houses diagonally angled and countering each other, full green trees, and a sunrise where the sun is breaking through the clouds making the sky pastel, pink, blue, purple and hints of a warm golden yellow. She is looking up at grey squared off fish above her face whom is swimming toward a whole sea/school of fish that look similar to the fish at the very top of the composition.
From the beginning, there has been a connection between man and nature. Sadly, man and nature are growing apart, and the tether holding them together continues to stretch. Richard Louv discusses this in Last Child in the Woods. Louv argues against the continued separation of nature and mankind due to advancements in technology through his use of imagery, anecdote, and hypothetical situations.
When one commits a sin, there are typically many external consequences that follow. Some people also find themselves having internal conflicts due to feeling regretful for engaging in their wrongdoing. In Hosseini’s The Kite Runner, Amir commits a sin that results in him severing a brotherhood between him and his half brother and friend, Hassan. Due to the fact that Amir and Hassan had a very strong relationship growing up, it should have been implied that the boys would show each other undying loyalty. However, Amir neglects to defend Hassan on the day that he was raped. This decision to be a bystander instead of a hero leaves Amir with a heavy load of guilt that will not disappear. Luckily for him, he is given the opportunity to redeem
Fromm underlines a split in humans, a theme of separation that is evident. To begin with, Fromm proposes that humans have been torn away from their prehistoric union with nature because of “reason.” Fromm suggests that man is a part of nature, while being “apart” from it, this is a result of “self-awareness, reason, and imagination.” These humanistic characteristics have disrupted harmony in nature, creating this dichotomous human existence. Furthermo...
“Loving nature is not the same as understanding it.” Like the majority of the human race, Harriet in Gary Larson’s [JH1] book, There’s a Hair in my Dirt, “‘not only [misunderstand] the things she saw – vilifying some creatures while romanticizing others, - but also her connection to them’” (Larson 1998). The human race is one big Harriet; we see what is on the surface and never truly understand what lies beneath because we fail to even look. In order to understand ourselves, we must first understand what makes us and shapes us.