Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of a research design
Effect of emotional intelligence on job performance
Effect of emotional intelligence on job performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of a research design
Introduction
Validity is the extent to which a test measures what it claims to measure. It is essential for a test to be valid in order for the results to be accurately applied and interpreted. Validity isn’t determined by a single statistic, but by a body of research that demonstrates the relationship between the test and the behavior it has set out to measure.
This paper examines the issue of validity research, comparing, and contrasting the characteristics of internal, external, and construct validity, while identifying the threats to them. It also briefly reflects upon how validity could impact the research I’ve envisioned on the “Effect of Emotional intelligence on Effectiveness of Organizational Leaders and the Enterprise with Special Reference to Information Security”.
The term validity expresses the degree to which a given research design actually measures what it sets out to measure, given that the central aim of research design is to establish a relationship between the independent and dependent variables with a high degree of certainty (Bless et al. 2006, p. 93).
Internal Validity
The internal validity of a research design refers to there being a relation between observed changes in the dependent variable, and the independent variable. It is about the isolation of the dependent variable, whereby alternative explanations to the hypothesis are ruled out in the research design. This makes it impossible for observed changes in the dependent variable to be attributed to anything other than the independent variable (Bless et al. 2006, p. 93). Internal validity is crucial in any study that aims to establish a relationship of causality between variables, and does not apply to most descriptive and observational studies....
... middle of paper ...
...cher to put together all of the disparate pieces of their research puzzle In the proposed research on emotional intelligence and the impact on organizations, internal validity will be of the greatest importance.
References
Blankenship, D. (2010). Applied Research and Evaluation Methods in Recreation. USA:
Sheridan Books.
Bless, C., Higson-Smith, C., & Kagee, (2006). A. Fundamentals of Social Research Methods:
An African Perspective. Cape Town: Juta & Co. Ltd.
Cozby, P.C. (2012). Methods in Behavioral Research. USA: McGraw-Hill.
Stough, C., Saklofske, D.H., & Parker, J.D.A. (2009). Assessing Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Research, and Applications. New York: Springer Science.
Trochim, W.M., & Donnelly, J.P. (2008). The Research Methods Knowledge Base. USA: Atomic Dog/Cengage Learning.
White, T., & McBurney, D. (2012). Research Methods. USA: Cengage Learning
8. Validity - Validity is the degree to which a test measures what it is supposed to measure.
1.4 face validity is the evaluation which the items in a scale adequately measure the construct. Face validity can be judged after the measure has been developed by potential measurement
Internal validity, unlike external and construct validity, deals with causal relationships. In other words, the question is whether any additional research that is found is actually associated with the study that is being conducted. The question, again, is whether we can be confident that the outcome of the study is a result of the experiment itself. What this means is that internal validity is the extent to which a change in a given variable is caused by the change in another variable.
Zeidner, M., Roberts, R.D., & Matthews, G. (2008). The science of emotional intelligence: Current consensus and controversies. European Psychologist, 13(1), 64-78.
Emotions are frequent companions in our lives. They come and go, and constantly change like the weather. They generate powerful chemicals that create positive and negative feelings, which have a powerful effect on leadership. Some emotions can either facilitate leadership, while others can detract from successful leadership. This course, Emotionally Intelligent Leadership, has truly opened my eyes to the affects that emotions have on being an effective leader. Peter Salovey and John Mayer defined emotional intelligence as “the ability to monitor one’s own and other’s feelings and emotions to use the information to guide one’s thinking and actions” (p. 5). This definition in itself states that emotions, whether it be ones own emotions or those of others, is the underlying factor that directs the actions of a leader. Therefore, throughout the progression (advancement) of this course, I have learned the importance of the development of emotional intelligence for being an effective leader, and because of this I plan on developing the capacities that contribute to being an emotionally intelligent leader for my own success, now and in the future.
(2013) separated emotional intelligence into four domains, self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and relationship management (pp. 30, 38). These domains are then broken into two competencies. Self-awareness, the understanding of one 's emotions and being clear about one 's purpose, and self-management, the focused drive and emotional self-control, make up the personal competence (pp. 39, 45-46). While social awareness, or empathy and service, and relationship management, the handling of other people 's emotions, make up the social competence (pp. 39, 48, 51). These emotional intelligence competencies are not innate talents, but learned abilities, each of which contribute to making leaders more resonant and effective (p. 38). This is good news for me because I still have much to develop in regards to emotional
The scope of emotional intelligence includes the verbal and nonverbal appraisal and expression of emotion, the regulation of emotion in the self and others, and the utilization of emotional content in problem solving. (pp. 433)
The ability to express and control our own emotions is vital for our survival in society and the work place but so is our ability to understand, interpret, and respond to the emotions of others. Salovey and Mayer proposed a model that identified four different factors of emotional intelligence (Cherry, 2015).
Validity is the most important requirement of all. A test must actually measure what it is intended to measure. (Content validity-the extent to which a test samples the behavior that is of interest and Predictive validity- the success with which a test predicts behavior it is designed to predict)
Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., Caruso, D. R., & Sitarenios, G. (2003). Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT V2.0. Emotion, 3(1), 97-105.
The above definition is associated with quantitative research methodology. It summarizes that validity to be the extent in which instruments measure the exact thing it purports to measure. An example of validity in research is ...
...sults were compared with those from another 140 supervisors, peers, and Regression analyses showed that there is a positive correlation between the emotional intelligence of managers and organizational climate. The results of the analyses also show that among emotional intelligence's factors, social awareness and self-awareness have more influence on organizational climate, while among organizational climate factors, credibility is most influenced by managers' emotional intelligence.”
Mayer, J.D., Salovey, P., Caruso, D.R. (2000). Emotional intelligence as Zeitgeist, as personality, and as a mental ability. The Handbook of Emotional Intelligence, ed/. J.D.A. Parker 9San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp92-117.
Myers, L. L. & Tucker, M. L. (2005). Increasing Awareness of Emotional Intelligence In A Business Curriculum. Business Communication Quarterly, 68, pp. 44-50.
An individual’s ability to control and express their emotions is just as important as his/her ability to respond, understand, and interpret the emotions of others. The ability to do both of these things is emotional intelligence, which, it has been argued, is just as important if not more important than IQ (Cassady & Eissa, 2011). Emotional intelligence refers to one’s ability to perceive emotions, control them, and evaluate them. While some psychologists argue that it is innate, others claim that it is possible to learn and strengthen it. Academically, it has been referred to as social intelligence sub-set. This involves an individual’s ability to monitor their emotions and feelings, as well as those of others, and to differentiate them in a manner that allows the individuals to integrate them in their actions and thoughts (Cassady & Eissa, 2011).