Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Drones used for offensive military
Drone warfare
Introduction of drones us military
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Drones used for offensive military
Use of Unmanned Aerial Drones in Warfare
UAVs have become an important asset to the American military in recent years with their use for information gathering, and their hunter killer capabilities. In recent years drones have sparked many heated debates of whether their use are harming more civilians then terrorist, or of the legality of their use overseas. But with advancements in recent years in surveillance technology drones have become a great asset, completely revolutionizing modern warfare while also being one of the least expensive programs to maintain. Even though there is great bitterness for drones in the Middle East, their use today in modern warfare cannot be rivaled and must be continued.
Military UAVs in recent years have been called out for their targeting of possible non-combatants under Obama’s policy of “signature strikes”. Under this policy anyone under surveillance can be targeted if portraying certain behaviors that fit a terrorist’s profile. It is estimated that drone strikes are responsible for an estimated 4000 deaths in strikes located throughout Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Somalia. Many of these deaths have been reported as non-militants, it is estimated that about 15% of people who die in drone strikes are civilians. But with recent advancement in surveillance technology UAVs are being equipped with sensors and monitors that make the targeting of militants more precise, lowering collateral damage. The MQ-9 Reaper drone is one of Americas flagship UAVs, equipped with cameras that can read a license plate from 2 miles away. The screening process has also undergone reform in the past few years mandating that a target must meet 5 criteria that greatly reduce accidental targeting of non- combatants. ...
... middle of paper ...
...lt to detect on radars allowing them to survey a large area without detection. The reaper can observe a 2x2 square mile area with the help of high-powered camera, and can survey over 40,000 square miles in a day. These capabilities are what make the UAV such a great asset to the American military.
UAVs in recent years have become a vital part of the American military with their use rising with demand. Even though there are many who disapprove of the use of drone in overseas conflicts the benefits that we receive are far more important. With their continued use we save many American lives both civilian and military, protecting citizens from terrorist organizations and keeping our troops out of harms way, while also being an economy safe solution. Ultimately UAVs are America’s silent guardians that grind away hours on end protecting Americas national security.
Pakistan? There is also Al Qaeda operatives working in the Arabian Peninsula as well, and is
Controversy has plagued America’s presence in the Middle East and America’s usage of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) contributes vastly to this controversy. Their usefulness and ability to keep allied troops out of harm’s reach is hardly disputed. However, their presence in countries that are not at war with America, such as Pakistan and Yemen, is something contested. People that see the implications of drone use are paying special attention to the civilian casualty count, world perspective, and the legality of drone operations in non-combative states. The use of drone technology in the countries of Yemen and Pakistan are having negative consequences. In a broad spectrum, unconsented drone strikes are illegal according to the laws of armed conflict, unethical, and are imposing a moral obligation upon those who use them. These issues are all of great importance and need to be addressed. Their legality is also something of great importance and begins with abiding to the Laws of Armed Conflict.
In this paper, I will examine how drone strikes are instituted in America’s foreign policy and their effectiveness against terrorist organizations. Although drone warfare might seem effective and thus desirable for many people, the civilian casualties that it causes increase anti-American sentiment in the region. This sentiment creates a backlash that in fact helps terrorist groups regain their leader, recruit new members, and facilitate revenge, making drones a counterproductive foreign policy
The post 9/11 era in The United States defense policies have been one of proactive as compared to reactive. The United States has been looking at methods to gather intelligence on our enemy while ensuring the safety of our troops. The drone has been the answer to the search because the drone is capable of ensuring the U.S. life, forced projection of power over our enemies, and Strategic stealth tactical striking.
The moment I received the prompt to explore just war theory, the first controversial topic containing strong arguments on both sides that interested me was that of drone warfare. As tensions rise between countries and technology improves, the possibility of advanced warfare among nations seems imminent as drones are deployed in replacement of soldiers. The purposes of these unmanned drones in present day are primarily intel collection and target acquisition, which usually leads to extermination of known and presumed threats to the dispatcher. In the United States, when it comes to the topic of using drones within foreign countries, most of the citizens will agree that it is an efficient way to remotely deal with immediate threats to the country.
The drone debate section of ProCon.org provides information that states that the U.S. military allocated $5 billion to drones in the 2012 budget, this makes up a meer 1% of the total budget. In comparison, the F-35 strike program, only one of the manned strike vehicle programs, cost the U.S. over $9 billion (“Should the United States”). These statistics could be due simply to the military choosing to invest more time and money into the manned strike programs, or more likely due to the cost of each drone and operation of that drone being significantly less than that of a manned aircraft. The cost to operate one manned aircraft on a mission for an hour can exceed $160,000 while the per-hour cost of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) will most likely not exceed $5,000. These estimates would lead to drones subsequently being .03% of the cost of traditional options and these conventional options being roughly 33 times more expensive than the UAVs (“Should the United States”). Drones also provide an option for the military to eliminate threats without being as invasive of the foreign country as other options
The military use of lethally autonomous robots (LAR) is not science fiction – it is happening right now. A robot is a mechanism guided by automatic controls. Autonomous robots are able to independently maintain stability and plan action. The first generation of military robots have operated under direct human control. The most well-known military robots are “drones” or unmanned aerial vehicles. The drone system currently in use is the unmanned aerial vehicles IAI Pioneer & RQ-1 Predator which can be armed with air-to-ground missiles and remotely operated from a command center. Drones have already been used by the U.S. military for unmanned air attacks in Afghanistan, Pakistan and other war zones. (Merchant, 276).
The Benefits of utilizing unmanned aerial vehicles on the battlefield to help support the ground forces and the general military effort can be traced all the way back in United States history back to the civil war. Military leaders quickly realized that through success the immense potential that utilizing unmanned aerial vehicles could bring to the fight. The technology is constantly evolving and is ultimately a game changer for war if applied in the proper manner and could great reduced the amount of Soldiers in harms way and a greater cost effectiveness. Osama bin Laden hated drones, because they work.
In this day and age the face of warfare has changed completely. The implementation of drone warfare to the modern day military doctrine has been a strong point of controversy since its origins. One of the biggest controversies facing drone is the killing of unarmed civilians across the Middle East. Unmanned: Americas Drone Wars is a documentary focusing on targets, or should I say murders of innocent civilians throughout Pakistan. The documentary steps through first hand accounts on both ends of the spectrum, drone pilot and drone victims. The major point that is examined, is the United States wrong in using drone warfare, is controversial just like any other thing in American politics and warfare.
There are many agencies that have the ability to perform Signals Intelligence, electronic reconnaissance and most of all signals intelligence from all available sources inducive to the environment. The United States Army uses the Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System (Joint STARS) as its main entity for signals collection. The Joint STARS platform was designed to provide a highly effective, real-time, collection tool to the ground task force commanders during battlefield engagements, but for the past ten years, the sensor has been used for peacekeeping missions. Army analysts can predict the enemy’s behavior by identifying choke points, potential avenues of approach and operating patterns such as supply routes and logistical points. The analysis gives the ground commander a more complete view of the enemy’s weaknesses. The United States Air Force employs the Joint STARS in a different mission than the Army. The Air Force uses Joint STARS as a battlefield management tool versus a collection tool as used for by the Army. The Air Force uses the platform to provide immediate and direct support to the Air Component Commander and continue to observe the enemy’s movement from a far distance in the sky. Providing essential data to commanders such as size, direction, and speed of the adversaries, with minimum casualties while under battlefield conditions, makes the Joint STARS an extremely effective tool. The Air Force also employs the Predator vehicles, which are unmanned aerial vehicles that are used for reconnaissance.
A primary concern about the uses of military drones is the amount of innocent people they intentionally killed thinking that person was doing something they were not supposed to. According to Background on Drones From ProCon.org, it states, “A meta-study of drone strikes concluded 8 to 17% of all people killed in drone strikes are civilians.” 8 to 17% is a lot of people being killed in the CIA’s “signature strikes”, which are targets outside named kill lists, and taken from their loved ones because they had “suspicious daily behavior.” This is mostly happening in
The use of drones as weapons of war and delivery and surveillance systems should not be dismissed because many people do not realize the real capabilities of drones and how they can be used to better the world through efficient air strikes, faster delivery times, and useful surveillance. Some of the most common misconceptions about drones arise due to the lack of knowledge about what drones are. A drone is a remote controlled, pilotless aircraft that can be used to survey an area, conduct stealth missions, and deliver supplies into difficult to reach areas (Drone). Unmanned aircraft are also, contrary to popular belief, not solely machines that kill without even a thought to who is being fired upon. They have proved to be effective surveillance units in areas that may be dangerous for manned aircraft to fly, along with the potential to be reliable delivery units (Drones).
Another name for drones are Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVS). These are “aircraft either controlled by ‘pilots’ from the ground or increasingly, autonomously following a pre-programmed mission” (Cole 4). Even though there are many unique types of drones, but they usually fall under two main categories: ones that are armed and equipped with missiles and bombs and others that are used for surveillance. In the past couple of years the use of drones has increased dramatically. The reason being because “unlike manned aircraft they can stay aloft for many hours and are flown remotely so there is no danger to the flight crew” (Cole 13). There are drones that can actually fly over more than fifty hours. In countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq, the Predator and U.S Reaper are physically there. Cause of the power of technology th...
There are many things in the world that we as humans do not like or understand. We do not understand why somethings happen or even exist, but they are there. One of the terrible things in our daily lives include terrorists. We don't normally understand their reasoning's, but they still happen and there is nothing we can do about it...or is there. Yes there is, and the "tool" that has been made for our seeking, and tracking of terrorist is called drone striking. Drone striking is an effective way of eliminating terrorists because of minimal U.S. losses, the physical act of drone striking, and the aftermath of drone striking.
The Reaper and Predator drones are two aircraft utilized by the U.S. government. They are both relatively large with wingspans measuring around 50ft each. Imagine a Reaper drone overhead. One might think of a aircraft resembling a bird maybe 10 stories in the air above. In